PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E G Pieper

Publications and source records attributed to E G Pieper.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Mini-maze suffices as adjunct to mitral valve surgery in patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: After mitral valve (MV) surgery, preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) often recurs while cardioversion therapy generally fails. Additional Cox maze surgery improves postoperative arrhythmia outcome, but the extensive nature of such an approach limits general appliance. We investigated the clinical outcome of a simplified, less extensive Cox maze procedure ("mini-maze") as adjunct to MV surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirteen patients with MV disease and preoperative AF were treated with combined surgery (group 1). Nine control patients without previous AF underwent isolated MV surgery (group 2). We retrospectively compared the results to findings in 23 patients with preoperative AF who had undergone isolated MV surgery (group 3). In group 1, mini-maze took an additional 46 minutes of perfusion time. One 75-year-old patient died of postoperative multiple organ failure. Seven patients showed spontaneously converting (within 2 months) postoperative AF. After 1 year, 82% were in sinus rhythm (SR). No sinus node dysfunction was observed. In group 2, all patients were in SR after 1 year. In group 3, only 53% were in SR after 1 year, despite serial cardioversion and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Exercise tolerance and heart rate were comparable for groups 1 and 2. Left atrial function was present in all but one patient in group 1 and in all patients in group 2 (after MV reconstruction). CONCLUSION: Adding a relatively simple mini-maze to MV surgery improves arrhythmia outcome in patients with preoperative AF without introducing sinus node dysfunction or persistent absence of left atrial function. The results of this type of combined surgery are encouraging and deserve further attention.

Aged↗

Prediction of surgical strategy in mitral valve regurgitation based on echocardiography. Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands.

The purpose of this prospective multicenter study of 350 consecutive patients who were accepted for mitral valve surgery because of severe regurgitation, was to assess the value of preoperative transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in predicting the surgical strategy in severe mitral regurgitation: repair or replacement. The cardiologist predicted the surgical strategy on the basis of the echocardiographic examination, according to predefined guidelines for repair and replacement. The predicted strategy and motivation thereof were compared with the surgical findings and procedure that was performed. Agreement on the basis of transthoracic echocardiography was reached in 86% of the repair patients and on the basis of transesophageal echocardiography in 89%. Agreement on the basis of transthoracic echocardiography was reached in 74% of the replacement patients and on the basis of transesophageal echocardiography in 75%. This study underlines the potential role of echocardiography in predicting the surgical procedure to be applied, provided that both surgeon and cardiologist use the same nomenclature and that the guidelines for replacement/repair are adhered to. Both transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography appear to be equally accurate in predicting the optimal surgical procedure in this respect.

Echocardiography↗

Categorization of abnormal left ventricular function: comparison between radionuclide angiographic and echocardiographic technique in postinfarction patients.

In postinfarction patients, only biplane echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) accurately predicts radionuclide EF > or <0.35, 0.40, and 0.45. A wall motion scoring system that does not account for hyperkinesia of healthy myocardium may be used to discriminate between radionuclide EF > or <0.40 or 0.45, but lacks accuracy for 0.35.

Adult↗

Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography with surgical findings in mitral regurgitation. The ESMIR Research Group.

This prospective study was conducted to ascertain whether echocardiographic evaluation could provide more insight into the genesis of mitral regurgitation (MR) before surgery. All patients underwent preoperative transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Nine centers participated in the ESMIR (Echocardiographic Selection of patients for MItral valve Reconstruction) study and 350 patients were included. Compared with surgical findings, the percentage of functional abnormalities correctly predicted by both echo modalities was highest in patients with increased leaflet mobility (83% for transthoracic and 86% transesophageal echocardiography). In contrast, in normal leaflet mobility, the prediction was better by transthoracic than by transesophageal echocardiography (75% vs 64%). In patients with restricted leaflet mobility, the predictive value of both techniques was similar. The diagnostic yield of anatomic abnormalities of both echo techniques was similar, except for chordal rupture; a sensitivity by transesophageal echocardiography of 79% and by transthoracic echocardiography of 57% (p < 0.001). In general, the sensitivity of each echo technique for detecting anatomic abnormalities was <70%, except for annular dilatation, leaflet thickening, and chordal rupture. At surgery, the prevailing functional condition was increased leaflet mobility (42%). The conclusion is that both echo techniques provide adequate information regarding the functional condition of the mitral valve apparatus, not withstanding limitations in assessing anatomic details. Transthoracic echocardiography appears to be sufficient for preoperative evaluation of MR.

Adolescent↗