PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Febré

Publications and source records attributed to E Febré.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Continuous spinal anaesthesia versus single dosing. A comparative study.

Continuous and single dose spinal anaesthesia were compared in a prospective randomized fashion in 108 patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Continuous spinal anaesthesia was via a 20 gauge polyamide multiperforated catheter introduced through an 18 gauge Tuohy needle. Single-dose spinal anaesthesia was performed with a 24 guage x 103 mm Sprotte spinal needle. The mean local anaesthetic dose for the continuous technique was 38.4 (SD 16.5) mg as hyperbaric lignocaine 5%, and for the single-dose spinal anaesthesia 10.8 (SD 2.2) mg as hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%. Segmental levels reached with the initial dose did not differ significantly between the two groups. Mean time required to perform continuous spinal anaesthesia was 6.7 (SD 3.9) min, which was longer than for single dose 4.9 (SD 2.8) min (P < 0.05). The onset time and efficacy of anaesthesia, and the duration of the operation were similar in the two groups. Analgesia was inadequate in six patients who received continuous spinal anaesthesia (11%) and one patient who received single dose (2%) (P = 0.18). Hypotension was more frequent in those receiving single doses (P < 0.05). Caudal rotation of the outlet needle orifice to advance the catheter correlated with inadequate analgesia (P < 0.01, r = 0.38). There were no significant differences in the incidence of post-operative complications.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Continuous intradural anesthesia in geriatric patients undergoing orthopedic and traumatologic surgery].

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to prospectively evaluate the results of continuous intradural anesthesia with 18G Tuohy needle and 20G catheter in geriatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 70 patients with a mean age of 75.9 +/- 10.8 years who were subjected to orthopedic or traumatologic surgery of the lower extremities with a duration of 104.6 +/- 53.6 min. RESULTS: Success index was 95.7%. The initial dose of 1% tetracaine was 10.36 +/- 3.96 mg, the second dose in 29 patients was 7.2 +/- 2.7 mg, the third in 7 cases was 7.40 +/- 2.47 mg, and the total dose was 14.56 +/- 5.6 mg. The metameric level was between T8 and T11 in 80.32% of patients. Peroperative complications were limited to paresthesia in 5 cases (7.14%) during insertion of the catheter, difficulties in catheter placement in one case (1.42%), and accidental catheter extraction during withdrawal of the needle in 2 cases (2.85%). Ten patients (14.28%) presented arterial hypotension (pressure decrease greater than 30% of baseline systolic arterial pressure). During the postoperative phase there were 3 cases of slight headache after dural puncture (4.28%) that recovered with conservative treatment, and one case of lumbalgia at the puncture zone (1.42%). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous intradural anesthesia with the material used in this study is technically easy. It allows to accurately reach the desired metameric level, avoiding massive sympathetic blockade, and providing a steady hemodynamic condition. All these effects are essential for anesthesia in geriatric patients.

Aged↗