PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E K Rowinsky

Publications and source records attributed to E K Rowinsky.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Activity of multitargeted antifolate (pemetrexed disodium, LY231514) in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma: results from a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to confirm the activity and assess the safety profile of multitargeted antifolate (MTA) for patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Forty-six patients were enrolled in the study, 35 with colon and 11 with rectal carcinoma. Adjuvant therapy was allowed if completed 1 year previously. Patients received MTA 600 mg/m(2) as a 10-minute intravenous infusion once every 21 days. Blood samples were taken every cycle for pharmacokinetic and vitamin metabolite assays. RESULTS: Among 39 patients eligible for efficacy analysis, 1 complete response and 5 partial responses were identified, for an overall response rate of 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.1-26. 7%) for all patients. Fifteen patients had stable disease, with 9 living longer than 1 year. The median survival was 16.2 months (95% CI, 10.5-17.0%); 65% of patients were alive at 1 year, and the median time to progression was 4.4 months (range, 3.2-5.7 months). The main toxicities were hematologic, with common toxicity criteria (CTC) Grades 3 or 4 noted as follows: thrombocytopenia (18%), neutropenia (55%), and anemia (18%). Nonhematologic toxicities included Grade 2 or 3 skin reaction (53%), ameliorated by dexamethasone, and Grade 3 transaminases (23%). Dose omissions were not required and 21% of doses were reduced. CONCLUSIONS: MTA has clear activity in patients with colorectal carcinoma, and encouraging survival times were noted. MTA was well tolerated in this patient group, but myelosuppression was frequent. Toxicity may be increased with folate deficiency.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Enhanced antitumour activity of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene in combination with topotecan or paclitaxel in the MV522 lung carcinoma xenograft model.

6-Hydroxymethylacylfulvene (HMAF; MGI 114; Irofulven) is a semisynthetic analogue of the toxin illudin S, which is a product of the Omphalotus mushroom. MGI 114 induces cytotoxicity against a broad range of solid tumours in vivo, including the drug-refractory MV522 human lung cancer xenograft. In this study, the potential application of MGI 114 in the treatment of lung cancer was explored by evaluating the activity of MGI 114 in combination with either topotecan (TPT) or paclitaxel. Groups of eight nude mice bearing MV522 xenografts were treated with MGI 114, TPT or paclitaxel as single agents and with MGI 114 in combination with TPT or paclitaxel. MGI 114 was administered at doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.) daily on days 1-5, while TPT and paclitaxel were administered at doses of 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg, respectively, i.p. on days 1-5. In the single-agent studies, MGI 114, TPT and paclitaxel all resulted in decreased final tumour weights compared with vehicle-treated controls. As single agents, TPT, at the 0.5 mg/kg dose level, and paclitaxel, at the 20 mg/kg dose level, produced partial shrinkages (PSs). All combinations of MGI 114, and either TPT or paclitaxel, produced decrements in final tumour weights compared with monotherapy with the same doses of MGI 114, TPT and paclitaxel. Although all animals treated with the combination of MGI 114 and paclitaxel experienced PSs or complete shrinkages (CSs) (or died), analysis of the time to tumour doubling revealed that the combination of MGI 114 and TPT at 2.5 and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively, was synergistic. These results suggest that cytotoxic activity is enhanced when MGI 114 is combined with either TPT or paclitaxel, and clinical trials to further evaluate these combination regimens are warranted.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a combined oral formulation of eniluracil, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and feasibility of a combined oral formulation of 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and eniluracil (Glaxo Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). The rationale for developing a combined eniluracil/5-FU formulation oral dosing form is to simplify treatment with these agents, which has been performed using separate dosing forms, and decrease the probability of severe toxicity and/or suboptimal therapeutic results caused by inadvertently high or conversely insufficient 5-FU dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The trial was a randomized, three-way crossover bioequivalence study of three oral dosing forms of eniluracil/5-FU tablets in adults with solid malignancies. Each period consisted of two days of treatment and a five- to seven-day washout phase. Eniluracil at a dose of 20 mg, which results in maximal DPD inactivation, was administered twice daily on the first day and in the evening on the second day of each of the three treatments. On the morning of the second day, all patients received a total eniluracil dose of 20 mg orally and a total 5-FU dose of 2 mg orally as either separate tablets (treatment A) or combined eniluracil/5-FU tablets in two different strengths (2 tablets of eniluracil/5-FU at a strength (mg/mg) of 10/1 (treatment B) or 8 tablets at a strength of 2.5/0.25 (treatment C)). The pharmacokinetics of plasma 5-FU, eniluracil, and uracil, and the urinary excretion of eniluracil, 5-FU, uracil, and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (FBAL), were studied. To determine the bioequivalence of the combined eniluracil/5-FU dosing forms compared to the separate tablets, an analysis of variance on pharmacokinetic parameters reflecting eniluracil and 5-FU exposure was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with advanced solid malignancies had complete pharmacokinetic studies performed during treatments A, B, and C. The pharmacokinetics of eniluracil and 5-FU were similar among the three types of treatment. Both strengths of the combined eniluracil/5-FU dosing form and the separate dosing forms were bioequivalent. Mean values for terminal half-life, systemic clearance, and apparent volume of distribution for oral 5-FU during treatments A/B/C were 5.5/5.6/5.6 hours, 6.6/6.6/6.5 liters/hour, and 50.7/51.5/50.0 liters, respectively. The intersubject coefficient of variation for pharmacokinetic variables reflecting 5-FU exposure and clearance in treatments ranged from 23% to 33%. The urinary excretion of unchanged 5-FU over 24 hours following treatments A, B, and C averaged 52.2%, 56.1%, and 50.8'%, of the administered dose of 5-FU, respectively. Parameters reflecting DPD inhibition, including plasma uracil and urinary FBAL excretion following treatments A, B, and C were similar. Toxicity was generally mild and similar following all three types of treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and eniluracil were similar and met bioequivalence criteria following treatment with the separate oral formulations of 5-FU and eniluracil and two strengths of the combined formulation. The availability of a combined eniluracil/5-FU oral dosing form will likely simplify dosing and decrease the probability of severe toxicity or suboptimal therapeutic results caused by an inadvertent 5-FU overdose or insufficient 5-FU dosing in the case of separate oral formulations, thereby enhancing the overall feasibility and 0therapeutic index of oral 5-FU therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

A phase I study of rhizoxin (NSC 332598) by 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Rhizoxin (NSC 332598) is a novel macrolide antitumor antibiotic that inhibits microtubule assembly and also depolymerizes preformed microtubules. In preclinical evaluations, rhizoxin demonstrated broad antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo including both vincristine- and vindesine-resistant human lung cancers. Prolonged exposure schedules in xenograft models demonstrated optimal efficacy indicating schedule-dependent antitumor activity. The early phase I and II evaluations a five-minute bolus infusion schedule was studied, however, only modest anti-tumor activity was noted, possibly due to rapid systemic clearance. To overcome these limitations and to exploit the potential for schedule-dependent behavior of rhizoxin, the feasibility of administering rhizoxin as a 72-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were entered into this phase I study, in which both the infusion duration and dose of rhizoxin were increased. The starting dose was 0.2 mg/m2 over 12 hours administered every 3 weeks. In each successive dose level, the dose and infusion duration were incrementally increased in a stepwise fashion. Once a 72-hour i.v. infusion duration was reached, rhizoxin dose-escalations alone continued until a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were entered into the study. Rhizoxin was administered at doses ranging from 0.2 mg/m2 i.v. over 12 hours to 2.4 mg/m2 i.v. over 72 hours every 3 weeks. The principal dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were severe neutropenia and mucositis, and the incidence of DLT was unacceptably high at rhizoxin doses above 1.2 mg/m2, which was determined to be the MTD and dose recommended for phase II studies. At these dose levels, rhizoxin could not be detected in the plasma by a previously validated and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography assay with a lower limit of detection of 1 ng/ml. No antitumor responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Rhizoxin can be safely administered using a 72-hour i.v. infusion schedule. The toxicity profile is similar to that observed previously using brief infusion schedules. Using this protracted i.v. infusion schedule the maximum tolerated dose is 1.2 mg/m2/72 hours.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacologic study of PN401 and fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering PN401, an oral uridine prodrug, as a rescue agent for the toxic effects of fluorouracil (5-FU), and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of 5-FU when given with PN401, with an 8-hour treatment interval between these agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of 5-FU, given as a rapid intravenous infusion weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. PN401 was administered orally 8 hours after 5-FU administration, to achieve sustained plasma uridine concentrations of at least 50 micromol/L. Initially, patients received 6 g of PN401 orally every 8 hours for eight doses (schedule 1). When dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was consistently noted, patients then received 6 g of PN401 every 2 hours for three doses and every 6 hours thereafter for 15 doses (schedule 2). RESULTS: Twenty-three patients received 50 courses of 5-FU and PN401. Among patients on schedule 1, DLT (grade 4 neutropenia complicated by fever and diarrhea) occurred in those receiving 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk. Among patients on schedule 2, 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk was well tolerated, but grade 4, protracted (> 5 days) neutropenia was consistently noted in those treated with higher doses of the drugs. Nonhematologic effects were uncommon and rarely severe. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU, assessed in 12 patients on schedule 2, were nonlinear, with the mean area under the time-versus-concentration curve (AUC) increasing from 298 +/- 44 to 962 +/- 23 micromol/L and mean clearance decreasing from 34 +/- 4 to 15.6 +/- 0.38 L/h/m(2) as the dose of 5-FU was increased from 1,250 to 1,950 mg/m(2)/wk. 5-FU AUCs achieved with 5-FU 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks along with the intensified PN401 dose schedule were approximately five-fold higher than those achieved with 5-FU alone. Plasma uridine concentrations increased with each of the three PN401 doses given every 2 hours, and uridine steady-state concentrations were greater than 50 micromol/L. CONCLUSION: Treatment with oral PN401 beginning 8 hours after 5-FU administration is well tolerated and results in sustained plasma uridine concentrations above therapeutic-relevant levels. The recommended 5-FU dosage for phase II evaluations is 1,250 mg/m(2)/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks with the intensified PN401 dose schedule (schedule 2). At this dose, systemic exposure to 5-FU as measured by AUC was five-fold higher than that observed after administration of a conventional 5-FU bolus.

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the specific matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY 12-9566 on a protracted oral daily dosing schedule in patients with solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering BAY 12-9566, a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor with relative specificity against MMP-2, MMP-3, and MMP-9, on a protracted oral daily dosing schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies. The study also sought to determine the principal toxicities of BAY 12-9566, whether plasma BAY 12-9566 steady state concentrations (C(ss)) of biologic relevance could be sustained for prolonged periods, and whether BAY 12-9566 affected plasma concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-9, and tissue inhibitor of MMP-2 (TIMP-2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid malignancies were treated with BAY 12-9566 at daily oral doses ranging from 100 to 1,600 mg. BAY 12-9566 dose schedules included 100 mg once daily, 400 mg once daily, 400 mg twice daily, 400 mg three times daily, 400 mg four times daily, and 800 mg twice daily. Plasma was collected to study the range of BAY 12-9566 C(ss) values achieved, and exploratory studies were performed to assess the effects of BAY 12-9566 on plasma concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-9, and TIMP-2. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were treated with 47 28-day courses of BAY 12-9566. The most common side effects were headache, nausea, vomiting, abnormalities in hepatic functions, and thrombocytopenia, which were rarely clinically significant. BAY 12-9566 was well tolerated on all dose schedules, and there was no consistent dose-limiting toxicity that precluded treatment in the range of dose schedules evaluated. Instead, dose escalation was terminated because BAY 12-9566 plasma C(ss) values increased less than proportionately and plateaued as the daily dose was increased within the dose range of 100 to 1,600 mg/d, suggesting saturable drug absorption. Mean plasma C(ss) values achieved with all dose schedules exceeded BAY 12-9566 concentrations required to inhibit MMPs in vitro and in vascular invasion and tumor proliferation in vivo models. There were no consistent effects of BAY 12-9566 on the plasma concentrations of MMP-2 and MMP-9 over the continuous dosing period at any dose schedule level. However, plasma levels of TIMP-2 seemed to increase in a dose-dependent manner (r(2) =.50, P =.046). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of BAY 12-9566 for subsequent disease directed studies is 800 mg twice daily, which resulted in biologically relevant plasma C(ss) values and an acceptable toxicity profile. Although exploratory studies of MMPs in plasma were not revealing, it is conceivable that some tumor types and disease settings are more likely to produce more readily quantifiable levels of activated MMPs than others. Therefore, attempts to identify and quantify surrogate markers of MMP inhibitory effects should continue to be performed in disease-directed studies in more homogenous patient populations.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Population pharmacokinetic model for topotecan derived from phase I clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To characterize the pharmacokinetics of topotecan in a population model that would identify patient variables or covariates that appreciably impacted on its disposition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All data were collected from 82 patients entered in four different phase I trials that were previously reported as separate studies from 1992 to 1996. All patients received topotecan as a 30-minute constant-rate infusion on a daily-times-five schedule and were selected for this study because their daily dose did not exceed 2.0 mg/m(2). Among the 82 patients were 30 patients classified as having renal insufficiency and 13 patients with hepatic dysfunction. The population pharmacokinetic model was built in sequential manner, starting with a covariate-free model and progressing to a covariate model with the aid of generalized additive modeling. RESULTS: A linear two-compartment model characterized total topotecan plasma concentrations (n = 899). Four primary pharmacokinetic parameters (total clearance, volume of the central compartment, distributional clearance, and volume of the peripheral compartment) were related to various combinations of covariates. The relationship for total clearance (TVCL [L/h] = 32.0 + [0.356(WT - 71) + 0.308(HT - 168.5) - 8.42(SCR - 1.1)] x [1 + 0.671 sex]) was dependent on the patients' weight (WT), height (HT), serum creatinine (SCR), and sex and had a moderate ability to predict (r(2) = 0.64) each patient's individual clearance value. The addition of covariates to the population model improved the prediction errors, particularly for clearance. Removal of 10 outlying patients from the analysis improved the ability of the model to predict individual clearance values (r(2) = 0.77). CONCLUSION: A population pharmacokinetic model for total topotecan has been developed that incorporates measures of body size and renal function to predict total clearance. The model can be used prospectively to obtain a revised and validated model that can then be used to design individualized dosing regimens.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

DX-8951f, a hexacyclic camptothecin analog, on a daily-times-five schedule: a phase I and pharmacokinetic study in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility of administering DX-8951f (exatecan mesylate), a water-soluble, camptothecin analog, as a 30-minute intravenous infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks, determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior of DX-8951f, and seek preliminary evidence of anticancer activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with escalating doses of DX-8951f. After three patients were treated at the first dose level, doses were to be escalated in increments of 100%, using a single patient at each dose level unless moderate toxicity was observed. The MTD, defined as the highest dose level at which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity did not exceed 20%, was calculated separately for minimally pretreated (MP) and heavily pretreated (HP) patients. The PK and excretory profiles of DX-8951, the anhydrous form of DX-8951f, were also characterized. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were treated with 130 courses of DX-8951f at six dose levels ranging from 0.1 to 0.6 mg/m(2)/d. Brief, noncumulative neutropenia was the most common toxicity observed. Severe myelosuppression (neutropenia that was protracted and/or associated with fever and/or severe thrombocytopenia) was consistently experienced by HP and MP patients at doses exceeding 0.3 and 0.5 mg/m(2)/d, respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) were also observed, but these effects were rarely severe. Objective antitumor activity included partial responses in one patient each with platinum-resistant extrapulmonary small-cell and fluoropyrimidine- and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinoma, and minor responses in patients with prostate, hepatocellular, thymic, primary peritoneal, and irinotecan-resistant colorectal carcinomas. The PKs of total DX-8951 were linear and well fit by a three-compartment model. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies of DX-8951f as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks are 0.5 and 0.3 mg/m(2)/d for MP and HP patients, respectively. The characteristics of the myelosuppressive effects of DX-8951f, paucity of severe nonhematologic toxicities, and antitumor activity against a wide range of malignancies warrant broad disease-directed evaluations of DX-8951f on this schedule.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral fluorouracil on a chronic daily schedule in combination with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator eniluracil.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of oral fluorouracil (5-FU) administered twice daily in combination with oral eniluracil, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, administered for 28 days every 35 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oral 5-FU 1.35 mg/m(2) twice daily was administered with oral eniluracil 10 mg daily for 14 to 28 days, followed by a 1-week rest period. Eniluracil was started 1 day before 5-FU. Patients then received escalated doses of oral 5-FU 1. 35 to 1.8 mg/m(2) twice daily with an increased dose of eniluracil 10 mg twice daily for 28 days. A reduced dose of 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil 20 mg twice daily was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with solid malignancies were enrolled onto the study. Diarrhea was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of oral 5-FU and eniluracil given on this chronic schedule. The recommended phase II dose is 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) twice daily with eniluracil 20 mg twice daily. Mean (SD) values for terminal half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and systemic clearance of 4.5 hours (0.83 hours), 19 L/m(2) (3.0 L/m(2)), and 51 mL/min/m(2) (13 mL/min/m(2)), respectively. An average of 77% of 5-FU was excreted unchanged in urine after 28 days of treatment. The mean (range) 5-FU C(SS,min) values achieved at the 1.0 mg/m(2) dose level were 22 ng/mL (8 to 38 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: Chronic oral administration of 5-FU with oral eniluracil is tolerable and produces 5-FU steady-state concentrations similar to those achieved with protracted intravenous administration of 5-FU on clinically relevant dose schedules. Eniluracil provides an attractive means of administering 5-FU on protracted schedules.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

The pursuit of optimal outcomes in cancer therapy in a new age of rationally designed target-based anticancer agents.

There have been extraordinary advances in anticancer therapy over the last few decades, particularly for patients with relatively uncommon malignancies, largely because of the advent of nonspecific cytotoxic chemotherapeutics. Although these agents have also brought improved outcomes for patients with many of the more common solid cancers, it is clear that the point of 'diminishing return' has been reached. The recent development of a plethora of rationally designed target-based anticancer agents has opened up new opportunities and extraordinary therapeutic challenges. Since these agents appear primarily to target malignant cells, they can be expected to be less toxic at clinically effective doses than the cytotoxic agents. Among the various types of rationally designed target-based agents are those that target strategic facets of cell growth signal transduction, angiogenesis, metastasis and cell cycle regulation. While the primary therapeutic benefit of these agents is expected to be decreased tumour growth, evidence suggests that objective tumour responses may also be achieved. However, because of their potentially cytostatic properties, the clinical efficacy of such biologically based agents may not be readily demonstrable with traditional phase I and II study methodologies. Additionally, their dose-toxicity relationships are likely to be less steep than those of the nonspecific cytotoxic agents, thereby rendering such concepts as the maximum tolerated dose less meaningful than alternatives such as the optimal biological dose or the biologically effective dose. Those end-points generally considered, both from a regulatory and clinical viewpoint, to be of secondary importance in trials of cytotoxic agents, such as time to disease progression, disease-related symptoms and quality of life, may evolve into primary end-points. Present findings from preclinical studies suggest that the development, evaluation and general clinical use of rationally designed target-based anticancer agents will require a radical departure from the traditional paradigms if the full potential of these new therapies is to be exploited.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the mitochondrial-specific rhodacyanine dye analog MKT 077.

This Phase I study was performed to evaluate the tolerability and pharmacokinetic behavior of MKT-077, a water soluble rhodacyanine dye analogue, which partitions into tumor cell mitochondria where it is thought to act as a metabolic poison, leading to G1 arrest and apoptosis. Thirteen patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with MKT-077 administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks at doses ranging from 42 to 126 mg/m2/week. The principal toxicity was renal magnesium wasting, which was dose-limiting (grade 3) in one patient at each of the 84- and 126-mg/m2 dose levels. The other three patients at the 126-mg/m2 dose level developed grade 2 hypomagnesemia, which was cumulative in nature, improved with i.v. magnesium supplementation, and was controlled in two patients by the administration of prophylactic magnesium before and after treatment with MKT-077. Given the requirement for extensive monitoring of serum magnesium levels, dose escalation >126 mg/m2 was not considered feasible. Thus, the recommended dose for disease-oriented studies with this schedule of MKT-077 is 126 mg/m2/week. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed a prolonged terminal half-life (37 +/- 17 h) and a large volume of distribution (685 +/- 430 liters/m2). Clearance averaged 39 +/- 13 liters/h/m2. Peak MKT-077 plasma concentrations (1.2 +/-0.31 to 6.3 +/- 5.3 microg/ml) exceeded the IC50 concentrations required for human CX-1 colon, MCF-breast, CRL-1420 pancreas, EJ bladder, and LOX melanoma tumor cell lines in vitro (0.15-0.5 microg/ml). These results indicate that at the recommended dose level of 126 mg/m2/week of MKT-077, the toxicity profile was consistent with the preferential accumulation of the agent within tumor cell mitochondria, and biologically relevant plasma concentrations were achieved.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Oral paclitaxel and concurrent cyclosporin A: targeting clinically relevant systemic exposure to paclitaxel.

Oral paclitaxel is not inherently bioavailable because of the overexpression of P-glycoprotein by intestinal cells and the significant first-pass extraction by cytochrome P450-dependent processes. This study sought to simulate the toxicological and pharmacological profile of a clinically relevant schedule of paclitaxel administered on clinically relevant i.v. dosing schedules in patients with advanced solid malignancies using oral paclitaxel administered with cyclosporin A, an inhibitor of both P-glycoprotein and P450 CYP3A. Nine patients were treated with a single course of oral paclitaxel in its parenteral formulation at a paclitaxel dose level of 180, 360, or 540 mg. Cyclosporin A was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg p.o. 1 h before and concurrently with oral paclitaxel. Blood sampling was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, 6-alpha-hydroxypaclitaxel, 3-p-hydroxypaclitaxel, and cyclosporin A. The pharmacokinetic behavior of paclitaxel was characterized using both compartmental and noncompartmental methods. Model-estimated parameters were used to simulate paclitaxel concentrations after once daily and twice daily oral administration of paclitaxel and cyclosporin A. Aside from an unpleasant taste, the oral regimen was well tolerated, and there were no grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicities. The systemic exposure to paclitaxel, as assessed by maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) values, did not increase as the dose of paclitaxel was increased from 180 to 540 mg, and there was substantial interindividual variability (4-6-fold) at each dose level. Mean paclitaxel Cmax values approached plasma concentrations achieved with clinically relevant parenteral dose schedules, averaging 268+/-164 ng/ml. AUC values averaged 3306+/-1977 ng x h/ ml, which was significantly lower than AUC values achieved with clinically relevant i.v. paclitaxel dose schedules. However, computer simulations using pharmacokinetic parameters derived from the present study demonstrated that pharmacodynamically relevant steady-state plasma paclitaxel concentrations of at least 0.06 microM would be achieved after protracted once daily and twice daily dosing with oral paclitaxel and cyclosporin A. Paclitaxel metabolites were detectable in three patients, and the 6-alpha-hydroxypaclitaxel: paclitaxel and 3-p-hydroxypaclitaxel:paclitaxel AUC ratios averaged 0.63 and 0.86, respectively; these values were substantially higher than values reported in patients treated with i.v. paclitaxel. Oral paclitaxel was bioavailable in humans when administered in combination with oral cyclosporin A 5 mg/kg 1 h before and concurrently with paclitaxel treatment, and plasma paclitaxel concentrations achieved with this schedule were biologically relevant and approached concentrations attained with clinically relevant parenteral dose schedules. However, treatment of patients with oral paclitaxel using a single oral dose administration schedule failed to achieve sufficiently high systemic drug exposure and pharmacodynamic effects. In contrast, computer simulations demonstrated that clinically relevant pharmacodynamic effects are likely to be achieved with multiple once daily and twice daily oral paclitaxel-cyclosporin A dosing schedules.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Enhanced antitumor activity of 6-hydroxymethylacylfulvene in combination with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil in the HT29 human colon tumor xenograft model.

6-Hydroxymethylacylfulvene (MGI-114) is a semisynthetic analogue of the toxin illudin S, a product of the Omphalotus mushroom. MGI-114 induces cytotoxicity in a variety of solid tumors in vivo, including the refractory HT29 human colon cancer xenograft. In this study, the potential application of MGI-114 in the treatment of colon cancer was further explored by evaluating the activity of MGI-114 in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Groups of 9 nude mice bearing HT29 xenografts were treated with either single agent MGI-114, CPT-11, or 5FU, or MGI-114 in combination with CPT-11 or 5FU. MGI-114 was administered at doses of 3.5 and 7 mg/kg i.p. daily on days 1 through 5, and CPT-11 and 5FU were administered at doses of 50 and 100 mg/kg i.p. on days 1, 12, and 19. In the single agent studies, MGI-114, CPT-11, and 5FU all resulted in decreased final tumor weights compared with vehicle-treated controls (P<0.05), but only MGI-114 at 7 mg/kg produced partial responses. When MGI-114 at 3.5 mg/kg was combined with CPT-11, significant decrements in final tumor weights occurred compared with monotherapy with the same doses of MGI-114 and CPT-11 (P< or =0.001). Also, administration of the low-dose combination (MGI-114 at 35 mg/kg and CPT-11 at 50 mg/kg) resulted in final tumor weights similar to those achieved after administration of high-dose MGI-114 as a single agent. Moreover, the combination of MGI-114 and CPT-11 produced partial responses in nearly all of the animals, with some animals achieving complete responses. The outcome with the combination of MGI-114 and 5FU was less striking, with fewer partial responses and no complete responses. These results suggest enhanced activity when MGI-114 is combined with CPT-11, and clinical trials to further evaluate this combination regimen are planned.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Activity of the multitargeted antifolate LY231514 in the human tumor cloning assay.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the activity of the multitargeted antifolate (MTA or LY231514) against a broad range of human tumors taken directly from patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human tumor colony-forming units were treated with MTA at concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, and 10 microg/ml in 1-h exposure studies. The responses of a limited number of specimens were also evaluated concurrently in 1-h exposures to cisplatin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and/or paclitaxel. RESULTS: Of 358 specimens plated in the 1-h exposure studies, 148 (41%) were evaluable. Overall, responses were observed in 3% of specimens (4/144) at 0.1 microg/ml, 11% (17/148) at 1.0 microg/ml, and 23% (33/141) at 10 microg/ml. In this range of concentrations achievable clinically, there was a significant concentration-response relationship. At 10 microg/ml in the 1-h exposure studies, the response rate in colorectal cancer specimens was 32% (9/28), and the response rate in non-small-cell lung cancer was 25% (6/24). Responses were also observed in several chemoresistant tumors, including renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, mesothelioma, and pancreatic carcinoma. The activity of MTA was not completely cross-resistant with that of cisplatin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: MTA demonstrated in vitro activity against a spectrum of tumors, including several tumors generally considered chemoresistant.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1999

A phase I study of docetaxel and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of administering docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc-Rorer) as a one-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a bolus i.v. injection for five (days 1-5) or three (days 1-3) consecutive days every four weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with 115 total courses involving seven dose levels of the two regimens of docetaxel and 5-FU (docetaxel/5-FU [mg/m2]/mg/m2/d]). In an effort to reduce fluid retention and hypersensitivity phenomena related to docetaxel, patients received premedication with dexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily for three consecutive days beginning 24 hours before treatment. RESULTS: Severe (grade 4) neutropenia lasting longer than seven days with or without fever and/or severe mucositis, precluded further dose escalation above docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-FU 300 mg/m2/day administered on days 1-5 every four weeks. The rates of these toxic effects were also unacceptably high above docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and 5-FU 300 mg/m2/day administered on days 1-3 every four weeks. Nine patients experienced various manifestations of fluid-retention that were potentially related to study drugs. However, neither treatment delay nor discontinuation of treatment was required. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue, were mild to modest in severity and occurred infrequently (< 10% of courses). Two patients with metastatic breast cancer experienced complete responses and a partial response occurred in a patient with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, the regimen of docetaxel 60 mg/m2 on day 1 followed by 5-FU 300 mg/m2/d i.v. for three or five days every four weeks is well tolerated and these doses are recommended for further evaluations. The feasibility of administering docetaxel 60 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 300 mg/m2 for three or five days every four weeks and the preliminary antitumor activity noted indicate that further disease-directed studies of docetaxel and 5-FU are warranted in patients with relevant solid malignancies.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Comparative activity of the cyclopropylpyrroloindole compounds adozelesin, bizelesin and carzelesin in a human tumor colony-forming assay.

Adozelesin, bizelesin and carzelesin are synthetic cyclopropylpyrroloindole (CPI) analogs, a class of potent antineoplastic agents modeled on the antitumor antibiotic CC-1065, that specifically bind to the minor groove of DNA and preferentially alkylate AT-rich regions. These compounds were evaluated against fresh human tumors in a human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCFA) to assess and to compare their relative antitumor spectra, concentration-response relationships and schedule-dependence. Human tumor colony-forming units were treated with adozelesin and bizelesin at concentrations of 0.02, 0.1 and 0.5 ng/ml as a continuous exposure for 14 days, and to 0.2, 1.0 and 5.0 ng/ml as a 1 h exposure. Carzelesin concentrations were 0.04, 0.2 and 1 ng/ml as a continuous exposure, and 0.6, 3.0 and 15.0 ng/ml as a 1 h exposure. A response was scored if there was 50% or less colony survival. The three analogs had similar antitumor activity against colon carcinoma, kidney carcinoma and melanoma colony-forming units. Adozelesin also displayed activity against both breast and non-small cell lung carcinoma colony-forming units, and carzelesin was active against ovarian carcinoma colony-forming units. Significantly positive concentration-response relationships were apparent with all three agents. Responses increased from below 15% at the lowest concentration to above 45% at the highest concentration for the three drugs on all schedules (p < 0.01). At the highest concentration, the overall response rate was significantly higher (p < 0.01) with carzelesin on the continuous schedule (71%) compared to the 1 h schedule (46%). However, overall response rates for adozelesin and bizelesin were similar on both schedules (1 h/continuous: adozelesin, 67/58%; bizelesin, 49/44%), indicating that adozelesin and bizelesin are less schedule dependent than carzelesin in the HTCFA. These results demonstrate that the CPIs have broad-spectrum activity against human tumor colony-forming units in the HTCFA at very low concentrations, as well as differences with regard to schedule dependence which may help guide the optimal clinical development of these agents.

Antineoplastic Agents↗