PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Macaluso

Publications and source records attributed to E Macaluso.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Preparatory states in crossmodal spatial attention: spatial specificity and possible control mechanisms.

We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging to study the neural correlates of endogenous spatial attention for vision and touch. We examined activity associated with attention-directing cues (central auditory pure tones), symbolically instructing subjects to attend to one hemifield or the other prior to upcoming stimuli, for a visual or tactile task. In different sessions, subjects discriminated either visual or tactile stimuli at the covertly attended side, during bilateral visuotactile stimulation. To distinguish cue-related preparatory activity from any modulation of stimulus processing, unpredictably on some trials only the auditory cue was presented. The use of attend-vision and attend-touch blocks revealed whether preparatory attentional effects were modality-specific or multimodal. Unimodal effects of spatial attention were found in somatosensory cortex for attention to touch, and in occipital areas for attention to vision, both contralateral to the attended side. Multimodal spatial effects (i.e. effects of attended side irrespective of task-relevant modality) were detected in contralateral intraparietal sulcus, traditionally considered a multimodal brain region; and also in the middle occipital gyrus, an area traditionally considered purely visual. Critically, all these activations were observed even on cue-only trials, when no visual or tactile stimuli were subsequently presented. Endogenous shifts of spatial attention result in changes of brain activity prior to the presentation of target stimulation (baseline shifts). Here, we show for the first time the separable multimodal and unimodal components of such preparatory activations. Additionally, irrespective of the attended side and modality, attention-directing auditory cues activated a network of superior frontal and parietal association areas that may play a role in voluntary control of spatial attention for both vision and touch.

Attention↗
PubMed2002

Crossmodal spatial influences of touch on extrastriate visual areas take current gaze direction into account.

Recent results indicate that crossmodal interactions can affect activity in cortical regions traditionally regarded as "unimodal." Previously we found that combining touch on one hand with visual stimulation in the anatomically corresponding hemifield could boost responses in contralateral visual cortex. Here we manipulated which visual hemifield corresponded to the location of the stimulated hand, by changing gaze direction such that right-hand touch could now arise in either the left or right visual field. Crossmodal effects on visual cortex switched from one hemisphere to the other, depending on gaze direction, regardless of whether the hand was seen. This indicates that crossmodal influences of touch upon visual cortex depend on spatial alignment for the multimodal stimuli, with gaze posture taken into account.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Directing attention to locations and to sensory modalities: multiple levels of selective processing revealed with PET.

We used positron emission tomography (PET) to investigate the neural correlates of selective attention in humans. We examined the effects of attending to one side of space versus another (spatial selection) and to one sensory modality versus another (intermodal selection) during bilateral, bimodal stimulation of vision and touch. Attention toward one side resulted in greater activity in several contralateral areas. In somatosensory cortex, these spatial attentional modulations were found only when touch was relevant. In the intraparietal sulcus, spatial attentional effects were multimodal, independent of the modality attended. In occipital areas, spatial modulations were also found during both visual and tactile attention, indicating that tactile attention can affect activity in visual cortex; but occipital areas also showed more activity overall during visual attention. This suggests that while spatial attention can exert multimodal influences on visual areas, these still maintain their specificity for the visual modality. Additionally, irrespective of the attended side, attending to vision activated posterior parietal and superior premotor cortices, while attending to touch activated the parietal operculi. We conclude that attentional selection operates at multiple levels, with attention to locations and attention to modalities showing distinct effects. These jointly contribute to boost processing of stimuli at the attended location in the relevant modality.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Multimodal mechanisms of attention related to rates of spatial shifting in vision and touch.

Covert attention can be directed spatially in several different sensory modalities (e.g. vision and touch). Recent psychological experiments indicate the existence of crossmodal links in spatial attention, but their neural basis in humans remains underspecified. We used positron emission tomography (PET) to assess the role of stimulus modality in the activity of brain regions involved in different rates of spatial attention shifting. A 2 x 2 factorial design manipulated the rate (high versus low) of spatial attention shifts between left and right hemifields, plus the sensory modality (vision versus touch) of stimulation. Two brain regions showed activations related to attentional shift-rate, independent of the stimulated modality: these were the right frontopolar gyrus, and the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (STS). The anterior area showed higher blood flow with the high rate of shifts in spatial attention, while the posterior area showed higher flow during the low rate conditions, where attention was sustained for longer on one side. No area showed a significant rate effect in one modality without an effect in the second modality. These results demonstrate multimodal roles for the activated brain regions in relation to the rate of spatial attention shifting, plus right-hemisphere dominance for this. They also suggest that anterior and posterior regions of the spatial-attention network play different roles in attention shifting.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Spatial attention and crossmodal interactions between vision and touch.

In the present paper, we review several functional imaging studies investigating crossmodal interactions between vision and touch relating to spatial attention. We asked how the spatial unity of a multimodal event in the external world might be represented in the brain, where signals from different modalities are initially processed in distinct brain regions. The results highlight several links between visual and tactile spatial representations. First, we found that activity in the anterior part of the intraparietal sulcus was influenced by stimulus position independently of the modality of the stimulation. This is consistent with crossmodal interactions via sensory convergence from early modality-specific spatial maps to higher-order multimodal regions. Second, we found that stimulation in, or attention to, one modality could affect activity in areas dedicated to a different modality, in a spatially-specific manner. These spatial crossmodal effects in unimodal regions demonstrate congruous activity in anatomically distant brain areas that represent similar external locations, implicating a distributed network of spatial representations in crossmodal integration. Finally, the results suggest that the temporo-parietal junction may be involved in aspects of controlling spatial attention, for both vision and touch. A multimodal attentional system may influence activity in distinct brain areas representing common regions of space for different modalities, thus suggesting a link between spatial attention and crossmodal integration.

Attention↗
PubMed2000

Modulation of human visual cortex by crossmodal spatial attention.

A sudden touch on one hand can improve vision near that hand, revealing crossmodal links in spatial attention. It is often assumed that such links involve only multimodal neural structures, but unimodal brain areas may also be affected. We tested the effect of simultaneous visuo-tactile stimulation on the activity of the human visual cortex. Tactile stimulation enhanced activity in the visual cortex, but only when it was on the same side as a visual target. Analysis of effective connectivity between brain areas suggests that touch influences unimodal visual cortex via back-projections from multimodal parietal areas. This provides a neural explanation for crossmodal links in spatial attention.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Interhemispheric differences in extrastriate areas during visuo-spatial selective attention.

Functional asymmetries between hemispheres have been reported in relation to spatial and temporal information processing. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the influence of task on activity in extrastriate areas during selective spatial attention. During bilateral visual stimulation, subjects attended either the left or the right hemifield. Within the attended side, the task was either to discriminate the orientation of the stimuli or to judge their temporal characteristics. The bilateral stimulation caused symmetric activation of the left and right occipitotemporal junction. Within these regions we investigated the modulatory effects attention and the effect of task upon these. A region of interest approach was used to compare activity in the two hemispheres. The signal at occipitotemporal junction was analyzed in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design, with attended side, type of task, and hemisphere as factors. We found that, in both hemispheres, activity was higher when attention was directed to the contralateral hemifield compared with the ipsilateral hemifield. However, the size of these contralateral attentional modulations was dependent on the task. In the left occipitotemporal junction, contralateral modulations were stronger during the temporal task, while in the right occipitotemporal junction contralateral modulations were stronger during orientation discrimination. Overall, this pattern of activity lead to a significant three-way interaction between attended side, type of task, and hemisphere. We conclude that task characteristics influence brain activity associated with spatial selective attention. Our results support the hypothesis that temporal and orientation processing are preferentially associated with the left and right hemisphere, respectively.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Selective spatial attention in vision and touch: unimodal and multimodal mechanisms revealed by PET.

Two positron-emission tomography (PET) experiments explored the neural basis of selective spatial attention in vision and touch, testing for modality-specific versus multimodal activations due to attended side. In the first study, either light flashes or finger vibrations were presented bilaterally. Twelve healthy volunteers were scanned while sustaining covert attention on the left or right hemifield within each modality. The main effect for attending right minus left, across both modalities, revealed bimodal spatial attention effects in the left intraparietal sulcus and left occipitotemporal junction. Modality-specific attentional effects (again, for attending right vs. left) were found in the left superior occipital gyrus for vision, and left superior postcentral gyrus for touch. No significant activations were seen for attending left minus right. The second study presented only tactile stimuli, manipulating whether the eyes were open or closed, and including passive stimulation and rest baselines. The unimodal activation for tactile spatial attention in the left superior postcentral gyrus was replicated. The bimodal activation of the left intraparietal sulcus observed in the first study was now found for touch, but only when the eyes were open (hands visible), apparently confirming its multimodal nature. These results reveal mechanisms of sustained spatial attention operating at both modality-specific and multimodal levels.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Motile areas of leech neurites are rich in microfilaments and two actin-binding proteins: gelsolin and profilin.

Cell motility is produced by changes in the dynamics and organization of actin filaments. The aim of the experiments described here was to test whether growing neurites contain two actin-binding proteins, gelsolin and profilin, that regulate polymerization of actin and affect non-neuronal cell motility. The distribution of gelsolin, profilin and the microfilaments was compared by immunocytochemistry of leech neurons growing in culture. We observed that microfilaments are enriched in the peripheral motile areas of the neurites. Both gelsolin and profilin are also concentrated in these regions. Gelsolin is abundant in filopodia and is associated with single identifiable microfilament bundles in lamellipodia. Profilin is not prominent in filopodia and shows a diffuse staining pattern in lamellipodia. The colocalization of gelsolin and profilin in motile, microfilament-rich areas supports the hypothesis that they synergistically regulate the actin dynamics that underlie neurite growth.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗