PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Fram

Publications and source records attributed to E Fram.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Potential pitfalls in the work-up and diagnosis of choanal atresia.

To increase an awareness of the developmental anatomy of the nasal cavity as it applies to the radiologic work-up of choanal atresia and frontoethmoidal cephaloceles, we report two cases that demonstrate potentially serious imaging pitfalls. Two neonates with nasopharyngeal obstruction were imaged with CT and MR. Both patients had surgically proved bilateral bony choanal atresia. In addition to choanal atresia, CT showed a radiolucent, or nonossified cribriform plate and mucoid secretions within the nasal fossa, adjacent to the cribriform plate, which approximated the attenuation of brain parenchyma. In one of the patients, a preoperative diagnosis of nasopharyngeal encephalocele resulted in surgical exploration. At surgery, however, the cartilaginous cribriform plate was found to be intact.

Choanal Atresia↗

Efficacy of MR vs CT in epilepsy.

We studied 59 seizure patients with CT, MR, and EEG to determine the efficacy of each in the detection of an epileptogenic focus. EEG was most sensitive (67%), MR was next (53%), and CT was least sensitive (42%). MR detected an abnormality in five patients (8%) in whom CT was negative. EEG was positive in each of these patients. CT failed to demonstrate any focal lesion not detected by MR. MR and CT detected focal abnormalities in seven patients (12%) who had negative EEGs. Five of the seven patients had brain tumors. Eighteen of the 26 patients who underwent surgery had positive CT and MR; 14 of these patients had tumors. The remaining eight patients who had surgery all had temporal lobectomies for intractable seizures; none had tumors. In the complex partial seizure subgroup of 34 patients, MR was positive in 44%, CT was positive in 29%, and EEG was positive in 80%. We consider MR to be the imaging procedure of choice for the detection of an epileptogenic focus in seizure patients. When indicated, CT may be performed as a second procedure to try to distinguish neoplasm from thrombosed vascular malformations and other lesions.

Brain Neoplasms↗

Comparative neurotoxicity of angiographic contrast media.

The neurotoxic effects in cerebral angiography of three iodinated ionic contrast media, nonionic iopamidol, 25% mannitol, and saline controls were compared in 25 rabbits. Diatrizoate sodium meglumine was the most toxic agent, followed by diatrizoate and meglumine, iothalamate meglumine, and mannitol in terms of blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption and coupled perfusion decline. HIPDm distribution was more sensitive than trypan blue extravasation for monitoring brain dysfunction. Iopamidol and saline controls exhibited no visual BBB breakdown or alteration in regional uptake of I-125 HIPDm, confirming the safety of nonionic iopamidol as compared with presently used ionic contrast media.

Animals↗