[Diarrhea by Clostridium difficile].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to E Guillem Ares.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Metabolic alkalosis usually complicates the evolution of patients with hypercapnia under diuretic or steroid therapy. The objective of this study was to analyze the efficiency of therapy with acetazolamide, a reversible carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, in this condition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study conducted at our hospital from June 1994 to March 1996, with 45 patients who had chronic respiratory acidosis and metabolic alkalosis. After a previous stabilization of the patient and eventually the discontinuation of diuretic or corticosteroid drugs fro 24-48 hours, 500 or 750 mg of acetazolamide were administered daily for 48 hours. Later, variations both in arterial gasometry and venous electrolytes were analyzed by comparing two means of paired data. RESULTS: After therapy with acetazolamide a clinical improvement was observed in patients, a decrease in PaCO2, pH and CO3H (p < 0.001) and an increase in PaO2 (p < 0.001). Hypochloremia (82.2%) and hypopotassemia (33.3%) were the most common electrolytic abnormalities before therapy. Both abnormalities improved significantly after the administration of acetazolamide. In five patients (11.1%) acetazolamide was discontinued when metabolic acidosis appeared, which only in three cases was associated with acidemia. No secondary effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Acetazolamide is an efficient alternative for treatment of patients with respiratory acidosis and metabolic alkalosis, particularly when other more common measures in this condition (discontinuation of diuretics and/or volemic replacement) have failed or are contraindicated. On the other hand, the emergence of relevant secondary effects is unlikely.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the utility of thrombolytic therapy administered outside tertiary hospital. METHODS: We analyzed 80 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to the emergency area of primary hospital within 24 hours after the onset of symptoms and lastly transported to a coronary care unit (CCU) of a reference hospital. The thrombolytic protocol was performed by medicine department of primary hospital and the CCU of reference hospital. RESULTS: 23 patients without (group A) and 57 with (group B) fibrinolytic therapy (APSAC 50 patients and streptokinase 7 patients) were analyzed. Group A patient were older (mean: 67 +/- 11 vs mean: 62 +/- 10 years; p = 0.01), and arrived later to emergency area (mean 254 +/- 284 vs mean 163 SD 161 min; p = 0.04) and to the coronary care unit (mean 561 +/- 371 vs mean 334 +/- 177 min; p = 0.0002). The guard physician decision to start or not the fibrinolytic therapy, was adequate in 86% of the patients (sensitivity 87%, predictive positive value 95%, specificity 83%). Complications on emergency area or during transport in group B were ventricular fibrillation in 9%, AV block (2-3 degree) in 9%, severe nonsustained ventricular arrhythmia in 11% and transitory hypotension in 23%. No death occurred before CCU admission. In group B, 35% patients was treated within the first 2 hours. The average time gain was 124 min (thrombolysis administration--CCU admission). CONCLUSION: On emergency area of primary hospital, thrombolytic therapy is feasible and safe when administered by well-equipped and well-trained medical emergence area and ambulance staff.