Biomedical subjects

Dov Lask

Publications and source records attributed to Dov Lask.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients who previously underwent open nephrolithotomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Open stone surgery nowdays is rare. However, some patients who are treated today have in the past undergone open nephrolithotomy. The aim of this study was to determine the possible impact of open nephrolithotomy on the efficacy and morbidity of subsequent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the files of all 167 patients undergoing PCNL at our institution between December 2000 and December 2003. The same surgeon performed all of the procedures. We compared 21 patients undergoing PCNL after open nephrolithotomy to the same kidney with all other patients undergoing PCNL. The groups did not differ in terms of age or stone burden (mean size, number of stones, percentage with staghorn calculi). The outcomes measured were operating time, necessity for secondary procedures, stonefree rate, and intraoperative and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The operating time (203+/-92 v 177+/-52 minutes) and percentage of secondary procedures (29% v 12%) were significantly higher in patients who had previously undergone open stone surgery. However, the stone-free rate (95% v 93%), intraoperative complication rate (10% v 9%), and postoperative complication rate (10% v 11%) did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: A PCNL in a patient with a history of open nephrolithotomy may take longer and lead to a higher percentage of auxiliary procedures, probably because of scar tissue and anatomic changes in the kidney. However, the morbidity and efficacy of PCNL appear to remain the same in these patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Ureteral ultrasonic lithotripsy revisited: a neglected tool?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ultrasonic lithotripsy was one of the first modalities used for treating renal and ureteral stones. However, in recent years, it has been largely replaced by newer techniques such as laser lithotripsy with rigid as well as flexible ureteroscopes. The aim of this study was to review the results and our current indications for ureteroscopic ultrasonic lithotripsy (UUL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 2000 and May 2002, 340 ureteroscopies were performed for the treatment of ureteral stones in the Rabin Medical Center. Of this series, 9 patients (2.6%) underwent UUL using a semirigid 8F ureteroscope (Wolf) and an Olympus ultrasonic lithotripter (LUS-1) with a 4.5F hollow probe. Four patients had Steinstrasse following shockwave lithotripsy, four had large (1-2-mm) ureteral stones, and one had an impacted calcified ureteral double-J stent. Stones >5 mm were initially fragmented by the holmium laser (550-microm fiber). A double-J stent was placed in all patients. The mean follow-up time was 20 months. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 84 minutes. No intraoperative complications occurred. The mean hospital stay was 3.9 days. Eight patients became stone free after the first procedure, and the other underwent secondary ureteroscopy, which rendered him stone free. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in whom UUL is performed are relatively complex stone patients. The use of ultrasonic lithotripsy following, or in combination with, laser or ballistic devices utilizes the unique properties of UUL, which combines stone fragmentation and efficient removal of small fragments. The technique was particularly useful in patients with Steinstrasse or a large stone burden. Thus, UUL has a limited but significant role in the treatment of ureteral stones.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Intrarenal foreign body presenting as a solid tumor.

A 45-year-old man underwent radical nephrectomy for an asymptomatic solid renal mass radiographically interpreted as a tumor. The pathologic examination revealed an intrarenal sponge forgotten during nephrolithotomy performed 5 years previously. The sponge was surrounded by a thick fibrous capsule. This case suggests that foreign body should be included in the differential diagnosis of a suspected renal mass in patients with a history of previous surgery.

Diagnosis, Differential↗

PubMed2003

Urinary tract infection in men younger than 45 years of age: is there a need for urologic investigation?

OBJECTIVES: To determine in a prospective study whether urinary tract infection (UTI) in men younger than 45 years of age is associated with anomalies of the genitourinary tract that necessitate additional urologic evaluation. UTI in young men is uncommon. In these patients, it is customary to follow the same policy as that for children or older men and to routinely perform urologic investigations. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive, otherwise healthy, male patients aged 16 to 45 years (mean 30.5) were hospitalized for a first event of acute UTI. All patients underwent an imaging evaluation, including ultrasonography and intravenous urography. Those with macroscopic hematuria underwent cystoscopy. Uroflowmetry was performed at least 1 month after recovery, and patients with a maximal flow rate of less than 15 mL/s underwent a pressure flow study. RESULTS: Significant urethral stricture was excluded in all patients. Twenty-seven patients (93%) had a postvoid residual urine volume of less than 20 mL, and only two had values of 120 and 200 mL. The imaging and cystoscopic evaluation demonstrated a normal urinary tract in all patients. The maximal urinary flow rate was greater than 15 mL/s in 22 patients (76%) and lower than 15 mL/s in 7 patients (24%). In the latter group, urodynamic investigations, including free flowmetry and/or pressure flow study, revealed normal lower urinary tract function in 6 patients and a bladder outflow obstruction in 1 (3%). CONCLUSIONS: A first event of UTI in men younger than 45 years is usually not associated with significant structural or functional urinary tract abnormalities. Therefore, no radiologic, endoscopic, or urodynamic investigation is required.

Adolescent↗