PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Mouhtouris

Publications and source records attributed to E Mouhtouris.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Definition and characterization of chicken Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies.

BACKGROUND: The Gal alpha(1,3)Gal epitope is of interest as, in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation, it is the major target of naturally occurring human IgM and IgG antibodies, leading to hyperacute rejection. Human and Old World monkeys make anti-Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies as they lack a functional gene and do not express Gal alpha(1,3)Gal. Interestingly, the cultured fibroblasts of some other species, such as chickens, have been reported also not to express Gal alpha(1,3)Gal--if this is true for other tissues, and chickens do not express Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antigen, then they would have anti-Gal antibodies--which could have diagnostic and therapeutic value, particularly as chicken antibodies do not fix mammalian complement. METHODS: Standard serological methods were used to characterize the antibodies. Several baboons received pig kidney xenografts that had been perfused with hyperimmune chicken anti-Gal antibodies. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We now demonstrate that chickens do not express Gal alpha(1,3)Gal on their red cells, leukocytes, or tissues, and that their serum contains large amounts of anti-Gal alpha(1,3)Gal antibodies. In addition, chickens could be immunized to produce high-titer, high-avidity antibodies (9.5x10(9) M(-1))--an avidity considerably greater than that of the Gal alpha(1,3)Gal binding lectin IB4 (2.9x10(8) M(-1)) or Gal antibodies in human serum (2.2x10(5) M(-1)). Chicken antibodies, obtained from both normal and immunized chickens, could block the in vitro cytolysis of pig endothelial cells or lymphocytes by human or baboon antibodies. However, such antibodies tested in vivo in pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation failed to block hyperacute rejection and, indeed, may have accelerated this.

Animals↗

Molecular cloning and characterization of the pig secretor type alpha 1,2fucosyltransferase (FUT2).

The existence of at least two distinct alpha 1,2fucosyltransferases has been postulated for many years, and recently confirmed in humans with the cloning of the human and rabbit secretor type alpha 1,2fucosyltransferase. We now describe the cloning and analysis of PFUT2, the pig secretor type alpha 1,2fucosyltransferase, which shows a high level of amino acid identity with previously cloned alpha 1,2fucosyltransferases, but more so with human and rabbit FUT2. Expression of PFUT2 in COS cells showed cell surface staining for H substance with UEAI lectin and anti-H monoclonal antibody, but not for A blood group substance. Kinetic studies were consistent with PFUT2 having a preference for type 1 and type 3 acceptors, as do the human and rabbit homologues, in contrast to PFUT1 which shows a preference for type 2 substrates. Like HuFUT1 and PFUT1, PFUT2 was able to dominate over the pig alpha 1,3galactosyltransferase in co-expression studies in COS cells and give preferential expression of H substance and reduced expression of Gal alpha (1,3)Gal. Cotransfection studies demonstrate that a combination of FUT1 and FUT2 cDNAs has an additive effect in suppressing expression of Gal alpha (1,3)Gal.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Switching amino-terminal cytoplasmic domains of alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase and alpha(1,3)galactosyltransferase alters the expression of H substance and Galalpha(1,3)Gal.

When alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase cDNA is expressed in cells that normally express large amounts of the terminal carbohydrate Galalpha(1,3)Gal, and therefore the alpha(1,3)galactosyltransferase (GT), the Galalpha(1,3)Gal almost disappears, indicating that the presence of the alpha(1,2)fucosyltransferase (HT) gene/enzyme alters the synthesis of Galalpha(1,3)Gal. A possible mechanism to account for these findings is enzyme location within the Golgi apparatus. We examined the effect of Golgi localization by exchanging the cytoplasmic tails of HT and GT; if Golgi targeting signals are contained within the cytoplasmic tail sequences of these enzymes then a "tail switch" would permit GT first access to the substrate and thereby reverse the observed dominance of HT. Two chimeric glycosyltransferase proteins were constructed and compared with the normal glycosyltransferases after transfection into COS cells. The chimeric enzymes showed Km values and cell surface carbohydrate expression comparable with normal glycosyltransferases. Co-expression of the two chimeric glycosyltransferases resulted in cell surface expression of Galalpha(1,3)Gal, and virtually no HT product was expressed. Thus the cytoplasmic tail of HT determines the temporal order of action, and therefore dominance, of these two enzymes.

Animals↗

Enzymatic remodelling of the carbohydrate surface of a xenogenic cell substantially reduces human antibody binding and complement-mediated cytolysis.

The major obstacle to successful discordant xenotransplantation is the phenomenon of hyperacute rejection (HAR). In the pig-to-primate discordant transplant setting, HAR results from the deposition of high-titre anti-alpha-galactosyl antibodies and complement activation leading to endothelial cell destruction and rapid graft failure. To overcome HAR, we developed an enzymatic carbohydrate remodelling strategy designed to replace expression of the Gal alpha-1,3-Gal xenoepitope on the surface of porcine cells with the non-antigenic universal donor human blood group O antigen, the alpha-1,2-fucosyl lactosamine moiety (H-epitope). Xenogenic cells expressing the human alpha-1,2-fucosyltransferase expressed high levels of the H-epitope and significantly reduced Gal alpha-1,3-Gal expression. As a result, these cells were shown to be resistant to human natural antibody binding and complement-mediated cytolysis.

Animals↗

CD48 is a low affinity ligand for human CD2.

COS cells transiently transfected with human CD48 were found to bind human PBL, whereas mock or CD7-transfected COS cells failed to bind human lymphocytes. Binding of PBL to CD48 transfectants was almost totally inhibited by either CD48 mAb pretreatment of COS cells or CD2 mAb pretreatment of PBL, implying an interaction between CD2 and CD48. This conclusion was confirmed by the demonstration that a highly fluorescent, multimeric form of rCD2 bound to CD48 transfected COS cells in a CD48-dependent manner. Additional mAb blocking studies revealed that CD48 interacts with the T11(1) region of CD2, the same region of CD2 that binds LFA-3 (CD58). Thus, CD48 and CD58 represent alternative and possibly competing ligands for CD2, although based on blocking studies with soluble CD2, CD48 interacts with CD2 with approximately a 100-fold lower affinity that CD58.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗