Age-related variations of the GH response to GH secretagogues in humans.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adult↗
Biomedical subjects
E Arvat
Publications and source records attributed to E Arvat.
Adrenal sensitivity to ACTH1-24 as function of age, body weight and pituitary function.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Adrenal Glands↗
Recombinant human IGF-I does not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in humans.
An inhibitory influence of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been hypothesized. In fact, it has been reported that the rhGH (recombinant human GH)-induced IGF-I increase inhibits both cortisol and GH response to MK-0677, a non-peptidyl GH secretagogue in animals. The aim of this study was to further clarify the inhibitory role, if any, of IGF-I on corticotroph function. We studied the effect of rhIGF-I (recombinant human IGF-I; 20 microg/kg s.c. at -180 min) or placebo on the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (human CRH; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) or hexarelin (HEX; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a peptidyl GHS, in normal young women. The effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to HEX was also studied. The subjects were six normal young women [age: 26-35 yr; body mass index (BMI): 19-23 kg/m2] in their early follicular phase. The results showed that after s.c. rhIGF-I administration, circulating IGF-I levels increased approximately 77%, peaking at -60 min and persisting similar up to +120 min. The mean ACTH, cortisol and GH concentrations did not change from -180 to 0 min when evaluated after both placebo or rhIGF-I. CRH and HEX induced similar ACTH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 47.5+/-10.9 vs 21.3+/-3.0 pg/ml and 30.3+/-6.9 vs 19.2+/-3.8 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.04) and cortisol responses (177.5+/-5.4 vs 109.3+/-10.3 microg/l and 149.4+/-12.3 vs 119.8+/-16.4 microg/l, respectively, p<0.04). RhIGF-I pretreatment did not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (46.0+/-13.8 pg/ml and 181.1+/-16.9 microg/l, respectively) as well as those to HEX (28.8+/-5.0 pg/ml and 144.1+/-16.2 microg/l, respectively). On the other hand, the GH response to HEX was clearly reduced by rhIGF-I (23.9+/-4.7 vs 64.7+/-14.8 microg/l, p<0.05). Our findings show that rhIGF-I-induced increase of circulating IGF-I levels exerts negative feedback action on somatotroph secretion, while it does not modify the corticotroph and the adrenal responsiveness to CRH or hexarelin.
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
Neuroendocrine effects of subcutaneous sumatriptan in patients with migraine.
We evaluated the sensitivity of 5-HT1D receptors in patients with migraine using sumatriptan as a pharmacological probe. The drug inhibits the release of ACTH, cortisol and prolactin and this effect may be used to explore the function of serotoninergic systems in vivo. We administered sumatriptan (6 mg sc) and placebo to 15 migraineurs, during the headache-free period, and to 10 healthy controls. Blood samples were collected -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after injections. Sumatriptan induced a significant (p<0.01) decrease of ACTH, cortisol and prolactin concentrations both in patients with migraine and in controls. The neuroendocrine response was not significantly different in the two groups. Our results suggest that 5-HT1D receptor sensitivity is not altered in migraine.
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
Short procedure of GHRH plus arginine test in clinical practice.
Either in children or in adults, arginine (ARG) alone and combined with GHRH (GHRH+ARG) are reliable tests for the diagnosis of GH deficiency. The procedures of these tests generally include GH measurement every 15 min from baseline up to 90-120 min. Aim of our study was to verify if the procedure of these tests could be usefully shortened in clinical practice. To this goal we have studied 173 normally growing children and adolescents (C, 117 M and 56 F, age: 11.3 +/- 0.4 yr.) and 125 young and middle aged normal adults (A, 68 M and 57 F, age: 30.0 +/- 0.6 yr.). ARG alone test was performed by 81 C and 33 A (0.5 g/kg arginine, i.v., from 0 to +30 min, up to a maximum of 30 g) while GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v. bolus at 0 min) + ARG test was performed by 92 C and 92 A. After ARG alone, taking into account data from +15 to +105 min, GH values above the 3rd centile limit of arbitrary cut-off (7 or 10 microg/l in C and 5 microg/l in A) occurred in 85% or 64% and 94% subjects, respectively. After GHRH+ARG test, taking into account only data at +30, +45, +60 min GH values above the 3rd centile limit (20 microg/l in C and 16.5 microg/l in A) occurred in 99% of subjects in both groups. Taking into account only these 3 timing points, the percentage of GH peak above the third centile limits after ARG alone was never higher than 60% in C and 85% in A. In conclusion, this study shows that single GHRH+arginine test can be reliably performed in a shortened procedure which makes easier the clinical practice and further reduces costs.
Adolescent↗
Elderly subjects show severe impairment of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate and reduced sensitivity of cortisol and aldosterone response to the stimulatory effect of ACTH(1-24).
OBJECTIVE: Hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in ageing has been reported both in humans and in animals and may be involved in age-related changes in body composition, structure functions and metabolism, as well as in brain ageing. Despite the supposed HPA hyperactivity and its refractoriness to negative glucocorticoid feedback, low levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulphate have been clearly demonstrated in human ageing and may suggest another cause of age-related changes in structure function and metabolism. Thus, our aim was to verify the adrenal responsiveness to various ACTH doses in normal elderly subjects. DESIGN: We studied cortisol (F), aldosterone (A) and DHEA responses to the sequential administration of very low, low and supramaximal ACTH1-24 doses (0.06 microg or 0.5 microg followed by 250 microg ACTH1-24 i.v. at 0 and +60 minutes) in healthy elderly subjects (ES) [six females and two males, aged 63-75 years, body mass index (BMI) 22-26 kg/m2]. The results in ES were compared with those recorded in healthy young subjects (YS) (six females and six males, aged 22-34 years, BMI 20-25 kg/m2). RESULTS: Basal DHEA levels in ES were lower (P < 0.05) than in YS, while F and A levels were similar in both groups. DHEA, F and A responses to ACTH were dose-dependent in both groups. In ES, however, DHEA levels showed no response to the 0.06 microg dose, a modest increase after 0.5 microg and a clearer rise after 250 microg ACTH; at any dose, the DHEA response in ES was clearly lower than in YS (P < 0.04). The F responses to 0.5 microg and 250 microg ACTH in ES were similar to those in YS; whereas, in ES, 0.06 microg ACTH elicited a non significant F increase which was significantly lower than in YS (P < 0.05). Similarly, the A responses to the highest ACTH doses were similar in both groups but, in ES, 0.06 microg ACTH elicited no increase in A secretion, which was clearly lower than in YS (P < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Normal elderly subjects show severe reduction of DHEA response to a wide range of ACTH doses, in agreement with peculiar impairment of the activity of the adrenal reticularis zone in ageing. In contrast to young adults, elderly subjects also show no cortisol and aldosterone response to a very low ACTH dose. This evidence indicates a reduced sensitivity to ACTH in the fasciculata and glomerulosa zones of the adrenal gland in ageing.
Adult↗
Effect of digoxin on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) alone or combined with arginine in normal young volunteers.
BACKGROUND: The activity of the GH/IGF-I axis, known to play a major role in myocardial structure and function, has been reported to be altered in patients with chronic heart failure. AIM AND DESIGN OF THE STUDY: In order to evaluate the possibility that clinically used cardioactive drugs may exert neuroendocrine influences on somatotroph secretion, we studied the effects of pretreatment with enalapril (20 mg/day orally for 3 days), furosemide (20 mg i.v. as a bolus at -5 minutes) or digoxin (0.25 mg orally 4x/day for 3 days) on the GH response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (1.0 microg/ kg i.v. as a bolus at 0 minutes) in 12 healthy male adults (age [mean +/- SEM] 30.2 +/- 1.4 years; BMI 22.7 +/- 0.7 kg/ m2). In a subgroup of 8 subjects the same study was performed testing the GH response to GHRH + arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg i.v. from 0 to + 30 minutes). RESULTS The GH response to GHRH (1,304.1 +/- 248-5 microg/l/h) was not modified by enalapril (1,368.7 +/- 171.2 microg/l/h) or by furosemide (1,269.3 +/- 185.2 microg/l/h) but was significantly blunted by digoxin (613.6 +/- 73.2 microg/l/h, P < 0.05). On the other hand digoxin, enalapril and furosemide did not modify the GH response to GHRH +ARG. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin, but not enalapril or furosemide, inhibits the GH response to GHRH in normal subjects. The blunting effect of digoxin on the GHRH-induced GH response is counteracted by arginine. These findings show that digoxin possesses an inhibitory effect on somatotroph secretion that may be mediated at the hypothalamic level.
Adult↗
Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on the growth hormone (gh) response to GH-releasing hormone in obesity.
Circulating GH levels are reduced in obesity due to true reduction of the 24-h GH production rate. GH insufficiency in obesity might reflect neuroendocrine abnormalities and/or alterations in peripheral hormones and metabolic factors. The somatotroph response to provocative stimuli including GHRH is markedly blunted in obese patients. However, the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obesity shows also peculiar refractoriness to the inhibitory effect of glucose load. In this present study we aimed at verifying the effect of low dose rhIGF-I (20 microgram/kg, sc, at 0 min) on the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv, at 180 min) in obesity. With this goal in mind, six obese women with abdominal adiposity [OB; age (mean +/- SEM), 32.3 +/- 4.4 yr; body mass index, 32.8 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] were studied. The effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) administration on circulating total IGF-I, insulin, and glucose levels were also evaluated. The results in OB were compared with those recorded in age-matched lean women (NW; age, 28.3 +/- 1.2 yr; body mass index, 20.1 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2)), in whom the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I had already been shown. Basal IGF-I levels in OB were similar to those in NW (199.7 +/- 33.3 vs. 274.4 +/- 25.3 microgram/L). The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from 0-180 min) in OB was lower than that in NW (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.8 microgram/L; P = NS). Administration of GHRH induced a GH response in OB lower than that in NW (area under the curve from 180-270 min, 576.5 +/- 137.5 vs. 1315.9 +/- 189.9 microgram/L.min; P < 0.02). Administration of rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels in both groups to the same percent extent (326.8 +/- 28.3 and 420.3 +/- 26.5 microgram/L in OB and NW, respectively). rhIGF-I administration inhibited the GH response to GHRH in OB (240.1 +/- 99.6 microgram/L; P < 0.05) as well as in NW (730.2 +/- 288.1 microgram/L; P < 0.05), although it failed to lower the mean GH concentration over 3 h in either OB or NW. After rhIGF-I the GH response to GHRH in OB was slight and was still lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW; in fact, the percent decreases were similar in both groups (44.21 +/- 14.06 and 48.21 +/- 13.95 microgram/L, in OB and NW, respectively). The mean insulin (107.1 +/- 21.9 and 36.8 +/- 7.2 pmol/L), but not glucose (4.0 +/- 0.3 and 4.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/L), levels calculated over 270 min, were higher (P = 0.005) in OB than in NW; rhIGF-I administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels in either group. Our study shows that the sc administration of a low rhIGF-I dose inhibits the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obese as well as in normal subjects, indicating that somatotroph sensitivity to the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I is preserved in obesity.
Abdomen↗
Ghrelin, a natural GH secretagogue produced by the stomach, induces hyperglycemia and reduces insulin secretion in humans.
Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid gastric hormone is a natural ligand of the GH Secretagogue (GHS) receptor (GHS-R) and strongly stimulates GH secretion though, like synthetic GHS, it shows other endocrine and non-endocrine activities. Aim of the present study was to clarify whether ghrelin administration influences insulin and glucose levels in humans. To this goal, we compared the effects of ghrelin, hexarelin, a synthetic GHS, or placebo on insulin and glucose as well as on GH levels in 11 normal young volunteers (age [mean +/- SEM]: 28.5 +/- 3.1 yr; BMI: 22.2 +/- 0.9 Kg/m(2)). Ghrelin induced very marked increase in GH secretion (DeltaAUC(0-180): 5777.1 +/- 812.6 microg/l/h; p < 0.01) which was not modified by placebo. Placebo administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels. On the other hand, ghrelin administration induced a prompt increase in glucose levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): 1343.1 +/- 443.5 mg/dl/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline). Absolute glucose levels at +15' were already higher than those at baseline (93.9 +/- 7.1 mg/dl; p < 0.01) and persisted elevated up to 165' (90.3 +/- 5.8 mg/dl; p < 0.01 vs. 0'). Ghrelin administration was also followed by a decrease in serum insulin levels (DeltaAUC(0-180): -207.1 +/- 70.5 mU/l/h; p < 0.05 vs. saline). Absolute insulin levels were significantly reduced from 30' (11.4 +/- 0.9 mU/l, p < 0.1 vs. 0'), showed the nadir at +45' (10.0 +/- 0.6 mU/l, p < 0.01 vs. 0') and then persisted lower (p < 0.01) than baseline up to +105'. Hexarelin administration did not modify glucose and insulin levels despite its marked GH-releasing effect (DeltaAUC(0-180): 4156.8 +/- 1180.3 microg/l/h; p < 0.01 vs. saline) that was slightly lower (p < 0.05) than that of ghrelin. In conclusion, these findings show that, besides stimulating GH secretion, ghrelin is a gastric hormone possessing metabolic actions such as hyperglycemic effect and lowering effect on insulin secretion in humans, at least after acute administration.
Adult↗
Endocrine activities of ghrelin, a natural growth hormone secretagogue (GHS), in humans: comparison and interactions with hexarelin, a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, and GH-releasing hormone.
An endogenous ligand for the GH secretagogue-receptor (GHS-receptor) has recently been isolated, from both the rat and the human stomach, and named ghrelin. It is a 28-amino-acid peptide showing a unique structure with an n-octanoyl ester at its third serine residue, which is essential for its potent stimulatory activity on somatotroph secretion. In fact, it has been demonstrated that ghrelin specifically stimulates GH secretion from both rat pituitary cells in culture and rats in vivo. The aim of the present study was to test the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans and to compare it with that of GHRH and hexarelin (HEX), a nonnatural peptidyl GHS, which possesses strong GH-releasing activity but also significantly stimulates PRL, ACTH, and cortisol secretion. To clarify the mechanisms of action underlying the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin in humans, its interaction with GHRH and HEX was also studied. Seven normal young volunteers (7 men; 24-32 yr old; body mass index, 20-24 kg/m(2)) were studied. All subjects underwent the administration of ghrelin, HEX, and GHRH-29 (1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) as well as placebo (2 mL isotonic saline i.v. at 0 min). Six subjects also underwent the combined administration of ghrelin and GHRH or HEX. Blood samples were taken every 15 min from -15 up to +180 min. GH levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions; PRL, ACTH, cortisol, and aldosterone levels were also assayed after administration of ghrelin and/or HEX. Ghrelin administration induced a prompt and marked increase in circulating GH levels (Cmax, mean +/- SEM, 92.1 +/- 16.7 microg/L; area under the curve, 1894.9 +/- 347.8 microg/L.h). The GH response to ghrelin was clearly higher (P < 0.01) than the one recorded after GHRH (26.7 +/- 8.7 microg/L; 619.6 +/- 174.4 microg/L.h) and even significantly higher (P < 0.05) than after HEX (68.4 +/- 14.7 microg/L; 1546.9 +/- 380.0 microg/L x h). Ghrelin administration also induced an increase in PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels; these responses were higher (P < 0.05) than those elicited by HEX. A significant increase in aldosterone levels was recorded after ghrelin but not after HEX. The endocrine responses to ghrelin were not modified by the coadministration of HEX. On the other hand, the coadministration of ghrelin and GHRH had a real synergistical effect (P < 0.05) on GH secretion (133.6 +/- 22.5 microg/L; 3374.3 +/- 617.3 microg/L x h). In conclusion, ghrelin, a natural ligand of GHS-receptor, exerts a strong stimulatory effect on GH secretion in humans, releasing more GH than GHRH and even more than a nonnatural GHS such as HEX. Ghrelin, as well as HEX, also stimulates lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Ghrelin shows no interaction with HEX, whereas it has a synergistical effect with GHRH on GH secretion. Thus, ghrelin is a new hormone playing a major role in the control of somatotroph secretion in humans, and its effects are imitated by nonnatural GHS.
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade by canrenoate increases both spontaneous and stimulated adrenal function in humans.
Animal studies indicate that mineralocorticoid receptors (MR) in the hippocampus play a major role in the glucocorticoid feedback control of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Specifically, MR mediate the proactive feedback of glucocorticoids in the maintenance of basal HPA activity. The stimulatory effect of intracerebroventricular and intrahippocampal MR blockade on the HPA axis in animals has been clearly shown, whereas the effect of systemic administration of mineralocorticoid antagonists in humans is still contradictory. To clarify this point, in seven normal young women (aged 25-32 yr; body mass index, 19.0-23.0 kg/m(2)) we studied the effects of canrenoate (CAN; 200 mg as iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 200 mg infused in 500 mL saline over 4 h up to 2400 h) or placebo (saline, 1.0 mL as iv bolus at 2000 h, followed by 500 mL over 4 h up to 2400 h) on the spontaneous ACTH, cortisol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and aldosterone secretion as well as on the ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA responses to human CRH (2.0 microg/kg as iv bolus at 2200 h) or arginine vasopressin (AVP; 0.17 U/kg as im bolus at 2200 h). Blood samples were taken every 15 min from 2000-2400 h. During placebo, spontaneous ACTH and cortisol levels showed progressive decreases (P < 0.05) from 2000-2400 h (baseline vs. nadir, mean +/- SEM, 2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.2 pmol/L and 115.1 +/- 23.7 vs. 63.5 +/- 24.3 nmol/L), whereas DHEA and aldosterone levels did not change. CRH induced clear increases in ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels (peaks, mean +/- SEM, 7.1 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.2 pmol/L, 322.9 +/- 19.5 vs. 92.8 +/- 24.5 nmol/L, and 44.2 +/- 2.7 vs. 20.0 +/- 3.0 nmol/L; P < 0.05). Similarly, AVP elicited significant increases in ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels (3.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.1 pmol/L, 211.9 +/- 27.2 vs. 67.7 +/- 9.7 nmol/L, and 51.6 +/- 4.0 vs. 16.3 +/- 2.0 nmol/L; P < 0.05). During CAN treatment, ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA levels showed progressive rises, which begun at approximately 60 min and peaked between 2300 and 2400 h (ACTH, 3.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.3 pmol/L; cortisol, 314.5 +/- 49.6 vs. 123.3 +/- 13.2 nmol/L; DHEA, 52.0 +/- 8.8 vs. 21.0 +/- 2.3 nmol/L; P < 0.05 vs. baseline as well as vs. the same time points during placebo). Aldosterone secretion was not modified by CAN. The ACTH, cortisol, and DHEA responses to human CRH were enhanced by CAN (10.0 +/- 1.7 pmol/L, 462.2 +/- 36.9 nmol/L, and 66.3 +/- 8.8 nmol/L), although statistical significance (P < 0.05) was obtained for cortisol and DHEA only. Also the ACTH, cortisol and DHEA responses to AVP were amplified by CAN (8.0 +/- 2.6 pmol/L, 324.0 +/- 34.8 nmol/L, and 77.8 +/- 4.0 nmol/L); again, statistical significance (P < 0.05) was obtained for cortisol and DHEA only. In conclusion, our study shows that the blockade of MR by CAN significantly enhances the activity of the HPA axis in humans, indicating a physiological role for MR in its control. These results also suggest that the stimulatory effect of CAN on HPA axis is mediated by concomitant modulation of CRH and AVP release.
Adrenal Glands↗
Growth hormone-releasing hormone and growth hormone secretagogue-receptor ligands: focus on reproductive system.
Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin are the most important hypothalamic neurohormones controlling growth hormone (GH) secretion. Several neurotransmitters and neuropeptides also play an important role in the control of GH secretion, mainly acting via modulation of GHRH and somatostatin. In the past two decades, particular attention has been given to a new family of substances showing a strong GH-releasing effect: GH secretagogues (GHSs). GHSs increase GH secretion in a dose- and age-related manner after iv and even oral administration. The endocrine effects of GHSs, are not fully specific for GH; they show, in fact, prolactin- (PRL), adenocorticotropic hormone- and cortisol-releasing effects. Specific GHS receptors are present in both the central nervous system and peripheral tissues, where they mediate several extraendocrine effects of GHSs. The isolation of these "orphan" receptors suggested the existence of an endogenous GHS-like ligand that could be represented by a recently discovered gastric peptide, named ghrelin. The interaction between GHSs and GHRH at the central level and in the pituitary gland, but not at peripheral level, has clearly been shown. Because GHRH and GHS receptors share the same localization in some peripheral tissues, they may have some interactions even at this level.
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
Biologic activities of growth hormone secretagogues in humans.
Growth hormone secretagogues (GHSs) are synthetic peptidyl and nonpeptidyl molecules with strong, dose-dependent, and reproducible growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity even after oral administration. GHSs release GH via actions on specific receptors (GHS-R) at the pituitary and, mainly, at the hypothalamic levels. GHSs likely act as functional somatostatin antagonists and meantime enhance the activity of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-secreting neurons. The GH-releasing effect of GHSs is independent of gender but undergoes marked age-related variations. Estrogens play a major role in enhancing the GH response to GHSs at puberty, which GHRH hypoactivity, somatostatinergic hyperactivity and impaired activity of the putative GHS-like ligand and receptors probably explain the reduced GH-releasing effect of GHSs in aging. The activity of GHSs is not fully specific for GH. Their slight prolactin-releasing activity probably comes from direct pituitary action. In physiological conditions, the ACTH-releasing activity of GHSs is dependent on central actions; a direct action on GHS-R in pituitary ACTH-secreting tumors likely explains the peculiar ACTH and cortisol hyperresponsiveness to GHSs in Cushing disease. GHSs have specific receptor subtypes in other central and peripheral endocrine and nonendocrine tissues mediating GH-independent biologic activities. GHSs influence sleep pattern, stimulate food intake, and have cardiovascular activities. GHs have specific binding in normal and neoplastic follicular derived human thyroid tissue and inhibit the proliferation of follicular-derived neoplastic cell lines. The discovery of ghrelin, a 28 amino acid peptide synthesized in the stomach but also in other tissues, has opened new fascinating perspectives of research in this field.
Age Factors↗
Growth hormone-independent cardiotropic activities of growth hormone-releasing peptides in normal subjects, in patients with growth hormone deficiency, and in patients with idiopathic or ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Growth hormone releasing peptides (GHRPs) are synthetic molecules endowed with potent neuroendocrine activities mediated by specific receptors in the pituitary and in the central nervous system. GHRPs receptors have been reported even in perpheral tissues, particularly in the myocardium, where they probably mediate growth hormone (GH)-independent activities. We studied in humans the cardiac effects of hexarelin administration in 7 normal adults, in 7 severe GH-deficient patients, and in 12 patients with severe dilated cardiomyopathy. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), mean blood pressure (MBP), heart rate (HR), and GH levels were evaluated at baseline and every 15 min up to 60 min after acute 2.0 microg/kg iv hexarelin administration. Basal LVEF in dilated cardiomyopathy was impaired and lower (p < 0.001) than in GH deficiency, in turn lower (p< 0.001) than in normal subjects. Hexarelin signficantly (p < 0.05) increased LVEF in normal and in GH-deficient subjects, but not in dilated cardiomyopathy, without significant variations in MBP and HR. Hexeralin significantly (p < 0.05) increased GH levels in normal subjects and in dilated cardiomyopathy but not in GH deficiency. These findings suggest that, in humans, the acute administration of hexarelin exerts a GH-independent positive inotropic effect likely mediated by specific GHRPs myocardial receptors.
Adult↗
Growth hormone-releasing hormone combined with arginine or growth hormone secretagogues for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in adults.
Insulin-induced hypoglycemia (ITT) is currently the "gold-standard" test for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD). ITT is often contraindicated, however, particularly in conditions that are also common in patients with suspected GHD. Used alone, GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) has no diagnostic value owing to within-subject variability and the inability to distinguish GHD from normal subjects. When combined with arginine, however, GHRH becomes a potent and reproducible test, which is unaffected by gender and aging, showing excellent specificity. The GHRH+ arginine (ARG) test distinguishes GHD patients from normal subjects and is at least as sensitive as ITT, provided that appropriate cutoff limits are considered. Its reliability for retesting GHD has also been demonstrated. The GHRH+ARG test can also be performed in a shorter procedure, resulting in potential for cost reduction. Synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs) possess a strong and reproducible GH-releasing effect and synergize with GHRH. The combination of GHRH and a peptidyl GHS, such as hexarelin or GH-releasing peptide-6, has recently been shown as another reliable test for the diagnosis of adult GHD, again provided that the cutoff limit is appropriate to the potency of the test. Thus, GHRH combined with either arginine or GHS is a potential tool for the diagnosis of adult GHD.
Adult↗
Gender and gonadal influences on ghrelin mRNA levels in rat stomach.
OBJECTIVE: The recently isolated endogenous GH secretagogue, named ghrelin, is a gastric peptide of 28 amino acids with an n-octanoylation in the serine 3 that confers the biological activity to this factor. Ghrelin has been shown to directly stimulate GH release in vivo and in vitro and to be involved in the regulation of gastric acid secretion and motility. In the present work we have studied gender and gonadal dependency of ghrelin mRNA expression in rat stomach. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analysed ghrelin mRNA expression in rat stomach by Northern blot analysis. We also examined the effect of gonadal steroid deprivation on ghrelin mRNA expression. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained showed clearly that ghrelin gastric mRNA expression increased with age in young rats (up to 90 days old) but exhibited no significant sex difference at each age tested. Ghrelin mRNA levels were lowest at postnatal day 9, reaching a stable level of expression at day 40 in both female and male rats, although the increase in female rats appears much more gradual than that in males. Moreover, neither ovariectomy nor orchidectomy significantly modified ghrelin mRNA gastric levels in adult rats. In conclusion, these data indicate that ghrelin mRNA expression is associated with age and that a progressive increase is present from the perinatal period up to a stable level after puberty. Gonadal hormones did not alter ghrelin mRNA levels. Taken together, these data showed that ghrelin mRNA levels in young rats are age but not gender dependent, and are not influenced by gonadal steroids.
Aging↗
Enhancement of the peripheral sensitivity to growth hormone in adults with GH deficiency.
OBJECTIVE: Adults with severe GH deficiency (GHD) need recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement to restore body composition, structure functions and metabolic abnormalities. The optimal rhGH dose for replacement has been progressively reduced to avoid side effects. The aim of the present study was to define the minimal rhGH dose able to increase both IGF-I and IGF binding protein (BP)-3 levels in GHD and to verify the possible change in GH sensitivity. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: To this goal, we studied the effect of 4-day treatment with 3 rhGH doses (1.25, 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg/day) on IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in 25 panhypopituitary adults with severe GHD (12 males and 13 females, age: 44.5+/-3.0 years, body mass index (BMI): 27.0+/-0.9 kg/m(2)) and 21 normal young adult volunteers (NV, 12 males and 9 females, age: 30.5+/-2.0 years, BMI: 20.8+/-0.5 kg/m(2)). RESULTS: Basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD were lower (P<0.001) than in NV. In NV the 1.25 microg/kg dose of rhGH did not modify IGF-I levels. The dose of 2.5 microg/kg rhGH significantly increased IGF-I levels in men (P<0.001) but not in women, while the 5.0 microg/kg dose increased IGF-I levels in both sexes (P<0.001). IGFBP-3 levels were not modified by any of the administered rhGH doses. In GHD patients, all rhGH doses increased IGF-I levels 12 h after both the first (P<0.01) and the fourth rhGH dose (P<0.001). At the end of treatment percentage increases in IGF-I were higher (P<0.001) in GHD patients than in NV. In contrast with NV, in GHD patients the IGF-I response to short-term stimulation with rhGH was independent of gender. Moreover, GHD patients showed increases in IGFBP-3 after the fourth administration of both 2.5 and 5.0 microg/kg rhGH. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study demonstrate that the minimal rhGH dose able to increase IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GHD patients is lower than in normal subjects, at least after a very short treatment. This evidence suggests an enhanced peripheral GH sensitivity in GH deprivation.
Adult↗
The negative GH auto-feedback in childhood: effects of rhGH and/or GHRH on the somatotroph response to GHRH or hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in children.
Aim of the present study was to further clarify the negative GH auto-feedback mechanisms in childhood. To this goal we studied the effects of rhGH and/or GHRH administration on the GH response to GHRH or hexarelin (HEX), a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in normal short children. In 34 prepubertal children (12 girls and 22 boys, age 8.2- 14.2 yr) with normal short stature (normal height velocity and IGF-I levels) the following tests were performed: group A (no.=11): GHRH (GHRH 1 - 29, Geref, Serono; 1 microg/kg iv at 150 min) preceded by saline or GHRH at 0 min; group B (no.=6): GHRH preceded by saline or rhGH (0.005 IU/kg iv at 0 min); group C (no.=6): GHRH preceded by rhGH alone or combined with GHRH; group D (no.=6): HEX (2 microg/kg iv at 150 min) alone or preceded by rhGH. In group A, the GH response to GHRH was not modified by pre-treatment with GHRH (GH peak, mean+/-SEM: 16.7+/-2.9 vs 15.1+/-2.3 microg/l, respectively). In group B, the GH response to GHRH was clearly inhibited by rhGH (8.7+/-2.3 vs 38.8+/-4.5 microg/l, p<0.001); the GH rise after rhGH in group B overlapped with that after GHRH in group A. In group C, the GH response to GHRH after pre-treatment with rhGH (13.2+/-4.0 microg/l) was similar to that in group B and was not significantly modified by pre-treatment with rhGH+ GHRH (6.9+/-2.7 microg/l); the GH rise after rhGH+GHRH was higher (p<0.05) than that after rhGH alone. In group D, the GH response to HEX was significantly blunted by pre-treatment with rhGH (34.1+/-11.7 vs 51.2+/-17.9 microg/l, p<0.05). Our results demonstrate that in childhood the somatotroph response to GHRH is preserved after GHRH while it is inhibited after rhGH administration, which is also able to blunt the GH response to HEX. Thus, the somatostatin-mediated negative GH auto-feedback is already operative in childhood; the reason why the GHRH- induced GH rise is not inhibited by GHRH pre-treatment is unexplained.
Adolescent↗