Biomedical subjects

E Conklin

Publications and source records attributed to E Conklin.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1996

Phase I/II study of combined granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor administration for the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells.

PURPOSE: To study the toxicity and efficacy of combined granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) administration for mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cohorts of a minimum of five patients each were treated subcutaneously as follows: G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 1 to 12 and GM-CSF at .5, 1, or 5 micrograms/kg on days 7 to 12 (cohorts 1, 2, and 3); GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 1 to 12 and G-CSF 5 micrograms/kg on days 7 to 12 (cohort 4); and G-CSF and GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg each on days 1 to 12 (cohort 5). Ten-liter aphereses were performed on days 1 (baseline, pre-CSF), 5, 7, 11, and 13. Colony assays for granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) and erythroid burst-forming units (BFU-E) were performed on each harvest. RESULTS: The principal toxicities were myalgias, bone pain, fever, nausea, and mild thrombocytopenia, but none was dose-limiting. Four days of treatment with either G-CSF or GM-CSF resulted in dramatic and sustained increases in the numbers of CFU-GM per kilogram collected per harvest that represented 35.6 +/- 8.9- and 33.7 +/- 13.0-fold increases over baseline, respectively. This increment was attributable both to increased numbers of mononuclear cells collected per 10-L apheresis and to increased concentrations of progenitors within each collection. The administration of G-CSF to patients already receiving GM-CSF (cohort 4) caused the HPC content to surge to nearly 80-fold the baseline (P = .024); the reverse sequence, ie, the addition of GM-CSF to G-CSF, was less effective. The CFU-GM content of the baseline aphereses correlated with the maximal mobilization achieved (r = .74, P = .001). CONCLUSION: Combined G-CSF and GM-CSF administration effectively and predictably mobilizes HPCs and facilitates apheresis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

Admissions for injury at a rural hospital in Ghana: implications for prevention in the developing world.

OBJECTIVES: Strategies for injury prevention have been extensively studied in developed nations but not in the developing world. This study sought to determine which mechanisms of injury were common in a rural developing area and which were important contributors to mortality and disability. METHODS: All 614 patients admitted for injuries to a rural African hospital between 1987 and 1991 were analyzed retrospectively for mechanism of injury and outcome, as assessed by mortality and long-term functional status. RESULTS: The leading mechanisms of injury were transport related (29%) and burns (16%). Burns accounted for 61% of injuries in children under 5 years. Mortality was 7.3% in the series, with 24% of deaths owing to transport injuries. Disability developed in 103 (22%) of the 462 survivors available for assessment, with most disability resulting from transport injuries (26% of all disabilities), burns (13%), and agricultural injuries (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Among injured patients who presented for treatment in this rural developing area, the largest burden of mortality and disability was from burns and transport-related injuries. Population-based studies are needed to substantiate whether these should be priorities for injury prevention efforts.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

A practical approach to crosslinking.

The various aspects of chemical crosslinking are addressed. Crosslinker reactivity, specificity, spacer arm length and solubility characteristics are detailed. Considerations for choosing one of these crosslinkers for a particular application are given as well as reaction conditions and practical tips for use of each category of crosslinkers.

Amines↗

PubMed1993

Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world: comparison with an urban level I trauma center.

Trauma is well known as a major cause of death and disability in the developed world, but has been inadequately studied in developing nations. We reviewed 539 trauma patients admitted from 1987 through 1991 to a rural African hospital, the Holy Family Hospital (HFH) in Berekum, Ghana, and compared these results with 14,270 patients admitted during the same period to a level I trauma center, the Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in Seattle, Washington. At HFH, 59% of patients were seen > 24 hours after injury, compared with 4% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Only 25% of HFH patients received prehospital care, compared with 82% of HMC patients (p < 0.001). Mean ISS was higher at HMC (10.0 +/- 6.3) than a HFH (6.7 +/- 6.5) (p < 0.001), but trauma mortality rates were identical (6%) at both institutions. Neurologic injuries were the leading cause of death at both HFH (62%) and HMC (54%). There was no significant difference between institutions in mortality for patients with ISS 1-8 (HMC: 0.7% n = 6390; HFH: 0.3%, n = 342). There was a marked decrease in mortality for patients with ISS 9-24 at HMC (3%, n = 3709) compared with HFH (10%, n = 146) (p < 0.001). There was a less pronounced decrease in mortality for patients with ISS > 24 at HMC (41%, n = 1520) compared with HFH (73%, n = 26) (p < 0.01). The type and the severity of injuries causing fatalities in this developing nation suggest that no inexpensive hospital-based changes would improve outcomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗