PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Glucksman

Publications and source records attributed to E Glucksman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of laryngeal mask and intubating laryngeal mask insertion by the naïve intubator.

Seventy-five inexperienced participants were timed inserting the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the intubating laryngeal mask (ILM) in one of five cadavers. Adequacy of ventilation was assessed on a three-point scale depending on chest expansion and air leak. Participants were also asked to intubate the trachea via the ILM. The ILM was inserted faster than the LMA (P < 0.05) with a greater proportion achieving adequate ventilation after their first attempt (P < 0.05). Tracheal intubation via the ILM was completed successfully by 67% (52 of 75) of participants. In a questionnaire, participants stated that the ILM was easier to use and the preferred device in an emergency. The results suggest that inexperienced practitioners should use the ILM rather than the LMA for emergency ventilation.

Cadaver↗

Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Falls in elderly people are a common presenting complaint to accident and emergency departments. Current practice commonly focuses on the injury, with little systematic assessment of the underlying cause, functional consequences, and possibilities for future prevention. We undertook a randomised controlled study to assess the benefit of a structured inderdisciplinary assessment of people who have fallen in terms of further falls. METHODS: Eligible patients were aged 65 years and older, lived in the community, and presented to an accident and emergency department with a fall. Patients assigned to the intervention group (n=184) underwent a detailed medical and occupational-therapy assessment with referral to relevant services if indicated; those assigned to the control group (n=213) received usual care only. The analyses were by intention to treat. Follow-up data were collected every 4 months for 1 year. FINDINGS: At 12-month follow-up, 77% of both groups remained in the study. The total reported number of falls during this period was 183 in the intervention group compared with 510 in the control group (p=0.0002). The risk of falling was significantly reduced in the intervention group (odds ratio 0.39 [95% CI 0.23-0.66]) as was the risk of recurrent falls (0.33 [0.16-0.68]). In addition, the odds of admission to hospital were lower in the intervention group (0.61 [0.35-1.05]) whereas the decline in Barthel score with time was greater in the control group (p<0.00001). INTERPRETATION: The study shows that an interdisciplinary approach to this high-risk population can significantly decrease the risk of further falls and limit functional impairment.

Accidental Falls↗

Training and supervision needs and experience: a longitudinal, cross-sectional survey of accident and emergency department senior house officers.

The aim of this study was to investigate senior house officers' (SHOs) perceptions about their training needs, satisfaction with teaching and supervision, and the relationship this has with psychological distress levels. All 171 SHOs employed within 27 accident and emergency (A&E) departments in the South Thames region were sent questionnaires at the start of their attachments in A&E, at the end of months four and six. The questionnaires asked SHOs to rate on visual analogue scales their perceived need for further training for 23 clinical and practical activities relevant to A&E practice. At the end of the fourth month SHOs were asked to indicate who had provided them with the most valuable teaching and supervision, indicate their satisfaction levels with training received, and suggest ways to improve teaching and supervision. SHOs' psychological distress levels were measured in all three questionnaires. Overall, satisfaction with supervision and training was mixed. SHOs perceived greatest need for further training in areas encountered less frequently in A&E. Registrars were the most valued providers of supervision and teaching. Increased numbers of middle grade staff and protected study time were suggested as ways to improve supervision and teaching. SHOs with higher scores for training need at the end of their attachment in A&E expressed significantly less satisfaction with training and higher psychological distress levels. The variation between SHOs' perceptions of training needs indicates the importance of tailoring training and supervision to individual requirements.

Cross-Sectional Studies↗

Emergency department senior house officers' consultation difficulties: implications for training.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We investigated the types of patient presentations that cause senior house officers (SHOs) most difficulty during their tenure in emergency departments and report the extent to which such difficulties are related to SHOs' communication problems, stress, or perceived lack of skills or knowledge. METHODS: We conducted a questionnaire survey of 171 newly appointed SHOs employed in 27 EDs in the South Thames region of England. Subjects were asked to describe the presentation that gave them greatest difficulty during three subsequent shifts at the end of the first and fourth months of their ED appointment. RESULTS: A total of 132 (77%) and 110 (64%) respondents returned questionnaires at the end of the first and fourth months, respectively; 61% (105) responded to both questionnaires. The respondents described 537 of a possible total of 726 cases (74%). Communication problems caused difficulty in 406 (76%) cases, SHOs' experience of stress in 352 (66%) cases, and a perceived lack of knowledge or skills in 281 (52%) cases. Communication problems and the experience of stress occurred in 141 (26%) cases. Patients presenting with mental or behavioral disorders and symptoms most frequently gave rise to communication problems, perceived lack of skills, and the experience of stress. The difficulties described at the two time periods were very similar indicating that experience alone had little effect on these problems. CONCLUSION: ED SHOs may benefit from communication skills training, the opportunity to review difficult case presentations, and the alleviation of organizational stress factors.

Adult↗

Senior house officers' work related stressors, psychological distress, and confidence in performing clinical tasks in accident and emergency: a questionnaire study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between accident and emergency senior house officers' psychological distress and confidence in performing clinical tasks and to describe work related stressors. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey with data collected at four points during senior house officers' six month attachment to accident and emergency departments. SUBJECTS: 171 newly appointed accident and emergency senior house officers from 27 hospitals in the South Thames region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress measured with a 25 item questionnaire; confidence in performing a range of 35 clinical and practical activities (visual analogue scales); reported consultation stress factors, other work related stressors, and personal stressors. RESULTS: Overall confidence scores in carrying out a range of clinical and practical activities increased significantly between the end of the first and the end of the fourth month (Z = -6.05, P < 0.001). Senior house officers with higher psychological distress scores at the end of their first and fourth month had significantly lower confidence scores (Z = -3.20, P < 0.001; Z = -1.90, P < 0.05). Senior house officers with lower increases in confidence between the first and fourth month had significantly higher distress than those with greater increases (Z = -2.62, P < 0.001). Factors identified as causing stress during consultations included difficulties with communication, certain clinical presentations, and department organisational factors (particularly the intensity of workload). CONCLUSIONS: Psychological distress is linked to confidence in senior house officers. This supports the need to monitor and build confidence in senior house officers and to address work related stressors. Additional communication skills training needs to be considered.

Clinical Competence↗

Primary care consultation skills training: implementing a new training programme for senior house officers in an accident and emergency department.

Senior house officers (SHOs) in Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments see many patients who present with primary care problems. Until now, most SHOs have lacked postgraduate training in primary care skills to enable them to meet these patients' needs effectively. This paper describes an innovative training programme that has been developing at King's College Hospital, London. It identifies a new opportunity for general practitioners to contribute to the postgraduate medical education of hospital junior medical staff. The training programme was designed to give A&E SHOs protected time in which to reflect on strengths and weaknesses in relation to primary care consultations and learn from their experiences. Its aim was to improve the assessment and management of patients, and to encourage a problem solving approach within the A&E setting. The programme, established in 1992, was developed through collaboration between the departments of A&E Medicine and General Practice and Primary Care. Evaluation has been a central theme in its development, and has been used to ensure that the training meets the needs of each individual set of SHOs and of the department. It has been used in establishing agreement about the training's value and benefits. The authors discuss some of the methodological difficulties encountered in evaluating this type of educational initiative.

Clinical Competence↗

Organ donation in the accident and emergency department: a study of relatives' views.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether recently bereaved people would object to being asked about organ donation immediately after the death of their relative. METHODS: A telephone interview of 78 recently bereaved relatives of people who had died in an inner city accident and emergency (A&E) department; 68 (87%) agreed to participate in the study and were sent a questionnaire. Outcome measures were views on being asked about organ donation in the A&E department immediately after the death of a relative and knowledge of the possibility for organ donation in A&E after a sudden death. RESULTS: 37 questionnaires were returned: 27 (72.9%) of those who responded would not have minded being asked, five would have minded, and five did not know or did not fill in the questionnaire; 29 were aware that organs could be donated following a death in A&E. Only six people had discussed organ donation before the bereavement. Only two of the people who died and seven of their relatives carried a donor card. Sixteen had heard about the NHS donor register. CONCLUSIONS: Most those responding would not have minded being asked about organ donation following a sudden death. More education is needed in two main areas: (1) to raise public awareness about the shortage of donor organs; (2) to improve the medical and nursing confidence in discussing these difficult issues sensitively but more openly and frequently.

Adult↗

How good are doctors at estimating children's weight?

OBJECTIVE: (1) To see whether children are weighted before drugs are prescribed in an accident and emergency (A&E) department; (2) to assess how safe it is for doctors to guess children's weight if they prescribe "by eye". METHODS: An audit of 100 sets of notes was performed to see if children were weighed before drugs were prescribed. A&E senior house officers were asked to estimate the weight of 75 children aged 12 years and under. RESULTS: Children were weighed before prescribing in only two out of 100 cases. The mean difference between the actual and estimated weights was -0.21 (not significantly different from zero: P = 0.40); 95% of the estimates were within two standard deviations of the mean difference. The percentage difference between the actual and estimated weight varied between overestimates of 300% and underestimates of nearly 100%. CONCLUSIONS: The average guess of doctors as a group was approximately correct. However, there was a wide range of estimates for individuals. If the child's weight is guessed, the doctor could risk under- or overprescribing analgesia, sedation, or intravenous fluids. Given the wide range of estimates, actual weights are required for accurate prescribing. Prescribing on an age basis may be acceptable for drugs such as paracetamol or amoxycillin, but it is imperative to prescribe on a mg/kg basis for opiates, sedatives, and intravenous fluids because of the large variation in weight that can occur for a single age.

Body Weight↗

Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars.

OBJECTIVES: To compare outcome and costs of general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars treating patients who attended accident and emergency department with problems assessed at triage as being of primary care type. DESIGN: Prospective intervention study which was later costed. SETTING: Inner city accident and emergency department in south east London. SUBJECTS: 4641 patients presenting with primary care problems: 1702 were seen by general practitioners, 2382 by senior house officers, and 557 by registrars. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Satisfaction and outcome assessed in subsample of 565 patients 7-10 days after hospital attendance and aggregate costs of hospital care provided. RESULTS: Most patients expressed high levels of satisfaction with clinical assessment (430/562 (77%)), treatment (418/557 (75%)), and consulting doctor's manner (434/492 (88%)). Patients' reported outcome and use of general practice in 7-10 days after attendance were similar: 206/241 (85%), 224/263 (85%), and 52/59 (88%) of those seen by general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars respectively were fully recovered or improving (chi2 = 0.35, P = 0.840), while 48/240 (20%), 48/268 (18%), and 12/57 (21%) respectively consulted a general practitioner or practice nurse (chi2 = 0.51, P = 0.774). Excluding costs of admissions, the average costs per case were 19.30 pounds, 17.97 pounds, and 11.70 pounds for senior house officers, registrars, and general practitioners respectively. With cost of admissions included, these costs were 58.25 pounds, 44.68 pounds, and 32.30 pounds respectively. CONCLUSION: Management of patients with primary care needs in accident and emergency department by general practitioners reduced costs with no apparent detrimental effect on outcome. These results support new role for general practitioners.

Consultants↗

Decision making in resuscitation from out of hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which factors are perceived by senior house officers (SHOs), consultants, and medical registrars in accident and emergency (A&E) medicine as being important in decision making. METHODS: 132 SHOs in A&E medicine, of 172 attending an induction course at the start of their job (77%), completed a questionnaire relating to 20 factors of possible importance in decision making; 73 completed the questionnaire at six weeks and 55 at six months. Ten medical registrars and 31 consultants in A&E medicine also completed the questionnaire. RESULTS: The SHOs were able to recognise bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and early advanced I support, as well as the presence of ventricular fibrillation, as important prognostic factors. There was considerable variation in all three groups in their opinions on the importance of the other factors considered. There was no obvious change in SHO responses over the period of training. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of guidelines may result in more patients receiving resuscitation than are salvageable, as doctors maintain a low threshold for continuing resuscitation to avoid missing potential survivors. A decision making algorithm is recommended.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Primary care in the accident and emergency department: I. Prospective identification of patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient characteristics and consultation activities for attenders at accident and emergency departments assessed by nurse triage as presenting with "primary care" or "accident and emergency" type problems. DESIGN: One year prospective study. SETTING: A busy, inner city accident and emergency department in south London. SUBJECTS: Of the 5658 patients treated for new problems during a stratified random sample of 204 three hour sessions between 10 am and 9 pm during June 1989 to May 1990, all "primary care" (2065 patients) and a 10% random sample of "accident and emergency" (291 patients) were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient's age, sex, duration of presenting problem, diagnosis, laboratory and radiographic investigations, treatments, and referrals. RESULTS: 40.9% of attenders with new problems were classified by triage as presenting with "primary care" problems (95% confidence interval 39.6% to 42.2%). Primary care attenders were more likely than accident and emergency patients to be young adults, to have symptoms with a duration of longer than 24 hours, and to present problems not related to injury (all P < 0.001). Accident and emergency patients were considerably more likely to be referred to on call teams and to be admitted. Even so, 9.7% of primary care patients were referred to on call teams and a further 8.9% were referred to the fracture clinic or advised to return to the accident and emergency department for follow up. CONCLUSION: Accident and emergency triage can be developed to identify patients with problems that are more likely to be of a primary care type, and these patients are less likely to receive an investigation, minor surgical procedure, or referral. Many patients in this category, however, receive interventions likely to support their decision to attend accident and emergency rather than general practice. This may reflect limitations in the sensitivity of triage practice or a clinical approach of junior medical staff that includes a propensity to intervene.

Adolescent↗

Primary care in the accident and emergency department: II. Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the process and outcome of "primary care" consultations undertaken by senior house officers, registrars, and general practitioners in an accident and emergency department. DESIGN: Prospective, controlled intervention study. SETTING: A busy, inner city accident and emergency department in south London. SUBJECTS: Patients treated during a stratified random sample of 419 three hour sessions between June 1989 and May 1990 assessed at nurse triage as presenting with problems that could be treated in a primary care setting. 1702 of these patients were treated by sessionally employed local general practitioners, 2382 by senior house officers, and 557 by registrars. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Process variables: laboratory and radiographic investigations, prescriptions, and referrals; outcome variables: results of investigations. RESULTS: Primary care consultations made by accident and emergency medical staff resulted in greater utilisation of investigative, outpatient, and specialist services than those made by general practitioners. For example, the odds ratios for patients receiving radiography were 2.78 (95% confidence interval 2.32 to 3.34) for senior house officer v general practitioner consultations and 2.37 (1.84 to 3.06) for registrars v general practitioners. For referral to hospital specialist on call teams or outpatient departments v discharge to the community the odds ratios were 2.88 (2.39 to 3.47) for senior house officers v general practitioners and 2.57 (1.98 to 3.35) for registrars v general practitioners. CONCLUSION: Employing general practitioners in accident and emergency departments to manage patients with primary care needs seems to result in reduced rates of investigations, prescriptions, and referrals. This suggests important benefits in terms of resource utilisation, but the impact on patient outcome and satisfaction needs to be considered further.

Adolescent↗

Prevention of drug absorption in simulated theophylline overdose.

1. The effects of emesis, gastric lavage and oral activated charcoal on theophylline absorption were compared in healthy volunteers. 2. One of four regimes (ipecacuanha-induced emesis, gastric lavage, oral activated charcoal and no treatment) was randomly chosen one hour after a simulated overdose with sustained-release theophylline on four separate occasions in twelve healthy volunteers. 3. Syrup of ipecacuanha produced emesis in all twelve volunteers but only seven vomited any tablets. Gastric lavage yielded tablets in only one volunteer. 4. The mean systemic availabilities (areas under the concentration-time curves relative to control) of theophylline for ipecacuanha-induced emesis, gastric lavage and charcoal, were 107.1%, 101.1% and 16.9%, respectively. 5. Oral activated charcoal was thus highly effective, while gastric lavage and emesis were ineffective in preventing theophylline absorption. Activated charcoal is potentially the most effective first-line treatment for acute overdosage with sustained-release theophylline tablets.

Administration, Oral↗

Training St John Ambulance volunteers to use an automated external defibrillator.

The key to improving survival from pre-hospital cardiac arrest lies in reducing the time interval between onset of cardiac arrest and defibrillation. Placing automated external defibrillators at strategic points in the community could potentially reduce this time interval, but would necessitate widespread training in defibrillation for lay people in addition to health care workers. There are unanswered questions regarding the ability of lay people to acquire and retain this skill when the training programme is, by necessity, very brief, (otherwise it would not be possible to train large enough numbers of people) and the skill is used infrequently. In this study, nurse and lay volunteer first-aiders were taught to use an automated external defibrillator, either by a 2-h, or a 4-h course, and their skills were assessed at training, and at 3 and 6 months afterwards. Using stringent assessment criteria, 54% of volunteers passed the assessment at every session. Little difference in acquisition or retention of skills between the nurse and lay volunteers, and the 2- and 4-h course groups was found. It is concluded that brief training in defibrillation for volunteer first-aiders is feasible.

Ambulances↗