PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Eeckhout

Publications and source records attributed to E Eeckhout.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Stent by stent crush: procedural outcome and angiographic follow-up.

Rewiring of an occluded and incompletely deployed coronary stent with a sharp and/or tortuous entrance angle may be difficult in the emergency setting. We report the case of a patient who experienced subacute stent thrombosis in the proximal right coronary artery. Incorrect rewiring resulted in stent crush after conventional balloon angioplasty at lesion site. In order to improve the angiographic result parallel stent placement was performed. Repeat angiography at 6 months demonstrated vessel patency without restenosis.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1998

Endoluminal vessel reconstruction by stent placement in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease who are poor surgical candidates.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of endoluminal vessel reconstruction by intracoronary stenting in patients with single or multivessel disease who have been turned down for surgical revascularisation. DESIGN: An observational, single centre trial of consecutive patients being followed up clinically. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: 43 patients treated between 1995 and 1996 with a clinical follow up period of at least six months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute procedural success following intervention (defined as a residual stenosis of < 30% with normal antegrade flow and without acute clinical complications); major adverse clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, repeat intervention, clinical restenosis); and functional status during follow up. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 39 patients. Failures resulted from a refractory no reflow phenomenon with Q wave myocardial infarction (two patients), and from subacute stent thrombosis (one patient) and saphenous vein graft rupture at stent site (one patient), both manifesting by non-Q wave myocardial infarction. During a follow up period of 17 (8) months (mean (SD)), three of these patients died. Clinical restenosis was treated by repeat percutaneous intervention in 11 patients, while 28 patients remained asymptomatic. On a Kaplan-Meier estimate, the proportion of patients without adverse clinical events at two years was 65%. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous reconstruction of diseased coronary arteries in patients with single or multivessel disease turned down for surgical revascularisation may be considered as a valuable treatment option. On follow up, more events seem to be encountered than after elective de novo stenting of discrete coronary lesions. This is probably related to higher clinical restenosis rates.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Long-term follow-up after implantation of a coronary endoprosthesis].

UNLABELLED: The authors analysed the long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up of patients after coronary stenting for the treatment of coronary stenosis of a native artery or vein graft. BACKGROUND: The need for revascularization at 6 months and the restenosis rate were decreased after coronary stenting, compared to the conventional percutaneous angioplasty. This benefit appears to persist in the longer term. METHOD: The incidence of major clinical and angiographic complications was evaluated in 129 patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. RESULTS: At 6 months, 20% of patients presented a major clinical complication and restenosis was documented in 20% of cases. In the long-term, a major cardiac event was observed in 49% of cases (death: 16%, infarction: 5%, coronary artery bypass graft: 12% and another angioplasty: 16%). Patients treated by stenting during coronary artery bypass graft had a significantly lower survival (60% versus 88%), and a higher incidence of major clinical complications (55% versus 18%), and a higher stent revascularization rate (41% versus 16%). CONCLUSION: The late stent revascularization rate was low. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients treated for a native vessel than in those treated for a coronary artery bypass graft. The complication rate and stent revascularization rate were also significantly lower.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

[Percutaneous versus surgical revascularization of isolated lesions of the proximal anterior interventricular artery. Five-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study].

The authors report the results of 5 years follow-up of 134 patients who benefited from percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty 5PTCA) or surgical intervention with implantation of the internal mammary artery as treatment of an isolated lesions of the proximal left anterior descending artery with normal left ventricular function. Sixty-eight patients underwent PTCA (group 1) and 66 had surgical bypass (group 2). The demographic data of the two groups was comparable. The incidence of the following events was analysed: death, myocardial infarction, indication for further revascularisation and functional class. At 5 years, the global mortality was 6% (8% in group 1 and 2% in group 2) but cardiac mortality was only 1% (1 patient in each group). The cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction was higher after angioplasty (15% vs 5%) but was mainly related to acute occlusions or acute coronary syndromes during angioplasty. However, the incidence of Q wave infarction was similar in the two groups. During follow-up, 32 patients (26 in group 1 and 6 in group 2) required one or more additional revascularisation procedures of the left anterior descending or of another artery. The proportion of asymptomatic patients at 5 years was high and similar in both groups. Finally, the proportion of patients without events during follow-up was 56% in group 1 and 86% in group 2. Despite the risk of restenosis and reoperation associated with angioplasty, this technique is an acceptable therapeutic alternative to surgical revascularisation in patients with isolated stenosis of the left anterior descending artery. Therefore, the therapeutic decision depends on the individual case, the availability of treatment and the patient's preference during consultation.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1997

[Immediate and mid-term clinical and angiographic results after implantation of AVE intracoronary micro-stents in 140 consecutive cases. An experience in Lausanne].

Two hundred AVE (Arterial Vascular Engineering) microstents measuring 4 to 30 mm were implanted in 140 patients aged 62 +/- 10 years with Class II to IV angina of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification. The indications were: de novo lesions (30%), suboptimal angioplasty results (54%), acute occlusion (8%) or restenosis (8%). The stents of 3.0 to 4.0 mm diameter were implanted in the left main coronary artery (1%) the left anterior descending artery (20%), the left circumflex artery (19%), the right coronary artery (44%) or a venous bypass graft (7%) after intravenous injection of 15,000 IU of heparin. Daily treatment with aspirin 100 mg and ticlopidine 500 mg was instituted from the day of the procedure. The success rate was 98.5% with only 3 technical failures. The minimal luminal diameter and percentage stenosis ranged from 0.80 +/- 0.2 mm and 74 +/- 13% before to 2.66 +/- 0.38 mm and 15 +/- 7% after the procedure in vessels with an average reference diameter of 3.05 +/- 0.35 mm. There were 3% of stent-related immediate clinical complications. In February 1996, 97 patients had survived 6 months. With a 97% follow-up rate, the clinical event rate was 18%. The angiographic follow-up rate was 70% and the restenosis rate was 27%. The authors conclude that the AVE microstents are easy to implant and provide excellent immediate angiographic results with a low complication rate.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Stents for intracoronary placement: current status and future directions.

The technique of intracoronary stenting has achieved remarkable progress over the last few years. Improved stent deployment techniques and optimization of postprocedural management have dramatically improved the safety of intracoronary stent placement. At present, the incidence of early vessel closure after stenting is even lower than that after standard angioplasty and, as most operators no longer prescribe aggressive anticoagulation, bleeding complications are uncommon. Stenting has become an extremely effective treatment for abrupt or threatened vessel closure or for any suboptimal angiographic result during conventional angioplasty. Furthermore, large prospective trials have demonstrated that its efficacy is superior to that of conventional angioplasty for primary restenosis prevention in focal lesions of some native coronary arteries. Ongoing trials tend to extrapolate these conclusions to saphenous vein graft lesions. Mechanical support of the vessel wall explains the sustained angiographic benefit observed after stenting. Future developments may include the use of stents as a vehicle for local drug delivery in an attempt to further reduce the incidence of restenosis. In view of these results, coronary stents should be considered a new standard therapeutic modality in interventional cardiology.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1996

[Coronary angioplasty in elderly patients].

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is a widely accepted treatment of symptomatic coronary heart disease providing prompt and prolonged clinical, improvement in most patients. We have examined the value of this therapy in a group of 91 patients in their eighth decade treated by 133 consecutive angioplasties. Most patients had refractory or instable angor in spite of optimal pharmacotherapy. Multivessel disease was present in 67% and maintained left-ventricular function in 92% of the patients. The angiographic success rate of PTCA was 84%; technical failures occurred in 12% and adverse events in 14%. Two patients died. The rate of symptomatic restenosis was 24%. Survival and patients free of myocardial events were at 89% and 60%, respectively, estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. PTCA is an efficient and acceptable treatment for the elderly patient with severe and drug-resistant angina. Two years after PTCA the majority of patients was asymptomatic.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Placement of multiple and different stent types for very long dissections during coronary angioplasty.

We have been investigating the safety and efficacy of multiple and different stent types placed in the unfavorable situation of a very long dissection (> 20 mm) after coronary angioplasty. We report our preliminary experience in 20 patients who were treated by the following combinations: Palmaz-Schatz and Micro stent (14 patients). Wallstent and Micro stent (4 patients); Wiktor and Micro stent (1 patient); and Palmaz-Schatz, Micro and Wallstent (1 patient). Normal distal flow was restored in all except one (no reflow phenomenon) patient and complete covering of the dissection was obtained in all but two patients. Event-free survival at 30 days was 90% (18 of 20 patients). During follow-up (mean period: 8 +/- 3 months), two patients died. Of the 18 other patients, 16 remained asymptomatic and free of complications. Symptomatic restenosis was treated by standard angioplasty in the two remaining patients. In conclusion, placement of different stent types seems a feasible, safe, and efficient treatment for very long dissections caused by standard angioplasty.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Coronary stenting for coronary artery narrowing in a heart transplant recipient.

Transplant atherosclerotic coronary disease remains the leading cause of death in heart transplant recipients. We report the first case of coronary stent implantation in a heart graft for epicardial focal stenosis. Due to the lower rate of restenosis after stenting in the native coronary artery, we suggest that coronary stenting be considered an acceptable, first intention therapeutic option instead of angioplasty alone whenever possible.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1996

Comparison of elective Wiktor stent placement with conventional balloon angioplasty for new-onset lesions of the right coronary artery.

This study compared the clinical and angiographic outcome, during a 6-month follow-up period, of 84 patients with new-onset lesions of the right coronary artery randomized to either Wiktor stent implantation (42 patients) or conventional balloon angioplasty (42 patients). At hospital discharge, three patients in each group (7%, p = not significant [NS]) reached a clinical end point. At 6 months, these proportions were 24% (10 patients with stents) and 29% (12 patients with angioplasty) (p = NS). There were no incidents of death or myocardial infarction. Despite a larger minimal luminal diameter after stenting (2.87 mm [95% confidence interval; 2.66 to 2.96 mm] vs 2.37 mm [2.23 to 2.61 mm for angioplasty] [p = 0.001]), no difference was observed at 6 months of follow-up (1.75 mm [1.43 to 2.18 mm] vs 1.74 mm [1.45 to 2.03 mm] [p = NS], respectively). Accordingly, angiographic restenosis rates were 47.5% (19 of 40 patients with stents) and 35% (14 of 40 patients with angioplasty) (p = NS). Elective stenting with the Wiktor stent and conventional balloon angioplasty are safe and immediately effective therapeutic options for symptomatic, obstructive right coronary artery disease. At 6 months of follow-up, clinical and angiographic outcome did not differ. The role of Wiktor stent placement in primary restenosis prevention remains to be determined for lesions of the right coronary artery.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1996

Intracoronary Stenting for Restenosis: Long-Term Follow-up: A Single Center Experience.

One-hundred thirteen stents (78 Wallstents, 29 Palmaz-Schatz and 6 Wiktor) were implanted in 106 patients aged 63 +/- 5 years to treat a restenosis following previous angioplasty in a native coronary artery (86 cases) and in a venous graft (20 cases). Implantation was technically possible in all cases. The native vessels had a mean reference diameter of 3.3 +/- 0.3 mm and their mean minimal lumen diameter increased from 1.2 +/- 0.3 mm before angioplasty to 2.8 +/- 0.8 after stent implantation. The venous grafts mean reference diameter was 4.4 +/- 0.7 mm and their mean minimal lumen diameter increased from 1.3 +/- 0.4 mm before angioplasty to 4.0 +/- 0.7 mm after implantation. Percentage stenosis in the native arteries and in the venous grafts were respectively 78 +/- 13% and 69 +/- 14% before angioplasty and 24 +/- 8% and 22 +/- 8% after stent implantation. Complications at 6 months, presented as a ranking scale with 100% follow-up rate were, overall, of 20% clinical events (4% deaths, 6% myocardial infractions, 2% coronary artery bypass grafting and 8% re-angioplasty). Angiographic complications were of 8% subacute thrombosis and 19% restenosis and chronic occlusions. Long-term, at 65 +/- 9 months, clinical (86% follow-up) and angiographic (74% follow-up) showed that only a further 9% clinical events and 14% restenosis (12% of them between 6 and 12 months) occurred after 6 months. At an estimated follow-up time of 104 months, 70% patients remain event-free and the survival rate is 95%. In conclusion, stent implantation in the treatment of restenosis following conventional balloon angioplasty is a valid strategy with good long-term results.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

Emergency endoluminal stenting for abrupt vessel closure following coronary angioplasty: a randomized comparison of the Wiktor and Palmaz-Schatz stents.

In order to compare the efficacy of two different stent types in case of bailout stenting, 65 patients, with abrupt or threatened vessel closure following coronary angioplasty, were randomly assigned to either Wiktor (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, 33 patients) or Palmaz-Schatz (Johnson & Johnson Interventional, Warren, NJ, 32 patients) stent implantation. Stenting was technically feasible in all except one patient and immediately successful in reverting ischemia and vessel closure in 60 patients (92%). At hospital discharge, complication rates were comparable: early vessel closure, 18% (Wiktor) versus 13% (Palmaz-Schatz) (P = 0.53); any clinical event (such as death, myocardial infarction, and surgical revascularization): 18% (Wiktor) versus 22% (Palmaz-Schatz) (P = 0.71). At 6 months follow-up, these complication rates remained equal: restenosis, 38% (Wiktor) versus 27% (Palmaz-Schatz) (P = 0.42); any clinical and angiographic (vessel closure and restenosis) event: 45% (Wiktor) and 41% (Palmaz-Schatz) (P = 0.69). Baseline, direct postprocedural, and follow-up quantitative coronary analysis data were similar, with, however, an exception for the postprocedural residual stenosis [28% (24-32%) (Wiktor) and 21% (18-23%) (Palmaz-Schatz] (means and 95% confidence intervals). In conclusion, despite a discrete postprocedural angiographic benefit observed with the Palmaz-Schatz stent, the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome is similar in both treatment groups. The choice whether to implant a Wiktor or Palmaz-Schatz stent may probably be left to the discretion of the operator and his experience with one particular device.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Unplanned use of intracoronary stents for the treatment of a suboptimal angiographic result after conventional balloon angioplasty.

This observational single-center trial examines the safety and efficacy of unplanned endoluminal stenting for the treatment of a suboptimal angiographic result (defined as a residual stenosis after angioplasty of 40% to 50% without delayed runoff as estimated by visual assessment) after conventional coronary angioplasty in native, new-onset, coronary artery stenoses. Between October 1991 and April 1994, 101 patients with suboptimal results after coronary angioplasty in new-onset lesions were treated by endoluminal Wiktor (41 patients) and Palmaz-Schatz (60 patients) stent implantation. Stenting was a technical and angiographic success in all cases. In-hospital complications were subacute closure (2%) and vascular complications at puncture site necessitating surgery (12%) or blood transfusion (3%). No myocardial infarction occurred, nor was any urgent bypass surgery performed. At follow-up restenosis was detected in 16 (20%, 80% angiographic follow-up rate) patients requiring repeat angioplasty (8%) and elective bypass grafting (4%). Myocardial infarction was not documented. However, one patient died suddenly at 5 months of follow-up. The unplanned use of intracoronary stents is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of a suboptimal angiographic result after conventional angioplasty in new-onset lesions. This approach guarantees a high immediate angiographic success but implies a considerable incidence of vascular complications at puncture site.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Stand-by versus stent-by during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

To evaluate the impact of a more liberal use of endoluminal stenting on the incidence of emergency coronary artery by-pass grafting, we analyzed our attitude toward abrupt or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty from 1986 through 1993. In 3083 procedures performed, 204 (6.6%) patients had abrupt or threatened closure. The incidence of closure or threatened closure remained stable during the 8 years, ranging between 5% (1986) and 8% (1987) (p = 0.89). Endoluminal stent implantation was attempted in 92 patients and successfully achieved in 90 (98%), and emergency bypass grafting had to be performed in 41 patients. The proportion without adverse end point (death or myocardial infarction) was higher in the patients treated by endoluminal stenting than in patients treated with bypass grafting (71/90 (79%) patients vs 17/41 (40%) patients, respectively; p < 0.0001). The use of bailout stenting gradually increased from 0.4% (1986) to 5.6% (1993) of all procedures (p = 0.0001), whereas the incidence of emergency bypass grafting decreased from 2.7% (1986) to 0.7% (1993) (p = 0.04). Meanwhile, the incidence of myocardial infarction remained stable between 5.6% (1988) and 1.8% (1992) (p = 0.1), and death rates decreased from 1.4% (1988) to 0.2% (1993) (p = 0.05). It is concluded that "stent-by" is a highly effective therapeutic approach (79% in the present study) toward closure after coronary angioplasty and that, although surgical "stand-by" is certainly mandatory for selected cases, routine stand-by is questionable.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1995

Initial experience with the "Big-Skinny" angioplasty catheter.

We describe our initial experience with the "Big Skinny" angioplasty catheter, currently only available as an investigational device and in sizes of 4.5, 5, and 6 mm. Six patients with severe angina pectoris were successfully dilated with this angioplasty catheter and have remained asymptomatic up until a mean follow-up period of 6 months. However, because of the large profile of the catheter, sufficient back-up with an adequate guiding catheter should be obtained and predilation with a smaller angioplasty catheter should be performed. The use of this catheter may be a more simple alternative for the treatment of oversized vessel stenosis than the "hugging balloon" technique or directional atherectomy. Otherwise, it may be considered as an adjunct technique in order to optimize the angiographic result after stenting or directional arthrectomy in this particular indication.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Randomized trials on PTCA and stenting in the treatment of De Novo coronary artery stenosis: an overview on existing data in June 1994.

This is a review on prospective randomized comparisons of PTCA and stents in the treatment of de novo native coronary artery lesions. BENESTENT and STRESS, two multicentric studies, used the articulated Palmaz-Schatz stent. In Lausanne, a single center trial limited to right coronary artery lesions, was conducted using the Wiktor stent. During the in-hospital phase. BENESTENT and STRESS showed the composite clinical end point to be less in the stent than in the PTCA groups (p < 0.05). In Lausanne, there was no difference between groups. The incidence of subacute closure was similar with both treatments in three trials. Angiographically, both postprocedural minimal luminal diameter (MLD) and percentage stenosis were larger in the stent group (P < 0.05). At 6 months, in both BENESTENT and STRESS, a composite clinical end point was reached by less stent patients than PTCA patients, with a reduced need for repeat nonsurgical reintervention by stenting. However, in Lausanne, there was no difference between stent and PTCA groups. At 6 months in both BENESTENT and STRESS, a persistent lower MLD, a larger percentage of stenosis, and a higher incidence of angiographic restenosis were found in the PTCA groups (P < 0.05). In Lausanne, no differences in MLD, percentage stenosis and angiographic restenosis were found between groups. Effective stenting of de novo lesions does improve immediate results compared to conventional balloon PTCA. The long-term outcome of stenting with Palmaz-Scharz stents is also improved compared to PTCA.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗