PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Ben-Menachem

Publications and source records attributed to E Ben-Menachem.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase function in progressive myoclonus epilepsies.

Progressive myoclonic epilepsies (EPM) are difficult to treat and refractory to most antiepileptic drugs. Besides epilepsy, EPMs also involve continuous neurological deterioration. Oxidative stress is thought to be an important factor in this process. We therefore analyzed a series of antioxidant enzymes in the blood of patients and compared with healthy age matched controls. In addition patients were given high doses of N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a glutathione percursor to determine if symptoms of EPM would improve. Five patients, four with EPM 1 (Unverricht-Lundborg disease) and one patient with EPM2 (Lafora body disease) were treated with 6 g/day of NAC. Before treatment, plasma samples were analyzed for glutathione peroxidase activity, catalase activity, extracellular superoxide dismutase (SOD) and CuZn-SOD and compared with the controls. Erythrocyte CuZn-SOD was significantly lower in the EPM patients compared to controls. NAC improved markedly and stabilized the neurological symptoms in patients with EPM 1 but had a doubtful effect in the patient with EPM 2.

Acetylcysteine↗

New antiepileptic drugs and non-pharmacological treatments.

Many new drugs and therapies can now be offered to patients with epilepsy. The problem is that we do not know just how much better these new and more expensive therapies are compared with the old ones, nor do we know the full range of side-effects. This review focuses on the major clinical studies that have been published in the past year with emphasis on information as to tolerability and efficacy, especially when there is some information comparing different drugs or therapies. The topics include vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, felbamate, topiramate, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, vagus nerve stimulation and the ketogenic diet. It is encouraging that some of the newly published double-blinded placebo-controlled studies now include children and the elderly, patient groups that have previously been neglected.

Anticonvulsants↗

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. European Levetiracetam Study Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy in selected patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, responder-selected study, patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive oral LEV 1500 mg twice daily or placebo during a 12-week add-on phase. Treatment responders (patients with a reduction in partial seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with baseline) entered a monotherapy phase that included a maximum 12-week down-titration period and 12 weeks of monotherapy at 1500 mg twice daily. In both phases, responder rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (placebo, n = 105; LEV, n = 181) entered the add-on phase, and 86 patients (placebo, n = 17; LEV, n = 69) were eligible for the monotherapy phase. Thirty-six of 181 patients (19.9%) who received LEV completed the entire study compared with only 10 of 105 patients (9.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.029). The odds of completing the study on LEV were 2.36 times (95% confidence interval, 1.08, 5.57) higher than on placebo. The responder rate during the add-on phase was significantly higher in the LEV group compared with the placebo group (42.1% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the LEV monotherapy group, the median percent reduction in partial seizure frequency compared with baseline was 73.8% (p = 0.037), with a responder rate of 59.2%. Nine patients (18.4%) remained seizure-free on LEV monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to LEV monotherapy (1500 mg twice daily) is effective and well tolerated in patients with refractory partial seizures who responded to 3000 mg/d LEV as add-on therapy.

Anticonvulsants↗

The effect of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA) on cerebral blood flow and metabolism.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of vigabatrin (VGB; gamma-vinyl gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA]), a selective irreversible GABA-transaminase inhibitor, on cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRGlc) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) measured with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET and 15O water PET. BACKGROUND: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) reduce CMRGlc to varying degrees. Phenobarbital causes a mean decrease of 30 to 40%. Phenytoin, carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA) cause milder reductions in CMRGlc. The combination of VPA with CBZ results in a greater decrease than either drug alone. The effect of novel AEDs on both CBF and CMRGlc has not been studied extensively. METHODS: Fourteen patients with refractory complex partial seizures on CBZ monotherapy for 4 weeks were included in the study. All patients had baseline 18F-FDG and 15O water PET studies followed by double-blind randomization to placebo (PLC) or VGB while on continuous CBZ treatment. PET scans were repeated after an interval of 2 months on target dose of VGB (50 mg/kg) or PLC. Quantitative PET data analysis was performed using a region of interest template. Significance was tested with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in age, duration of epilepsy, or CBZ levels was observed in the two patient groups. VGB reduced global CMRGlc by 8.1+/-6.5% and global CBF by 13.1+/-10.4%. The change in CMRGlc was different in patients taking VGB compared with those on PLC (p < 0.04). VGB patients showed regional decreases in both CMRGlc and CBF, particularly in temporal lobes. CSF total GABA increased in the VGB patient group (1.48+/-1.06 versus 4.03+/-4.19 nm/mL). The increase differed from the PLC group (p < 0.03). We found a strong relation between decreased total CSF GABA and increased CMRGlc in the VGB patient group (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Vigabatrin (VGB) causes mild reductions in both cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRGlc) in contrast to other drugs such as barbiturates, which are direct agonists at the gamma-aminobutyric acid-benzodiazepine receptor complex. Conventional AEDs depress CBF and CMRGlc to a greater degree than does VGB. The relatively mild reduction could be due to pre- as well as postsynaptic effects or a use-dependent mechanism.

Adult↗

Evaluation of refractory epilepsy treated with vagus nerve stimulation for up to 5 years.

We assessed the long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 64 refractory epilepsy patients. After implantation, intermittent stimulation was delivered and seizure frequency and severity were counted. Average treatment time was 20 months. Nineteen of 47 patients with partial seizures, five of nine patients with idiopathic generalized seizures, and five of eight patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome had >50% seizure reduction. Side effects were mild. VNS is a safe and effective treatment for refractory epilepsy.

Electric Stimulation↗

New antiepileptic drugs: comparison of key clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Data accrued from clinical trials of five new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are compared for efficacy in reducing seizures and self-reported adverse events as a basis of selection among new AEDs. Drawbacks to use of these data also are demonstrated. METHODS: A review of double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of a new AED or placebo added to a standard AED provided data on reduction of complex partial seizures (CPSs). Success is > or =50% fewer CPSs with a new AED or placebo; Overall Improvement is the success rate with drug minus the success rate with placebo. Adverse events were tabulated from product-labeling lists of COSTART items (incidence, > or =5%). The Summary Complaint score is the total number of reports of individual events for each AED. RESULTS: Efficacy data demonstrate differences in Overall Improvement rates among five new AEDs and placebos (p = 0.001). However, rates of response to placebo also differed significantly among trials (p = 0.01). Adverse events predominantly affect central nervous system, psychiatric, and general body systems. However, patients in the placebo control groups did not consistently report adverse effects. Summary Complaint scores differ among the five new AEDs, but variability in use of COSTART terms nullifies comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Comparisons of data for five new AEDs provide information for selection among treatments when a second drug is needed to improve control of CPSs. However, significant differences among the control groups and other problems make comparisons between trials problematic. The final choice should be based on the need of the individual patient for superior seizure control versus minimal adverse effects.

Acetates↗

Zonisamide for progressive myoclonus epilepsy: long-term observations in seven patients.

Progressive myoclonic epilepsy (PME) syndromes are intractable to most antiepileptic drugs (AED). The course of these diseases, results in almost total dependency due to continuous myoclonias, repeated episodes of status epilepticus, ataxia and dementia. The need for new treatment strategies is therefore imperative. Zonisamide has previously been reported to be effective in two patients with PME. Case reports of seven patients (ages 19-42) with Unverricht-Lundborgs disease (ULD) and one Lafora Body Disease are presented. Zonisamide was given at doses of 100-600 mg/day for a period of 2 to 3 years. Concomitant AEDs were usually valproate and a benzodiazepine. Zonisamide dramatically reduced the amount of myoclonias and generalized seizures. In three of the cases, the initial dramatic effect on myoclonias wore off after 2-4 years of treatment but patients still experienced moderate efficacy for generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The dramatic reduction of stimulus sensitivity for light, touch and startle by zonisamide was sustained in all patients with ULD. Zonisamide may be a useful agent in the treatment of PME. Controlled clinical trials are warranted to further investigate the antiepileptic effects of this drug, in difficult to treat epileptic syndromes.

Adult↗

Clinical efficacy of topiramate as add-on therapy in refractory partial epilepsy: the European experience.

In three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled add-on European trials, target daily topiramate (TPM) dosages of 400, 600, and 800 mg/day (200, 300, and 400 mg bid) were evaluated in adults with refractory partial seizures with or without becoming secondarily generalized. Median reductions from baseline in monthly seizure rate were 41% with TPM 400 mg/day vs. 1% with placebo (n = 0.065), 46% with TPM 600 mg/day compared to -12% (a 12% increase) with placebo (p < or = 0.005), and 36% with TPM 800 mg/day versus -18% (an 18% increase) with placebo (p < 0.001). Differences between TPM and placebo with respect to percent responders (percent of patients demonstrating a 50% or greater reduction in seizures) significantly favored TPM (p < 0.05) at all three target dosages. Significant reductions in secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures compared to placebo were also observed with 400 mg/day (p = 0.002) and 800 mg/day (p < 0.05) of TPM. TPM appears to be a promising new antiepileptic drug for use as adjunctive therapy in adults with refractory partial epilepsy.

Adolescent↗

Cost analysis of epilepsy surgery and of vigabatrin treatment in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

In this study the direct actual costs associated with epilepsy-related health care, treatment with the novel antiepileptic drug vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl GABA, GVG), epilepsy surgery evaluation (ESE) and epilepsy surgery were analysed in 52 patients with intractable partial epilepsy who were on a waiting-list for ESE while trying GVG. Sixty percent of the 52 patients obtained a reduction in seizure frequency of 50% or more with GVG. Of the twenty-one operated patients 57% became seizure free, 10% had more than 75%, 5% had 50-75% and 29% had less than 50% reduction of seizure frequency. Of the 17 patients who did not go through ESE (the "GVG responders"), the corresponding outcome was 6%, 59%, 29% and 6%. For the 14 patients who were neither operated nor GVG responders, the outcome was 0%, 0%, 36% and 64%. The mean yearly costs (expressed in 1991 prices) of epilepsy-related health care including antiepileptic drug treatment was US $1,594 the year before starting GVG therapy, and US $2959 the first year of GVG treatment including a mean yearly cost of GVG of US $1,572. The mean total cost for ESE and surgery was US $46,778 (N = 21), while the mean cost of ESE in patients evaluated but not accepted for surgery (N = 14) was US $24,054. Considering the costs for ESE and surgery in the whole patient series, the mean total cost of rendering one patient seizure free with surgery was US $110,000. Surgery is the most effective treatment option in selected cases of severe partial epilepsy. If its costs are distributed over the patient's expected lifetime, the yearly cost is comparable to the present yearly cost of medication with GVG. However, since many patients achieve satisfactory seizure control with GVG, and considering the risks of surgery, we consider it a rational policy to let patients try this drug (or another of the new generation of antiepileptic drugs) before entering ESE.

Adult↗

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

The efficacy and safety of topiramate 400 mg/day as adjunctive therapy to traditional antieleptic drugs for partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization were assessed in a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-seven patients with at least one seizure per week during an 8 week baseline were randomly assigned to topiramate (N = 23) or placebo (N = 24) double-blind treatment for a 3 week titration and an 8 week stabilization period. Median percent reduction from baseline in monthly seizure frequency during the double-blind phase was not significantly greater in the topiramate group than in the placebo group (41% vs. 1%; P = 0.065). Nevertheless, other efficacy variables evidenced statistically significant differences in favor of topiramate: a greater number of treatment responders (> or = 50% reduction in seizures; 35% vs. 8%; P = 0.033); better investigator (P = 0.002) and patient (P = 0.021) global assessments; and greater reductions in secondarily generalized seizures compared to placebo (P = 0.002). The most commonly reported topiramate treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, fatigue, abnormal vision, weight decrease, and anxiety. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Among 7 withdrawals due to limiting adverse events, 6 were CNS-related (in 5 topiramate-treated patients). Results of this trial strongly suggest that topiramate 400 mg/day is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy.

Adolescent↗

Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures.

In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial, we compared topiramate (TPM) with placebo as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. TPM was titrated either to the target dosage of 800 mg/ day [400 mg twice daily (b.i.d)] or to the maximal tolerated dose if lower. Twenty-eight (28) patients were randomized to each treatment group. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the net median percent reduction relative to placebo in average monthly seizure rate was 54% for patients in the TPM group (p < 0.001). None of the placebo-treated patients and 43% of the patients treated with TPM experienced > or = 50% reduction in seizures (p = 0.001), and 36% of patients assigned to TPM had a 75-100% reduction in seizures (p < 0.01). Secondarily generalized seizures were also significantly reduced in the TPM group (p = 0.044). The most common adverse events (AE) reported in the TPM group were fatigue, impaired concentration, weight loss, dizziness, and paresthesias. AE occurring either during the rapid titration of TPM or at high dosages led 21% of TPM-treated patients to withdraw from the study. Half of these occurred during the titration study period. No serious AE or clinically important changes in clinical laboratory measures were observed. The present study further establishes the favorable profile and good benefit/risk ratio of TPM in resistant partial epilepsy.

Adolescent↗

Expanding antiepileptic drug options: clinical efficacy of new therapeutic agents.

Results of double-blind, placebo-controlled, add-on trials of topiramate (TPM), lamotrigine (LTG), and vigabatrin (VGB) in refractory partial epilepsy were reviewed. In three European multicenter studies of TPM, the clinical efficacy of 400-, 600-, and 800-mg/day target dosages was demonstrated. In a similarly designed United States trial, LTG was significantly superior to placebo at a 500-mg/day dosage but not at a 300-mg/day dosage. A meta-analysis of a number of smaller trials of VGB suggests that a > or = 50% reduction in seizures is observed in approximately 45% of patients with refractory partial epilepsy. All of these newer antiepileptic drugs have shown efficacy in well-controlled trials and should contribute significantly to our ability to manage partial epilepsy.

Anticonvulsants↗

Modern management of epilepsy: Vagus nerve stimulation.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was first tried as a treatment for seizure patients in 1988. The idea to stimulate the vagus nerve and disrupt or prevent seizures was proposed by Jacob Zabarra. He observed a consistent finding among several animal studies which indicated that stimulation of the vagus nerve could alter the brain wave patterns of the animals under study. His hypothesis formed the basis for the development of the vagus nerve stimulator, an implantable device similar to a pacemaker, which is implanted in the left chest and attached to the left vagus nerve via a stimulating lead. Once implanted, the stimulator is programmed by a physician to deliver regular stimulation 24 hours a day regardless of seizure activity. Patients can also activate extra 'on-demand' stimulation with a handheld magnet. Clinical studies have demonstrated VNS therapy to be a safe and effective mode of treatment when added to the existing regimen of severe, refractory patients with epilepsy. Efficacy ranges from seizure free to no response with the majority of patients (> 50%) reporting at least a 50% improvement in number of seizures after 1.5 years of treatment. The side-effect profile is unique and mostly includes stimulation-related sensations in the neck and throat. The mechanism of action for VNS is not clearly understood although two theories have emerged. First, the direct connection theory hypothesizes that the anticonvulsant action of VNS is caused by a threshold raising effect of the connections to the nucleus of the solitary tract and on to other structures. The second is the concept that chronic stimulation of the vagus nerve increases the amount of inhibitory neurotransmitters and decreases the amount of excitatory neurotransmitters. Additional research into the optimal use of VNS is ongoing. Animal and clinical research have produced some interesting new data suggesting there are numerous ways to improve the clinical performance of vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for refractory patients.

Adult↗

Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on amino acids and other metabolites in the CSF of patients with partial seizures.

Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is a new method for the treatment of patients with medically intractable epilepsy. Sixteen patients, ten of whom participated in a larger multicenter double-blind trial on the efficacy of VNS in epilepsy, and six who participated in pilot studies, consented to participate in the present study. Ten patients received HIGH stimulation and six patients LOW stimulation for the 3-month trial. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples (16 ml) were collected both before and after 3 months of VNS. Amino acid and neurotransmitter metabolites were analyzed. Four patients responded to VS with more than a 25% seizure reduction after 3 months. Mean and median concentrations of phosphoethanolamine (PEA) increased in responders and decreased in nonresponders. Free GABA increased in both groups but more so in the nonresponders. After 9 months of VS (6-9 months on HIGH stimulation) 4 of 15 patients had more than 40% seizure reduction. There were significant correlations between seizure reduction and increases in asparagine, phenylalanine, PEA, alanine and tryptophan concentrations. Comparison between patients with HIGH or LOW stimulation showed a significant increase in ethanolamine (EA) in the HIGH group and a decrease in glutamine in the LOW group. All patients regardless of response or stimulation intensity showed significantly increased total and free GABA levels. A decrease in CSF aspartate was marginally significant. Other trends were decreases in glutamate and increases in 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid. Chronic VNS appears to have an effect on various amino acids pools in the brain.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Seizure frequency and CSF parameters in a double-blind placebo controlled trial of gabapentin in patients with intractable complex partial seizures.

Gabapentin (GBP) is a non-protein-bound gamma amino acid which is not subjected to metabolic degradation in man. As part of a placebo-controlled double-blind study, patients suffering from intractable complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization were followed with lumbar punctures at baseline and after three months of GBP treatment (900 mg/day or 1200 mg/day). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was analyzed for concentrations of GBP, amino acids including GABA, homovanillic acid (HVA), and 5 hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA). The results indicate that there were no changes in the selected amino acids, HVA, or 5-HIAA after GBP treatment. At steady state the CSF/plasma ratios of GBP ranged from 0.056 to 0.34, indicating that there may be some type of active out-transport of GBP across the blood-brain barrier. No linear relationship was observed between plasma and CSF levels in these patients.

Acetates↗

Vigabatrin.

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) was first proposed as a putative inhibitory neurotransmitter by Elliot and van Gelder in 1958. Since then, numerous efforts have been made to find ways to increase GABA at its receptor sites, based on the findings that decreased GABA results in convulsions in animals and that agents enhancing GABA-mediated functions can have antiepileptic effects. However, the relationship between GABA levels and seizures is not simple. Seizures can occur even in the presence of elevated GABA levels. Indeed, it is possible that regional biochemical differences in the brain can be important. The antiepileptic effects of GABA depend on the mechanism whereby GABA-mediated inhibition is enhanced. Since the 1970s, several compounds have been developed that are designed to act in some manner on the GABA system. These compounds affect GABA-mediated inhibition at different levels and appear to have varied effects, depending on their mechanism of action. To date, specific antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with potential GABA-inhibitory effects have been designed either to have GABA agonist properties, to inhibit GABA catabolism, to inhibit GABA uptake, or to facilitate GABA release or facilitate GABAA receptor activity. Vigabatrin (VGB) was designed specifically to inhibit GABA transaminase and thereby increase the availability of GABA in the brain. Study data and clinical experience over the past 14 years have demonstrated VGB to be an effective AED.

Animals↗