Defining educational objectives at the University of Virginia.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to E C Corbett.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a short, 3-hour teaching skills workshop could improve residents' teaching performances and attitudes toward teaching. DESIGN: Controlled study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Forty-four second- and third-year residents in a university-based internal medicine residency program. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-two residents were assigned to a nonparticipant (control) group, and 22 residents were assigned to a 3-hour teaching skills workshop designed to help them establish a positive learning climate and provide effective feedback to medical students. MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaires completed by medical students and residents that measured the residents' abilities to establish a positive learning climate and provide feedback, their overall teaching skills, and their attitudes toward teaching. RESULTS: Four months after the workshop intervention, workshop participants improved their learning climate and feedback according to student evaluations (p = .02, p = .001, respectively) and resident self-assessments (p = .002, p = .01, respectively) compared with nonparticipants. Overall teaching skills were not significantly changed (p = .20 for student evaluation and p = .09 for self-assessments). Workshop participants also gained more confidence in their teaching (p = .001), and adopted more learner-centered approaches to teaching than did nonparticipants. CONCLUSIONS: A 3-hour instructional workshop is a feasible and effective method to help residents improve their teaching skills, their confidence in teaching, and the approaches they use to teach medical students on the wards.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Medical residents require an experience beyond the tertiary care hospital to understand many aspects of contemporary medical practice and to make informed career choices. To provide this balanced training, the University of Virginia has operated for 10 years an internal medicine teaching office practice to provide an outpatient experience similar to private practice. It allows residents to work closely with general internal medicine faculty and introduces them to the knowledge and skills necessary to establish and manage a successful practice. The curriculum of the 10 week rotation includes patient care in the office and by telephone, nursing home and home visits, tutorials and seminars on primary care and office management topics, and training in the use of microcomputers. A survey of 46 (92%) of the first 50 residents completing the rotation revealed that the content of the rotation was valuable, the rotation substantially influenced career choices, and the rotation helped provide a balanced view of internal medicine practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features of home visits and their role in continuity of care, costs, and benefits in a rural office practice. DESIGN: Prospective study of all home visits performed during a 26-month period. SETTING: A general medicine teaching office practice located in rural Virginia. PATIENTS: All persons to whom home visits were made during the study period. MAIN RESULTS: 138 home visits were made to 47 patients who had a mean age of 73.2 years. Home visits accounted for 1.4% of patient encounters in the practice, required a mean of 7.1 miles of one-way travel and a mean of 48 minutes, including travel time, to complete, and generated $36 in income per visit. Most patients (27 of 47) were not permanently homebound. Reasons for patients' being homebound were grouped into six categories (acute illness, frail elderly, terminal illness, advanced chronic disease, neurologic problem, and miscellaneous reasons). The reasons for visits were grouped into four categories (acute self-limited illness, exacerbation of chronic disease, routine follow-up of chronic disease, and psychosocial problem). Physicians judged that 80% of home visits represented appropriate use of their services. In addition, 46% of home visits made an emergency room visit unnecessary, and 9% made a hospital admission unnecessary. At the time of 75% of home visits, physicians reported personal benefits of making the visit. CONCLUSIONS: Home visits have an important role in the care of ambulatory as well as permanently homebound patients. While physicians judged most home visits to be appropriate and personally beneficial, these visits required more time and generated less revenue than did office visits for comparable problems. Because home visits generated as well as prevented the use of medical services, their impact on the overall cost of medical care in this setting is unclear.