PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E M Gilbert

Publications and source records attributed to E M Gilbert.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Carvedilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with mild symptoms of heart failure. US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that carvedilol inhibits clinical progression in patients with mildly symptomatic heart failure due to left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients (n = 366) who had mildly symptomatic heart failure with an LV ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 0.35, had minimal functional impairment (defined as the ability to walk 450 to 550 m on a 6-minute walk test), and were receiving optimal standard therapy, including ACE inhibitors, were randomized double-blind to carvedilol (n = 232) or placebo (n = 134) and followed up for 12 months. The primary end point was clinical progression, defined as death due to heart failure, hospitalization for heart failure, or a sustained increase in heart failure medications. Clinical progression of heart failure occurred in 21% of placebo patients and 11% of carvedilol patients, reflecting a 48% (P = .008) reduction in the primary end point of heart failure progression (relative risk, 0.52; CI, 0.32 to 0.85). This effect of carvedilol was not influenced by sex, age, race, cause of heart failure, or baseline LVEF. Carvedilol also significantly improved several secondary end points, including LVEF, heart failure score, NYHA functional class, and the physician and patient global assessments. Carvedilol reduced all-cause mortality but had no effects on the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure scale, the distance walked in 9 minutes on a self-powered treadmill, or cardiothoracic index. The drug was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol, when added to standard therapy, including an ACE inhibitor, reduces clinical progression in patients who are only mildly symptomatic with well-compensated heart failure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investigators.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial designed to establish the efficacy and safety of carvedilol, a "third-generation" beta -blocking agent with vasodilator properties, in chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five subjects with mild to moderate, stable chronic heart failure were randomized to receive treatment with placebo, 6.25 mg BID carvedilol (low-dose group), 12.5 mg BID carvedilol (medium-dose group), or 25 mg BID carvedilol (high-dose group). After a 2- to 4-week up-titration period, subjects remained on study medication for a period of 6 months. The primary efficacy parameter was submaximal exercise measured by two different techniques, the 6-minute corridor walk test and the 9-minute self-powered treadmill test. Carvedilol had no detectable effect on submaximal exercise as measured by either technique. However, carvedilol was associated with dose-related improvements in LV function (by 5, 6, and 8 ejection fraction [EF] units in the low-, medium-, and high-dose carvedilol groups, respectively, compared with 2 EF units with placebo, P < .001 for linear dose response) and survival (respective crude mortality rates of 6.0%, 6.7%, and 1.1% with increasing doses of carvedilol compared with 15.5% in the placebo group, P < .001). When the three carvedilol groups were combined, the all-cause actuarial mortality risk was lowered by 73% in carvedilol-treated subjects (P < .001). Carvedilol also lowered the hospitalization rate (by 58% to 64%, P = .01) and was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with mild to moderate heart failure from systolic dysfunction, carvedilol produced dose-related improvements in LV function and dose-related reductions in mortality and hospitalization rate.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Comparative hemodynamic, left ventricular functional, and antiadrenergic effects of chronic treatment with metoprolol versus carvedilol in the failing heart.

BACKGROUND: The basic pharmacology of the third-generation beta-blocking agent carvedilol differs considerably from second-generation compounds such as metoprolol. Moreover, carvedilol may produce different, ie, more favorable, clinical effects in chronic heart failure. For these reasons, we compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on adrenergic activity, receptor expression, degree of clinical beta-blockade, hemodynamics, and left ventricular function in patients with mild or moderate chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol were compared in two concurrent placebo-controlled trials with carvedilol or metoprolol that had common substudies focused on adrenergic, hemodynamic, and left ventricular functional measurements. All subjects in the substudies had chronic heart failure resulting from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Carvedilol at 50 to 100 mg/d produced reductions in exercise heart rate that were similar to metoprolol at 125 to 150 mg/d, indicating comparable degrees of beta-blockade. Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol was associated with greater improvement in New York Heart Association functional class. Although there were no significant differences in hemodynamic effects between the carvedilol and metoprolol active-treatment groups, carvedilol tended to produce relatively greater improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction, stroke volume, and stroke work compared with changes in the respective placebo groups. Carvedilol selectively lowered coronary sinus norepinephrine levels, an index of cardiac adrenergic activity, whereas metoprolol did not lower coronary sinus norepinephrine and actually increased central venous norepinephrine levels. Finally, metoprolol was associated with an increase in cardiac beta-receptor density, whereas carvedilol did not change cardiac beta-receptor expression. CONCLUSIONS: The third-generation beta-blocking agent carvedilol has substantially different effects on left ventricular function, hemodynamics, adrenergic activity, and beta-receptor expression than dose the second-generation compound metoprolol. Some or all of these differences may explain the apparent differences in clinical results between the two compounds.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Effects of carvedilol on systolic and diastolic left ventricular performance in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy or ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Recent evidence has shown that improvement in left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with New York Heart Association class II to III heart failure occurs with beta-adrenergic blocking agents. However the specific effects on LV diastolic function have been subjected to only limited examination. This study investigated the effects of the combined beta blocker/vasodilator, carvedilol, on systolic and diastolic LV performance in dilated cardiomyopathy. Thirty-six patients with New York Heart Association II to III heart failure and LV ejection fraction < or = 0.35 were entered into either arm of this placebo-controlled, double-blind 4-month trial. Twenty-one subjects were entered into the carvedilol treatment arm and 15 patients were entered into the placebo arm in a 3:2 ratio. Carvedilol therapy resulted in a significant improvement in LV ejection fraction, from 0.22 +/- 0.02 to 0.30 +/- 0.02 when compared with the placebo group (0.19 +/- 0.02 to 0.21 +/- 0.02 at baseline and after 4 months of therapy, respectively; p = 0.0001). However, no significant change in radionuclide parameters of LV diastolic function, including peak filling rate or time to peak filling rate, was observed. LV end-diastolic volume index did not change with carvedilol therapy, whereas end-diastolic volume index increased in the placebo group, although the difference between groups at 4 months was significant (p = 0.02). In conjunction with these changes, end-systolic volume index was smaller at 4 months after carvedilol treatment compared with that of the placebo group (p = 0.04). Thus, these results demonstrate that in moderate chronic heart failure, systolic LV performance improves but diastolic LV function does not improve when compared with placebo after treatment with carvedilol.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. U.S. Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Controlled clinical trials have shown that beta-blockers can produce hemodynamic and symptomatic improvement in chronic heart failure, but the effect of these drugs on survival has not been determined. METHODS: We enrolled 1094 patients with chronic heart failure in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, stratified program, in which patients were assigned to one of the four treatment protocols on the basis of their exercise capacity. Within each of the four protocols patients with mild, moderate, or severe heart failure with left ventricular ejection fractions < or = 0.35 were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n = 398) or the beta-blocker carvedilol (n = 696); background therapy with digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor remained constant. Patient were observed for the occurrence death or hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons during the following 6 months, after the beginning (12 months for the group with mild heart failure). RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 7.8 percent in the placebo group and 3.2 percent in the carvedilol group; the reduction in risk attributable to carvedilol was 65 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 39 to 80 percent; P < 0.001). This finding led the Data and Safety Monitoring Board to recommend termination of the study before its scheduled completion. In addition, as compared with placebo, carvedilol therapy was accompanied by a 27 percent reduction in the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular causes (19.6 percent vs. 14.1 percent, P = 0.036), as well as a 38 percent reduction in the combined risk of hospitalization or death (24.6 percent vs, 15.8 percent, P < 0.001). Worsening heart failure as an adverse reaction during treatment was less frequent in the carvedilol than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Carvedilol reduces the risk or death as well as the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular causes in patients with heart failure who are receiving treatment with digoxin, diuretics, and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed1996

Circulating concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines in mild or moderate heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Proinflammatory cytokines are capable of modulating cardiovascular function by a variety of mechanisms. These cytokines are elevated in patients with severe heart failure, but changes in mild or moderate heart failure have not been reported. Therefore, simultaneous arterial and coronary sinus concentrations of interleukin-1alpha, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were measured in 78 patients with New York Heart Association functional class II to IV heart failure and compared with 17 healthy volunteers. Concentrations of interleukin-1alpha, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, and interleukin-6 were determined by a "sandwich" enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and tumor necrosis factor-alpha by tissue culture technique. There were no statistical differences in interleukin-1alpha, soluble interleukin-2 receptor, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha concentrations in mild to moderate heart failure versus control subjects. Interleukin-6 was significantly elevated, 75 +/- 16 versus 0.4 +/- 0.4pg/ml (p = 0.002). Cytokine concentrations did not differ by heart failure etiology. Paired arterial and coronary sinus concentrations were not significantly different. Soluble interleukin-2 receptor concentrations were significantly correlated with New York Heart Association functional class (r = 0.59, p = 0.04) and negatively associated with exercise tolerance time (r = -0.59, p = 0.007). Thus, interleukin-6 is significantly elevated in mild or moderate heart failure.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed1996

Exercise capacity after heart transplantation: influence of donor and recipient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: For incompletely understood reasons, cardiac transplant recipients achieve only 60% to 70% of predicted values for maximal exercise capacity. The objective was to determine the characteristics of cardiac transplant recipients that are predictive of exercise capacity. METHODS: One hundred ten patients underwent maximal exercise testing using a modified Naughton protocol 26 +/- 1 months after transplantation. Recipient characteristics, resting hemodynamic variables and exercise parameters were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The average maximum heart rate was 85% of predicted, and the average peak oxygen consumption (Vo2) was 17.7 +/- 0.3 ml/kg/min (64% of predicted). Pretransplant status, etiology of heart failure, ischemic time, degree of HLA disparity, cumulative corticosteroid exposure, and number of rejection episodes failed to correlate with any exercise parameter. Older recipient age and female gender were associated with greater values for the proportion of the predicted peak Vo2 (p < 0.001 for age; p = 0.001 for gender). Older donor age was the strongest independent predictor of a decreased chronotropic response (p < 0.001) and was a weak predictor of decreased peak Vo2 (p = 0.014). Even in the multivariate analysis, maintenance prednisone dose negatively impacts exercise duration (p = 0.05), peak Vo2 (p = 0.035) and percent of predicted peak Vo2 (p = 0.032). Of all characteristics tested, pulmonary vascular resistance within 24 hours of exercise most powerfully predicts exercise duration (p = 0.002) and peak Vo2 (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Female recipients and older recipients have a lower absolute exercise capacity, but achieve a greater proportion of their predicted capacity. Recipients of older donor hearts and those receiving chronic corticosteroids have decreased exercise capacity. Pulmonary vascular resistance is inversely correlated with exercise capacity.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Role of beta-adrenergic receptor downregulation in the peak exercise response in patients with heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

The effect of beta-adrenergic receptor downregulation on peak exercise response in patients with heart failure has not been directly investigated. Seventy-two patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who had a mean ejection fraction of 23 +/- 1% (mean +/- SEM) and New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms were investigated. Subjects underwent maximal exercise testing on a bicycle or a treadmill, hemodynamic assessment by right heart catheterization, and measurement of total beta-adrenergic receptor density by 125I-iodocyanopindolol binding performed in the right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy tissue and in peripheral lymphocytes. Endomyocardial biopsy beta-adrenergic receptor density (Bmax) was markedly decreased (45 +/- 2 fmol/mg), and significantly lower than lymphocytes Bmax (107 +/- 14 fmol/mg; p < 0.05). By univariate analysis, all exercise variables correlated significantly with biopsy tissue Bmax but not with lymphocyte Bmax. Maximal exercise oxygen consumption (VO2max) yielded the highest correlation with Bmax (r2 = 0.61, p < 0.001). By stepwise regression analysis, VO2 max, delta heart rate x systolic blood pressure, and ejection fraction were all independently related to Bmax. Myocardial beta-adrenergic receptor downregulation is likely to be partially responsible for the reduced chronotropic and inotropic responses to peak exercise in patients with mild to moderate symptomatic heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Left ventricular mass increases during cardiac allograft vascular rejection.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated whether left ventricular mass increases during cellular or vascular (humoral) cardiac allograft rejection. BACKGROUND: An increase in left ventricular mass during cellular cardiac allograft rejection has been described by other investigators, although controversy has existed over the validity of these findings. Left ventricular mass changes have not been evaluated in the setting of vascular (humoral) cardiac allograft rejection. METHODS: To determine the effect of allograft rejection on left ventricular mass, we retrospectively reviewed endomyocardial biopsy results and corresponding echocardiograms in 41 cardiac transplant recipients undergoing treatment for allograft rejection. Left ventricular mass was assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography using the method of Schiller. Maintenance immunosuppression included cyclosporine in all patients. RESULTS: Although significant changes in left ventricular wall thickness, mass and dimensions were not observed in patients experiencing moderate or severe cellular allograft rejection (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grades III and IV, n = 27), marked changes were noted in patients with vascular (humoral) rejection (n = 14). Patients with vascular rejection demonstrated an echocardiographic mean (+/- SEM) increase in left ventricular wall mass (from 109 +/- 17 to 151 +/- 17 g), and left ventricular wall thickness (from 1.3 +/- 0.1 to 1.6 +/- 0.1 cm) during the rejection episode. Additionally, vascular rejection was associated with a trend toward an increase in left ventricular systolic dimension (from 2.6 +/- 0.1 to 3.0 +/- 0.2 cm) and a decrease in left ventricular fractional shortening and increased incidence of hemodynamic compromise with rejection (50% for vascular vs. 11% for cellular rejection). CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular mass increases during episodes of vascular (humoral) rejection, but there is no significant change in left ventricular mass during cellular cardiac allograft rejection.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Carvedilol improves left ventricular function and symptoms in chronic heart failure: a double-blind randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the safety and efficacy of carvedilol in patients with heart failure caused by idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy. BACKGROUND: Carvedilol is a mildly beta 1-selective beta-adrenergic blocking agent with vasodilator properties. Beta-blockade may be beneficial in patients with heart failure, but the effects of carvedilol are not known. METHODS: Sixty patients with heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classes II to IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 0.35 were enrolled in the study. All patients tolerated challenge with carvedilol, 3.125 mg twice a day, and were randomized to receive carvedilol (n = 36) versus placebo (n = 24). Study medication was titrated over 1 month from 6.25 to 25 mg twice a day (< 75 kg) or 50 mg twice a day (> 75 kg) and continued for 3 months. One placebo-treated and two carvedilol-treated patients did not complete the study. RESULTS: Carvedilol therapy resulted in a significant reduction in heart rate and mean pulmonary artery and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures and a significant increase in stroke volume and left ventricular stroke work. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased 52% in the carvedilol group (from 0.21 to 0.32, p < 0.0001 vs. placebo group). Carvedilol-treated patients also reported a significant lessening of heart failure symptoms (p < 0.05 vs. placebo group). Submaximal exercise duration tended to increase with carvedilol therapy (from 688 +/- 31 s to 871 +/- 32 s), but this change was not significantly different from that with placebo therapy by between-group analysis. Peak oxygen consumption during maximal exercise did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term carvedilol therapy improves rest cardiac function and lessens symptoms in patients with heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1995

Improvement in cardiac myocyte function by biological effects of medical therapy: a new concept in the treatment of heart failure.

Virtually all medications used to treat cardiac problems act through a pharmacological mechanism that immediately improves electrical or mechanical function or inhibits the manifestation of a pathological process. The idea that medical therapy could exert a favourable myocardial effect by fundamentally improving the biological function of cardiac myocytes is novel, and is based on the observation that in heart failure the acute pharmacological effects of beta-blocking agents on left ventricular function are completely different from their long-term effects. beta-blocking agents improve intrinsic systolic function long-term, despite depressing function initially through the pharmacological effect of withdrawing adrenergic drive, indicating that the beneficial effect of this form of therapy is due to improved myocyte biology. Implicit in this observation is that improvement in the fundamental biology of failing cardiac myocytes should favourably affect the natural history of heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1995

Pharmacologic and hemodynamic effects of combined beta-agonist stimulation and phosphodiesterase inhibition in the failing human heart.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We measured the individual and combined effects of the beta-agonist dobutamine and the phosphodiesterase inhibitor enoximone both in vitro and in vivo in the failing human heart. DESIGN: This was an unblinded, prospective study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: The in vitro measurements were performed on 20 hearts obtained from subjects with end-stage biventricular failure and from seven normal hearts. The in vivo measurements were performed in eight subjects with class IV heart failure. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: The in vitro measurements of enoximone, dobutamine, and the combination of these agents were phosphodiesterase activity using a sarcoplasmic reticulum-enriched preparation, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation using particulate fractions, and tension response using isolated right ventricular trabeculae. The dose response to dobutamine, the combination of enoximone and dobutamine, and the combination of nitroprusside and dobutamine were measured in vivo using invasive hemodynamic monitoring. RESULTS: In vitro, enoximone exhibited dose-dependent inhibition of phosphodiesterase activity. The addition of enoximone to dobutamine resulted in an upward and leftward shift of the dobutamine dose-response curve for both cAMP production and contractile response. In vivo, enoximone significantly shifted the dobutamine dose-response curves for cardiac index, left ventricular stroke work index, and heart rate upward and to the left; and shifted the dobutamine dose-response curves for right atrial, pulmonary arterial, and pulmonary wedge pressures downward and to the right. CONCLUSIONS: Enoximone exerts favorable effects on cardiac performance that are additive to those produced by dobutamine. These effects are mediated by increasing cellular cAMP concentrations through independent, additive mechanisms.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Computerized practice guidelines for heart failure management: the HeartMan system.

In this paper we discuss the initial stages of development and evaluation of the HeartMan system, a set of computerized practice guidelines for heart failure management. The concept of computerized guidelines as a hybrid of expert systems and practice guidelines methodologies and techniques is proposed. We show the results of the initial evaluation of the system, which are very promising, although the sample size is small, and the study is retrospective: Of 177 messages, 90% were considered appropriate, of which 97.5% would have been followed. Eight percent of the messages were classified as neutral, and 2% classified as inappropriate. The errors were correctable by changing the logic. The potential technical and sociological barriers to the complete development and clinical use of the system are discussed.

Expert Systems↗
PubMed1994

Dose-response of chronic beta-blocker treatment in heart failure from either idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Bucindolol Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Small-scale clinical investigations have demonstrated that single doses of beta-blocking agents can improve left ventricular function in heart failure from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC). The purpose of this multicenter clinical trial was to determine the dose-effect characteristics of beta-blockade in a heart failure population that includes ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (ISCD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Bucindolol is a nonselective beta-blocking agent with mild vasodilatory properties. One hundred forty-one subjects with class II or III heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < or = 0.40, and background therapy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin, and diuretics were given an initial challenge dose of bucindolol 12.5 mg. One hundred thirty-nine subjects (99 with IDC, 40 with ISCDC) tolerated challenge and were randomized to treatment with placebo or bucindolol 12.5 mg/d (low dose), 50 mg/d (medium dose), or 200 mg/d (high dose). At the end of 12 weeks, left ventricular function and other parameters were measured and compared with baseline values. There was a dose-related improvement in left ventricular function in bucindolol-treated subjects. In the high-dose bucindolol group, radionuclide-measured LVEF improved by 7.8 EF units (%) compared with 1.8 units in the placebo group (P < .05), and compared with the placebo group, a greater percentage of subjects had an increase in LVEF by > or = 5 units. In contrast, all three bucindolol doses prevented deterioration of myocardial function as defined by an LVEF decline of > or = 5 units. CONCLUSIONS: In heart failure from systolic dysfunction, beta-blockade with bucindolol produces a dose-related improvement in and prevents deterioration of left ventricular function.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1993

Beneficial effects of metoprolol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Metoprolol in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (MDC) Trial Study Group.

Several small studies have suggested beneficial effects of long-term beta-blocker treatment in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Our large multicentre study aimed to find out whether metoprolol improves overall survival and morbidity in this disorder. 383 subjects with heart failure from idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction < 0.40) were randomly assigned placebo or metoprolol. 94% were in New York Heart Association functional classes II and III, and 80% were receiving background treatment. A test dose of metoprolol (5 mg twice daily) was given for 2-7 days; those tolerating this dose (96%) entered randomisation. Study medication was increased slowly from 10 mg to 100-150 mg daily. There were 34% (95% CI -6 to 62%, p = 0.058) fewer primary endpoints in the metoprolol than the placebo group; 2 and 19 patients, respectively, deteriorated to the point of needing transplantation and 23 and 19 died. The change in ejection fraction from baseline to 12 months was significantly greater with metoprolol than with placebo (0.13 vs 0.06, p < 0.0001). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased more from baseline to 12 months with metoprolol than with placebo (5 vs 2 mm Hg, p = 0.06). Exercise time at 12 months was significantly greater (p = 0.046) in metoprolol-treated than in placebo-treated patients. In patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, treatment with metoprolol prevented clinical deterioration, improved symptoms and cardiac function, and was well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Effects of vesnarinone on morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Vesnarinone Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Inotropic therapy, other than with digitalis glycosides, has had limited success in patients with chronic congestive heart failure. We investigated whether vesnarinone, a new positive inotropic agent, reduces morbidity and mortality and improves the quality of life of patients with symptomatic heart failure. METHODS: Patients receiving concomitant therapy with digoxin (87 percent) and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (90 percent) who had ejection fractions of 30 percent or less were randomly assigned to receive double-blinded therapy with 60 mg of vesnarinone per day, 120 mg of vesnarinone per day, or placebo. Afer 253 patients had been enrolled, randomization to the 120-mg vesnarinone group had to be stopped because of a significant increase in early mortality in this group. Thereafter, patients were randomly assigned only to 60 mg of vesnarinone per day (a total of 239 patients) or placebo (a total of 238 patients). RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the group receiving 60 mg of vesnarinone than in the group receiving placebo (26 vs. 50 patients; P = 0.003) died or had worsening heart failure during the six-month study period. The reduction in risk was 50 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 20 to 69 percent). Similarly, there was a 62 percent reduction (95 percent confidence interval, 28 to 80 percent) in the risk of dying from any cause among the patients receiving vesnarinone. Furthermore, quality of life improved to a greater extent in the vesnarinone group than in the placebo group over 12 weeks (P = 0.008). The principal side effect associated with vesnarinone was reversible neutropenia, which occurred in 2.5 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Six months of therapy with 60 mg of vesnarinone per day resulted in lower morbidity and mortality and improved the quality of life of patients with congestive heart failure. However, a higher dose of vesnarinone (120 mg per day) increased mortality, suggesting that this drug has a narrow therapeutic range; the long-term effects of vesnarinone are unknown.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

beta-adrenergic receptor regulation and left ventricular function in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Alterations in the myocardial receptor-G protein-adenylate cyclase (RGC) complex and cardiac adrenergic neurons in the failing human heart result in subsensitivity to beta-adrenergic stimulation. Pharmacologic interventions such as beta blockade may modify critical components of the RGC complex and partially restore the sensitivity of the beta-adrenergic pathway. Among the receptors coupled to the stimulatory (Gs) protein are the beta 1 and beta 2 receptors. Because of differences in receptor population and agonist (i.e., norepinephrine) affinity, the beta 1-receptor is the predominate adrenergic subtype regulating contractility in the nonfailing myocardium. Down-regulation occurs in the myocardial beta-receptor component of the RGC complex with mild-to-moderate and severe left ventricular dysfunction. However, abnormalities of the RGC complex vary with the etiology of heart failure; beta 1-receptor down-regulation is greater in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy than in post-infarction cardiomyopathy, while beta-receptor uncoupling is greater in post-infarction disease. In chronic heart failure, the adrenergic nervous system is activated in the heart and kidney. There is evidence that an increased cardiac norepinephrine concentration contributes to the decrease in beta 1-receptor density in heart failure. However, norepinephrine exposure is not the only factor responsible for regulating beta-adrenergic receptors in heart failure. Chronic beta blockade may improve hemodynamic and clinical response in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy by protecting the myocardium from the cardiotoxic effects of increased catecholamines and by up-regulating the beta 1 receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗