PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Jaksić

Publications and source records attributed to E Jaksić.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

99Tcm-p-aminohippuric acid as a new renal agent.

99Tcm-p-aminohippuric acid (99Tcm-PAH) is a new renal radiopharmaceutical prepared from a lyophilized kit by the addition of sodium pertechnetate (Na99TcmO4). Each vial contains PAH, the calcium trisodium salt of diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (CaNa3DTPA) and stannous chloride (SnCl2.2H2O) in an inert atmosphere. It is a stable radiopharmaceutical with high radiochemical purity (> 95%). Its protein binding is very similar to that of 131I-OIH, but it is hydrophilic in character. Animal studies using 99Tcm-PAH have indicated that it provides renal images of satisfactory quality with no external background. Despite its almost identical radiochemical purity and HPLC analysis results to 99Tcm-DTPA, 99Tcm-PAH is rapidly secreted by the kidneys in a manner consistent with tubular secretion, as confirmed by rat probenecid studies, whereas 99Tcm-DTPA is excreted by glomerular filtration. The pharmacokinetic parameters of 99Tcm-PAH (t1/2(alpha)) = 2.5 min, t1/2(beta) = 41.7 min, Cl = 5.22 ml.min-1, Kel = 5.1 x 10(-4) min-1) differ from those of 99Tcm-DTPA. Evaluation of 99Tcm-PAH in two human volunteers confirmed its good renal characteristics: rapid disappearance from the vascular system, high uptake in kidneys followed by its very fast elimination, and low residual activity 20 min after its intravenous administration.

Animals↗

Interobserver variability in 99mTc-DMSA renal scintigraphy reports: multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the interobserver variability and reproducibility of the renal scintigraphy reports. METHODS: The study was prospective performed in 60 99mTc DMSA scintigraphies (116 kidneys), done in one centre, displayed on X ray films as analogue 300 kcounts images in 4 standard projections. Six observers from 4 different centres (group A), including three observers from one institution (group B), were asked to interpret original scans. Seven parameters of scintigraphy protocol were analysed with at least two responses: kidney size (1), uptake (2), outlines (3), scars (4), SOL (5), differential function (6) and conclusion (7). RESULTS: Among 116 kidneys, concordant results in interpretation of seven points of report from 1 to 7, in the group A were found in 62%, 42.5%, 45%, 9%, 47%, 52% and 34%, and In the group B in 72%, 55%, 59%, 22%, 62%, 60% and 41% respectively. Some improvement in concordant reporting was noted in the group of 3 observers, in comparison of group of all, statistically significant in category of scar reports (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest to use of standardised criteria and terminology in interpretations, to improve low interobserver reproducibility and objectivity of renal scintigraphy reports, particularly in evaluation of renal scars.

Journal Article↗