PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

E Getzoff

Publications and source records attributed to E Getzoff.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition.

Initial events in Mu DNA transposition involve specific recognition of Mu DNA ends (att sites) and an internal enhancer site by the Mu transposase (A protein). This interaction between A protein and Mu DNA sequences present on a supercoiled DNA substrate leads to the formation of a stable synaptic complex in which the att ends are nicked, prior to DNA strand transfer. This study examines the properties of a synaptic complex proficient for DNA transposition. We show that the A protein binds as a monomer to its binding sites, and causes the DNA to bend through approximately 90 degrees at each site. All six att binding sites (three at each Mu end) are occupied by A within the synaptic complex. Three of these sites are loosely held and can be emptied of A upon challenge with heparin. A synaptic complex with only three sites occupied is stable and is fully competent in the subsequent strand-transfer step of transposition.

Bacteriophage mu

Perspectives on antigenicity and idiotypy.

The recent crystal determination of a lysozyme-antilysozyme complex provides a three-dimensional prototype of the manner in which contacts in idiotype-anti-idiotype interactions may be realized. Such interactions can be approximated by two complementary "flat" surfaces. Each IDR (autoantigenic locus) location might provide a particular recognition feature between two interacting partners. The combinatorial manner in which IDR domains are recognized by anti-idiotypic antibodies describe the repertoire of private and public (crossreactive) idiotopes of an antibody. Several interesting features emerge from consideration of the Ab contact residues in the crystal structure. First, framework residues are implicated in contacting the antigen: Thr 30 (FR1) of the heavy chain and Tyr 49 (FR2) of the kappa light chain. Both of these residues lie within predicted IDRs. Framework regions have recently been suggested to be involved in several anti-idiotypic systems, although such regions have, in the past, been disregarded based solely upon sequence analysis. The surface variability analysis, which identifies the repertoire of complementary interacting surfaces, depicts the immunoglobulin as having more variability than generally thought. This variability may also extend to T cell receptors since T cell chains express an extensive surface variable repertoire similar to that of the immunoglobulin light chains (Kieber-Emmons and Köhler, unpublished). Second, the D region plays a critical role in the generation of the antilysozyme combining sites. Similarly, the D segment makes up the largest component of an IDR. Third, while the CDR3 of the heavy chain contributes most to the antibody-lysozyme complex it is not the most surface-exposed (see Novotny, this issue). Nevertheless, surface variability analysis indicates that this region is generally immunodominant which is also observed experimentally. Together, these results indicate that perhaps certain IDR regions are intrinsically more antigenic. Idiotypic structures must be accessible for antibody recognition and binding. From a structural viewpoint, a single antibody molecule has a continuum or several different combining sites. Subsequently, a single residue can be contained in several overlapping idiotypic determinants. Surface variability analysis suggests that the hypervariable regions of Igs provide a diverse idiotope repertoire that can be utilized for binding. Monoclonal antibodies have been shown to have multiple specificities and this capacity for multiple binding is also intrinsic to the definitions that have emerged for anti-idiotypic antibodies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Amino Acid Sequence