Coronary bifurcation stenting: from crush to culotte. Avoiding limerence and meme propagation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Duccio Baldari.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
We describe a patient with bifascicular block, who developed transient high-degree atrioventricular block during dipyridamole infusion. This patient was subsequently found to have significant His-Purkinje disease at electrophysiology study, and underwent permanent pacemaker implantation. Spontaneous atrioventricular block was documented during follow-up. This case report raises the issue of dipyridamole safety in patients with intraventricular conduction defects, and contributes an additional mechanism to the possible explanation of dipyridamole-induced atrioventricular block.
BACKGROUND: The intrinsic thrombogeneity of stents was the historic limitation to their usage during the early phases of stenting. The risk of stent thrombosis has been minimized by the widespread use of platelet antiaggregation. Nowadays, the risk of subacute stent thrombosis is around 1%. Thrombotic risk depends on several factors, such as type of stent, complexity of lesion, and clinical picture. CASE REPORT: We present a case of recurrent acute in-stent thrombosis in a patient with mild antithrombin III (AT) deficiency despite the combined administration of clopidogrel and aspirin. CONCLUSION: In our patient, several factors, such as diabetes, AT deficiency, and the use of a paclitaxel-eluting stent, have contributed to the development of recurrent acute stent thrombosis. Although we were not able to identify the culprit factor, we should keep in mind that the deployment of a drug-eluting stent could be unsafe if it is not supported by a clear clinically oriented pathway that considers the overall condition of the patient since, in some cases, neither coronary lesions nor coronary stents are responsible for the negative outcome of patient therapy, which may be caused instead by incomplete or inadequate patient assessment.
This case is about an aortic pseudoaneurysm after Dacron graft replacement that presented as a rapidly evolving superior vena cava syndrome.