PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E A Doherty

Publications and source records attributed to E A Doherty.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

The P5abc peripheral element facilitates preorganization of the tetrahymena group I ribozyme for catalysis.

Phylogenetic comparisons and site-directed mutagenesis indicate that group I introns are composed of a catalytic core that is universally conserved and peripheral elements that are conserved only within intron subclasses. Despite this low overall conservation, peripheral elements are essential for efficient splicing of their parent introns. We have undertaken an in-depth structure-function analysis to investigate the role of one of these elements, P5abc, using the well-characterized ribozyme derived from the Tetrahymena group I intron. Structural comparisons using solution-based free radical cleavage revealed that a ribozyme lacking P5abc (E(DeltaP5abc)) and E(DeltaP5abc) with P5abc added in trans (E(DeltaP5abc).P5abc) adopt a similar global tertiary structure at Mg(2+) concentrations greater than 20 mM [Doherty, E. A., et al. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 2982-90]. However, free E(DeltaP5abc) is greatly compromised in overall oligonucleotide cleavage activity, even at Mg(2+) concentrations as high as 100 mM. Further characterization of E(DeltaP5abc) via DMS modification revealed local structural differences at several positions in the conserved core that cluster around the substrate binding sites. Kinetic and thermodynamic dissection of individual reaction steps identified defects in binding of both substrates to E(DeltaP5abc), with > or =25-fold weaker binding of a guanosine nucleophile and > or =350-fold weaker docking of the oligonucleotide substrate into its tertiary interactions with the ribozyme core. These defects in binding of the substrates account for essentially all of the 10(4)-fold decrease in overall activity of the deletion mutant. Together, the structural and functional observations suggest that the P5abc peripheral element not only provides stability but also positions active site residues through indirect interactions, thereby preferentially stabilizing the active ribozyme structure relative to alternative less active states. This is consistent with the view that peripheral elements engage in a network of mutually reinforcing interactions that together ensure cooperative folding of the ribozyme to its active structure.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Ribozyme structures and mechanisms.

The past few years have seen exciting advances in understanding the structure and function of catalytic RNA. Crystal structures of several ribozymes have provided detailed insight into the folds of RNA molecules. Models of other biologically important RNAs have been constructed based on structural, phylogenetic, and biochemical data. However, many questions regarding the catalytic mechanisms of ribozymes remain. This review compares the structures and possible catalytic mechanisms of four small self-cleaving RNAs: the hammerhead, hairpin, hepatitis delta virus, and in vitro-selected lead-dependent ribozymes. The organization of these small catalysts is contrasted to that of larger ribozymes, such as the group I intron.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Assembly of an exceptionally stable RNA tertiary interface in a group I ribozyme.

Group I intron RNAs contain a core of highly conserved helices flanked by peripheral domains that stabilize the core structure. In the Tetrahymena group I ribozyme, the P4, P5, and P6 helices of the core pack tightly against a three-helix subdomain called P5abc. Chemical footprinting and the crystal structure of the Tetrahymena intron P4-P6 domain revealed that tertiary interactions between these two parts of the domain create an extensive solvent-inaccessible interface. We have examined the formation and stability of this tertiary interface by providing the P5abc segment in trans to a Tetrahymena ribozyme construct that lacks P5abc (EDeltaP5abc). Equilibrium gel shift experiments show that the affinity of the P5abc and EDeltaP5abc RNAs is exceptionally strong, with a Kd of approximately 100 pM at 10 mM MgCl2 (at 37 degrees C). Chemical and enzymatic footprinting shows that the RNAs are substantially folded prior to assembly of the complex. Solvent accessibility mapping reveals that, in the absence of P5abc, the intron RNA maintains a nativelike fold but its active-site helices are not tightly packed. Upon binding of P5abc, the catalytic core becomes more tightly packed through indirect effects of the tertiary interface formation. This two-component system facilitates quantitative examination of individual tertiary contacts that stabilize the folded intron.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

The P4-P6 domain directs higher order folding of the Tetrahymena ribozyme core.

The active site of group I self-splicing introns occurs at the interface of two proposed structural domains. In the Tetrahymena intron, half of the catalytic core resides within the independently-folding P4-P6 domain while the other half belongs to a putative domain that includes helices P3, P7, P8, and P9 (P3-P9). To determine whether the P3-P9 region of the intron can also fold independently, we used Fe(II)-EDTA and dimethyl sulfate to probe the solvent accessibility of separate fragments of the Tetrahymena intron. These RNAs self-assemble into an active complex in trans, enabling analysis of their structural features both alone and within the complex. Our results show that while the P3-P9 region of the intron retains its secondary structure, most of the tertiary interactions within this region do not form stably in the absence of the P4-P6 domain. This indicates that the P4-P6 domain induces folding in the P3-P9 region, organizing the catalytic cleft between them. Thus the P4-P6 domain provides a scaffold for the folding of the Tetrahymena intron core.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Emerging themes in RNA folding.

RNAs, like proteins, readily form specific structures adapted for ligand binding and catalysis. Since they are composed of completely different chemical building blocks, however, RNAs and proteins necessarily use distinct strategies to assemble complex architectures. While burial of hydrophobic residues drives protein folding, the hydrophobic effect in RNA contributes primarily to the formation of secondary structure. To form tertiary structure, RNA must overcome electrostatic repulsions from the phosphate backbone. How do negatively charged double helices pack together to produce catalytic centers and ligand binding surfaces? Here, we review our understanding of the principles that underlie RNA folding based on the structural information currently available.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1996

Multiple specific CytR binding sites at the Escherichia coli deoP2 promoter mediate both cooperative and competitive interactions between CytR and cAMP receptor protein.

Binding of cAMP receptor protein (CRP) and CytR mediates both positive and negative control of transcription from Escherichia coli deoP2. Transcription is activated by CRP and repressed by a multi-protein CRP.CytR.CRP complex. The latter is stabilized by cooperative interactions between CRP and CytR. Similar interactions at the other transcriptional units of the CytR regulon coordinate expression of the transport proteins and enzymes required for nucleoside catabolism. A fundamental question in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic gene regulation is how combinatorial mechanisms of this sort regulate differential expression. To understand the combinatorial control mechanism at deoP2, we have used quantitative footprint and gel shift analysis of CRP and CytR binding to evaluate the distribution of ligation states. By comparison to distributions for other CytR-regulated promoters, we hope to understand the roles of individual states in differential gene expression. The results indicate that CytR binds specifically to multiple sites at deoP2, including both the well recognized CytR site flanked by CRP1 and CRP2 and also sites coincident with CRP1 and CRP2. Binding to these multiple sites yields both cooperative and competitive interactions between CytR and CRP. Based on these findings we propose that CytR functions as a differential modulator of CRP1 versus CRP2-mediated activation. Additional high affinity specific sites are located at deoP1 and near the middle of the 600-base pair sequence separating P1 and P2. Evaluation of the DNA sequence requirement for specific CytR binding suggests that a limited array of contiguous and overlapping CytR sites exists at deoP2. Similar extended arrays, but with different arrangements of overlapping CytR and CRP sites, are found at the other CytR-regulated promoters. We propose that competition and cooperativity in CytR and CRP binding are important to differential regulation of these promoters.

Bacterial Proteins↗