PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E D Peselow

Publications and source records attributed to E D Peselow.

52 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Age of onset of affective illness.

The age of onset of affective illness as measured by the initial psychiatric consultation for four affective subtypes was evaluated. Bipolar I (mean age = 28.00) and cyclothymics (mean age = 27.58) sought psychiatric consultation for their affective symptoms significantly earlier than unipolar patients (mean age = 34.69). Bipolar II patients (mean age = 31.54) sought psychiatric consultation at an age intermediate between bipolar I and unipolar patients. Male bipolar II patients sought psychiatric treatment significantly later than female bipolar II patients and there was a nonsignificant trend toward male cyclothymics initially seeking treatment later than female cyclothymics. In all, the range of age of onset for the four affective subtypes was quite wide suggesting that a patient was at risk for developing an affective disorder at any time from adolescence to the geriatric age range.

Adolescent↗

Lithium prophylaxis of depression in unipolar, bipolar II, and cyclothymic patients.

The authors assessed lithium's prophylactic effect against depression in unipolar (N = 43), bipolar II (N = 102), and cyclothymic (N = 69) patients using a longitudinal life-table analysis and calculated the probability of remaining free of a depressive episode. The probability of remaining free of one depressive episode after 2 years of taking lithium ranged from 42% to 55% for the bipolar II patients, 31% to 42% for the unipolar patients, and 26% to 36% for the cyclothymic patients. The average probability of suffering one depressive episode severe enough to require either pharmacologic intervention or hospitalization in a 2-year period was 51% for the bipolar II patients, 64% for the unipolar patients, and 69% for the cyclothymic patients.

Adult↗

Clinical trials of benzamides in psychiatry.

The utility of the benzamides in clinical psychiatry requires further evaluation. Of the four compounds mentioned in this chapter, it seems clear that sulpiride is an effective antipsychotic agent as shown by double-blind trials comparing it with placebo and reference antipsychotics (see Table I). Claimed efficacy for this agent in depression, anxiety, and school-phobia require more intensive evaluation. Sultopride has been reported to have efficacy in a variety of psychiatric syndromes, i.e., manic depressive illness and agitation associated with alcoholic syndromes. Tiapride has reported efficacy in a variety of alcoholic states, agitation associated with medical disease, and movement disorders. Unfortunately, all of the studies on both tiapride and sultopride have been open trials on which the results were based solely on the global clinical impression of the investigator. The total lack of formal diagnostic criteria, adequate study design, small sample size, heterogeneity of diagnosis, and questionable length of time for treatment of these disorders make it impossible to draw any firm conclusions at this time as to the efficacy toward any psychiatric disorder. Metoclopramide, on the other hand, may not only have possible antipsychotic efficacy based on one open study (62,63) but may provide an important clue as to the action of antipsychotics in general. More double-blind studies are indicated to assess its function in acute psychosis. The four compounds do seem to have properties similar to many of the classic antipsychotic agents in view of their common dopamine-blocking activity, antiemetic, sedative, and cataleptic effects. In addition, they have similar spectrum of side effects. Certain effects such as lack of efficacy in dopamine receptor models (for metoclopramide) and questionable differences in sites of action (blocking of dopamine and mesolimbic versus nigral striatal areas for sulpiride) may indicate unique neurochemical effects for these compounds and may provide a clue to allow the investigators to better predict antipsychotic efficacy and draw inferences regarding sites of action and mechanisms underlying neuroleptic activity. The benzamides have been used extensively in France since 1967. Before these drugs can be considered to be effective antipsychotic agents on par with phenothiazines and butyrophenones, further double-blind studies are indicated. These studies would give us a better idea as to whether they fit into the psychiatrist's armanentarium and may allow further insights into the relationship between descriptive psychopathology and neuropharmacology.

Amisulpride↗

Course and relationship of lithium side effects to plasma lithium levels.

49 patients with primary affective disorders maintained on lithium were evaluated over a 6-month course and the pattern of 10 well-known innocuous side effects of lithium therapy was closely evaluated. The patients had significantly more side effects in the 1st month as opposed to the 4th through 6th months. The difference was statistically significant (with p less than 0.05). There was no difference in plasma lithium levels among individuals having no side effects, 1-2 side effects or 3 or more side effects at any point during the 6-month period.

Adult↗

Lithium carbonate and weight gain.

In order to evaluate weight gain in lithium-treated patients., a group of 21 bipolar patients on lithium were compared against a group of 12 bipolar patients on placebo over a 12-month period. During this time both groups exhibited euthymic mood. Eleven of the 21 patients on lithium gained greater than 10 lbs. whereas only 1 placebo patient gained more than 10 lbs. Thirteen of 21 lithium-treated patients showed a gain of 5% total body weight while only 2 of 12 placebo patients showed a gain of 5% total body weight. Both of these results were statistically significant (P less tha 0.05). The findings seem to indicate that weight gain is a direct effect of lithium treatment.

Adult↗

Specificity of symptoms in RDC endogenous depression.

The Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC) define endogenous depression by the presence of a particular subset of depressive symptoms. This typological approach to classification implicitly assumes that endogenous and non-endogenous patients differ only or primarily in this subset of symptoms, rather than simply in severity of all depressive symptoms. We tested this assumption in a sample of 80 patients with a current episode of major depressive disorder. Whereas RDC endogenous patients (n = 53) had significantly higher levels of most criterial symptoms than did non-endogenous patients (n = 27), they differed on almost no non-endogenous symptoms. These findings support the concept of a specific endogenous symptom cluster.

Adult↗