Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody and rheumatoid factor isotypes in African Americans with early rheumatoid arthritis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Doyt L Conn.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physical activity and exercise play a critical role in the management of arthritis. Understanding the factors affecting physical activity and exercise behavior is a necessary first step toward identifying the needs of, and intervention strategies for, people with arthritis. The purpose of this study was to identify factors affecting physical activity and exercise behavior in urban subjects with osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). SUBJECTS: Seventy-two consecutive subjects were recruited from the rheumatology clinic at a large urban public hospital. The sample was predominantly African American (92%), female (87%), and not working (90%). The subjects' average age was 60.9 years (SD=13.9, range=30-90). METHODS: Time per day spent sitting or lying down and time per week spent in exercise, leisure, and household activities were determined by individual interview. Self-efficacy, outcome expectations, disability, pain, body mass index, and social support were measured as possible explanatory factors. RESULTS: The average daily total activity time was 3.1 hours. Household and leisure activities accounted for 85% of that time. Explanatory factors for physical activity behavior were not the same for subjects with OA and RA, despite similar between-group characteristics. Self-efficacy was present in all of the significant explanatory models. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results indicate that factors that affect physical activity behavior among urban and predominantly African-American adults are dependent upon the type of physical activity and are different for people with OA and RA. Self-efficacy was the most consistent explanatory factor.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This article provides guidelines for the perioperative management of the most commonly used antirheumatic drugs being used to treat patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with an emphasis on the relatively new addition of biologic response modifiers. RECENT FINDINGS: Few clinical data exist examining the perioperative management of the biologic drugs, which include the inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab), the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra, and to a much lesser extent the CD20 inhibitor rituximab. The only human data available in that regard is based on the use of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor infliximab in surgical patients with Crohn disease. Although quite limited, that data appeared favorable in finding that infliximab did not result in an increased risk of postoperative complications in that setting. SUMMARY: Perioperative guidelines have never been well established for a majority of the traditional antirheumatic drugs in use today. Recommendations for the perioperative use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and glucocorticoids have the most evidence-based support. Data for the use of methotrexate are also available from which to generate reasonable guidelines; however, for the remaining antirheumatic drugs in current use, the available data cannot support any clear evidence-based recommendations. To provide reasonable guidelines for the use of the biologics, perhaps the best we can do is to extrapolate from the very limited data coming from the concurrent use of infliximab in patients with Crohn disease who have undergone surgery. Beyond that, we are left with animal and tissue culture data from which any recommendations would be rather tenuous.
There has been a renewed interest in the use of low doses of prednisone in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. This is because it has been conclusively shown that low doses of prednisone retard bone damage, and physicians use prednisone because it helps control tender and swollen joints. Two studies appeared in 2002, one by van Everdingen et al. and one by Landewe et al. demonstrating the reduction of bone damage in early RA with the use of prednisone. Van Everdingen used 10 mg/day of prednisone and Landewe used an initial high dose of 60 mg/day of prednisone for a week, tapering off by 6 months. The bone sparing effect was still evident at 5 years. Low doses of prednisone are well tolerated, with documented side effects including weight gain, ecchymosis, and osteopenia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The public health burden of arthritis and related conditions is incompletely described by commonly used public health surveillance systems. We examined the potential of administrative data as a supplement. The administrative data sources we used underestimated the prevalence of arthritis and overestimated service utilization for persons with arthritis when data from only one year were used. The use of five year's data doubled the prevalence estimate and reduced the service utilization estimate by half. The demographics of the population covered by administrative data also influence the prevalence estimate. Administrative data may usefully supplement routine public health surveillance systems but must be used with caution.