PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E J Small

Publications and source records attributed to E J Small.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Prognostic significance of plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9480.

PURPOSE: Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels are significantly elevated in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) compared with patients with localized disease and have been associated with disease progression in other cancer patient populations. Therefore, we measured VEGF levels in plasma prospectively collected from patients enrolled in Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9480, an intergroup study of suramin in patients with HRPC, to determine whether these levels had prognostic significance. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Pretreatment plasma was collected from patients with HRPC enrolled in Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9480. In a subset of samples representative of the entire cohort, plasma VEGF levels were determined in duplicate using a Quantiglo chemiluminescent ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Statistical analyses were performed to determine the correlation between pretreatment plasma VEGF levels and time of overall survival. The proportional hazards model was used to assess the prognostic significance of various cut points in multivariate models. RESULTS: Plasma VEGF levels in this population ranged from 4-885 pg/ml, with a median level of 83 pg/ml. As a continuous variable, plasma VEGF levels inversely correlated with survival time (P = 0.002). Using various exploratory cut points, plasma VEGF levels appeared to correlate with survival. In multivariate models in which other prognostic factors (serum prostate-specific antigen, alkaline phosphatase, evidence of measurable disease, and hemoglobin) were included, plasma VEGF levels were significant at various cut points tested. CONCLUSION: Although these data are exploratory and need to be confirmed in an independent data set, they suggest that VEGF may have clinical significance in patients with HRPC.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Immunotherapy of hormone-refractory prostate cancer with antigen-loaded dendritic cells.

PURPOSE: Provenge (Dendreon Corp, Seattle, WA) is an immunotherapy product consisting of autologous dendritic cells loaded ex vivo with a recombinant fusion protein consisting of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) linked to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Sequential phase I and phase II trials were performed to determine the safety and efficacy of Provenge and to assess its capacity to break immune tolerance to the normal tissue antigen PAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Dendritic-cell precursors were harvested by leukapheresis in weeks 0, 4, 8, and 24, loaded ex vivo with antigen for 2 days, and then infused intravenously over 30 minutes. Phase I patients received increasing doses of Provenge, and phase II patients received all the Provenge that could be prepared from a leukapheresis product. RESULTS: Patients tolerated treatment well. Fever, the most common adverse event, occurred after 15 infusions (14.7%). All patients developed immune responses to the recombinant fusion protein used to prepare Provenge, and 38% developed immune responses to PAP. Three patients had a more than 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and another three patients had 25% to 49% decreases in PSA. The time to disease progression correlated with development of an immune response to PAP and with the dose of dendritic cells received. CONCLUSION: Provenge is a novel immunotherapy agent that is safe and breaks tolerance to the tissue antigen PAP. Preliminary evidence for clinical efficacy warrants further exploration.

Acid Phosphatase↗
PubMed2000

Prospective trial of the herbal supplement PC-SPES in patients with progressive prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: PC-SPES is an herbal supplement for which there are anecdotal reports of anti-prostate cancer activity. This phase II study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and toxicity of PC-SPES in prostate cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients with androgen-dependent prostate cancer (ADPCa) and 37 patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPCa) were treated with PC-SPES at a dose of nine capsules daily. Clinical outcome was assessed with serial serum prostate-specific androgen (PSA) level measurement and imaging studies. RESULTS: One hundred percent of ADPCa patients experienced a PSA decline of >/= 80%, with a median duration of 57+ weeks. No patient has developed PSA progression. Thirty-one patients (97%) had declines of testosterone to the anorchid range. Two ADPCa patients had positive bone scans; both improved. One patient with a bladder mass measurable on computed tomography scan experienced disappearance of this mass. Nineteen (54%) of 35 AIPCa patients had a PSA decline of >/= 50%, including eight (50%) of 16 patients who had received prior ketoconazole therapy. Median time to PSA progression was 16 weeks (range, 2 to 69+ weeks). Of 25 patients with positive bone scans, two had improvement, seven had stable disease, 11 had progressive disease, and five did not have a repeat bone scan because of PSA progression. Severe toxicities included thromboembolic events (n = 3) and allergic reactions (n = 3). Other frequent toxicities included gynecomastia/gynecodynia, leg cramps, and grade 1 or 2 diarrhea. CONCLUSION: PC-SPES seems to have activity in the treatment of both ADPCa and AIPCa and has acceptable toxicity. Further study is required to determine whether its effects exceed those expected with estrogen therapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Infusional floxuridine-based therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) continues to pose a major clinical challenge. Previous studies have suggested that infusional floxuridine (FUDR) has antitumor efficacy and is well tolerated. To the authors knowledge the combination of infusional FUDR with biologic response modifiers (BRMs) has not been evaluated extensively in patients with metastatic RCC. METHODS: Thirty-nine previously untreated patients with metastatic RCC were treated with infusional FUDR at 0.075 mg/kg/day for 14 days of a 28-day cycle. Beginning with the second cycle of FUDR, 24 patients received subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2b (3 million U 3 times a week for Weeks 1 and 2) and 15 received subcutaneous interleukin-2 (IL-2) (5 million U/m(2) 5 days a week for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off). The dose of FUDR was increased by 0.025 mg/kg each cycle until the maximum tolerated dose for each patient was reached. RESULTS: Five patients receiving FUDR plus interferon achieved a partial response and 1 achieved a complete response whereas 3 patients receiving FUDR plus IL-2 achieved a partial response, for an overall response rate of 23%. The median survival for all patients was 21 months, and 8 patients still were alive 6-57+ months after the initiation of therapy. Toxicity was mild to moderate, and was comprised primarily of fatigue, diarrhea, dacryocystitis, and fluid retention (in the IL-2 cohort). CONCLUSIONS: FUDR in conjunction with IL-2 or interferon appears to produce response rates comparable to those observed with other programs utilizing BRMs and generally is well tolerated. FUDR regimens may be useful in the treatment of metastatic RCC in the outpatient community setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A randomized study comparing standard versus moderately high dose megestrol acetate for patients with advanced prostate carcinoma: cancer and leukemia group B study 9181.

BACKGROUND: Megestrol acetate (MA) is a synthetic progestin with reported activity in both hormone-sensitive and hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma (HRPC). Based on limited data suggesting a possible dose-response effect, a trial was initiated to compare standard versus moderately high dose MA in HRPC. METHODS: One hundred forty-nine men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma were randomized to receive oral MA either at 160 mg/day (low dose) or 640 mg/day (high dose). Patients were stratified by performance status and measurable versus evaluable disease. The primary end point was tumor response. Secondary end points were survival, quality-of-life measures, and prostate specific antigen (PSA) decline. RESULTS: The median survival times of 11.2 months for patients who received the low dose and 12.1 months for patients who received the high dose therapy were not significantly different. Best response was equivalent in the 2 arms: 2 partial responses and 22 patients with stable disease for the 160 mg/day dose, and 1 partial response and 28 patients with stable disease for the 640 mg/day dose. A greater than 50% decline in PSA occurred in 13.8% and 8.8% of patients in the low and high dose treatment arms, respectively. There were no differences in the toxicity or quality-of-life outcomes between the two arms. Poorer performance status (2 vs. 0-1), greater than 5% weight loss, higher baseline PSA, and measurable disease all predicted shorter survival. CONCLUSIONS: MA has limited activity in hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma, and there is no apparent dose-response correlation.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

New treatment strategies in advanced prostate cancer.

The treatment of advanced prostate cancer has evolved rapidly in the last 5 years. Therapeutic options for patients with advanced disease, once essentially limited to the use of androgen deprivation, have expanded to include a number of interventions, including secondary hormonal manipulations, chemotherapy, and a variety of investigational approaches. Novel therapeutic approaches in prostate cancer patients are likely to be undertaken in patients with disease that is at or below the limits of detection by current imaging technology, so novel methods will be essential to the successful evaluation and use of these agents.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2000

Potential role of nephrectomy in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent initial nephrectomy as a component of therapy, because the role of nephrectomy in the treatment of patients with metastatic RCC is uncertain. METHODS: A retrospective review of 63 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy with or without additional surgical procedures in the setting of metastatic RCC was performed. Pretreatment characteristics and the type of surgery were examined as predictors of outcome, and the type of systemic therapy received (if any) and overall survival were determined. RESULTS: The median patient age was 59 years (range 39 to 79). Thirty-two patients had a single metastatic site, with the most common sites being the lung (n = 33), lymphatics (n = 32), and bone (n = 19). Seventeen patients (27%) also underwent vena cavotomy during surgery. Two patients died perioperatively. Thirty-nine (62%) patients underwent systemic therapy after surgery, and 6 patients (9.5%) were rendered free of disease and elected not to receive systemic treatment. The median survival was 17.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Primary renal surgery may be beneficial for selected patients with metastatic RCC, and most patients will be able to receive postoperative systemic therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A phase II pilot study of KW-2189 in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: KW-2189 is a semi-synthetic, water-soluble analog of duocarmycin B2, a new class of potent antitumor antibiotics produced by streptomyces, with improved in vitro antitumor potency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic renal cell carcinoma were treated in this multicenter, open-label phase II trial. All patients received 0.4 mg/m2 KW-2189 as an i.v. infusion for Cycle I. Cycles were repeated every 5 to 6 weeks with escalations to 0.5 mg/m2 in the absence of significant toxicity or disease progression. RESULTS: No patient had an objective response. The most common drug-related toxicity was hematological-delayed neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, with recovery by week 6. Non-hematologic toxicity consisted of mild to moderate fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and anorexia that was generally manageable. CONCLUSIONS: KW-2189 in this dose and schedule has a predictable safety profile of reversible myelosuppression. No activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma was demonstrated.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2000

An update on prostate cancer research.

The pathogenesis of prostate cancer reflects complex interactions among environmental and genetic factors. Recent advances suggest molecular mechanisms that may explain geographic and ethnic variations in prostate cancer incidence, and understanding of molecular disease progression is advancing rapidly. Clinically, the case for screening has become stronger, and declining prostate cancer mortality rates may be due in part to early detection and treatment. Improved risk assessment for patients with localized disease is now available, although further refinement in predictive algorithms will need to incorporate validated molecular prognostic markers. Treatment options for patients with localized prostate cancer have expanded and the role of androgen deprivation further delineated. Finally, treatment strategies for patients with androgen-independent disease have also expanded, although novel therapies are required to improve survival in this group of patients.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2000

Southwest Oncology Group Study of paclitaxel and carboplatin for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma: the importance of survival as a clinical trial end point.

PURPOSE: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium has promising activity and acceptable toxicity. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in a cooperative group setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with advanced TCC were treated every 21 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), administered as a 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin dosed to an area under the curve of 5. Prior systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy was not permitted unless completed at least 1 year before enrollment. Patients were evaluated for response every three cycles, and follow-up was conducted to determine survival. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and were assessable. Four (14%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Node-only disease was present in 24%, and 76% of patients had extranodal disease. The median number of cycles received was five. Grade 4 toxicity consisted primarily of neutropenia (38% of patients). Neurologic toxicity was noted in 16 patients (grade 1 in four patients, grade 2 in five patients, grade 3 in six patients, and grade 4 in one patient). Six partial responses and no complete responses were noted, for a response proportion of 20.7% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 40%). Median progression-free survival time was 4 months, and overall survival time was 9 months. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced TCC is reasonably well tolerated. However, a response proportion considerably lower than that previously reported was noted. In addition, the median survival time of 9 months was less than the survival time previously reported for patients treated with the combination of methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin. Although our results may reflect enrollment of patients with poor prognostic features, they also call into question the utility of this regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Androgen deprivation and four courses of fixed-schedule suramin treatment in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering a combination of suramin and hydrocortisone in addition to androgen deprivation in a cooperative group setting; to assess the feasibility of treatment with multiple courses of suramin; and to assess progression-free and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who underwent such treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer who had adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and coagulation parameters were treated by combined androgen deprivation and suramin plus hydrocortisone. Suramin was administered on a 78-day fixed dosing schedule (one cycle), and suramin treatment cycles were repeated every 6 months for a total of four cycles. The statistical design was developed on the basis of the feasibility of administering suramin, as judged by the number of patients who developed neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher or by treatment interruption of 4 weeks or longer due to any persistent suramin-related toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 62 patients enrolled onto the study between August 1994 and January 1997, 59 were eligible and assessable for toxicity on the first cycle. Thirty-two (54%) of 59 patients received a second cycle, 13 (22%) of 59 patients received a third cycle, and only five patients (8%) received a fourth cycle. During the first cycle, 27 patients were removed from the study: 17 because of toxicity, five because of disease progression, two who had died, and three because of other reasons. There was one therapy-related death. Grade 4 toxicities were noted in 11 and three patients during first and second courses, respectively. Neurotoxicity of grade 3 or higher was observed in nine and seven patients during the first and second cycles, respectively. Fifteen patients had treatment interruptions of 4 weeks or longer. Overall, only 54% (95% confidence interval, 41% to 67%) of the patients demonstrated acceptable limits of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Suramin plus hydrocortisone and androgen deprivation has limited applicability in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Suramin therapy for patients with symptomatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial comparing suramin plus hydrocortisone to placebo plus hydrocortisone.

PURPOSE: Suramin is a novel agent that has demonstrated preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A prospective randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate pain and opioid analgesic intake as surrogates for antitumor response in HRPC patients with significant, opioid analgesic-dependent pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized patients to receive a 78-day, outpatient regimen of either suramin plus hydrocortisone (HC, 40 mg/d) or placebo plus HC. Treatment assignment was unblinded when either disease progression or dose-limiting toxicity occurred; placebo patients were allowed to cross-over to open-label suramin plus HC. In addition to pain and opioid analgesic intake, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, time to disease progression, quality of life, performance status, and survival were compared. RESULTS: Overall mean reductions in combined pain and opioid analgesic intake were greater for suramin plus HC (rank sum P =.0001). Pain response was achieved in a higher proportion of patients receiving suramin than placebo (43% v 28%; P =.001), and duration of response was longer for suramin responders (median, 240 v 69 days; P =.0027). Time to disease progression was longer (relative risk = 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.9) and the proportion of patients with a greater than 50% decline in PSA was higher (33% v 16%; P =.01) in patients who received suramin. Neither quality of life nor performance status was decreased by suramin treatment, and overall survival was similar. Most adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity and were easily managed medically. CONCLUSION: Outpatient treatment with suramin plus HC is well tolerated and provides moderate palliative benefit and delay in disease progression for patients with symptomatic HRPC.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Management of a positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy: decision analysis.

PURPOSE: We created and tested a decision analysis model to help determine the preferred management of a positive surgical margin(s) after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We constructed a decision tree modeling surveillance versus immediate prophylactic adjuvant radiation in patients with a positive surgical margin(s) after radical prostatectomy. Literature and institution based estimates were determined for certain factors, including the probability of undetectable prostate specific antigen (PSA) in patients followed expectantly postoperatively and those treated with immediate adjuvant radiotherapy, complications of radiotherapy after prostatectomy and probability of undetectable PSA in those treated with therapeutic radiation for detectable PSA postoperatively. A panel of experts assigned utilities to the various outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine threshold values required to change the model outcome. RESULTS: Using average probability estimates from a literature review the decision model recommended initial surveillance. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the model depended on the probability of disease recurrence in men followed expectantly after surgery as well as the efficacy of therapeutic radiation. We tested the decision model again for patient groups based on tumor grade, pathological stage, preoperative PSA and number of positive margins. The model recommended initial radiation for patients with low to intermediate grade disease, no evidence of seminal vesicle invasion and multiple positive margins. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our decision analysis imply that immediate radiation may be appropriate for patients with a positive surgical margin(s) and a high likelihood of recurrent local rather than distant disease. This model may be useful to physicians and patients who use individual probability estimates and utility values to determine the preferred course of management after surgery.

Decision Trees↗
PubMed1999

Outpatient combination chemoimmunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma. Results of a phase I/II trial.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of an outpatient biochemotherapy regimen of low dose, subcutaneously administered interleukin-2 (IL-2) for patients with metastatic (Stage IV) melanoma. METHODS: Nineteen patients were treated with intravenous cisplatin and dacarbazine (DTIC), oral tamoxifen, and subcutaneous IL-2 and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN). Eligibility requirements included bidimensionally measurable metastatic melanoma, a Karnofsky performance score of 60 or higher, absence of significant cardiac or pulmonary dysfunction, no prior DTIC or cisplatin chemotherapy, and no evidence of central nervous system involvement. Patients were given a minimum of 2 6-week cycles. Treatment was continued in the absence of progressive disease, and patients were monitored for response at two-cycle intervals. RESULTS: Of the 19 patients, 1 (5%) achieved a complete response; 6 (32%) a partial response; 3 (16%) stable disease; and 9 (47%) progressive disease, for an overall response proportion of 37% (95% confidence interval, 16-61%). The median survival of the treated cohort was 10.6 months. The mean time to disease progression for patients with stable disease or better was 8.4 months, with a mean response duration of 5.1 months. The most common toxicities noted were constitutional symptoms, weight loss, nausea, neutropenia, and fatigue. The 19 patients received a total of 59 cycles of treatment, and IL-2, IFN, or both were held in 14 of these cycles secondary to Grade 3 or 4 toxicities. In addition, six patients required dose reduction of IL-2 and/or IFN. CONCLUSIONS: Chemoimmunotherapy consisting of cisplatin, DTIC, and tamoxifen combined with subcutaneous IL-2 and IFN can be safely administered in an outpatient setting. The described regimen yields moderate activity in metastatic melanoma, and efforts to improve its efficacy merit further examination.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Selection for androgen receptor mutations in prostate cancers treated with androgen antagonist.

The role of androgen receptor (AR) mutations in androgen-independent prostate cancer (PCa) was determined by examining AR transcripts and genes from a large series of bone marrow metastases. Mutations were found in 5 of 16 patients who received combined androgen blockade with the AR antagonist flutamide, and these mutant ARs were strongly stimulated by flutamide. In contrast, the single mutant AR found among 17 patients treated with androgen ablation monotherapy was not flutamide stimulated. Patients with flutamide-stimulated AR mutations responded to subsequent treatment with bicalutamide, an AR antagonist that blocks the mutant ARs. These findings demonstrate that AR mutations occur in response to strong selective pressure from flutamide treatment.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1999

Secondary hormonal manipulations in hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Hormone refractory prostate cancer is clinically heterogeneous, and many patients retain sensitivity to subsequent hormonal manipulations, even after combined androgen blockage. Antiandrogen withdrawal is a mandatory first step. Subsequent treatment with an alternate antiandrogen, adrenal androgen inhibitor (such as ketoconazole), or glucocorticoid may provide both subjective and objective clinical benefit in up to 65% of patients.

Androgen Antagonists↗