PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E B Goldman

Publications and source records attributed to E B Goldman.

14 recordsLinked to original sources

Adverse events in primary care identified from a risk-management database.

BACKGROUND: The inevitability of adverse events in medicine arises from human fallibility, negligent care, limits of medical knowledge, risks inherent in medical practice, and biological variability among individuals. A better understanding of the nature and causes of adverse events is necessary to reduce their occurrence and limit their harm. This study describes adverse events identified from a risk-management database that occurred in an out-patient primary care setting. METHODS: Incident reports filed with the risk-management office of an academic medical center between January 1, 1991, and June 30, 1996, by eight primary health care clinics affiliated with the center were eligible for the study. Two independent reviewers assessed the incidents to determine whether there were adverse medical events. Incidents classified as adverse events were analyzed to determine the cause, potential preventability, and outcome. RESULTS: The prevalence of adverse events was 3.7 per 100,000 clinic visits over a period of 5 1/2 years. Twenty-nine of 35 (83%) adverse events were due to medical errors and were considered preventable. The causes of the adverse events included 9 diagnostic errors (26%), 11 treatment errors (31%), and 9 other errors (26%). Of the adverse events attributed to medical errors, 4 (14%) resulted in a permanent, disabling injury and 1 (3%) resulted in a death. CONCLUSIONS: Serious adverse events appear to occur infrequently in primary care outpatient practice, although these data probably underestimate the overall prevalence. To reduce or prevent the occurrence of adverse events in primary care, better systems for recognizing and tracking them and for assessing their causes are needed.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Legal considerations for allogeneic blood transfusion.

Our legal system seeks to resolve conflicts while also taking societal concerns into account. In striving for conflict resolution, the court performs a balancing act that weighs legitimate but differing individual and societal needs. Accordingly, in the preoperative setting, surgery patients are afforded the opportunity to accept or reject transfusions or alternatives to transfusion. The current legal standard is that alternatives to allogeneic transfusions should be offered to and carefully considered for patients. This article reviews blood shield laws, malpractice, and informed consent considerations in allogeneic blood transfusion. It also examines issues involved in refusal of transfusions. The discussion assumes that a physician-patient relationship exists and that the patient requires a surgical procedure in which blood loss is a reasonable probability. Guidelines are offered for preoperative physician-patient discussion of transfusion issues in light of the present status of transfusion law.

Adult↗

Medico-legal consultation: an expanded role of the tertiary neonatologist.

Between January 1982 and December 1984, the neonatologists at the University of Michigan Medical Center were asked to render 115 consultations regarding potential medical litigation. Requests for consultation were made by attorneys representing plaintiffs in 36 per cent of cases and defendants in 64 per cent (hospitals, 32 per cent, physicians, 30 per cent, private industry, 2 per cent). A review of these cases indicates frequently recurring themes, especially fetal distress, postdate pregnancies, and birth trauma among obstetrical cases, and neurologic injury, birth asphyxia, meconium aspiration, and hypoglycemia among neonatal cases. In many instances, incomplete documentation in the medical record and poor physician-patient communications were the issues leading to litigation. In 49 per cent of plaintiff cases reviewed, outcomes were felt not be related to the medical care rendered. Sixty-one per cent of defendant cases were felt to be strongly defensible; in 30 per cent of cases significant doubt as to defensibility existed. The physician practicing perinatal or neonatal medicine must be aware of the areas of vulnerability to malpractice litigation and the need for adequate documentation and patient communication. The daily activities of the tertiary neonatologist support his credentials as an expert medical witness in his specialty.

Academic Medical Centers↗