E D Barone-Nugent | PubMed Health

PubMed2002

Quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy II: differential interference contrast imaging for biological TEM.

Although phase contrast microscopy is widespread in optical microscopy, it has not been as widely adopted in transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which has therefore to a large extent relied on staining techniques to yield sufficient contrast. Those methods of phase contrast that are used in biological electron microscopy have been limited by factors such as the need for small phase shifts in very thin samples, the requirement for difficult experimental conditions, or the use of complex data analysis methods. We here demonstrate a simple method for quantitative TEM phase microscopy that is suitable for large phase shifts and requires only two images. We present a TEM phase image of unstained Radula sp. (liverwort spore). We show how the image may be transformed into the differential interference contrast image format familiar from optical microscopy. The phase images contain features not visible with the other imaging modalities. The resulting technique should permit phase contrast TEM to be performed almost as readily as phase contrast optical microscopy.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy I: optical microscopy.

In this paper, the application of a new optical microscopy method (quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy) to biological imaging is explored, and the issue of resolution and image quality is examined. The paper begins by presenting a theoretical analysis of the method using the optical transfer function formalism of Streibl (1985). The effect of coherence on the formation of the phase image is explored, and it is shown that the resolution of the method is not compromised over that of a conventional bright-field image. It is shown that the signal-to-noise ratio of the phase recovery, however, does depend on the degree of coherence in the illumination. Streibl (1985) notes that partially coherent image formation is a non-linear process because of the intermingling of amplitude and phase information. The work presented here shows that the quantitative phase-amplitude microscopy method acts to linearize the image formation process, and that the phase and amplitude information is properly described using a transfer function analysis. The theoretical conclusions are tested experimentally using an optical microscope and the theoretical deductions are confirmed. Samples for microscopy influence both the phase and amplitude of the light wave and it is demonstrated that the new phase recovery method can separate the amplitude and phase information, something not possible using traditional phase microscopy. In the case of a coherent wave, knowledge of the phase and amplitude constitutes complete information that can be used to emulate other forms of microscopy. This capacity is demonstrated by recovering the phase of a sample and using the data to emulate a differential interference contrast image.

Journal Article↗