Biomedical subjects

E Bajetta

Publications and source records attributed to E Bajetta.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Chemoradiotherapy as preoperative treatment in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer patients: results of a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The combination of radiotherapy and fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma has led to a significant increase in survival in comparison with radiotherapy alone. Doxifluridine (5-DFUR) is an orally active fluoropyrimidine, and its cytotoxic metabolite (5-FU) may concentrate in areas of high tumor vascularization. This trial was carried out with the aims of improving locoregional control and making lesions resectable in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. METHODS: 5-DFUR was given at a dose of 500 mg/m2 b.i.d. by way of mouth for 4 days every other week for a total of four courses, with leucovorin 25 mg b.i.d. orally being given 2 hours before each 5-DFUR administration. External beam RT was administered at a dose of 1000 cGy per week for 3 weeks, followed by a 2-week break and then by 1000 cGy per week for a further 2 weeks (a total dose of 5000 cGy). The patients were restaged 4 weeks after the end of treatment and explored for resection in cases of partial response (PR). RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were treated between 1992 and 1997. Ab initio unresectability was shown by laparotomy (16 cases) or computed tomography (16 cases), and was due to vascular invasion in 27 patients, massive regional nodal metastases in nine, and both in four. The median age was 63 years (range 36-71); performance status (PS) (ECOG): 0-1 = 28 and PS 2 = 4. All the patients had measurable disease and were evaluable for response. There were seven PR (22%), 10 SD (31%), and 15 PD (47%). All of the responders underwent surgical exploration, and radical resection was possible in 5. Three of these patients are still disease-free with a follow-up of 18, 27, and 65 months; the other two cases relapsed 11 and 14 months after surgery. The median survival time was 9 months for the entire group, and 1-year survival rate was 31%. The treatment was never stopped because of toxicity. There were no CTC-NCI grade 3 or 4 toxic events; grade 1-2 diarrhea was observed in 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: This preoperative regimen was feasible and led to a successful surgical resection in 16% of otherwise inoperable cases. The median survival was comparable with the results obtained after 5-FU infusion plus radiotherapy. The resectability rate, and the benefit in terms of survival in the resected patients, make these results worthy of confirmation by larger studies.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Double-blind, randomised, multicentre endocrine trial comparing two letrozole doses, in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Letrozole is an orally competitive aromatase inhibitor. This double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial was carried out to evaluate the endocrine effects of two doses of letrozole, 0.5 mg versus 2.5 mg orally daily, in postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients progressing after tamoxifen. The pharmacokinetics of letrozole was also assessed. 46 patients entered the trial, 22 on letrozole 0.5 mg and 24 on 2.5 mg. A significant suppression of oestrone and oestradiol levels was achieved by both letrozole doses. Neither letrozole dose induced any changes in cortisol and aldosterone production at rest or after Synacthen stimulation. Androstenedione, testosterone, 17 alpha-OH progesterone, triiodothyronine (T3) thyroxine, (T4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) plasma levels did not show any significant changes. Sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinising hormone (LH) levels increased significantly over time. Plasma letrozole concentrations increased until reaching steady-state values after 1 month at the dose of 0.5 mg and after 2 months at 2.5 mg. In conclusion, both letrozole doses suppressed oestrogen levels without affecting adrenal activity.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Multi-institutional phase II randomized trial of integrated therapy with cisplatin, dacarbazine, vindesine, subcutaneous interleukin-2, interferon alpha2a and tamoxifen in metastatic melanoma. BREMIM (Biological Response Modifiers in Melanoma).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of a monochemotherapy regimen of dacarbazine (DTIC), tamoxifen , interferon-alpha2a and interleukin-2 (IL-2) and two polychemotherapy regimens of cisplatin, DTIC, vindesine, tamoxifen, interferon-alpha2a with or without IL-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma. Consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled in this trial and were randomized to arm A, consisting of DTIC 800 mg/m2 every 21 days, IL-2 9 MIU subcutaneously days 1-5 and 8-12, arm B, consisting of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 days 1-3, DTIC 250 mg/m2 days 1-3 and vindesine 2.5 mg/m2 day 1 every 28 days (CVD), or arm C, consisting of CVD plus IL-2 6 MIU days 1-5 and 8-12 every 28 days. In all three arms Interferon 3 MU subcutaneously three times a week and tamoxifen 20 mg orally were given throughout. Ninety-two patients were included in this study. Patient characteristics in the three groups were well balanced. The three regimens were delivered on an outpatient basis without major toxicity. The toxicities that did occur consisted primarily of flu-like symptoms in the IL-2 arms (A and C) and haematological toxicities in the CVD arms (B and C). No grade IV toxicities were encountered and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The total response rate was 13% in arm A, 35% in arm B and 37% in arm C. The median duration of response was 6 months and the median survival was 11 months. According to this phase II randomized trial polychemoimmunotherapy with CVD has an objective response rate of 35-36%, while monochemoimmunotherapy with DTIC has a response rate of 13%.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed1999

Aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer.

Anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole are new aromatase inhibitors with a nonsteroidal structure (NSS), and have been demonstrated to be highly effective and better tolerated than standard endocrine therapy with megestrol (megestrol acetate) and aminoglutethimide (AG). These agents are very potent and selective: all of them are capable of suppressing estrone (E1) and estradiol (E2) to the limit of sensitivity methods, and plasma estrone sulfate (E1S) levels are also suppressed. However, the fact that this potency has not led to any greater clinical efficacy, and that there is no relationship between estrogen suppression and clinical response, suggests that aromatase inhibitors may have additional mechanisms of action. A number of international, multicentre clinical trials have compared anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole with megestrol 160 mg/day or AG 500 mg/day plus hydrocortisone in patients with advanced breast cancer. Letrozole proved to be significantly more effective than megestrol but anastrozole had a greater effect on survival than either agent. However, letrozole therapy led to longer survival than that observed in patients treated with AG. The activity of vorozole was similar to that of megestrol and AG. These results have raised a number of questions. The first is how should the clinical results be evaluated, given that 'disease stabilisation lasting > or =6 months' has been considered a response? The second is how should these drugs be used, and whether there is a rationale for using them in combination or sequentially in the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer? Finally, is the possible effect of formestane and vorozole on intratumoral aromatase an alternative or concomitant mechanism of action? Anastrozole, letrozole and vorozole will be compared with tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer in adjuvant and primary settings. However, we feel that concomitant biological and clinical studies should also be carried out in order to clarify the properties of these drugs and avoid possible risks for patients over time.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed1998

Randomised trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continuous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In phase II trials, irinotecan is active in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but the survival and clinical benefit of irinotecan compared with second-line fluorouracil by continuous infusion is not known. METHODS: 267 patients who had failed to respond to first-line fluorouracil, or whose disease had progressed after treatment with first-line fluorouracil were randomly allocated irinotecan 300-350 mg/m2 infused once every 3 weeks or fluorouracil by continuous infusion. Treatment was given until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or the patient refused to continue treatment. The primary endpoint was survival, while progression-free survival, response rate, symptom-free survival, adverse events, and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. FINDINGS: 133 patients were randomly allocated irinotecan and 134 were allocated fluorouracil by continuous infusion. Patients treated with irinotecan lived for significantly longer than patients on fluorouracil (p=0.035). Survival at 1 year was increased from 32% in the fluorouracil group to 45% in the irinotecan group. Median survival was 10.8 months in the irinotecan group and 8.5 months in the fluorouracil group. Median progression-free survival was longer with irinotecan (4.2 vs 2.9 months for irinotecan vs fluorouracil, respectively; p=0.030). The median pain-free survival was 10.3 months and 8.5 months (p=0.06) for irinotecan and fluorouracil, respectively. Both treatments were equally well tolerated. QoL was similar in both groups. INTERPRETATION: Compared with fluorouracil by continuous infusion second-line irinotecan significantly improved survival in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1998

Oral doxifluridine plus levoleucovorin in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: There currently is no agreement regarding the appropriate treatment of elderly patients with advanced breast carcinoma (ABC). Doxifluridine (5-dFUR), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, has been found to be effective in this entity, but its use is limited by neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity that are not observed when the oral formulation is used. The objective of this Phase II trial was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of oral 5-dFUR, biomodulated with levoleucovorin (1-leucovorin), in elderly patients (age > 70 years) with ABC. METHODS: 5-dFUR was administered orally at 600 mg/m2 twice daily for 4 consecutive days every 12 days, and oral 1-leucovorin was administered as 25 mg 2 hours before each 5-dFUR administration. Response was assessed every five cycles according to the World Health Organization criteria. In the presence of response or stable disease, the patients were treated for a maximum of 15 cycles. RESULTS: Seventy-three eligible patients were enrolled, 27 of whom had been pretreated with chemotherapy and/or hormonotherapy; all were assessable for response and toxicity after a median follow-up of 15 months. The objective response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval, 17.4-45.4). Regression predominantly occurred in the presence of soft tissue involvement (skin, lymph nodes, and breast). The median time to response was 2 months (range, 1-2 months) and the median response duration was 7 months (range, 2-17+ months). The median survival was 24 months (range, 2-42+ months). The treatment was very well tolerated, and the side effects were manageable and always reversible. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study show that 5-dFUR plus 1-leucovorin, both given orally, are associated with excellent patient compliance. Although the results are suboptimal in terms of an objective response, this characteristic could allow 5-dFUR to be used in elderly patients considered unsuitable for "aggressive" chemotherapy.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1998

5-Fluorouracil, dacarbazine, and epirubicin in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: For patients with surgically untreatable neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the optimal therapeutic approach remains undefined. Somatostatin analogs and interferons have failed to control neoplastic growth, and chemotherapy has been only moderately more effective. The authors' previous study of the combination of 5-fluorouracil (FU), dacarbazine (DTIC), and epirubicin (EPI) (the FDE regimen) documented good tolerability, but the results for tumor growth control were disappointing. In an attempt to improve these results, the authors conducted a preliminary trial of an intensified FDE regimen (FU 500 mg/m2 administered intravenously [i.v.], DTIC 200 mg/m2 i.v., and EPI 30 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1, 2, and 3 every 3 weeks). METHODS: Thirty NET patients (15 male, 15 female; median age, 55 years; age range, 19-72 years) were enrolled, none of whom had previously been given chemotherapy. The histologic types of disease were gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) tumors (n = 21, 6 carcinoid tumors and 15 pancreatic NETs), other carcinoid tumors (n = 3), other NETs (n = 4), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) (n = 1), and Merkel cell carcinoma (n = 1). Six patients had a syndrome related to endocrine hypersecretion. One hundred fifty-four therapy cycles were delivered (median, six per patient), and all patients could be evaluated for response on the basis of intent-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: There were 9 objective responses: 2 complete responses (in 1 patient with Merkel cell carcinoma and 1 with pancreatic NET) and 7 partial responses (in 3 patients with pancreatic NETs, 2 with other NETs, 1 with GEP carcinoid tumor, and 1 with MTC). The median duration of response was 10 months (range, 5+ to 24+ months). No reduction in symptoms was achieved among the six patients with endocrine hypersecretion syndrome. Levels of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and serum chromogranin A were decreased in 50% and 14% of patients, respectively, who presented with abnormal baseline values. Treatment toxicity was acceptable and included nausea and vomiting, alopecia, leukopenia, and mucositis. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated that the FDE regimen may be at least as effective as other systemic regimens. Comparison of this experience with the authors' previous trial revealed a noteworthy increase in the activity of the intensified regimen, especially in GEP NETs (the most chemoresistant tumors). Continued clinical research to improve these results is highly justified.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

FEP regimen (epidoxorubicin, etoposide and cisplatin) in advanced gastric cancer, with or without low-dose GM-CSF: an Italian Trial in Medical Oncology (ITMO) study.

The new regimens developed over the last few years have led to an improvement in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, and our previous experience confirmed the fact that the combination of etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (EAP regimen) is an active treatment that leads to interesting complete remission rates. The primary end point of the present multicentre, randomized, parallel-group phase II study was to determine the activity of the simplified 2-day EAP schedule in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, and to verify whether the addition of low doses of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) made it possible to increase dose intensity. Of the 62 enrolled patients, 30 were randomized to receive epirubicin 35 mg m(-2), etoposide 120 mg m(-2) and cisplatin 45 mg m(-2) (FEP) on days 1 and 2 every 28 days and 32 to receive the same schedule plus subcutaneous GM-CSF (molgramostin) 150 microg day(-1) on days 5-14 every 21 days. The patients were stratified by age and the number of disease sites. The characteristics of the patients were well balanced between the two groups. The objective response rate of the patients as a whole was 34% (21 out of 62; 95% confidence interval 22-46), with only one complete remission. The median response duration was 4.5 months (range 1-24 months). The median time to treatment failure was 5 months (range 1-14 months), without any difference between the two groups. The median survival of the patients as a whole was 9 months. Full doses were administered in 92% and 94% of the cycles in the control and GM-CSF arms respectively. The average dose intensity calculated for all drugs was 0.96% in the control and 1.27% in the GM-CSF group. CTC-NCI grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 39% vs 45% of patients, thrombocytopenia in 11% vs 35% (P = 0.020) and anaemia in 7% vs 35% (P = 0.014). The FEP combination is as active (OR: 34%) in the treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer as the EAP regimen, although it leads to fewer complete remissions. The patients randomized to receive low-dose GM-CSF achieved a significantly higher dose intensity than controls (P = 0.0001).

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Effects of short-term pre-operative tamoxifen on steroid receptor and Ki-67 expression in primary breast cancer: an immunocytochemical study.

The effects of the short-term pre-operative administration of tamoxifen (TAM, 20 mg once daily) on the tumor levels of steroid receptors and the nuclear proliferation Ki-67 antigen, were investigated in 32 elderly patients with hormone-sensitive, operable primary breast cancer by means of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). The FNAB smears before (pre-TAM) and after six weeks of treatment (post-TAM) were stained immunocytochemically in order to obtain an H-score for steroid receptors, and the percentage of cellular nuclei containing Ki-67. The mean oestrogen receptor (ER) score between the pre- and post-TAM specimens fell from 181.2 9.7 ( SEM) to 148.1 7.9 (Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-rank test, p=0. 01) and there was also a significant decrease in both the mean progesterone receptor (PgR) score (178.4 10.6 vs 148.5 10.6; p=0.01) and mean Ki-67 index (8.2% 1.2 vs 4.9% 0.9; p=0.0002). The reliability of FNAB as a sampling method was checked by comparing the results of the immunocytochemical assay (ICA) of the post-TAM biopsies with those of the immunohistochemical assay (IHA) of the corresponding excised tumors. There was a positive correlation between the ICA and IHA scores: ER (Spearman's correlation coefficient, rho=0.66, p<0.001), PgR (rho=0.84, p<0.001) and Ki-67 (rho=0.96, p<0.001). We conclude that the sequential use of FNAB is a reliable means of assessing the behaviour of within-tumor biomarkers during endocrine therapy.

Aged↗

PubMed1998

Pilot study of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin 12 in metastatic melanoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of s.c. administered recombinant human interleukin 12 (rHuIL-12). Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rHuIL-12 and any evidence of antitumor effect were also considered. Ten pretreated patients with progressive metastatic melanoma were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients received a fixed dose of rHuIL-12 (0.5 microgram/kg) for two identical 28-day cycles, with injections given on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle. In case of any evidence of response or disease stabilization, the treatment was continued for two further 28-day cycles. Toxicity mainly consisted of a flu-like syndrome. Transient increases in transaminasemia (6 of 10 patients) and triglyceridemia (8 of 10 patients) were observed. Peak serum IL-12 levels were reached 8-12 h after the first injection in all patients; no serum IL-12 was detectable in 6 of 9 evaluable patients after the last injection of the second cycle. No antibody response to rHuIL-12 could be detected in any of the patients. A marked, transient reduction in circulating CD8+ and CD16+ lymphocytes and neutrophils was observed after the first administration and high levels of serum IFN-gamma and IL-10 were detected in all patients within 24-48 h. Tumor shrinkage, not reaching partial or complete remission, involved the regression of s.c. nodules (2 of 3 patients), superficial adenopathies (1 of 3 patients), and hepatic metastases (1 of 3 patients); regressions were detected after the first cycle of treatment and were maintained in spite of progression at different sites. s.c. rHuIL-12 treatment was well tolerated and had marked effects on immune parameters and potential antitumor activity.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil as initial treatment for previously untreated, unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a phase II multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The combination of vinorelbine (VNR), cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has previously been shown to be active in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCHNC). This multicenter Phase II study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of this combination in patients with previously untreated, unresectable locally advanced SCHNC. METHODS: Sixty patients with previously untreated, unresectable SCHNC were treated with CDDP 80 mg/m2 on Days 1, 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as a 4-hour infusion on Days 2-5, and VNR 25 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on Days 2 and 8. There were 15 patients with laryngeal carcinoma, 19 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma, 15 with carcinoma in the oral cavity, 5 with carcinoma in the hypopharynx, and 4 with carcinoma in the maxillary sinus. Most patients (78%) had Stage IV disease. After achievement of the best possible objective response, patients were subjected to definitive locoregional treatment, i.e., radiotherapy and/or surgery, as appropriate. RESULTS: All patients completed the induction chemotherapy. After a mean of 3.86 cycles per patient, the overall response rate was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-94%), with a complete response rate of 23% (95% CI, 14-26%). Complete responses were more frequently seen in patients with N0-1 disease than in those with N2-3 disease (P = 0.037). No other statistically significant correlation between type of response and extent of disease was noted. Toxicity consisted mainly of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal side effects. After definitive locoregional treatment, 58% of patients were clinically free of disease. These patients included those who had complete response after induction chemotherapy, 19 of 39 patients who had partial response, and 2 with stable disease. Median disease free survival was 16 months, and median overall survival was 23 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination regimen of CDDP, 5-FU, and VNR was very active in previously untreated SCHNC. It was well tolerated in most cases, and neurotoxicity was not a major side effect. This regimen, which does not require hospitalization, should be compared with standard chemotherapy, such as the combination of CDDP and continuous-infusion 5-FU.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Doxifluridine in colorectal cancer patients resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) containing regimens.

Doxifluridine (5-dFUR) is a fluoropyrimidine derivative, which is preferentially converted to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) within tumour tissues. Although the activity of 5-FU in metastatic colorectal cancer is well recognised, resistance to this agent is frequently observed and remains its major limitation. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the activity of oral and i.v. 5-dFUR in metastatic or locally advanced colorectal cancer patients, who had been previously treated with a 5-FU containing regimen in either an adjuvant or metastatic setting. We treated 48 patients who, on the basis of tumour progression during, or within 8 weeks of the discontinuation of 5-FU therapy, were considered 5-FU resistant, 14 of the patients received 5-dFUR 3000 mg/m2 as a 1-h i.v. infusion, combined with L-leucovorin 25 mg/dose on days 1-5, every 3 weeks; the remaining 34 received oral 5-dFUR 1200 mg/m2 for 5 days followed by 5 days off. Oral L-leucovorin 25 mg/dose was administered 2 h before 5-dFUR. On the basis of WHO criteria, 4/14 (29%, 95% CI 4-51) partial responses were noted in the i.v. treated patients, and 4/34 (12%, 95% CI 1-23) in those treated orally. The radiological examinations documenting the response were a CT scan in 4 cases, ultrasound in 2 and NMR in 2. The median response duration was 6 months (range 3-11+), whereas the median time to treatment failure was 4 months (range 2-17). The responses were achieved in cases previously treated with a median of 9250 mg/m2 (range 5500-18,650) of 5-FU. No CTC-NC1 grade 4 toxicity was observed, although grade 3 diarrhoea occurred in 5 of the orally treated and in 3 of the intravenously treated patients. This is the first report documenting the efficacy of 5-dFUR in patients resistant to 5-FU therapy, and suggests that there is an absence of complete cross-resistance between these two fluoropyrimidines.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1997

The minimal effective exemestane dose for endocrine activity in advanced breast cancer.

Phase I studies have demonstrated that exemestane, an irreversible oral aromatase inhibitor, is able to suppress circulating oestrogen levels. In our previous experience, doses ranging from 2.5 to 25 mg induced a similar suppression of oestrogens. The aim of this study was to identify the minimum effective exemestane dose on the basis of endocrine activity. 20 evaluable postmenopausal advanced breast cancer patients were randomly given exemestane 0.5, 1, 2.5 or 5 mg, in double-blind conditions. Oestrone (E1), oestradiol (E2), oestrone sulphate (E1S), gonadotrophins, sex-hormone binding globulin and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate serum levels were evaluated from the first day of treatment to the 7th, 14th, 28th and 56th day. Serum E1, E2 and E1S levels were suppressed by all doses starting from day 7; the degree of inhibition versus baseline was 25 up to 72% for E1, 30 up to 62% for E2 and 16 up to 52% for E1S, with higher doses achieving greater suppression; these changes were maintained over time. A significant increase in FSH and LH levels was observed for all doses. Treatment tolerability was satisfactory. The endocrine effects of exemestane appear to be dose related and 0.5 and 1 mg are ineffective for adequately suppressing circulating oestrogens.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

A multicentre, randomized, pharmacokinetic, endocrine and clinical study to evaluate formestane in breast cancer patients at first relapse: endocrine and clinical results. The Italian Trials in Medical Oncology (I.T.M.O.) group.

BACKGROUND: In postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients, tamoxifen (TAM) is frequently used in first-line therapy, and for those relapsing under TAM, aromatase inhibitors would be the drug of choice. Formestane, a new aromatase inhibitor, has been demonstrated to be as effective as TAM in first-line therapy. This trial was carried out to investigate the pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity of two formestane doses in BC patients at first relapse, as well as their effects on estrogen levels, evaluated by means of a new analytical method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty-two postmenopausal BC patients were randomly given formestane 250 mg or 500 mg intramuscularly every two weeks. The blood samples for estrogen measurements were taken on the first day of therapy, at 4 and 10 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Tumor response was first evaluated after 2.5 months, and then every three months. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients received formestane 250 mg and 79 received 500 mg. After four weeks, plasma estrone, estradiol and estrone sulphate levels were significantly (P < 0.001) suppressed in both groups. The overall response rates were 30% and 40% on 250 mg and 500 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Both of the formestane doses are effective in reducing plasma estrogen levels in BC patients at first relapse, and the new analytical method improved the quality of results. The antitumor response was highly satisfactory.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Quality of life assessment and clinical decision-making.

Survival and quality of life are the two end-points of cancer treatment. Recommendations are available as to how quality of life should be assessed in clinical studies in order for quantitative scores to be provided for it, along with survival data. The two measurements can be combined, and their total should yield a definition of the state of the art in cancer treatment with respect to both the quantity and the quality of life. However, at the individual level, quality of life can be traded off against survival only by taking into account the patient's attitude toward risk. More importantly, the quality of health status may be valued in a completely different way from patient to patient. Thus, when a clinical choice is to be made from among different treatment options, the ethical principle of respect for the patient's autonomy would require that the patient be informed of their possible respective outcomes, and allowed to provide his/her own assessment of the quality of life associated with these outcomes. This might have consequences for quality of life assessment in clinical studies, which should not only quantify average scores for treatment comparisons, but also provide a 'health state description' with respect to the aftermath of each of the treatment options. These data could be formalized in the already proposed decision instruments incorporating clinical scenarios for patient information. In any case, this should allow individualized clinical decisions incorporating each patient's preferences for the quality of his/her expected life span. Providing average quality of life scores may be useful, indeed, for population-based health decisions, as are those on resource allocation and those on registration of new drugs.

Clinical Medicine↗

PubMed1997

Serum markers of bone metastases in postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with formestane.

Bone metabolism marker evaluation is expected to play an auxiliary role in the diagnosis and follow-up of bone metastases in patients affected by different types of neoplasms. In this study we have evaluated osteoblastic and osteoclastic markers in 18 patients with bone metastases from breast cancer at diagnosis and for 1 year of follow-up during treatment with the aromatase inhibitor formestane. Osteoblastic markers include the carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen, the bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and the bone GLA protein. The carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) was evaluated as a marker of osteoclastic activity. The patients were classified into three groups according to clinical response. A good correlation between marker level modifications and clinical evolution of skeletal metastases was observed for all the examined markers. Patients with progressive disease showed increasing levels of all markers, whereas patients in regression showed a reduction compared to the basal levels; patients with stable disease fell in between these two categories. We also found that basal ICTP values have prognostic significance: in the stable and progressive disease group they were higher than in the partial response group.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

PubMed1996

Randomized phase II noncomparative trial of oral and intravenous doxifluridine plus levo-leucovorin in untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Doxifluridine (5-dFUR) is a fluoropyrimidine derivative that has been shown to be active on a variety of solid tumors. The clinical use of intravenous (i.v.) 5-dFUR as a bolus injection or short term infusion has been limited because of its unpredictable severe neurotoxicity. Unlike fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-dFUR is effective when administered orally. METHODS: This randomized, parallel-group, Phase II trial of two schedules of 5-dFUR was conducted between April 1993 and September 1994. A total of 130 previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma were randomized to receive oral levo-leucovorin (1-leucovorin) 25 mg/dose followed by oral 5-dFUR 750 mg/m2 twice daily for 4 days every 12 days (arm A) or i.v. 1-leucovorin 25 mg/dose followed by i.v. 5-dFUR 3000 mg/m2 for 5 days every 21 days (arm B). RESULTS: The two treatment arms were well balanced in terms of age, sex, and disease extension. Metastases were present in more than 90% of the total population, with the liver being the most common site. A median of 7 oral courses (range, 1-15) and 5 intravenous courses (range, 1-9) were administered. Intent-to-treat analysis rate of the randomized patients revealed a response rate of 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 7-26) in arm A and 41% (95% CI, 29-54) in arm B. However, 7 cases in arm A and 12 in arm B were inadequately treated, and the response rates, according to standard analysis, were respectively 17% (95% CI, 8-28) and 51% (95% CI, 37-65). The median time to treatment failure was 4 months (range, 1-23) and 7 months (range, 1-9), respectively, for the two groups; median survival was 11 months (range, 1-24) in both groups. National Cancer Institute Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea were observed in 25% of the orally treated patients and in 18% of those receiving i.v. treatment. Stomatitis was reported mainly in arm B (15%). Mild and moderate neurotoxicity was observed in 6% of the patients in both arms; no severe neurotoxicity was reported. CONCLUSIONS: 5-dFUR with l-leucovorin, administered either orally or intravenously, produces response rates that are similar to those offered by the regimens containing 5-FU that are usually used to treat advanced colorectal carcinoma. This study documents the good tolerance of the i.v. schedule administered as a 1-hour infusion; furthermore, oral administration seems to be promising and feasible as a home treatment.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1996

A dose-finding study of lanreotide (a somatostatin analog) in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Laboratory data suggest that insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) may stimulate the growth of different human tumors. At least in acromegalic patients, somatostatin (SMS) analogs, such as lanreotide, suppress the serum levels of growth hormone (GH) and IGF-1. METHODS: To evaluate the tolerability and biologic activity of different doses of lanreotide in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma, consecutive groups of 3 patients each were subcutaneous treated with lanreotide at doses of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 mg three times a day for 2 months. In the event of Grade 3 side effects, 3 additional patients were treated with the same dose before the next dose escalation. Serum samples were obtained on Days 0, 15, 30, and 60 for serum GH, IGF-1, and lanreotide assessment. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and all were evaluable. Except for the 3 and 6 mg doses, for which the observation of a Grade 3 side effect required that an additional three patients be treated, it was sufficient to treat 3 patients at each dose. The overall incidence of side effects was as follows: changes in bowel habits, 83%; abdominal cramps, 79%; diarrhea, 17%; vomiting, 17%; nausea, 21%; steatorrhea, 78%; hyperglycemia, 35%; laboratory hypothyroidism, 39%; gallstones, 13%; and weight loss, 17%. No evidence of an increase in the incidence, intensity, or duration of side effects was observed with dose escalation. Serum IGF-1 levels were as follows: Day 15: 63%, 60%, and 67% of the baseline values for the low (1-2 mg), intermediate (3-4 mg), and high (5-6 mg) dose groups, respectively; Day 30: 63%, 59%, and 51%, respectively; and Day 60: 73%, 69%, and 47%, respectively. Serum lanreotide levels declined during treatment in all of the dose groups (90 ng/mL on Day 15, and 35 ng/mL on Day 60 for the 5-6 mg group; 10 ng/mL on Day 15, and 1.5 ng/mL on Day 60 for the 1-2 mg group). No antitumor activity or tumor marker reduction was observed. CONCLUSIONS: No increase in toxicity was observed when subcutaneous lanreotide doses were escalated to 6 mg three times a day for 2 months. The highest doses seemed to maintain reduced serum IGF-1 levels; with the lowest doses, a "rebound" in serum IGF-1 levels was observed during treatment. Nevertheless, intermittent subcutaneous injections do not ensure constant serum drug concentrations over time.

Adult↗