PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E J Power

Publications and source records attributed to E J Power.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

Transforming insurance coverage into quality health care: voltage drops from potential to delivered quality.

Although the US health care system is often touted as one of the best in the world, disparities exist in quality of care received by different populations, in different regions, and across different institutions and clinicians. Initiatives to provide access to health insurance have been a major policy tool to ensure that Americans receive high-quality health care. However, availability of insurance coverage does not automatically lead to high-quality care. This article explores points of vulnerability in the US health care system at which the potential to achieve high-quality care can be lost: (1) access to insurance coverage; (2) enrollment in available insurance plans; (3) access to covered services, clinicians, and health care institutions; (4) choice of plans, clinicians, and health care institutions; (5) access to a consistent source of primary care; (6) access to referral services; and (7) delivery of high-quality health care services. Ensuring high-quality health care requires that each of these "voltage drops" be recognized and addressed. JAMA. 2000;284:2100-2107.

Delivery of Health Care↗

Are we ready to use cost-effectiveness analysis in health care decision-making? A health services research challenge for clinicians, patients, health care systems, and public policy.

The dominance of managed care as an organizing principle for health care delivery suggests that cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) may be applied increasingly to decision-making at all levels. Health services researchers now need to address questions of how to further the underlying methods of CEA, how to make it a more practical tool for market-based as well as public policy decisions, and how to enhance CEA's ability to lead to responsible decisions that result in more effective and efficient care.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

The adoption and use of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy by hospitals in the United States.

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for upper urinary stones has been in use in the United States since 1984. It was accepted immediately by hospitals and physicians, and its diffusion has been and continues to be rapid. Government payment and planning policies do not seem to have slowed this diffusion, although they have had some effect on the ownership of lithotripters and the manner in which ESWL is provided. An unintended but foreseeable result of ESWL's popularity with hospitals, physicians, and patients is that ESWL is not only rapidly replacing traditional surgery but is being used on many patients who would not have had surgery. It is likely that many more upper urinary stones are being treated aggressively now than before ESWL was introduced.

Diffusion of Innovation↗