PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Clonfero

Publications and source records attributed to E Clonfero.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

[Assessment of occupational exposure to aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons determining urinary levels of 1-pyrenol].

In conformity with Italian law 626/94, occupational exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) in several types of work environments was assessed by analysing urinary levels of 1-pyrenol. A total of 231 non-smokers exposed to PAH (82 workers, employed in two different thermoelectric power plants using combustible oil (30 subjects from plant A and 52 from plant B), 18 subjects working for a company recovering exhausted oils, 12 working on rubber production, 10 on road surface asphalting operations, 22 working in the anodizing section of an aluminium plant, 27 chimney-sweeps, and 60 coke-oven workers (30 topside workers, and 30 doing other jobs)) were enrolled. There were also 53 non-smoker control subjects, not occupationally exposed to PAH. Current smokers were excluded, since smoking is an important confounding factor when occupational exposure to low PAH concentrations are monitored. Confounding factors, i.e., diet and passive smoking, were checked by means of a questionnaire which, in addition to personal data and habits, also requested specific details about the type of diet followed and possible exposure to passive smoking during the 24-hour period preceding urine collection. In controls, exposure to PAH in the diet significantly increased 1-pyrenol levels in urine: in subjects introducing > or = 1 microgram of pyrene with the diet, the mean urinary level of 1-pyrenol was significantly higher than that introduced with < 1 microgram (high versus low dietary intake, mean +/- SD, 0.08 +/- 0.13 and 0.04 +/- 0.06 1-pyrenol mumoles/mole of creatinine, respectively; Mann-Whitney U-test Z = 2.67, p < 0.01). Conversely, passive smoking did not influence 1-pyrenol levels. In the overall population (controls and exposed), multiple linear regression analysis showed that levels of urinary 1-pyrenol were significantly influenced by occupational exposure to PAH in asphalt workers, anodizing plant workers, chimney-sweeps, and coke-oven workers, both those working at the top side of the oven and those doing other jobs (t = 2.19, p = 0.02; t = 2.56, p = 0.01; t = 5.25, p = 0.001; t = 3.34, p = 0.001; t = 7.82, p = 0.001, respectively; F = 9.7, p < 0.01), but not in power plant workers in contact with combustible oils, workers recovering exhausted oils, or rubber production workers. Diet and passive smoking did not influence urinary 1-pyrenol levels in the entire sample population. This biomarker also allowed an assessment of exposure levels among certainly exposed subjects. The percentage of subjects with urinary 1-pyrenol values higher than the 99th percentile of the reference population (0.67 mumoles 1-pyrenol/mole of creatinine) was significantly higher than that of controls in asphalt workers (20%), anodizing plant workers (14%), chimney-sweeps (13%) and coke-oven workers (33%) (chi-square test: asphalt workers = 6.1, p = 0.01; anodizing plant workers = 4.3, p = 0.04; chimney-sweeps = 7.1, p = 0.008; coke-oven workers with other duties = 4.4, p = 0.04; top side workers = 16.5, p < 0.001). In chimney sweeps and top side workers, respectively 2 and 4 subjects (7% and 13%) exceeded the precautionary level of 1.4 mumoles 1-pyrenol/mole of creatinine; of these, 1 chimney sweep and 3 top side workers (4% and 10%) exceeded the recommended biological threshold of 2.3 mumoles 1-pyrenol/mole of creatinine.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Biomarkers of gentotoxic risk and metabolic polymorphism].

This paper reviews studies published in the international scientific literature evaluating the influence of genetically based metabolic polymorphisms on biological indicators of genotoxic risk in environmental or occupational exposure. Exposures due to life style (i.e. diet or smoking) were not considered. Indicators are subdivided into internal dose indicators (concentration of the substance or its metabolites in biological fluids, urinary mutagenicity, adducts of hemoglobin, plasma proteins and DNA), and early biological effects (chromosome aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, COMET assay, HPRT mutants). The metabolic genotypes (or phenotypes) examined by various authors are: ALDH2 (aldehyde dehydrogenase), CYP (P450 cytochrome) 1AI, CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP2D6, EPHX (epoxidohydrolase), NAT2 (N-acetyl transferase), NQO1 (NAD(P)H: kinone oxidoreductase), PON1 (paraoxonase), GST (glutathione S-transferase) M1, GSTT1 and GSTP1. In more than half the studies (52 out of 96), no influence of genotype was found in the biological indicator. This may be due either to the poor sensitivity of the indicator used, or to low exposure. In studies examining the effect of genotype on the indicator, the biological plausibility of the result was evaluated, i.e., whether the effect is consistent with the type of enzymatic activity expressed. Four studies reported not very reliable results and suggest either the unfavourable influence of genotype GSTM1 with high detoxifying activity, or enzymatic activity poorly involved in the metabolism of the xenobiotics in question (NAT2 in the case of PAH). As regards urinary metabolites of genotoxic agents, eight studies reported the modulating effect of genotype. The urinary excretion of mercapturic acids was greater in subjects with high GST activity. In exposure to PAH, urinary 1-pyrenol and PAH metabolites turn out to be significantly influenced by genotypes CYP1A1 or GSTM1 null; in exposure to aromatic amines, the influence of NAT2 on exposure indicators (levels of acetylated and non-acetylated metabolites) was confirmed. Exposure to benzene led to an increase in t-t-MA in some genotypes, although experimental verification is still necessary. As regards urinary mutagenicity, the effect of genotype GSTM1 null is reported, and of the same genotype combined with NAT2 slow, in non-smoking individuals subjected to high exposure to PAH and in cigarette-smoking/coke-oven workers. Lastly, the determination of urinary metabolites in monitoring exposure to genotoxic substances, provides sufficient evidence that genetically based metabolic polymorphisms must be taken into account in the future. There is still little evidence regarding the importance of genotype on the level of protein adducts in environmental and occupational exposure. A relatively large number of publications (22) dealt with DNA adduct levels in PAH exposure. In 18 studies, the biological indicator clearly increases with respect to values in control subjects. Of these studies, seven reported the influence of GSTM1 null on DNA adducts and, of the five studies which also examined genotype CYP1A1, four reported the influence on DNA adduct level of genotype CYP1A1, alone or in combination with GSTM1 null. It therefore seems as if the unfavourable association for the activating/detoxifying metabolism of PAH is a risk factor for the formation of PAH-DNA adducts. Most publications (25 out of 41; 61%) dealing with metabolic polymorphisms in effect indicators (cytogenetic markers, COMET assay, HPRT mutants) did not report any increase in the indicator due to exposure to the genotoxic agents studied. These indicators of genotoxic damage, including mainly the frequency of HPRT mutants (100%), Mn (90%) and the COMET assay (67%), are not sufficiently sensitive in revealing exposure, confirming that they are not particularly suitable for measuring exposure to genotoxic substances in occupational or environmental exposures. It is therefore difficult to assess the influence of metabolic genotypes by means of this type of biological indicator. The few positive results reported for SCE in occupational studies mentioned the influence of genotype ALDH2, either alone or in combination with genotype CYP2E1 in exposure to CVM, or in combination with GSTM1 null in exposure to epichlorohydrin. For CA the results showed unfavourable combinations of genotypes CYP2E1, GSTM1 and PON1 in exposure to pesticides, and GSTM1 null in combination with NAT2 slow in exposure to urban air. All the remaining studies on the effect of genotype on biological indicators of cytogenetic damage reported negative results.

Biomarkers↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The prevention of tumors in the aluminum industry].

Aluminium industry workers are exposed to various carcinogenic substances, the most important of which are asbestos and coal pitch and tar fumes. Primary prevention of cancer risk can be achieved either by eliminating the carcinogenic agent from the working environment, or by reducing the exposure levels or the number of exposed workers. In the aluminium industry the first type of approach is possible in the case of asbestos, which can be substituted with MMMF (man made mineral fibers), with the cancer risk thus passing from group 1 to group 2b of the IARC Classification. Complete abolition of exposure to pitch and coal-tar fumes is not feasible, but a reduction in risk can be achieved by using the pre-bake anode cell process instead of the Söderberg process, since the former reduces exposure of potroom workers to pitch and coal-tar fumes. A further reduction of exposure in pot-rooms can be achieved, as demonstrated by direct experience in an aluminium plant at Port Marghera (Province of Venice). Environmental monitoring performed from 1978 to 1989 showed a decrease in levels of total dust concentrations and thus of PAH and BaP concentrations as a result of a series of technical and/or organisational improvements. In biological monitoring, which can detect any skin absorption of the carcinogen, the concentrations of urinary hydroxypyrene confirmed low levels of exposure in the plant under study, excluding the pitch plant workers.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The urinary mutagenicity test in monitoring exposure to aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons in workers in the aluminum industry].

The sensitivity of 3 urinary mutagenicity tests was assayed: the plate test, the fluctuation test and the micropreincubation test, in order to assess their possible use in monitoring human exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Urine samples from workers of an anode production plant exposed to coal tar and from psoriatic patients undergoing treatment with coal-tar ointments were tested for mutagenic activity on strain TA98 Salmonella typhimurium, in the presence of the microsome fraction and deconjugating enzymes. Parallelly, the urinary concentration of PAH metabolites or one of their trace metabolites, 1-hydroxypyrene, was determined. Increased levels of PAH metabolites were observed in the urine of anode production workers after a work shift compared with controls. Results of the plate test and the fluctuation test performed on urine of exposed subjects, both smokers and nonsmokers, showed mutagenicity values similar to the controls. Much higher 1-hydroxypyrene concentrations were found in the urine of psoriatic patients treated with coal tar than in post-shift urine of anode production workers. The urine of the former was also mutagenic in the 3 mutagenicity tests used. The minimum mean dose of PAH metabolites was calculated, expressed as quantity of 1-hydroxypyrene, that would give a mutagenic response in the 3 tests: the micropreincubation test was found to be about 100 times more sensitive than the plate test and about 30 times more sensitive than the fluctuation test. The theoretical minimum urinary concentration of 1-hydroxypyrene detectable by each test was determined: the micropreincubation test was 15 times more sensitive than the plate test and 7 times more sensitive than the fluctuation test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aluminum↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Molecular epidemiology in occupational medicine: methodological features and impact of individual genetic susceptibility].

A review of main methodological questions regarding biomarkers is reported focusing on validation, laboratory variability, study design and statistical analysis. The indicated perspective is the setup of protocols finalized at the study of multiple panels of genotoxicity biomarkers taking into account the influence of gene-environment interaction at low doses, of the modulation of the biomarkers associated to the genetic polymorphism. An overview on the influence of metabolic and DNA repair polymorphisms on biological indicators of genotoxic risk in occupational, environmental or life-style exposure is also presented. Genetic polymorphisms that influence human genotoxic risk are those of glutathione s-transferase and cytochrome P450 in exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), those of N-acetyltransferase in both occupational and environmental exposures to aromatic amines (AAs) and similar compounds. Lastly recent and important studies, on the effect of the newly discovered polymorphisms affecting DNA repair enzymes on the modulation of genotoxic risk linked to life style (i.e., aflatoxin and PAHs from diet) and smoking behaviour and to environmental genotoxic exposure, are reported. To date biomarkers represent a new tool for epidemiological research in occupational medicine and they could represent a valid instrument for group evaluation but they are not useful for the risk assessment on individual basis. To achieve this objective it is necessary to demonstrate a stronger association with the endpoint that perhaps the future development of genetic and molecular epidemiology will make possible.

Genetic Predisposition to Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[CYP1A2, NAT2, and GSTM1 phenotype/genotype modulate human exposure and various environmental mutagens: our experience].

Since some years in our research group has been studied the influence of metabolic genotypes on two biomarkers of genotoxic risk (BPDE-DNA adducts and urinary mutagenicity) in humans exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and aromatic amines. The aim was to identify possible genetic susceptible factors capable of modulating individual response to these carcinogens. Humans exposed to PAHs: dermatological patients therapeutically treated with coal tar based ointments (CT), coke oven workers and chimney sweeps. People exposed to aromatic amines will be volunteers after a meal of pan-fried hamburgers and smokers. An overview of the results we found until now will be presented.

7,8-Dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene 9,10-oxide↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Biologically effective dose biomarkers].

Biologically effective dose markers--DNA and protein adducts--are classified among exposure biomarkers, and are currently used to assess the biologically active fraction of xenobiotics, which is capable of interacting with cellular macromolecules at the target site. Macromolecular adducts should not only be considered as exposure indicators; indeed, their biological significance can also be extended to biomarkers of effect and of susceptibility. The achievement of such a goal needs research programs aimed both at studying molecular mechanisms related to each step along the continuum of events between exposure and disease, and at establishing quantitative relationships between exposure levels and adduct formation, between adducts and early biological effects, effects and cellular structural/functional modifications, leading to the development and eventual increase in incidence of specific diseases. Moreover, different factors must be considered during data evaluation, such as interindividual variability, the background levels of biomarkers in non occupationally exposed population, the gradually decreasing doses of genotoxic agents involved in occupational exposure, and confounding factors such as diet and smoking habits. Despite the large body of literature documenting DNA and protein adduct molecular dosimetry for many carcinogen exposures, many authors highlight the need for systematic interlaboratory comparison and collaboration by measuring the same biomarkers using different techniques and/or different biomarkers related to the same exposure levels. There is also general agreement about reducing costs, so that dosimetric analyses can become economically more advantageous and accessible in all cases where they prove to be useful in preventing health risks.

Biomarkers↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Individual susceptibility to occupational carcinogens: the evidence from biomonitoring and molecular epidemiology studies].

This paper reviews the literature on the influence of metabolic and DNA repair polymorphisms of biological indicators of genotoxic risk commonly used in biomonitoring occupational exposure to carcinogens. Genetic polymorphisms which influence biomarkers (urinary metabolites, protein and DNA adducts), include P450 cytochromes (CYPs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and acetyltransferases (NATs) in exposure to aromatic amines (AAs). As regards exposure to benzene, also relevant is the influence of epoxydohydrolase (EPHX) and NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase (NQO1) on the urinary excretion of t,t-muconic and phenylmercapturic acids. With respect to occupational exposure to styrene, EPHX significantly influences the levels of Chromosome Aberrations (CAs), strongly predictive genotoxic biomarkers of cancer risk. Some recent studies examine the role of polymorphisms linked to DNA repair genes in the modulation of genotoxic risk associated with PAH exposure, both for life-style (dietary and smoking behaviour) and for occupational reasons. In addition, molecular epidemiology studies (case/control studies) of lung cancer in smokers published since 2000 may also be viewed as representing models of effects due to exposure to carcinogenic mixtures, some of which are present in the working environment (e.g., BaP, benzene, AAs). Almost all studies show the clearcut influence (i.e., increased lung cancer risk with OR > or = 2) of genetic polymorphisms linked to PAH metabolism (in particular, CYPIA1, GSTM1 and P1). Among the risk factors are the different mutagen sensitivity towards, for instance, bleomycin and BaP (tested in vitro), the reduced repair capacity to DNA damage induced by BaP, and increases in some biomarkers of early biological effect (DNA adducts and stable CAs). Other risk factors, such as heredity (siblings of cancer patients have a risk factor > or = 3 with respect to the general population), ethnicity (Chileans > Caucasians; Japanese > Americans) and gender (women > men), have still not been clearly characterized and these are also reported in this paper. It is clear from the above that genetic differences underlie individual susceptibility to lung cancer, whether caused by exposure to tobacco smoke or to occupational carcinogens like PAHs. Some of these indicators of exposure/individual susceptibility can be evaluated in groups at high risk of occupational lung cancer, such as coke-oven and aluminium workers and those exposed to coal tar fumes and soot, etc., with the aim of identifying subjects who are susceptible due to the high concentrations of carcinogens found in their working environment.

Biomarkers↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Anti-B[a]PDE-DNA formation in lymphomonocytes of humans environmentally exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons].

[Anti-B[a]PDE-DNA formation in lymphomonocytes of humans environmentally exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons] We are currently evaluating anti-benzo[a]pyrenediolepoxide-(B[a]PDE)-DNA adduct levels in lymphomonocytes of humans exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to validate this indicator of biologically effective dose in a surrogate tissue. The study protocol (October 2002-June 2005) implies: (a) a signed informed consent by each participant; (b) recruitment of 600 Padua municipal workers during visits at our outpatient clinic; (c) administration of a questionnaire regarding non occupational sources of PAH (B[a]P) exposure; (d) collection of blood (15 ml) and urine (200 ml) samples. Anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adduct levels in lymphomonocytes are detected by HPLC-fluorescence analysis. To date, 438 subjects have been examined (age range 20-62 years; 52% males). We found that: (i) anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adduct levels are significantly lower than those we previously found in coke-oven workers (N=95) occupationally exposed to high levels of PAHs (1.51 +/- 2.68 versus 4.07 +/- 3.78 anti-B[a]PDE-adduct/10(8) nucleotides, p < 0.001; 37% versus 97% positive subjects with > or =1 adduct/10(8) nucleotides; p < 0.001); (ii) smokers (23%) have significantly higher adduct levels than non smokers (p < 0.001); iii) non smokers who consume PAH-rich meals > or =52 times/year (142 subjects, 42%) have significantly increased adduct levels than those <52 times/year (p < 0.01). Dietary and smoking habits did not influence the occupationally-induced adduct levels in coke-oven workers. This is the first study that examines anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adduct levels in a large cohort showing that anti-B[a]PDE-DNA adducts can be detected in humans environmentally exposed to low doses of PAH (B[a]P and are modulated by smoke and dietary habits.

7,8-Dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene 9,10-oxide↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Mutagens and carcinogens in city air].

Many urban air pollutants are recognized to be mutagenic and carcinogenic agents. Combustion processes, which generate gaseous and particulate complex mixtures, are responsible for the major part of urban air pollution. Emissions from automotive sources are estimated to be nowadays the main cause of mutagenic/carcinogenic risk for people living in urban areas of industrialized countries. Increasing vehicle traffic also contributes to the presence in urban air of valuable concentrations of asbestos fibers and benzene, both well-known potent carcinogens.

Air Pollutants↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[The AMES test in environmental and occupational medicine].

The authors review the use of the gene mutation test on Salmonella typhimurium, better known as the Ames test, in environmental and occupational health. This test, which was originally intended as a predictive test of the carcinogenicity of chemical substances, has been widely applied in in vitro screening of complex mixtures of substances present in the environment and in the biological monitoring of high risk populations. Data are reported on the main environmental exposures that were positive with the Ames test and it is stressed how this biological assay has contributed to the identification of new classes of genotoxic compounds (nitropyrenes, mutagen X). The Ames test performed on extracts of human urine was used to study exposure to carcinogenic substances in the working environment. Many occupational exposures can cause an increase in mutagenic activity in the exposed subjects (cytostatic drugs, rubber manufacture, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons). It is recommended to restrict the use of the urinary mutagenesis test to group studies and carefully check confounding factors (e.g., smoking and diet).

Carcinogenicity Tests↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Identification of genotoxic compounds used in leather processing industry].

The release of mutagens from 7 carbon black-based leather dyes and from leather samples at various stages of finishing was determined. After vigorous treatment with toluene, 4 commercial dyes yelded mutagenic extracts on Salmonella typhimurium in the presence of microsomal enzymes. Only in one case were the responsible chemicals identified as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The low bioavailability of mutagens contained in carbon black and their low mutagenic activity suggest that the risk associated with the use of these dyes is probably negligible. Soxhlet extracts with ethanol from finished leather were mutagenic on strain TA98 of Salmonella typhimurium in the absence of S9 mix. Analysis of extracts of leather samples at various intermediate stages of processing showed that mutagenic activity was detectable after the colouring process. The responsible compound was identified as a nitroazo dye (Colour Index: Acid Brown 83), with a mutagenic potential of about 4 revertant/micrograms. Eighteen commercial tannins containing mainly Cr(III) sulphates were assessed for genotoxicity. Most were contaminated with Cr(VI), a known mutagenic and carcinogenic agent, at levels sufficient to induce an increased frequency of SCE (sister chromatid exchanges) in mammalian cells (CHO, chinese hamster ovary) tested in vitro.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Leather azo dyes: mutagenic and carcinogenic risks].

The paper reviews the carcinogenicity and mutagenicity data on azo dyes used in the leather industry. Two water soluble benzidine-based dyes were classified as "probably carcinogenic to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). No other dyes have been evaluated by the IARC. Of the 48 azo dyes assayed in the Salmonella/microsome test, 20 gave positive results. Attention is drawn to the important role of the in vivo metabolism of azo compounds, which includes a preliminary reduction of the azo bonds and subsequent release of the aromatic amines of the dye. A useful assay (Prival test) for evaluating the mutagenic properties of azo dyes involves a reductive step that permits the release of any genotoxic agents present in the compounds. A list of leather azo dyes is furnished that are considered as potentially harmful due to the presence of a carcinogenic aromatic amine (benzidine, p-aminobenzene and derivatives) in their formulae.

Azo Compounds↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Urinary excretion of mutagens and cisplatin among the nursing staff at a medical oncology department exposed to cytostatic drugs].

Exposure to cytostatic drugs was assessed in a group of 9 nurses employed in a hospital cancer therapy department by measuring the post-shift levels of urinary mutagens and cis-platinum. A slight but significant increase in urinary mutagenic activity compared to 11 controls was observed in the non-smokers: the mean values of mutagenic activity on the Ta100 strain in the presence of both microsomal and deconjugating enzymes were 4418 +/- 1186 and 2468 +/- 1681 respectively. Conversely, the urinary platinum concentration was below the detection limit of the analytical method (10 micrograms/l) in all samples. The increased urinary mutagenic activity in the exposed group can probably be attributed to the absorption of cyclophosphamide either during preparation and administration of the drug, or due to accidental contact with contaminated biological fluids, in view of the fact that the level of mutagens in urine samples from cyclophosphamide-treated patients is extremely high (up to 319,478 revertants/g creatinine in the case we examined).

Antineoplastic Agents↗