PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Arvat

Publications and source records attributed to E Arvat.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Enhanced adrenocorticotrophic hormone and cortisol responses to corticotrophin-releasing hormone in central idiopathic diabetes insipidus.

It is well known that arginine vasopressin (AVP) exerts a stimulatory effect on adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) secretion. Moreover, there is consistent evidence that the hypothalamic AVP-secreting neurons are involved in the neuroregulation of ACTH secretion. With the aim to throw further light on the interaction between AVP and corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the neuroregulation of ACTH secretion, in this study we compared the ACTH and cortisol responses to human CRH (100 micrograms iv as a bolus) in 18 normal subjects (15 females and three males, age 22-35 years) and seven patients with central isolated diabetes insipidus (six females and one male, age 16-40 years). Two patients were newly diagnosed and five had discontinued substitution therapy with desamino-D-AVP 24 h before testing. All had free access to water before and during the test period. The ACTH and cortisol responses to CRH were higher in subjects with diabetes insipidus than in controls, either when evaluated as peak values (ACTH, mean +/- SEM: 17.0 +/- 1.2 vs 7.7 +/- 0.7 pmol/l, p = 0.0003; cortisol: 611.3 +/- 59.4 vs 450.7 +/- 21.2 nmol/l, p = 0.01) or area under curve values (ACTH: 672.5 +/- 75.7 vs 364.0 +/- 33.6 pmol.l-1 x h-1, p = 0.002; cortisol: 29158.0 +/- 2937.0 vs 23236.7 +/- 1052.1 nmol.l-1 x h-1, p = 0.03). These results show that patients with diabetes insipidus have an exaggerated pituitary-adrenal response to CRH. This may be due to the fact that in diabetes insipidus AVP secretion from parvocellular neurons of the paraventricular nucleus in the hypophysial portal system is not impaired.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Growth hormone-releasing activity of growth hormone-releasing peptide-6 is maintained after short-term oral pretreatment with the hexapeptide in normal aging.

The reduced activity of the growth hormone (GH)-insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis in aging may contribute to changes in body composition. As this GH insufficiency is due to hypothalamic pathogenesis, the availability of GH-releasing peptides (GHRPs), such as GHRP-6 (His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2) which is active even after oral administration, might be useful to restore it. The aim of our study was to verify the effectiveness of oral administration of GHRP-6 in normal elderly subjects and to investigate whether its GH-releasing activity is maintained or vanishes after short-term oral treatment. Seven normal elderly women (aged 65-82 years) were studied. The effect of oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 on GH secretion was investigated before and after 4 days of treatment with the hexapeptide given twice daily. The GH response to the maximal effective dose of GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) also was studied. Before treatment, oral administration of 300 micrograms/kg GHRP-6 elicited a clear GH rise (peak 10.7 +/- 3.3 micrograms/l; AUC 353.1 +/- 90.6 micrograms.l-1.h-1), which was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than that induced by intravenous GHRH (peak 5.1 +/- 1.5 micrograms/l; AUC 106.5 +/- 43.9 micrograms.l-1.h-1). After 4 days of treatment with GHRP-6, the GH response to the hexapeptide was maintained, with a trend towards an increase (peak 16.8 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l; AUC 499.8 +/- 107.2 micrograms.l-1.h-1). The IGF-I levels were not increased significantly after treatment (77.1 +/- 8.4 vs 84.1 +/- 12.2 micrograms/l).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Repetitive GHRH administration fails to increase the response to GHRH in obese subjects. Evidence for a somatotrope defect in obesity?

Spontaneous GH secretion as well as GH response to several stimuli including GHRH have been shown to be reduced in obesity. To clarify the pathogenesis underlying these alterations, in six obese patients (3 males and 3 females, age 20-44 yrs, BMI = 42.1 +/- 2.2) on unrestricted diet we studied the effect of 8 day GHRH pretreatment (1 micrograms/kg iv each day) on the acute somatotropic response to the neurohormone administered both alone and combined with arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg iv infused from 0 to 30 min) which likely inhibits the release of hypothalamic somatostatin. Before treatment the GH response to GHRH (AUC: 231.9 +/- 106.4 micrograms/l/h) was potentiated (p < 0.001) by ARG (932.6 +/- 166.2 micrograms/l/h). However, the GH responses to the neurohormone both alone and combined with ARG were lower (p < 0.02 and 0.002, respectively) than in normals (712.4 +/- 111.6 and 2608.3 +/- 453.2 micrograms/l/h, respectively). After repetitive GHRH administration, in obese subjects baseline GH and IGF-I levels were unchanged. Also the GH responses to GHRH both alone (217.3 +/- 68.1 micrograms/l/h) and combined with ARG (756.3 +/- 202.9 micrograms/l/h) were not modified. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the failure of GHRH pretreatment to improve the somatotrope hyporesponsiveness to GHRH both alone and combined with ARG suggesting the existence of a somatotropic defect in obesity.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Pyridostigmine potentiates growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-induced GH release in both men and women.

It has been recently reported that pyridostigmine (PD), an indirect cholinergic agonist, probably acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin, potentiates the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced GH rise in men, but not in women. The aim of this study was to verify the sex-related, if any, GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg, i.v., as a bolus) both alone and preceded by two different doses of PD (120 mg, group A, and 60 mg, group B, given orally 60 min before GHRH) in a large group of volunteers (36 women, aged 18-35 yr, and 48 men, aged 18-35 yrs). In group A, 120 mg oral PD potentiated the GH response to GHRH in both men [area under the curve (AUC), 2579.3 +/- 264.5 vs. 806.2 +/- 99.7 micrograms/L.h; P < 0.00001] and women (AUC, 2273.2 +/- 248.7 vs. 792.6 +/- 72.7 micrograms/L.h; P < 0.00001). Similarly, in the group B, 60 mg oral PD potentiated the GH response to GHRH in both men (AUC, 1929.6 +/- 157.2 vs. 568.2 +/- 81.3 micrograms/L.h; P < 0.01) and in women (AUC, 1655.9 +/- 146.9 vs. 738.2 +/- 105.7 micrograms/L.h; P < 0.01). The GH responses to GHRH, both alone and after 120 and 60 mg oral PD, did not significantly differ in men and women. No sex-related difference was observed in the cholinergic side-effects (mild abdominal pain and muscle fasciculations) that occurred in nearly 30% of the subjects. In conclusion, our results clearly show that there is no sex-related difference in the potentiating effect of PD on GHRH-induced GH release, ruling out the suggestion that women have increased cholinergic activity, leading to reduced somatostatinergic tone.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of the potentiating effect of pyridostigmine, arginine and propranolol on the GHRH-induced GH release in short children.

The effect of pyridostigmine (60 mg orally), arginine (0.5 g/kg iv) and propranolol (PROP, 40 mg orally) on GHRH (1 microgram/kg iv)-induced GH release was studied in seven short children. Pyridostigmine and arginine induced a similar potentiating effect on GHRH-induced GH rise (Peak, mean +/- SEM: 56.9 +/- 12.8 and 48.6 +/- 8.5 micrograms/L, respectively vs 12.3 +/- 1.6 micrograms/L; p < 0.05). Combination of GHRH with propranolol induced an increase of GH that was significant only with regard to peak (28.9 +/- 8.4 micrograms/L) but not to AUC. However, GH rises observed after GHRH combined with PD or ARG did not significantly differ from that recorded after coadministration of GHRH and PROP both for peak and AUC. Our results confirm that pyridostigmine and arginine have a striking potentiating effect on the GHRH-induced GH rise in children and show that the tests with GHRH + PD and GH + H + ARG are ore reliable than that with GHRH + PROP to explore the secretory capacity of somatotroph cells.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

A neuroendocrinological approach to evidence an impairment of central cholinergic function in aging.

A hypothalamic pathogenesis for the reduced GH secretion in aging has been reported for both animal and man. To further address this issue we studied in 31 elderly normal subjects (6 males and 25 females, aged 66-90 yr) and in 22 young healthy controls (13 males and 9 females, aged 20-35 yr) the GH responses to GHRH test (GHRH29, 1 microgram/kg i.v. as a bolus at 0 min) alone and combined with pyridostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor (PD, 120 mg po 60 min before GHRH), or with arginine (ARG, 30 g in 100 ml infused from 0 to 30 min). Serum IGF-I levels were lower in elderly than in young subjects (mean +/- SE: 86.9 +/- 7.2 vs 288.7 +/- 22.1 micrograms/L, p < 0.01). The GHRH-induced GH increase was lower in elderly than in young subjects (p < 0.01). PD increased the GH response to GHRH in both groups (p < 0.001), but in elderly subjects this response persisted lower (p < 0.0001) than that observed in young adults. Also ARG coadministration potentiated the GHRH-induced GH release in both groups (p < 0.0001) but in this case the elderly's responses overlapped with the young's. The GH increase observed after combined administration of ARG and GHRH was higher (p < 0.0001) than that elicited by PD plus GHRH in elderly but not in young subjects. Analyzing individual GH responses, a GH peak below the limit of normality for young adults was observed in 19 (61.3%) elderly subjects after PD plus GHRH administration while ARG plus GHRH test elicited a normal GH peak in all but one.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Arginine abolishes the inhibitory effect of glucose on the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in man.

Acute hyperglycemia inhibits the growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), likely acting by stimulation of endogenous somatostatin release. The aim of our study was to verify whether arginine ([Arg] 30 g intravenously [IV] in 30 minutes), a well-known GH secretagogue likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, counteracts the inhibitory effect of oral glucose (OG) administration (100 mg orally) on the GH response to GHRH (1 micrograms/kg IV bolus) in seven normal subjects (aged 20 to 30 years). The GH response to GHRH (peak, 11.6 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L) was inhibited by previous OG load (peak, 7.4 +/- 0.8 micrograms/L; P less than .02 v GHRH alone) and potentiated by Arg coadministration (peak, 36.2 +/- 8.8 micrograms/L; P less than .03 v GHRH alone). The potentiating effect of Arg on the GHRH-induced GH increase was unaffected by previous OG load (peak, 30.4 +/- 6.9 micrograms/L). In conclusion, our results show that Arg abolishes the inhibitory effect of OG administration on the GHRH-induced GH response in man. These data, although indirect, suggest that both acute hyperglycemia and Arg act at the hypothalamic level, stimulating and inhibiting, respectively, the release of somatostatin.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1992

Interactions of galanin and arginine on growth hormone, prolactin, and insulin secretion in man.

Galanin (GAL), a 29 amino acid neuropeptide, is known to increase both basal and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)-induced growth hormone (GH) secretion while not significantly increasing prolactin (PRL) secretion in man. GAL is also endowed with an inhibiting effect on glucose-stimulated insulin release in animals, but not in man. We studied the effect of GAL (80 pmol/kg/min infused over 60 minutes) on the arginine- (ARG, 30 g infused over 30 minutes) stimulated GH, PRL, insulin, and C-peptide secretion in eight healthy volunteers (age, 20 to 30 years). GAL induced an increase of GH (GAL v saline, area under curve [AUC], mean +/- SEM: 316.5 +/- 73.9 v 93.2 +/- 20.9 micrograms/L/h, P less than .05), but failed to modify both PRL and insulin secretion. GAL enhanced the ARG-induced stimulation of both GH (1,634.1 +/- 293.1 v 566.9 +/- 144.0 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02) and PRL secretion (1,541.9 +/- 248.8 v 1,023.8 +/- 158.7 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02). On the contrary, GAL blunted the ARG-stimulated insulin (816.3 +/- 87.7 v 1,322.7 +/- 240.9 mU/L/h, P less than .05), as well as C-peptide secretion (105.1 +/- 9.8 v 132.8 +/- 17.3 micrograms/L/h, P less than .02). ARG administration induced a transient increase of glucose levels (P less than .01 v baseline) followed by a significant decrease (P less than .05 v baseline). This latter effect was prevented by the coadministration of GAL. In conclusion, these results show that in man GAL potentiates the GH response to ARG, suggesting that these drugs act at the hypothalamic level, at least in part, via different mechanisms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Arginine potentiates but does not restore the blunted growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in obesity.

A blunted growth hormone (GH) response to several stimuli, including growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), has been shown in obesity. Arginine (ARG) has been demonstrated to potentiate the GHRH-induced GH increase in normal subjects, likely acting via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release. To shed further light onto the mechanisms underlying the blunted GH secretion in obesity, we studied the effect of ARG (0.5 g/kg infused intravenously [IV] over 30 minutes) on both basal and GHRH (1 micron/kg IV)-stimulated GH secretion. Eight obese subjects (aged 26.4 +/- 3.9 years; body mass index, 39.0 +/- 1.9 kg/m2) and eight normal control volunteers (aged 27.0 +/- 1.7 years; body mass index, 22.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2) were studied. In obese subjects, the GH response to both GHRH and ARG was lower (P less than .01 and P less than .002, respectively) than in controls. ARG potentiated the GH response to GHRH in obese patients (P less than .0003). However, in these patients, the GH secretion elicited by GHRH, even when coadministered with ARG, persisted at reduced levels (P less than .005) when compared with controls. Basal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels did not significantly differ in obese subjects and in normal subjects (161.1 +/- 37.0 v 181.0 +/- 12.8 micrograms/L). In conclusion, ARG enhances the blunted GHRH-induced GH increase in obese patients, but the GH responses to ARG alone and to ARG + GHRH persist at lower levels than in normals. Thus, our results suggest the existence of a reduced pituitary GH pool in obesity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Inhibition by salbutamol of GHRH-induced GH release in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (IDDM) show augmented GH secretion, which is implicated in the pathogenesis of microvascular complications. On the other hand, it is well known that beta-adrenergic receptors have inhibitory influence on GH secretion, likely via stimulation of hypothalamic somatostatin. Since the possibility of pharmacological suppression of GH secretion would be of value in IDDM, we investigated the effect of salbutamol (SAL, 4 mg orally at -60 min) on the GH response to GHRH (1 micrograms/kg iv at 0 min) in 6 well-controlled (mean HbA1c +/- SEM: 7.3 +/- 0.5%) patients with IDDM. Salbutamol was able to inhibit basal GH levels (p < 0.05) as well as to abolish the GHRH-induced GH rise. After SAL administration, a significant (p < 0.05) reduction of glucagon levels was also found. Our data show that the enhancement of beta 2 adrenergic activity by oral therapeutical doses of SAL inhibits basal and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in patients with IDDM.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Galanin reinstates the growth hormone response to repeated growth hormone-releasing hormone administration in man.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the mechanism by which galanin, a 29-amino-acid peptide, increases GH secretion in man. DESIGN: We studied the GH-releasing effect of this neurohormone (galanin, 15 micrograms/kg) infused over 60 minutes after 120 minutes of saline, following a previous GHRH bolus (GHRH 1 microgram/kg i.v. at 0 minutes, galanin infused from 120 to 180 minutes) and coadministered with the second of two consecutive GHRH boluses (GHRH every 120 minutes, galanin infused from 120 to 180 minutes). PATIENTS: Fourteen healthy male subjects, aged 20-34 years, in two groups (group A, 20-31 years (n = 8); group B, 25-34 years (n = 6)) were studied. MEASUREMENT: Blood samples were drawn every 15 minutes of 255 minutes. Serum GH was measured in duplicate by IRMA. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out by non-parametric ANOVA test. RESULTS: The GH response to galanin infused 120 minutes after saline overlapped with that induced by the neuropeptide infused following previous GHRH bolus (AUC, mean +/- SEM: 317.3 +/- 73.2 vs 326.8 +/- 54.2 micrograms/l/h). The GH-releasing effect of the second GHRH bolus (126.9 +/- 32.3 micrograms/l/h) was lower than that of the first one (503.4 +/- 41.3 micrograms/l/h; P = 0.0002). Galanin markedly enhanced the GH responses to the second GHRH bolus (1118.0 +/- 212.7 micrograms/l/h; P = 0.0002 vs second GHRH bolus alone) so that it did not significantly differ from the first one (710.9 +/- 107.8 micrograms/l/h). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the GH-releasing effect of galanin is not modified by GHRH pretreatment and that the neuropeptide reinstates the GH response to the repeated GHRH stimulation in man. They suggest that these effects are due to the inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Arginine reinstates the somatotrope responsiveness to intermittent growth hormone-releasing hormone administration in normal adults.

It is well known that in normal adults the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) is inhibited by previous administration of the neurohormone. In 7 healthy volunteers (age 20-34 years) we studied the GH responses to two consecutive GHRH boluses (1 microgram/kg i.v. every 120 min) alone or coadministered with arginine (30 g i.v. over 30 min). The GH response to the first GHRH bolus (area under the curve, mean +/- SEM: 506.3 +/- 35.1 micrograms/l/h) was higher (p = 0.0001) than that to the second one (87.1 +/- 14.6 micrograms/l/h). The latter response was clearly increased (p = 0.0001) by coadministering arginine (980.5 +/- 257.5 micrograms/l/h). When every GHRH bolus was combined with arginine a marked potentiation of GH response to both boluses was found. However, the second combined administration of arginine and GHRH induced a GH increase which was lower compared to the first one (p = 0.016). In conclusion, our results show that arginine potentiates the GHRH-induced GH secretion preventing the lessening of somatotrope responsiveness to the neurohormone alone. As there is evidence that this phenomenon is due to an enhanced somatostatin release, these findings give further evidence of a somatostatin-suppressing effect of arginine.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A new test for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency due to primary pituitary impairment: combined administration of pyridostigmine and growth hormone-releasing hormone.

The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is currently based on failure to increase plasma GH levels to an arbitrary cutoff point of 7 or 10 micrograms/l in response to two provocative stimuli. False negative responses to these tests, however, frequently occur thus reducing their diagnostic reliability. The aim of this study was to assess a combination of pyridostigmine (PD) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (60 mg oral PD 60 min before 1 microgram/Kg GHRH iv) as a reliable test probing pituitary somatotropic function. In fact PD, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, strikingly potentiates GH response to GHRH likely by inhibiting somatostatin release. The combination PD + GHRH was tested in normal children and adolescents (NS, n = 27) and in a large group of short children classified as having familial short stature (FSS, n = 24), constitutional growth delay (CGD, n = 34) and GH deficiency (organic, oGHD, n = 6; idiopathic, iGHD, n = 10). In all groups results obtained by PD + GHRH were compared with those obtained by testing with GHRH, clonidine (CLON) and PD alone and by studying spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion over 8 hours. Assuming 7 micrograms/l as minimum normal GH peak, a positive response occurred in only 18/24, 11/12 and 12/13 NS for GHRH, CLON, and PD, respectively. In contrast even assuming a minimum normal GH peak as high as 20 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH induced a positive response in 27/27 NS all having a nocturnal GH mean concentration (MC) greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. Therefore PD + GHRH test gave no false negative responses and this was true not only in NS but even in all FSS and CGD having a GH MC greater than or equal to 3 micrograms/l. On the other hand, PD + GHRH induced a negative GH response in all oGHD and in 8/10 iGHD patients. In the remaining two iGHD patients, PD + GHRH demonstrated a normal pituitary GH reserve in spite of a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l and low IGF-I level, thus pointing to a hypothalamic pathogenesis for the GHD. Considering FSS and CGD children having a GH MC less than 3 micrograms/l, PD + GHRH showed a primary pituitary GH deficiency in 3/12 CGD with low plasma IGF-I levels. In conclusion, in slowly growing children PD + GHRH test is the most reliable provocative test for the diagnosis of primary pituitary GH deficiency being capable to discriminate between an unequivocally normal and impaired somatotropic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1990

Pyridostigmine potentiates L-dopa- but not arginine- and galanin-induced growth hormone secretion in children.

The coadministration of growth hormone (GH) secretagogues can provide insight into the neuroregulation of GH secretion. The GH response to L-dopa (125, 250 and 500 mg orally for body weights less than 15 kg, between 15 and 30 kg and greater than 30 kg, respectively), arginine (Arg; 0.5 g/kg infused intravenously over 30 min) and galanin (GAL; 15 micrograms/kg infused intravenously over 60 min) when administered alone or combined with pyridostigmine (PD; 60 mg orally), a cholinergic agonist that likely acts via inhibition of endogenous somatostatin secretion, was studied in children with familial short stature. The GH-releasing effect of PD was also evaluated. In 8 children, PD and L-dopa when administered alone induced an equivalent GH rise (area under the response curve, mean +/- SEM: 241.4 +/- 31.1 vs. 202.9 +/- 38.6 micrograms/l/h) while their coadministration had an additive effect (435.4 +/- 41.4 micrograms/l/h; p less than 0.02 vs. PD and L-dopa alone). On the contrary, in other 8 children, PD and Arg induced similar GH increases either when administered alone (394.2 +/- 68.5 vs. 405.8 +/- 103.9 micrograms/l/h) or in combination (535.8 +/- 97.3 micrograms/l/h). GH increases almost superimposable were also observed when PD and GAL were administered alone (405.2 +/- 72.3 vs. 412.6 +/- 94.1 micrograms/l/h) or in combination (537.9 +/- 139.0 micrograms/l/h) in other 7 children. These data show that the enhancement of the cholinergic activity by PD increases the L-dopa-induced GH release but fails to modify both Arg- and GAL-induced GH release in short children.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Evidence for involvement of endogenous somatostatin in the galanin-induced growth hormone secretion in children.

We have evaluated the effects of the combined administration of Galanin (Gal) plus growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and of pyridostigmine (PD), a cholinergic agonist, plus Gal on GH secretion in 15 children (12 males and three females, age 7.7-14.5 y) with short stature. Children were subdivided into two groups. In group 1 (n = 7) Gal (15 micrograms/kg h i.v.) plus GHRH (1 microgram/kg i.v.) administration induced a higher GH rise (peak = 73.1 +/- 10.2 ng/mL, mean +/- SD; area under the curve (AUC) = 531.9 +/- 78.7 ng.min.mL-1) than did GHRH alone (peak = 38.9 +/- 26.5 ng/mL, p less than 0.05; AUC = 256.9 +/- 165.6 ng/mL/min-1, p less than 0.005). Gal had a synergistic effect on the GHRH-induced GH response because the GHRH plus Gal AUC response was significantly higher (p less than 0.01) than the sum of the areas of response to GHRH and Gal alone. In group 2 (n = 8) PD administration (60 mg/kg p.o.) had no significant effects on the Gal-induced GH secretion (peak = 14.9 +/- 8.8 and 16.0 +/- 9.8 ng/mL after Gal and PD + Gal, respectively; AUC = 91.2 +/- 52.1 and 125.2 +/- 83.6 ng.mL.min-1 after Gal and PD + Gal, respectively). Our results confirm the ability of Gal to stimulate GH secretion in children, and strengthen the view that its mechanism of action involves modulation of endogenous somatostatin release.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Acute clonidine administration potentiates spontaneous diurnal, but not nocturnal, growth hormone secretion in normal short children.

It has been shown that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor activation induced by clonidine (CLON) increases plasma GH levels in both adults and children. In this study the effects of CLON (150 micrograms/m2, orally) on GH secretion were studied both in the morning (from 0800-1100 h) and at night (from 2300-0200 h) in nine short children previously shown to have normal spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion. In the morning, CLON induced a GH increase higher than placebo [peak (mean +/- SEM), 23.8 +/- 4.3 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.4 micrograms/L; P = 0.0001; area under curve (AUC), 624.4 +/- 62.7 vs. 135.6 +/- 33.3 micrograms/L.h; P less than 0.00001]. In the night, no difference was observed between GH secretion after CLON (peak, 15.4 +/- 3.2 micrograms/L; AUC, 562.2 +/- 57.5 micrograms/L.h) and placebo (peak, 13.1 +/- 4.7 micrograms/L; AUC, 497.2 +/- 83.5 micrograms/L.h). Spontaneous GH secretion was higher during the night than in the morning (P = 0.0001), whereas nocturnal GH secretion overlapped with that in the morning after CLON. The data presented show that alpha 2-adrenoreceptor activation is probably mediated by increased endogenous GHRH release; our results suggest that the endogenous GHRH secretion is maximally stimulated at night.

Adolescent↗