PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Kennepohl

Publications and source records attributed to E Kennepohl.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of estimated daily per capita intakes of flavouring substances with no-observed-effect levels from animal studies.

A study was conducted to determine the margins of safety between no-observed-effect levels (NOELs) and daily per capita intake of flavouring substances evaluated by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) using the safety evaluation procedure for flavouring substances. The safety evaluation procedure provides a practical method for integrating data on intake, structure-activity relationships, metabolism and toxicity to evaluate flavouring substances. The comparison of NOELs to intake reinforces the fact that the margins of safety between intake of flavouring substances and their representative NOELs is very large. 98% of flavouring substances have margins of safety greater than 1000, illustrating that even if intake was underestimated by several fold, in almost every case, a wide margin of safety would still exist.

Animals↗

Erythritol: an interpretive summary of biochemical, metabolic, toxicological and clinical data.

A critical and comprehensive review of the safety information on erythritol was undertaken. Numerous toxicity and metabolic studies have been conducted on erythritol in rats, mice and dogs. The toxicity studies consist of long-term feeding studies conducted to determine carcinogenic potential, intravenous and oral teratogenicity studies to determine the potential for effects on the foetus, oral studies in which erythritol was administered over one or two generations to determine the potential for reproductive effects, and studies in bacterial and mammalian systems to determine mutagenic potential. The majority of the safety studies conducted were feeding studies in which erythritol was mixed into the diet at concentrations as high as 20%. The metabolic studies in animals have shown that erythritol is almost completely absorbed, not metabolized systemically and is excreted unchanged in the urine. The safety studies have demonstrated that erythritol is well tolerated and elicits no toxicological effects. The clinical program for erythritol involved a series of single-dose and repeat-dose, short-duration studies which have been used to investigate the human correlates to the physiological responses seen in the preclinical studies. The clinical studies showed erythritol to be well tolerated and not to cause any toxicologically relevant effects, even following high-dose exposure. Erythritol administered orally to humans was rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and quantitatively excreted in the urine without undergoing metabolic change. At high oral doses, urinary excretion accounted for approximately 90% of the administered dose with minimal amounts appearing in the faeces. A comparison of the human and animal data indicated a high degree of similarity in the metabolism of erythritol and this finding supports the use of the animal species used to evaluate the safety of erythritol for human consumption. It can be concluded, based on the available studies that erythritol did not produce evidence of toxicity.

Animals↗

Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern.

The relationship between chemical structure and toxicity was explored through the compilation of a large reference database consisting of over 600 chemical substances tested for a variety of endpoints resulting in over 2900 no-observed-effect levels (NOELs). Each substance in the database was classified into one of three structural classes using a decision tree approach. The resulting cumulative distributions of NOELs for each of the structural classes differed significantly from one another, supporting the contention that chemical structure defines toxicity. The database was used to derive a threshold of acceptable human exposure for each of the structural classes that could be applied in the absence of specific toxicity data on a substance within one of the three structural classes. The human exposure thresholds provide guidance on the degree of testing and evaluation required for substances that lack toxicity data.

Animals↗

A procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives.

This review describes a procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Over 2500 flavouring substances are currently in use in food. While toxicity data do not exist on all flavouring substances currently in use, within structurally related groups of flavouring substances many do have toxicity data and this information along with knowledge of structure-activity relationships and data on the daily intake provides a framework for safety evaluation. The safety evaluation procedure provides a scientifically based practical method of integrating data on intake, structure-activity relationships, metabolism and toxicity to evaluate flavouring substances in a timely manner. The procedure has been used recently by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) to evaluate a total of 263 flavouring substances.

Flavoring Agents↗