Biomedical subjects

E Hernández-Quintela

Publications and source records attributed to E Hernández-Quintela.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Posterior corneal surface changes after refractive surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of changes in posterior corneal surface after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: Nonrandomized, comparative trial. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-five eyes (71 patients) that underwent PRK (n = 45) or LASIK (n = 50). CONTROLS: Twenty nonsurgery eyes were used to validate the method of analysis of the posterior corneal curvature (PCC). Seventy nonsurgery eyes were used for comparisons. METHODS: Float, apex-fixed best fit corneal curvature (ABC), and posterior elevation difference were evaluated in 20 elevation topography maps at 6 zone diameters (3-7 and 10 mm) and at two time points. Corneal elevation maps before and after PRK or LASIK were analyzed by the ABC and float methods and compared with a nonsurgery group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Posterior corneal curvature change (mm) was classified as flattening, steepening, or no change. RESULTS: Flattening of more than 0.12 mm was found in 22.2% of eyes (n = 10) in the PRK group, a change of +/-0.12 mm was found in 53.3% of eyes (n = 24), and steepening of more than 0.12 mm was found in 24.4% of eyes (n = 11) using the float method and in 28.9% of eyes (n = 13), 35.6% of eyes (n = 16), and 35.6% eyes (n = 16), respectively, using the ABC method. In the LASIK group, the float method registered flattening in 20% of eyes (n = 10), no change in 52% of eyes (n = 26), and steepening in 28% of eyes (n = 14), whereas the ABC method registered flattening in 30% of eyes (n = 15), no change in 40% of eyes (n = 20), and steepening in 30% of eyes (n = 15). The nonsurgery group showed a similar change in PCC at two different time points similar to that of the PRK and the LASIK groups. CONCLUSIONS: The differences observed in the PCC after PRK or LASIK were not statistically significantly different from those observed over time in the nonsurgery control group.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Confocal microscopy of cystic disorders of the corneal epithelium.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the morphology of cystic disorders of the corneal epithelium by confocal microscopy. DESIGN: The study design was a prospective evaluation of confocal microscopic images of patients with cystic corneal disorders. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen patients (19 eyes) were included. The corneal disorders included four patients with corneal decompensation (Fuchs' dystrophy), five patients with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy (e.g., Cogan's microcystic and map-dot dystrophies), one patient with Meesmann's dystrophy, and three patients with recurrent erosion syndrome of unknown etiology. Confocal images of diseased corneas were compared with those of ten normal control eyes (ten subjects). INTERVENTION: All patients were examined by slit-lamp biomicroscopic analysis and confocal microscopic analysis (Tomey, Erlangen-Temmenlohe, Germany). Image analysis was used to identify the corneal epithelial structures correlated with the corresponding pathology. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Confocal microscopy was used to assess the size, shape, light scatter, and reflection of the cysts. RESULTS: Slit-lamp examination results showed corneal epithelial cystic lesions in all cases. Confocal microscopy was able to identify cystic lesions in 9 (69.2%) of 13 patients. Of the four patients in whom lesions could not be found by confocal microscopy, three had recurrent erosion syndrome and the other one had epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. The confocal images were compatible with the clinical and histologic pictures of the disease. Normal control eyes did not show any epithelial lesion, either by biomicroscopy or confocal microscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Confocal microscopy provides an in vivo evaluation of cystic epithelial corneal lesions. This study shows that confocal microscopy is suitable for examining cystic lesions of the corneal epithelium. Nevertheless, it is not as sensitive as biomicroscopy in detecting cystic lesions in certain corneal conditions.

Corneal Diseases↗