PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E J Sebold

Publications and source records attributed to E J Sebold.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Use of titanium grommets in silicone implant arthroplasty of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint.

Double-stem silicone implants protected by titanium grommets were placed in the hallux metatarsophalangeal joints of 32 patients (47 feet). All patients had a painful destroyed joint and most were women. Three patients (six feet) were lost to follow-up. Nineteen patients had a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (25 feet) and 10 had degenerative joint disease (16 feet). The average age for the group was 57 years and the average follow-up was 51 months (range, 34-76 months). Twenty patients (30 feet) were completely satisfied with their result. Eight patients (10 feet), all with rheumatoid arthritis, had some minor postoperative complaints, usually involving the lateral toes. Two patients (three feet) in this group had no pain, but would have preferred more hallux motion. One patient with rheumatoid arthritis (one foot) had a poor result due to implant removal for deep sepsis. Radiographic analysis of these patients showed no evidence of implant fracture and the implant composite appeared to be well tolerated by the surrounding bone in which it was placed. When compared with another, similar group of patients in whom grommets were not used, this implant appeared to be much more stable, as there was significantly less evidence of radiolucency seen around those implants protected by the grommets. It appears that the titanium grommets may protect the silicone implant and may help provide a longer life for the silicone implant.

Adult↗

Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis.

A prospective study was conducted to determine the rate of puncture of the inner glove when various double-gloving protocols were used for elective total joint procedures. Group 1 consisted of 22 cases in which two pairs of regular latex gloves were used. Group 2 consisted of 25 cases in which outer "orthopaedic" gloves were used over regular latex gloves. Group 3 consisted of 24 cases in which Repel gloves were used between two regular latex gloves. The patients were randomly assigned to one of the three groups. All gloves, both inner and outer, were tested for holes at the end of the procedure. All gloves that were changed for presumed intraoperative holes were also tested. The type and duration of the procedure was also documented. Of the inner holes, there were significant differences between each group. Group 1 (double latex) and Group 2 (outer orthopaedic/inner regular) had significantly more holes than Group 3 (Repel between two regular gloves). There were no holes in Group 3, and Group 2 offered significant protection over Group 1.

Gloves, Surgical↗