PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Douglas T Dieterich

Publications and source records attributed to Douglas T Dieterich.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A treatment algorithm for the management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: an update.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an important public health problem worldwide and in the United States, with approximately 25% of patients infected as neonates dying prematurely from cirrhosis or liver cancer. A treatment algorithm for CHB previously developed and published by a panel of United States hepatologists was revised based on new developments in the understanding of CHB, the availability of more sensitive molecular diagnostic testing, the addition of new treatments, and better understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of approved therapies. This updated algorithm is based on available evidence using a systematic review of the scientific literature. Where data are lacking, the panel relied on clinical experience and consensus expert opinion. Serum HBV DNA can be detected at levels as low as 10 IU/mL using molecular assays and should be determined to establish a baseline level before treatment, monitor response to antiviral therapy, and survey for the development of drug resistance. The primary aim of antiviral therapy is durable suppression of serum HBV DNA to the lowest levels possible. The threshold level of HBV DNA for determination of candidacy for therapy is 20,000 IU/mL or more for patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive CHB. A lower serum HBV DNA threshold of 2000 IU/mL or more is recommended for patients with hepatitis B e antigen-negative CHB, and 200 IU/mL or more for those with decompensated cirrhosis. Interferon alfa-2b, lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, and peginterferon alfa-2a all are approved as initial therapy for CHB and have certain advantages and disadvantages. Issues for consideration include efficacy, safety, incidence of resistance, method of administration, and cost.

Algorithms↗

Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a (40kDa) plus ribavirin in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus co-infection.

BACKGROUND: A multinational trial (APRICOT) showed that peginterferon alfa-2a (40kDa) plus ribavirin is efficacious for treatment of HIV-HCV co-infection. The cost-effectiveness of treating these patients with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin has yet to be explored from a US societal perspective. OBJECTIVE: To predict the cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin with interferon/ribavirin (IFN/RBV) or no treatment in HIV-HCV co-infected patients. STUDY DESIGN: A Markov model was constructed with liver progression estimates based on published literature. Sustained virological response and baseline characteristics of the reference case were based on APRICOT. Quality of life and costs in 2004 US dollars (US$) were based on literature estimates and discounted at 3%. RESULTS: Peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin compared with IFN/RBV or no treatment is predicted to increase quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) by 0.73 and 0.94 years, respectively, in HCV-genotype-1 patients. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin compared with IFN/RBV and no treatment for all patients is respectively US$ 2,082 and 5,187/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-HCV treatment is predicted to decrease the risk of cirrhosis and increase quality-adjusted survival of HIV-HCV co-infected patients compared with IFN/RBV and no treatment. Peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin's cost per QALY gained relative to these options falls within the cost-effectiveness level of many health technologies commonly adopted in the US.

Age Distribution↗

HBV plus HCV, HCV plus HIV, HBV plus HIV.

Coinfection of hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and HIV is common due to shared modes of transmission. These coinfections accelerate the course of chronic liver disease and facilitate progression to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The viral interactions between these viruses are complex, and their treatment may be challenging for clinicians.

Algorithms↗

Risk of immune recovery uveitis in patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus retinitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for immune recovery uveitis (IRU) in eyes of patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. DESIGN: Enrollment data from a 19-clinical center cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred seventy-four patients with AIDS and CMV retinitis affecting 539 eyes. METHODS: Patients with AIDS were enrolled at 19 United States AIDS ophthalmology clinics. Data were collected by interview, review of medical records, ophthalmic examination, and phlebotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Immune recovery uveitis. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (9.6%) were diagnosed with IRU involving 50 eyes. The CD4+ T-cell count of 31 of these had risen by > or =50 cells per microliter above nadir to a level > or = 100 cells per microliter (immune recovery), making up 17.6% of the patients known to have immune recovery after diagnosis of CMV retinitis (95% confidence interval, 12.3%-24.1%). No patients with IRU were observed to have active retinitis or detectable CMV DNA in peripheral blood (P<0.001 and P<0.001 with respect to patients without IRU). Other factors associated with IRU were > or =25% retinal area (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; P = 0.014) or posterior pole involvement with CMV retinitis (odds ratio, 0.43; P = 0.039), treatment with intravitreous injection of cidofovir (OR, 10.6 with respect to eyes never exposed to intravitreous or IV cidofovir; P<0.001), and male gender (OR, 0.26; P = 0.012). More eyes with IRU had visual acuity (VA) of 20/50 or worse (38.0% vs. 26.3%, P = 0.077) relative to eyes without IRU, but the proportions with VA of 20/200 or worse were similar (14.0% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.96). Eyes with IRU more commonly had cystoid macular edema (CME) (45.5% vs. 3.7%, P<0.001) and epiretinal membrane (48.9% vs. 13.3%, P<0.001) than eyes without IRU. CONCLUSIONS: Among eyes of patients with immune recovery, the prevalence of IRU is substantial. Eyes with IRU have a high risk of additional morbidity over and above that seen with CMV retinitis, with several-fold higher risk of CME and epiretinal membrane. Large CMV lesions and use of intravitreous cidofovir are risk factors for IRU.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗

Effect of switching to tenofovir with emtricitabine in patients with chronic hepatitis B failing to respond to an adefovir-containing regimen.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic hepatitis B, long-term use of lamivudine is limited by resistance mutations. Adefovir dipivoxil has a very low rate of resistance, but there have been recent reports describing resistance mutations. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine show potent activity against wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus. METHODS: We describe a series of seven HIV-seronegative patients who failed to achieve undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA on adefovir. No lamivudine resistance testing was performed. The antiviral regimen was changed to tenofovir (300 mg daily) and emtricitabine (200 mg daily). Variables collected included levels of hepatitis B viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction, alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B e antibody. RESULTS: The median hepatitis B viral DNA level while on adefovir was 430,000 copies/ml with a median fall in hepatitis B viral DNA levels of 2.0 log10 copies/ml. Patients were on adefovir for a median period of 10 months before a change in regimen to tenofovir and emtricitabine. This regimen change resulted in a median fall in hepatitis B viral DNA levels of 3.0 log10 copies/ml (range, 2-4) after a median treatment duration of 23 months (range, 14-28). All patients (100%) had achieved undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA levels following combination therapy. Anti-hepatitis B e seroconversion occurred in one patient. No change in serum creatinine was observed during therapy, and no significant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In patients failing to respond to adefovir monotherapy or an adefovir-containing regimen for chronic hepatitis B virus, a combination of tenofovir and emtricitabine resulted in undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA levels without any renal toxicity. Tenofovir, in combination with emtricitabine, may be an alternative treatment for those with detectable hepatitis B viral DNA on adefovir.

Adenine↗

Sustained virologic response with short-course ribavirin and peginterferon treatment in 2 patients coinfected with HIV and HCV genotype 1.

The current recommendation for the duration of treatment of patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 is 48 weeks; however, the standard regimen of peginterferon plus ribavirin bears significant adverse effects, which make completion of treatment exceedingly difficult. Reported here are 2 cases of HIV-HCV-coinfected genotype-1 patients who discontinued treatment early (after 3 and 8 weeks) because of adverse effects yet had a sustained virologic response with undetectable HCV viral loads at follow-up.

Adult↗

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus in patients with HIV.

The life expectancy of HIV seropositive persons is approaching the life expectancy of those who are uninfected with HIV. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has emerged as a worldwide epidemic. Given the similar transmission route between HCV and HIV, there has been an explosion in the number of individuals infected with both viruses. Because of the successful introduction of antiretroviral therapy, patients are more susceptible to new opportunistic infections such as HCV. HCV leads to a more rapid progression to end-stage liver disease in patients with HIV, and the morbidity and mortality related to HCV in co-infected patients is on the rise. Therefore, it has become imperative to treat both HIV and HCV in co-infected patients. The primary goal of HCV therapy is permanent eradication of the virus. Secondary goals include reduction in hepatic fibrosis progression, development of decompensated cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Early studies using standard interferon-alfa for the treatment of HCV in co-infected individuals were discouraging, as poor outcomes, high discontinuation rates, and severe adverse events were observed. The current standard of care for treatment of HCV is pegylated-interferon and ribavirin. New studies have recently demonstrated a higher sustained virologic response rate and a better adverse event profile than previously reported in co-infected patients. As a result, we recommend considering all co-infected patients for HCV therapy while watching closely for unique treatment-related toxicities. The treatment of HCV in co-infected patients should be a high priority for all providers.

Journal Article↗

HIV and liver diseases: recent clinical advances.

Because the life expectancy of patients infected with HIV has been prolonged, liver diseases have assumed far greater importance as a cause of morbidity and mortality in these patients. Given the shared risks of transmission, patients who have HIV often are coinfected with hepatotrophic viruses such as hepatitis C and hepatitis B. Further, antiretroviral therapy (ART) used by patients who have HIV is often hepatotoxic, contributing to liver damage. With increasing immunosuppression caused by AIDS, patients who have HIV have to deal with these issues and the increased risk of infection with opportunistic viral, fungal, bacterial, and protozoal pathogens. In addition, steatosis and lipodystrophy now are recognized more commonly in patients who have HIV, particularly in the setting of ART. Thus, understanding of liver diseases in the setting of HIV infection becomes an important focus in caring these individuals. There have been numerous advances in the treatment of liver disease in patients who have HIV, particularly in treating viral hepatitis C and B. This article reviews various liver manifestations in patients who have HIV and the recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic options.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Management of hepatitis C virus in special populations: patient and treatment considerations.

The most common chronic blood-borne infection in the United States is caused by hepatitis C virus. An estimated 3.9 million people (1.8%) in the United States have been infected with the hepatitis C virus, excluding certain subpopulations who are at high risk for hepatitis C virus infection. Among these subpopulations are an estimated 255,000 (15%) of prison inmates and 175,000 (22%) of homeless people. Prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection is also high among veterans (6.6% overall and even higher among homeless veterans). The single most important risk factor for hepatitis C virus infection is injection drug use; up to 90% of illicit injection drug users are infected with hepatitis C virus. This review describes the prevalence of hepatitis C virus in special populations and discusses the treatment options for patients with severe disease, transplant recipients, and patients at high risk for infection. Close monitoring and management of therapeutic side effects are required to assist these patients in adhering to therapy.

Communicable Disease Control↗

Treatment of hepatitis C virus in HIV patients: a review.

BACKGROUND: Survival in HIV infection has improved dramatically in the last decade due to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Due to shared routes of transmission, HCV is found in approximately 30% of HIV infected patients. HCV infection has emerged as a major issue in this population as manifest by a major increase in liver-related mortality. ART-associated hepatotoxicity has been demonstrated to occur more frequently in co-infected individuals and may be severe or fatal in some instances. Thus treatment of HCV has become a priority in HIV infected individuals. OBJECTIVES: The main aims of this review are to summarise and illustrate the current evidence based management of anti-HCV therapy in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed using Pubmed and Medline searches. CONCLUSION: All HIV-infected patients should be screened for HCV infection via anti-HCV antibody and HCV RNA polymerase chain reaction. If HCV infection is present, treatment should be considered in those patients with evidence of liver inflammation and fibrosis. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of anti-HCV therapy in HIV-infected individuals with pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy. HCV genotype is predictive of response to therapy and increasing the duration of therapy to 48 weeks has proven to be more effective in patients with genotypes 2 and 3. HCV treatment with interferon based therapy is associated with many unique side effects and toxicities in this population of which the clinician must be aware.

Antiviral Agents↗

Interferon-induced depression and cognitive impairment in hepatitis C virus patients: a 72 week prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the rates and course of depressive symptomatology and neurocognitive deficits in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients undergoing interferon treatment, and explored possible predictors of depression and neurocognitive deficits. DESIGN: In order to obtain objective assessments of depression, and to evaluate cognitive impairment, a 72-week prospective study, comprising 48 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up was utilized. METHODS: A total of 50 HCV patients were assessed at baseline, and 14 times during pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment. Patients were also assessed on four timepoints after the termination of treatment. All patients have previously been treated for hepatitis C infection with interferon and were judged to be treatment resistant in these treatments. Depression was assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) questionnaire, and patients were interviewed regarding problems with memory, attention and concentration. RESULTS: Eighty-two per cent of interferon-treated patients developed severe enough depressive symptoms to meet the CES-D criteria for possible major depressive disorder (MDD). Possible MDD onset was most frequent by the first week of treatment, and almost all possible MDD cases were observed by week 8. More severe depressive symptoms at baseline were associated with higher depressive symptoms during interferon treatment. Thirty per cent of patients complained about cognitive problems. In half of these patients cognitive impairments were still reported after the termination of treatment. There was no association between depression during interferon treatment and subjective cognitive complaints. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that depression and cognitive impairments are frequent and persistent side-effects of interferon treatment in treatment-resistant patients.

Adult↗

Intrahepatic CD4+ cell depletion in hepatitis C virus/HIV-coinfected patients.

Coinfection with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific immune responses, increases hepatic inflammation, accelerates hepatic fibrosis, and is associated with deceased treatment responses. We quantified intrahepatic lymphocyte and hepatocyte phenotypes in HCV-infected patients with (n = 38) and without (n = 41) HIV infection. A single pathologist counted positive cells in 5 portal and 5 lobular areas. Coinfected patients had 6.81 +/- 1.9 fewer CD4 cells per portal field (10.58 +/- 1.12 vs. 4.97 +/- 1.09 cells/high-power field [HPF]; P < 0.001) and 0.48 +/- 0.15 more apoptotic lymphocytes per lobular field (0.16 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.64 +/- 0.15 cell/HPF; P = 0.002) than monoinfected patients. The number of portal CD4 cells was not associated with the peripheral CD4 cell number. Portal and lobular CD8 cells did not differ between the 2 groups. Portal proliferative hepatocytes were increased in coinfected patients with HIV RNA levels of >400 copies/mL (1.13 +/- 0.32 cells/HPF; P = 0.01) compared with those with undetectable HIV RNA (0.46 +/- 0.09 cell/HPF) and monoinfected patients (0.45 +/- 0.08 cell/HPF). In conclusion, HIV coinfection is associated with fewer portal CD4 cells and increased lobular lymphocyte apoptosis that may impact on the natural history of HCV infection.

CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes↗

Peginterferon Alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly prevalent and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality among persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2a (peginterferon alfa-2a) plus either ribavirin or placebo with those of interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic HCV infection in patients who were also infected with HIV. METHODS: A total of 868 persons who were infected with both HIV and HCV and who had not previously been treated with interferon or ribavirin were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg per week) plus ribavirin (800 mg per day), peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo, or interferon alfa-2a (3 million IU three times a week) plus ribavirin. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response (defined as a serum HCV RNA level below 50 IU per milliliter at the end of follow-up, at week 72). RESULTS: The overall rate of sustained virologic response was significantly higher among the recipients of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin than among those assigned to interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin (40 percent vs. 12 percent, P<0.001), or peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo (40 percent vs. 20 percent, P<0.001). Among patients infected with HCV genotype 1, the rates of sustained virologic response were 29 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin, 14 percent with peginterferon alfa-2a plus placebo, and 7 percent with interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin. The corresponding rates among patients infected with HCV genotype 2 or 3 were 62 percent, 36 percent, and 20 percent. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common among patients treated with regimens that contained peginterferon alfa-2a, and anemia was more common among patients treated with regimens containing ribavirin. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients infected with both HIV and HCV, the combination of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than either interferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy.

Adult↗

Daily versus thrice-weekly interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected persons: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Among HIV-infected persons, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection causes substantial morbidity and mortality. However, few studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of interferon alfa (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy in co-infected persons. Accordingly, a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial was conducted to establish the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of IFN alfa-2b 3 mIU daily plus RBV 800 mg/d compared with IFN alfa-2b 3 mIU thrice weekly (TIW) plus RBV 800 mg/d in HCV treatment-naive, HIV-infected subjects with compensated liver disease and stable HIV disease. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as an undetectable HCV RNA level 24 weeks after discontinuation of HCV therapy. At study entry, subjects in both groups were similar with respect to age, gender, HCV genotype, and HIV disease status. Of 180 randomized subjects, 162 received at least 1 dose of study medication, constituting the modified intention-to-treat population. After 12 weeks of therapy, 122 (75%) had serum HCV RNA levels assessed; of these subjects, early virologic response (undetectable HCV RNA or >2 log10 decrease from baseline) was observed in 33 (42%) and 13 (16%) of subjects taking daily and TIW IFN, respectively (P < 0.001). SVR was observed in 15 (19.0%) and 7 (8.4%) of subjects taking daily and TIW IFN, respectively (P = 0.05). Adverse events were similar in both groups. However, while no deaths or opportunistic infections were observed, nearly 30% of subjects stopped treatment due to adverse events and 7 subjects experienced a serious adverse event. In conclusion, SVR was achieved in 19% of HIV/HCV coinfected subjects treated with daily IFN plus RBV, but the effectiveness of therapy was substantially diminished by relatively high rates of treatment-related toxicity.

Adult↗

Drug-induced liver injury associated with the use of nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients frequently present with elevated levels of serum transaminases (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] and/or aspartate aminotransferase [AST]). This has often been attributed to the hepatic effects of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, including nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs). A review of cohort studies investigating the incidence of hepatotoxicity among patients receiving ARV therapy suggests that the overall rate of ALT and/or AST elevations is similar among all ARVs. The rate of severe hepatotoxicity, ALT and/or ASTlevels >5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), during therapy with NNRTIs is relatively low but may be significantly higher in patients with concurrent chronic viral hepatitis (hepatitis B or C). A comprehensive analysis of 17 randomized clinical trials of nevirapine demonstrated that 10% of all nevirapine-treated patients developed elevated levels of ALT and/or AST >5 times the ULN; however, almost two-thirds (6.3% of nevirapine-treated patients) of these elevations were asymptomatic. Symptomatic hepatic events were seen in 4.9% (3.2%-8.9%) of nevirapine-treated patients.

Adult↗