PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Lorenson

Publications and source records attributed to E Lorenson.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Upper extremity versus lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT), it is widely believed that upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) is associated with minimal morbidity or mortality. METHODS: In an attempt to compare the two disease processes with respect to pulmonary embolism and mortality, we have reviewed records and performed interviews of 430 patients with LEDVT and 52 patients with UEDVT presenting to our institution between January 1994 and June 1995. RESULTS: Pulmonary embolism was documented by ventilation/perfusion lung scan in 9 of 52 patients (17%) with UEDVT and 33 of 430 patients (8%) with LEDVT (P <0.05). Twenty-five of the UEDVT patients (48%) died within 6 months of the diagnosis of UEDVT. Conversely, 14 patients (13%) in the LEDVT group died within 6 months of the diagnosis of LEDVT (P <0.0002). CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous reports, this study suggests that UEDVT is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality as compared with LEDVT. These data show that UEDVT has been an underrecognized predictor of morbidity and mortality.

APACHE↗

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and its impact on morbidity and mortality rates in a hospital-based population.

PURPOSE: Although much attention has been focused on lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT), there is a relative paucity of data regarding the impact of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) on morbidity and mortality rates. To increase our knowledge with the latter disease, we have reviewed our experience at our institution with 170 patients who had brachial, axillary, and subclavian vein thromboses. METHODS: Over the past 5 years, UEDVT was diagnosed in 170 patients by duplex scanning. The indications for duplex examination were either upper extremity swelling (95%) or as part of the workup for pulmonary embolism (5%). There were 103 women (61%) and 67 men (39%), with ages ranging from 9 to 101 years (mean, 68 +/- 17 years). The diagnosis was made in 152 patients (89%) while they were admitted to the hospital and in 18 patients (11%) in the outpatient clinic. Risk factors included presence of a central venous catheter or pacemaker in 110 patients (65%), malignancy in 63 patients (37%), concomitant LEDVT in 19 patients (11%), and history of LEDVT in 18 patients (11%). Fifty-six patients (33%) had multiple risk factors, whereas 36 patients (21%) had no obvious risk factor. RESULTS: The 1-month and 3-month mortality rates for the entire study group were 16% and 34%, respectively. Patients who had concomitant LEDVT, were 75 years of age or older, and were not treated with anticoagulation medication had a significantly higher 1-month mortality rate. Patients whose diagnoses were made in the outpatient setting were statistically younger and had a lower 3-month mortality rate when compared with the patients whose diagnoses were made as inpatients. Pulmonary embolism was documented by ventilation/perfusion scan in 12 patients (7%). Although no patient in the group in which UEDVT was diagnosed on an outpatient basis was documented to have a pulmonary embolism and 12 patients (8%) in the inpatient group had pulmonary emboli, this difference was not statistically significant. Anticoagulation medication did not totally prevent pulmonary embolism in this review. All patients were followed-up for between 0 to 49 months (mean, 13 +/- 1 months). No swelling of the affected arm was observed in 145 patients (94%); four patients complained of mild intermittent swelling (2%), and seven patients reported significant swelling (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous reports, these data suggest that UEDVT is associated with a low incidence of postthrombotic upper extremity swelling, but a significant incidence of pulmonary embolism and rate of mortality. This review suggests that UEDVT is at least as serious a disease entity as LEDVT and should be managed as aggressively as LEDVT.

APACHE↗

Complementary distal arterio-venous fistula combined with deep vein interposition to improve infrapopliteal prosthetic bypass patency.

The rapid evolution of vascular surgical techniques over the last few years coupled with the availability of an adequate venous conduit has allowed a more liberal and successful approach to salvage ischemic limbs caused by advanced atherosclerosis. This aggressive approach can be exemplified by the construction of arterial bypasses to the terminal branches of tibial vessels. However, a significant number of patients will continue to face the threat of a major amputation because of insufficient amounts of vein(s) to perform a totally autogenous bypass to one of the infrapopliteal arteries.

Journal Article↗

The natural history of the external carotid artery after carotid endarterectomy: implications for management.

PURPOSE: Most surgeons perform some type of endarterectomy of the external carotid artery (ECA) routinely during standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This approach has been shown to result in a small percentage of ECA occlusions, the clinical significance of which remains poorly understood. We have modified our approach to the management of the ECA during standard CEA by averting any attempt at external CEA. To evaluate the natural history of the untreated ECA after CEA, we reviewed the preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up duplex scans obtained from 232 CEAs over the past 4 years. METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative carotid artery duplex examinations with specific evaluation of the extent of ECA stenosis were available for review on 114 CEAs performed between January 1991 and July 1994. All CEAs were performed for internal carotid artery stenosis greater than 75% as determined by duplex scanning, which was confirmed by either contrast arteriography or magnetic resonance angiography. RESULTS: Seventy-three (64.0%) procedures were performed for symptomatic lesions, whereas 41 (36.0%) were performed for asymptomatic stenosis. There were no perioperative strokes or transient ischemic attacks in this group, and there was one postoperative death (0.9%). Short- and intermediate-term follow-up demonstrated insignificant changes in ECA diameter after operation, with no cases of ECA occlusion and only five cases progressing to greater than 75% on the 1-year follow up duplex examination. CONCLUSION: We conclude from these data that averting external CEA during standard CEA does not result in significant progression of ECA stenosis or occlusion.

Aged↗