One-step vs two-step procedure in dynamic graciloplasty.
OBJECTIVE: Dynamic graciloplasty, a proven treatment for end-stage faecal incontinence, requires transposition of the gracilis muscle around the anal canal and implantation of a pulse generator and intramuscular electrodes. In view of the risk of infection around the implanted material the implantation was initially not performed in combination with the perineal procedure but 6 weeks later. Sparing the patients an extra operation, however, might be justified if morbidity is not increased. This study aimed to compare the combined single-stage with the two-stage procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups of 13 patients were admitted to this prospective, matched control study according to waiting list ranking. They were matched for age, gender and aetiology. Group I had transposition and transplantation combined, group II underwent these procedures separately with a 6-week interval. Continence, manometry, stimulation parameters, quality of life results and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: After a mean 521-day follow up infection rates were comparable in both groups, as were continence rates, morbidity, anal manometry, stimulation parameters and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Outcome, morbidity and quality of life seem to be comparable. A single procedure avoids the need for an extra admission and operation, so the one-stage approach should be the standard procedure in dynamic graciloplasty.