PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E A Pedersen

Publications and source records attributed to E A Pedersen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Bone response to in vivo mechanical loading in C3H/HeJ mice.

Bone, being sensitive to mechanical stimulus, adapts to mechanical loads in response to bending or deformation. Although the signal/receptor mechanism for bone adaptation to deformation is still under investigation, the mechanical signal is related to the amount of bone deformation or strain. Adaptation to changes in physical activity depends on both the magnitude of increase in strain above average daily levels for maintaining current bone density and the Minimum Effective Strain (MES) for initiating adaptive bone formation. Given the variation of peak bone density that exists in any human population, it is likely that variation in levels for MES is, to a considerable degree, inherited and varies among animal species and breeds. This study showed a dose-related periosteal response to loading in C3H/HeJ mice. The extent of active formation surface, the rate of periosteal bone formation, and area of bone formation increased with increasing peak periosteal strain. In these mice, the loaded tibia consistently showed lower endocortical formation surface and mineral apposition rate than the nonloaded bones at every load level. Although periosteal expansion is the most efficient means of increasing moment of inertia in adaptation to bending, a dose response increase in endocortical formation would have been predicted. Our characterization of the mouse bone formation response to increasing bending loads will be useful in the design of experiments to study the tibial adaptive response to known loads in different mouse breeds.

Animals↗

Bone response to in vivo mechanical loading in two breeds of mice.

We investigated the bone response to external loading in C57BL/6J and C3H/HeJ mice, both breeds with low and high bone density, respectively. An in vivo tibial four-point bending device previously used for application of measured external loads in rats was adapted for mice. It delivered a uniform medio-lateral bending moment to the region of the tibia located 1-5.5 mm proximal to the tibio-fibula junction. The right legs of six C57BL/6J [low bone density (LBD)] and C3H/HeJ [high bone density (HBD)] mice were externally loaded in the device for 36 cycles/day at 2 Hz, 6 days/week for 2 weeks at 9.3 +/- 0.9 N force, inducing estimated lateral periosteal surface compressive strains of 5121 +/- 1128 mu epsilon in C3H/HeJ (HBD) mice (n = 6), significantly higher than the estimated 3988 +/- 820 mu epsilon in C57BL/6J mice (n = 6) (mean +/- SD). In addition, C3H/HeJ HBD mice (n = 11) were externally sham (pad pressure or no bending) loaded in the device for 36 cycles/day at 2 Hz, 3 days/week for 3 weeks at 9.3 +/- 0.9 N force. Calcein injections for bone labeling were given at the 10th and 3rd days before sacrifice. At the end of the experiment, all mice were killed and both tibiae were removed, fixed, embedded, and cross-sectioned through the loaded region. Both tibiae were measured for marrow area (Ma.Ar), cortical area (Ct.Ar), total area (Tt.Ar), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI), and periosteal and endocortical woven bone surface (Wo.B/BS), single-labeled surface (sLS), double-labeled surface (dLS), and total formation surface (FS/BS). Differences in all variables due to breed and loading (both bending and sham-bending) were tested by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (P < 0.05). Ma.Ar, Tt.Ar, and CSMI were greater in C57BL/6J (LBD) than in C3H/HeJ (HBD) mice. Periosteal and endocortical woven bone and formation surface were increased significantly more by loading (bending) in C57BL/6J than in C3H/HeJ mice. Periosteal woven bone response due to sham-bending or sham-loading was significantly lower than due to bending loads in the C3H/HeJ mice. We conclude that the bone response to external loading is greater in LBD mice than in HBD mice. The high bone density of C3H/HeJ (HBD) mice is related to breed-specific factors other than the response to loading.

Analysis of Variance↗