PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E A Messent

Publications and source records attributed to E A Messent.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Differences in trabecular structure between knees with and without osteoarthritis quantified by macro and standard radiography, respectively.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of standard and macro-radiography for quantifying cancellous bone differences between subjects with and without medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Patients with medial compartment knee OA (n=24) and non-OA reference subjects (n=10) had a standard and a macro-radiograph (x4 magnification) of one knee. Fractal Signature Analysis (FSA), a computerised image analysis technique, measured differences in cancellous bone structure between OA and non-OA tibiae in all radiographs. RESULTS: Compared to non-OA, FSA of vertical trabeculae in macro-radiographs increased significantly (P<0.05) in the OA group at several trabecular widths (0.30-0.60mm, 0.7 mm, 0.98-1.14 mm) and in standard radiographs at a single trabecular width (0.48 mm). CONCLUSION: Compared to standard radiography, increased spatial resolution of macro-radiography allowed greater detection of trabecular bone differences between OA and non-OA knees. Nonetheless, difference was also detected in standard radiographs.

Adult↗

Osteophytes, juxta-articular radiolucencies and cancellous bone changes in the proximal tibia of patients with knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in tibial cancellous bone organisation in knee osteoarthritis (OA) between the central weight-bearing region and juxta-articular radiolucencies adjacent to small, medium or large marginal osteophytes. METHODS: Patients with medial compartment OA (n = 60; F = 39), mean (SD) age 60.0 (9.7) years, and non-OA reference subjects (n = 21; F = 5), mean (SD) age 36.8 (11.5) years, had x4 macroradiographs digitised by laser scanner. Using a modified Osteoarthritis Research Society (OARS) Atlas, right and/or left knees were graded according to marginal osteophyte size into those with small (n = 30), medium (n = 30) or large (n = 27) marginal osteophytes, identified as OPH1, OPH2 and OPH3, respectively. Non-OA knees (n = 30) were anatomically normal. Computerised method of Fractal Signature Analysis (FSA) quantified differences in cancellous bone structure between non-OA and osteophyte subgroups at two regions of interest (ROIs); central weight-bearing and tibial margin. RESULTS: Compared to non-OA, vertical trabecular number increased significantly (P < 0.05) in all osteophyte subgroups (width range 0.12-1.14 mm) within both ROIs. In OPH3, this increase was significantly (P < 0.05) greater compared to OPH2 in the central ROI, and to OPH2 and OPH1 in the marginal ROI at most trabecular widths (0.12-1.14 mm). In the marginal ROI, compared to non-OA, horizontal trabeculae number decreased in all osteophyte subgroups. This decrease was significantly greater in OPH3 compared to OPH2 and OPH1 at small to medium trabecular widths (0.12-0.54 mm). CONCLUSION: Compared to disease associated bone loss at the central ROI of the tibia, the extent of juxta-articular bone loss appears to be associated with the size of the marginal osteophytes.

Adult↗

A 2 yr longitudinal radiographic study examining the effect of a bisphosphonate (risedronate) upon subchondral bone loss in osteoarthritic knee patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether risedronate (RIS) slows down trabecular bone loss in the medial compartment of the proximal tibia, a characteristic of patients with progressive knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Initially, 100 patients were randomly selected from each treatment group (each N approximately 300) comprising placebo and RIS 5 mg/day, 15 mg/day and 50 mg/week from a double blind, multi-centre, placebo-controlled, 2 yr investigation of OA knee patients in North America. Using fluoroscopic semi-flexed standard radiography, baseline and exit knee radiographs were digitized by laser scanner. Following computerized measurement of minimum medial compartment joint space width, each group was subdivided into joint space narrowing (JSN) non-progressor or JSN-progressor (JSN >or=0.6 mm measured at any point post-baseline). Computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) quantified longitudinal changes separately in horizontal and vertical trabeculae in region of interest (three-fourth width of tibial compartment x 6 mm height) in the medial compartment. Following the initial study, all JSN-progressor knees within the entire patient cohort (N = 1232) were similarly analysed. RESULTS: OA knees in JSN non-progressor group had a slight decrease in FSA for vertical and horizontal trabeculae and showed no drug effect. In JSN-progressor knees, bone loss was greater in both placebo and RIS 5 mg/day groups compared with those in RIS 15 mg/day group in which trabeculae were retained, and in the RIS 50 mg/week group in which the vertical trabecular number increased significantly (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study showed that patients with marked cartilage loss (JSN>or=0.6 mm) receiving RIS 15 mg/day retained vertical trabecular structure, and those receiving RIS 50 mg/week increased vertical trabecular number, thereby preserving the structural integrity of subchondral bone in knee OA.

Adult↗

Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD).

The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P < 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

The negative feedback action of progesterone on luteinizing hormone release is not associated with changes in GnRH mRNA expression in the Ewe.

Progesterone is the ovarian hormone that times events in the ovine reproductive cycle. When elevated, this ovarian hormone acts centrally to inhibit both the tonic and surge modes of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) release. Two studies were performed to address the underlying neural mechanisms. The first tested the hypothesis that the rapid rise in GnRH release, that results from an acute fall in progesterone concentrations (such as occurs following luteolysis), is temporally associated with a rapid rise in the cellular content of GnRH mRNA. Three groups of ovariectomised (OVX) ewes were treated with exogenous progesterone for 10 days, while one remained steroid free (OVX, n=7). To determine the effects of acute progesterone (P) withdrawal, ewes were killed on day 10 while implants were still in place (OVX+P, n=6) or 4 (OVX-P4, n=7) or 12 h (OVX-P12, n=7) after progesterone removal. Coronal sections through the rostral portion of the medial preoptic area (rPOA) were processed for cellular in-situ hybridization for GnRH mRNA. An increase in progesterone concentrations markedly suppressed luteinizing hormone (LH) release, while removal of the implants caused progesterone concentrations to fall (P<0.01) within 1 h and LH pulse frequency to increase (P<0.05) within 4 h. Despite these progesterone-induced changes in LH/GnRH release there were no differences in the cellular content of GnRH mRNA among the four groups. In the second study, three groups of ovariectomised ewes were used to determined whether the inhibitory actions of early (EL; n=8) and mid-luteal (ML; n=8) phase concentrations of progesterone on LH release are accompanied by a decrease in GnRH mRNA expression. P inhibited the secretion of LH in a dose dependant manner; pulses of LH were virtually absent in the ML group. Despite this marked inhibitory steroid action, there was no significant difference in the cellular content of GnRH mRNA among the OVX, OVX (EL) and OVX (ML) groups. Thus, both the negative feedback actions of physiological concentrations of progesterone on GnRH release and the rapid escape from progesterone-inhibition are independent of changes in the cellular content of GnRH mRNA. These data suggest that the mechanism by which progesterone controls the timing of events in the ovine oestrous cycle is primarily by altering the secretion of GnRH rather than GnRH biosynthesis.

Animals↗