Biomedical subjects

E Berástegui-Jimeno

Publications and source records attributed to E Berástegui-Jimeno.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1997

Apical sealing using two thermoplasticized gutta-percha techniques compared with lateral condensation.

This study was conducted to compare the apical sealing capacity of three filling techniques, a multiphase gutta-percha obturation technique, JS Quickfill, and lateral gutta-percha condensation. A four-stage stepback preparation was executed with circumferential filing in a total of 70 recently extracted permanent maxillary incisors and canines. Three experimental groups (20 teeth in each group) and two control groups (5 teeth in each group) were formed at random. Each experimental group was obturated with a different technique. The positive control group was not obturated. In the negative control group, the whole root was covered with two full nail varnish layers. Teeth were immersed in India ink for 48 h, demineralized, cleared with methyl salicylate, and examined with a stereomicroscope. None of the specimens obturated with the multiphase gutta-percha obturation system showed any penetration of India ink beyond the end of the preparation. In the groups of teeth obturated by JS Quickfill or lateral gutta-percha condensation, leakage was detected in one specimen from each group. No statistically significant differences were seen among groups. We conclude that the newer thermoplasticized filling techniques can be used successfully to obturate root canals in large, straight roots.

Carbon↗

PubMed1996

A comparison of bending and torsional properties of K-files manufactured with different metallic alloys.

The purpose of this study was to compare bending (bending moment) and resistance to fracture by twisting (torsional moment and angular deflection) of triangular cross-section K-files made of either nickel titanium (Nitiflex, Naviflex), titanium (Microtitane) or stainless steel (Flexofile, Flex-R). A total of 200 files were tested, 10 instruments for each type from size 25 to 40, according to ANSI/ADA specification no. 28 and ISO reference no. 3630. Files made of nickel titanium, especially Nitiflex, were the most flexible. Stainless steel instruments presented a higher bending moment than files made of nickel titanium and titanium, particularly Flex-R sizes 35 and 40. With regard to resistance to fracture, measured by angular deflection at the failure point, Flexofile followed by Flex-R were the most resistant to fracture and Nitiflex were the least resistant. Differences in angular deflection among file groups were greater than those for torsional moment. Thus, it seems that angular deflection is a more specific measurement for assessing resistance to fracture by twisting.

Alloys↗

PubMed1996

Torsional and bending properties of stainless steel and nickel titanium Canal Master U and Flexogate instruments.

The purpose of this study was to assess and to compare the torsional and bending properties of the Canal Master U (CMU) and Flexogate instruments made of stainless steel and nickel titanium. The bending moment, the torsional moment and angular deflection were measured according to ANSI/ADA specification number 28 and ISO reference number 3630. Ten instruments of each size, sizes 25 to 40 were used for each test. Nickel titanium instruments were significantly more flexible than stainless steel files. With regard to the torsional moment, values obtained were below the standards in all sizes except stainless steel CMU sizes 25, 35 and 40, and nickel titanium CMU size 25. Nickel titanium instrument also showed the highest angular deflection values. There were statistically significant differences between nickel titanium files and stainless steel Flexogates and between stainless steel Flexogates and stainless steel CMU. Based on these findings, the use of nickel titanium CMU and Flexogates is encouraged. Given the perceived advantages of both CMU and Flexogate instruments over conventional files for canal preparation, it would appear desirable to have the torque resistance of these instruments improved.

Dental Instruments↗

PubMed1996

Cutting efficiency of K-files manufactured with different metallic alloys.

The aim of this study was to compare, in vitro, the machining efficiency of different triangular cross-section K-files made of nickel titanium (Nitiflex, Naviflex), titanium (Microtitane), and stainless steel (Flexofile, Flex-R). Ten instruments of each K-file from size 25 to 40 were tested. The cutting efficiency was assessed in a linear motion using an indentation caliper to measure the depth of grooves. The load applied (in grams) was equal to the ISO file size. Each file was allowed to do 100 back-and-forward movements. Files made of stainless steel were the most effective, in particular Flexofile. There were statistically significant differences between Flexofile and Flex-R in all sizes. In the group of nickel titanium instruments, Nitiflex was significantly more efficient than Naviflex in all sizes. The machining ability of titanium files was higher than that of Naviflex but lower than that of Nitiflex and stainless steel files.

Alloys↗