PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E M Mascini

Publications and source records attributed to E M Mascini.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Genotyping and preemptive isolation to control an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium.

BACKGROUND: Control of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) in European hospitals is hampered because of widespread asymptomatic carriage of VRE by healthy Europeans. In 2000, our hospital (The University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands) was confronted with a large outbreak of VRE. INTERVENTION: On the basis of genotyping (by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis), epidemic and nonepidemic VRE strains were distinguished, and infection-control measures were exclusively targeted toward epidemic VRE. The outbreak was retrospectively divided into 3 periods of different infection-control measures. Compliance with use of alcohol-based hand rubs was enforced during all periods. Period I involved active surveillance, isolation of carriers, and cohorting (duration, 4 months); preemptive isolation of high-risk patients for VRE colonization was added in period II (7 months); and cohorting and preemptive isolation were abandoned in period III (18 months). METHODS: When the outbreak was identified, 27 patients in 6 wards were colonized; 93% were colonized with an epidemic VRE strain. Detection rates of nonepidemic VRE were 3.5%, 3.0%, and 2.9% among 683, 810, and 977 screened patients in periods I, II, and III, respectively, comparable to a prevalence of 2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1%-3.5%) among 600 nonhospitalized persons. The relative risks of detecting epidemic VRE in periods II and III, compared with period I, were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.41-1.10) for period II and 0.02 (95% CI, 0.002-0.6) for period III. Infection-control measures were withheld for patients colonized with nonepidemic VRE (76 [54%] of 140 patients with a test result positive for VRE). Use of alcohol-based hand rubs increased by 31%-275% in outbreak wards. CONCLUSION: Genotyping-targeted infection control, isolation of VRE carriers, enhancement of hand-hygiene compliance, and preemptive isolation successfully controlled nosocomial spread of epidemic VRE infection.

Disease Outbreaks↗
PubMed2006

Epidemiology of multiple Acinetobacter outbreaks in The Netherlands during the period 1999-2001.

An increase in the number of outbreaks of Acinetobacter infection was notified in The Netherlands during 1999-2001. The present study compared the outbreaks at the species and strain levels, and analysed the epidemiology and control measures at the different locations. For each institute, three representative isolates from three patients were identified to the species and strain levels by genotyping methods. A questionnaire investigated the impact of the outbreak, the control measures that were taken, and the possible effects of the measures. Seven outbreaks were associated with Acinetobacter baumannii (three outbreaks with a strain designated strain A, two outbreaks with a strain designated strain B, and one outbreak each with strains designated C and D). An additional outbreak was caused by genomic species 13TU, which is related closely to A. baumannii. Strains B and D were identified as European clones III and II, respectively. Except for two hospitals with outbreaks caused by strain A, there was no known epidemiological link between the participating hospitals. In all hospitals the outbreak occurred on one or several intensive care units, and spread to other departments was noted in two hospitals. The number of patients affected ranged from six to 66 over a period of 2-22 months. In most outbreaks, patients were the likely reservoir from which spread occurred. In all hospitals, a large panel of measures was required to bring the outbreak to an end. Extensive environmental sampling yielded numerous positive samples in most but not all hospitals.

Acinetobacter↗
PubMed2005

Long-term surveillance of invasive group A streptococcal disease in The Netherlands, 1994-2003.

A nationwide laboratory-based surveillance study of invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) infections was conducted in The Netherlands from May 1994 until December 2003 (average population during this period was 15 729 704). Microbiologically invasive isolates were obtained from 1504 patients, with most (70%) isolates cultured from blood. There was a clear seasonal pattern in invasive streptococcal infections, with an estimated annual incidence that peaked in 1996 (4.0 cases/100 000 individuals/year) and was at its lowest in 1999 (2.0 cases/100 000 individuals/year). Twenty-eight different M-types were identified, of which the most frequent were M1 (339/1504, 23%), M3 (187/1504, 12%), M89 (174/1504, 12%), M28 (164/1504, 11%), M12 (109/1504, 7%) and M6 (55/1504, 4%). There was a high degree of variation in the relative annual contributions of the predominant M-types, but variations in M1 and M3 combined correlated with overall changes in the annual incidence. The contribution of the patient group aged > or = 56 years to all cases of invasive GAS disease increased during the study period, whereas that of the group aged 0-20 years decreased. A peak in the incidence of invasive GAS disease among the patient group aged 30-34 years did not vary during the study period, indicating that the high incidence of invasive GAS disease in this age group was age-specific rather than cohort-related.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: consequences for therapy and infection control.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens, initially in the USA, but now also in Europe, where hospital outbreaks are being reported with increasing frequency, although the incidence of VRE infections remains extremely low in most European countries. The recently demonstrated in-human transmission of vancomycin resistance from VRE to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in two American patients underscores the potential danger of a coexisting reservoir of both pathogens. As MRSA is already endemic in many European hospital settings, prevention of endemicity with VRE seems relevant, but should be balanced against the costs associated with the implementation of effective strategies. The presence of a large community reservoir of VRE in Europe could hamper the feasibility of infection control strategies. Although the prevalence of colonisation amongst healthy subjects has apparently decreased after the ban on avoparcin use in the agricultural industry, a large proportion of admitted patients are still potential sources of VRE transmission. With no risk profile available to identify these carriers, effective screening, followed by barrier precautions for carriers, seems to be impossible. Recent studies, however, have suggested that hospital outbreaks are almost exclusively caused by specific genogroups of VRE that can be characterised phenotypically and genotypically (e.g., co-resistance to ampicillin and the presence of the variant esp gene). Based on our own experience, we propose that VRE infection control programmes should be restricted to patients colonised with these VRE strains. If such a strain is cultured from a clinical sample, surveillance amongst contact patients is recommended and barrier precautions should be implemented in the case of documented spread.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2004

[Vancomycin resistant enterococci in the Netherlands].

Enterococci (Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium) are relatively avirulent enteric bacteria that usually only cause infections in immunocompromised patients. Antimicrobial treatment, however, is hampered as enterococci are intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics. For years, vancomycin was considered the last available antibiotic. Plasmid-mediated resistance against vancomycin among enterococci was first described in the nineteen-eighties and since then incidences of infection caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have increased dramatically, especially in the United States. In 2000, three outbreaks of VRE occurred in hospitals in the Netherlands and a set of infection-control measures was proposed to limit further transmission. These measures were based on the simultaneous isolation of VRE from multiple patients. All three outbreaks were controlled by these measures and no new outbreaks in Dutch hospitals have been reported since then. Epidemiological studies have shown that hospital outbreaks on three continents were caused by a subpopulation of E. faecium, which is characterized by the presence of a potential virulence gene (variant esp) and resistance to amoxicillin. This 'hospital strain' of E. faecium has probably been prevalent within hospital settings for some time, but only became clinically relevant when it had acquired vancomycin-resistance. Current advice is to implement the set of infection control measures formulated in 2000, only in those patients colonized by amoxicillin-resistant VRE. The potential dangers of VRE were recently underlined by the proven transmission of the vancomycin-resistance gene from VRE to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in two patients in the United States. It is in the interest of the patients that prevalence of VRE and MRSA in Dutch hospitals should be kept as low as possible.

Disease Outbreaks↗
PubMed2003

[A pseudo-epidemic of puerperal sepsis].

Within a four-week period, five patients were admitted to the maternity ward of the Utrecht Children's Hospital diagnosed with puerperal sepsis due to group-A streptococcal infection. The clinical presentation was different for each patient. All patients recovered upon adequate antibiotic treatment. One of the children died, possibly due to sepsis and hypotension of his mother. As group-A streptococci can be extremely contagious and an epidemic was suspected, measures for additional hygiene were taken. Furthermore, all personnel at the maternity ward and the obstetric centre were tested. T-serotyping, M-genotyping, exotoxin A- and C-gene amplification and pulsed field gel electrophoresis were used to characterize the cultured group-A streptococci. Cross-contamination was not found. Therefore, this increase in puerperal sepsis was attributed to polyclonal expansion rather than an epidemic. All mothers of newly born children who present with fever and lower abdominal pain should be suspected of group-A streptococcal infection. Evaluation and treatment in hospital is indicated due to a sometimes fulminant course. When group-A streptococci are cultured again in a new pregnancy, eradication therapy during pregnancy or prophylactic treatment during birth should be considered to prevent recurrent infection.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2003

Acquisition and duration of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal carriage in relation to strain type.

In May 2000, the first outbreak of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) was detected in the University Medical Center Utrecht in the nephrology ward. The question arose why some VREF strains spread among hospitalized patients, whereas other strains do not. Thirty patients who were found to be colonized with VREF between May and November 2000 were included in the study. Molecular typing confirmed that 19 of them carried an identical epidemic strain which harbored the esp gene while 11 were colonized by nonepidemic strains that were all esp negative. Acquisition of the outbreak strain was significantly associated with diabetes mellitus, renal transplantation, and extensive use of antibiotics, especially cephalosporins, in the 2-month period before the first isolation of VREF. To establish the duration of colonization, prospective surveillance of VREF carriage for a 6-month period starting from the first isolation of VREF was realized for 20 patients. After 6 months, VREF was still recovered from 60% of carriers of the outbreak strain versus 20% of carriers of nonepidemic strains (P < 0.01). However, antibiotic use during the follow-up period was significantly higher by carriers of the outbreak strain than by carriers of nonepidemic strains. The fact that the outbreak strain was recovered for a longer period of time than nonepidemic strains may facilitate dissemination of the strain. The results support a careful restrictive antibiotic policy for wards at risk for spread of VREF and implementation of isolation precautions for patients who are colonized with esp-positive outbreak strains.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

[Epidemic of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus due to the transfer of 2 Dutch burn patients from a hospital outside of the Netherlands; who suffers the consequences?].

Two burns patients who were transferred to the Central Military Hospital Utrecht from a foreign hospital, were found to be colonised with MRSA. During their 5-week hospitalisation, 21 healthcare workers and one patient became colonised with the same MRSA strain, despite isolation precautions. The department was closed for 29 days; 96 admissions were cancelled and 1411 screening cultures for MRSA were performed. Colonised healthcare workers were temporarily unable to work and additional costs were incurred for disposables and cleaning procedures. The resultant bill for this outbreak was approximately [symbol: see text] 122,500. MRSA outbreaks occur in hospitals with some degree of regularity, but the strong dispersal during this epidemic was exceptional. The transfer of possible MRSA-colonised patients from hospitals outside of the Netherlands sometimes faces opposition due to the considerable demands it makes on a hospital's personnel, organisation and finances. If this were to be compensated, then the currently successful Dutch MRSA policy could be coupled with a willingness to accept patients from hospitals outside of the Netherlands.

Burns↗
PubMed2002

[Increase in rate of resistance to fusidic acid among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients admitted with atopic dermatitis].

To determine whether there has been an increase in the incidence of resistance to fusidic acid among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in the Netherlands, a retrospective study was carried out. The resistance pattern of S. aureus isolates from patients with atopic dermatitis at the Dermatology inpatient department of the University Medical Centre Utrecht was determined during the period 1995-2001. The rate of resistance increased from 9.7% to 23.4% during this period, whereas the rate of resistance of S. aureus to methicillin remained stable at around 0.5%. Prolonged topical use of fusidic acid is probably the main cause for the increase in fusidin resistance. Therefore it is advised to limit the use of fusidic acid for infected dermatitis to short periods of about two weeks, and only after sensitivity of the strain to fusidin has been confirmed.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2002

Outbreak of a susceptible strain of Acinetobacter species 13 (sensu Tjernberg and Ursing) in an adult neurosurgical intensive care unit.

Between December 1999 and June 2000, an outbreak caused by Acinetobacter emerged on the neurosurgical intensive care unit of our hospital. It was shown using automated ribotyping using Eco RI and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis that the outbreak was caused by spread of a single strain, which was identified by ribotyping and amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis as Acinetobacter DNA group 13TU (sensu Tjernberg and Ursing). The outbreak strain, which showed no antibiotic resistance, was identified in 23 patients, five of whom developed an infection. The organism was also isolated from various environmental sites. Cross-transmission among patients continued despite contact isolation of colonized patients and reinforcement of basic disinfection procedures. Eventually, after implementation of additional stringent measures such as cohorting of positive patients and daily disinfection of the floor, the outbreak was brought under control. This study demonstrates that apart from Acinetobacter baumanii, Acinetobacter 13TU strains, even when they are fully susceptible, may cause outbreaks that are difficult to control. Correct identification to the species level of Acinetobacter by genotypic methods is necessary to get insight in the importance of the different Acinetobacter genomic species in hospital epidemiology.

Acinetobacter↗
PubMed2001

Variant esp gene as a marker of a distinct genetic lineage of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium spreading in hospitals.

In the USA, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) is endemic in hospitals, despite lack of carriage among healthy individuals. In Europe, however, hospital outbreaks are rare, but VREF carriage among healthy individuals and livestock is common. We used amplified fragment-length polymorphism analysis to genotype 120 VREF isolates associated with hospital outbreaks and 45 non-epidemic isolates from the USA, Europe, and Australia. We also looked for the esp virulence gene in these isolates and in 98 VREF from animals. A specific E. faecium subpopulation genetically distinct from non-epidemic VREF isolates was found to be the cause of the hospital epidemics in all three continents. This subpopulation contained a variant of the esp gene that was absent in all non-epidemic and animal isolates. Identification of the variant esp gene will be important in guiding infection-control strategies, and the Esp protein could be a new target for antibacterial therapy.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2001

Penicillin and clindamycin differentially inhibit the production of pyrogenic exotoxins A and B by group A streptococci.

Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins A (SPE-A) and B (SPE-B) have been implicated in the pathogenesis of serious group A streptococcal infections including streptococcal toxic shock-syndrome. Current antibiotics used for the treatment of these infections are penicillin and clindamycin. The effects of sub- and suprainhibitory concentrations of penicillin and clindamycin were evaluated in 14 isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes that were fully susceptible to both antibiotics. Clindamycin was superior to penicillin in reducing the production of SPE-A and SPE-B by invasive and non-invasive Dutch group A streptococcal isolates in vitro.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2000

[What is to be done with vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections?].

Recently, three epidemics in Dutch hospitals were caused by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Although the number of infections was small, spread of colonization was extensive and many infection control measures were necessary to prevent further spread. VRE are relatively avirulent bacteria. However, few, if any, antibiotics are available for treatment of infections caused by VRE and the genetic code for resistance may be transferable to other, more virulent, bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Although colonization and infection with MRSA have become endemic in many surrounding countries, such a situation has been prevented in the Netherlands by employing an aggressive 'search and destroy' policy. Although many questions regarding the optimal approach of VRE remain unanswered, a similar policy as employed for MRSA will not be possible. In contrast to MRSA, colonization with VRE occurs in the open population, no populations with increased risk for colonization appear to be definable and colonization cannot be eradicated. Based on common sense, a differentiated approach seems indicated in which extensive infection control measures should only be implemented when spread of a single genotype has been demonstrated. A reference laboratory should be created for uniform genotyping.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2000

[Epidemiologic increase of various genotypes of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in a university hospital].

After a report of a possible relationship between an outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in a nearby hospital and earlier admission of two of the patients with this VRE in the University Medical Centre of Utrecht (UMCU), the Netherlands, an extensive search for VRE carriers was started in the UMCU. In the study period of two months, VRE carriership was diagnosed in 51 patients in nine of the 11 wards investigated. Twenty-six patients in eight wards were colonized with the same VRE genotype as in the nearby hospital; spread was demonstrated in three wards. In addition, six patients of one ward were colonized with a second genotype and seven other patients with a third genotype, while 12 patients were carriers of a unique genotype. Most carriers were found in the internal medicine/nephrology and dialysis ward. Far-reaching measures (such as cohort nursing, admission stops, use of gowns and gloves, disinfection and restriction of use of vancomycin) taken in the four wards where spread was demonstrated, appeared effective but in three wards, spread was again demonstrated later. Frequent readmissions and transfers of patients appear to play an important part in this matter. None of the 51 colonized patients developed a serious VRE infection.

Carrier State↗
PubMed2000

Invasive group A streptococcal disease in the Netherlands: evidence for a protective role of anti-exotoxin A antibodies.

As part of a nationwide surveillance in The Netherlands during 1994-1997, 53 patients with invasive group A streptococcal (GAS) infections were evaluated for medical history, symptoms, and outcome. Patients' isolates were tested for the production of pyrogenic exotoxins A (SPE-A) and B (SPE-B). Acute-phase sera from all patients and convalescent sera from 12 patients were investigated for the presence of antibodies against SPE-A and SPE-B. Twenty-three patients developed toxic shock-like syndrome and 16 died. Absence of antibodies against SPE-A and/or SPE-B was a risk factor for developing invasive streptococcal disease. Toxic shock and mortality were associated with a lack of anti-SPE-A antibodies (P<.025). Anti-SPE-A antibodies were found in convalescent sera from all patients infected by speA-positive isolates. Virtually all invasive speA-positive streptococci expressed SPE-A protein in vitro. Thus antibodies against SPE-A appeared vital for mediating the outcome of invasive GAS disease in this population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Relative avidities of human immunoglobulin G antibodies for streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins A and B.

In this pilot study, we investigated the relative avidities for streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A (SPE-A) and SPE-B of antibodies in sera from patients with fatal streptococcal toxic shock-like syndrome and from healthy individuals and in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations. We observed a great variation in the relative avidities of patient, control, and IVIG immunoglobulin G (IgG) (values estimated to be between 10(-7) and 10(-11) M), with mean values for patient IgG about 10-fold lower than those of control IgG.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Invasive and noninvasive group A streptococcal isolates with different speA alleles in The Netherlands: genetic relatedness and production of pyrogenic exotoxins A and B.

Streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A (SPE-A) and SPE-B have been implicated in the pathogenesis of severe group A streptococcal (GAS) disease. We studied 31 invasive GAS strains including 18 isolates from patients with toxic shock syndrome and 22 noninvasive strains isolated in The Netherlands between 1994 and 1998. These strains were associated with the different allelic variants of the gene encoding SPE-A. We selected endemic strains with speA-positive M and T serotypes: speA2-associated M1T1 and M22-60T12 strains, speA3-associated M3T3 strains, and speA4-associated M6T6 strains. Since speA1-positive isolates were not frequently encountered, we included speA1 strains of different serotypes. The GAS strains were compared genotypically by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and phenotypically by the in vitro production of SPE-A and SPE-B. All strains within one M and T type appeared to be of clonal origin. Most strains produced SPE-A and SPE-B, but only a minority of the speA4-positive isolates did so. Among our isolates, speA1- and speA3-positive strains produced significantly more SPE-A than speA2- and speA4-carrying strains, while SPE-B production was most pronounced among speA1- and speA2-containing strains. There was a marked degree of variability in the amounts of exotoxins produced in vitro by strains that shared the same genetic profile. We conclude that the differences in the in vitro production of SPE-A and SPE-B between our selected strains with identical M and T types were not related to either genetic heterogeneity or the clinical course of GAS disease in the patient from whom they were isolated.

Alleles↗