PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Mulder

Publications and source records attributed to E Mulder.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1996

Deoxyribonucleic acid-binding ability of androgen receptors in whole cells: implications for the actions of androgens and antiandrogens.

In whole cells, the effects of several androgens and antiandrogens on the in the induction of DNA binding for the human wild-type androgen receptor (AR) and a mutant receptor ARL (LNCaP mutation; codon 868, Thr to Ala) were examined and related to the transcription activation ability of these receptors. To study DNA binding, an AR expression vector was cotransfected in Chinese hamster ovary cells with a promoter interference plasmid cytomegalovirus-(androgen-responsive element)3-luciferase, containing one or more androgen-responsive elements between the TATA box of the cytomegalovirus promoter and the start site of luciferase gene transcription. Expression levels of the AR are up-regulated by some agonists, but receptor expression levels are comparable for all antiandrogens studied. In the presence of androgens, the wild-type AR is able to reduce promoter activity of the cytomegalovirus-(androgen-responsive element)3-luciferase plasmid, indicating androgen-dependent DNA binding of the AR. The full antagonists hydroxyflutamide, ICI 176.334, and RU 23908 block AR binding to DNA. The antagonists cyproterone acetate and RU 38486 induce approximately 50% of the DNA binding found for androgens. In a transcription activation assay, the RU 38646-bound receptor was almost inactive, and the receptor complexed with cyproterone acetate showed partial agonistic activity. Interaction of the antagonists cyproterone acetate, hydroxyflutamide, and RU 23908 with the mutant receptor ARL resulted in both DNA-bound and a transcriptionally active receptor. In conclusion, transformation of the AR to a DNA-binding state in whole cells is blocked by several antiandrogens. Furthermore, studies with the antiandrogens cyproterone acetate and RU 38486 show that DNA binding alone is not sufficient to accomplish full transcriptional activity. Full activity requires additional changes, presumably in the protein structure of the receptor.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1995

Ligand-induced conformational alterations of the androgen receptor analyzed by limited trypsinization. Studies on the mechanism of antiandrogen action.

Limited proteolysis of in vitro produced human androgen receptor was used to probe the different conformations of the receptor after binding of androgens and several antiandrogens. The results provide evidence for five different conformations of the receptor, as detected by the formation of proteolysis resisting fragments: 1) an initial conformation of the unoccupied receptor not resisting proteolytic attack; and receptor conformations characterized by 2) a 35-kDa proteolysis resisting fragment spanning the ligand binding domain and part of the hinge region, obtained with most antagonists, and in an initial step after agonist binding; 3) a 29-kDa proteolysis resisting fragment spanning the ligand binding domain, obtained in the presence of agonists after an activation process; 4 and 5) 30- and 25-kDa fragments, derived from 2 and 3, but missing part of the C terminus, obtained with RU486 (RU486 has antiandrogenic properties, besides its effects as an antiprogestagen/antiglucocorticoid). Concomitantly with the change from 2 to 3 (and of 4 to 5 for RU486), dissociation of the 8 S complex of receptor with associated proteins occurred. With a mutant receptor (LNCaP cell mutation in C-terminal region), some antagonists activated transcription analogous to agonists, and induced the activated receptor conformation 3. A mutant lacking the C-terminal 12 amino acids bound RU486 but not androgens, and formed with RU486 conformation 5. These data imply that, after the initial rapid binding of ligand, androgens induce a conformational change of the receptor, a process that also involves release of associated proteins. RU486 induces an inappropriate conformation of the C-terminal end, similar as found for its effect on the progesterone receptor. In contrast, the other antiandrogens act at a different step in the mechanism of action: they do not induce an abnormal conformation, but act earlier and prevent a conformation change by stabilizing a complex with associated proteins.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1994

Mechanism of antiandrogen action: conformational changes of the receptor.

Androgen receptor mRNA was translated in vitro, and androgen- and antiandrogen-bound receptor complexes were studied using limited proteolytic digestion by trypsin. Partial proteolysis of androgen-bound receptor protein resulted in a 29-kDa proteolysis-resisting fragment, whereas antiandrogen binding stabilised a 35-kDa fragment. Both fragments contain the entire ligand binding domain, and the 35-kDa fragment extended into the hinge region of the receptor. Several antiandrogens show agonistic properties for a mutated androgen receptor (LNCaP cell variant); trypsin digestion of antiandrogen-bound mutated receptor also resulted in a 29-kDa fragment. Our results point to an important difference between antiandrogens and antagonists of other steroid hormone receptors. Antiandrogens result in protection of both the hinge region and C-terminus of the androgen receptor agonist proteolytic attack, whereas other studies showed that antiestrogens and antiprogestagens expose the C-terminal end of the ligand binding domain of their respective receptors to protease. Differences in conformation of the hinge region distinguish androgen-bound from antiandrogen-bound receptor complexes, which represents an important feature of antiandrogen action.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1994

Studies on the human prostatic cancer cell line LNCaP.

The effects of androgens, antiandrogens, and other steroid hormones on growth of the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP were studied. Despite the absence of receptors for progesterone and estradiol, the growth rate of the androgen responsive LNCaP-FGC cells increased when cultured in the presence of either estrogens or progestagens. In addition, most antiandrogens were also growth stimulators. This aberrant response was due to a threonine to alanine substitution at amino acid position 868 in the steroid binding domain of the androgen receptor (AR). Only the antiandrogen ICI 176,334 could block transcription and cell growth by the mutant receptor. By immunoprecipitation of the AR from LNCaP cells with the specific antibody F39.4.1 and Western blotting, three types of heat-shock proteins co-precipitated: hsp90, hsp70 and hsp56. This co-isolation could be prevented by pre-incubating the cells with androgens or with the antiandrogen hydroxyflutamide. Only the antiandrogen ICI 176,334 could block the effect of androgens on complex dissociation and prevent tight nuclear binding of the AR. Hydroxyflutamide could only inhibit tight nuclear binding of the wild-type AR. Therefore, in LNCaP cells the mutation in the steroid binding domain of the AR prevents a blockade of receptor function by most antiandrogens, but not by ICI 176,334, probably because of a different mechanism by which this compound blocks receptor function.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1993

Effect of culture conditions on androgen sensitivity of the human prostatic cancer cell line LNCaP.

Several effects of androgens on LNCaP-FGC prostate tumor cells showed a biphasic pattern. Stimulation of growth and inhibition of secretion of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) was observed at low androgen concentrations (below 1 nM of the synthetic androgen R1881), and inhibition of growth and stimulation of PAP secretion was observed at higher concentrations. In contrast, prostate specific antigen (PSA) secretion did not show this biphasic response pattern. Comparable effects were found for two sublines of the LNCaP-FGC cells: an early (passage 20, androgen-dependent) and relatively late (passage 70, androgen-sensitive) passage of the cells. Culturing of both sublines in the presence of a high concentration of androgens (10 nM R1881) resulted initially in a decrease in growth rate, but the cells started to proliferate within 3 weeks. These cells became less sensitive to androgens, lost their biphasic response pattern, and showed reduced androgen receptor levels. Three weeks after removal of the excess of androgens, the passage 70 cells regained a biphasic growth response to androgens. Culture in medium without steroids but with EGF resulted in a decrease of both androgen sensitivity and androgen receptor level. In conclusion, rapid changes of the androgen sensitivity and receptor level of the LNCaP cells occurred under the influence of culture conditions. These changes were partly reversible and, therefore, were most likely due to adaptation of the cells.

Acid Phosphatase↗
PubMed1993

Effects of antiandrogens on transformation and transcription activation of wild-type and mutated (LNCaP) androgen receptors.

LNCaP cells contain androgen receptors with a mutation in the steroid binding domain (Thr 868 changed to Ala) resulting in a changed hormone specificity. Both the wild-type and mutated androgen receptors were transfected into COS cells. Transcription activation was studied in cells co-transfected with an androgen sensitive reporter (CAT) gene. The wild-type androgen receptor was activated by the agonist R1881, but the antiandrogens did not enhance transcription apart from a partial agonistic effect at high concentrations of cyproterone acetate. The mutated androgen receptor was fully activated by R1881, cyproterone acetate and hydroxyflutamide, but not by ICI 176,334. Receptor transformation to a tight nuclear binding state was studied by preparation of detergent washed nuclei and Western blotting with a specific antibody against the androgen receptor. Nuclei of COS cells transfected with wild-type receptor retained the receptor when the cells had been treated with the agonist R1881, partially retained receptors when treated with antiandrogen cyproterone acetate, but did not retain receptor when treated with hydroxyflutamide or ICI 176,334. The cells transfected with the mutated receptor additionally retained nuclear receptors after treatment with hydroxyflutamide. We conclude that each one of the three antiandrogens tested displayed different characteristics with respect to its effect on transformation and transcription activation.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1993

Plasmolysis bays in Escherichia coli: are they related to development and positioning of division sites?

Plasmolysis bays, induced in Escherichia coli by hypertonic treatment, are flanked by zones of adhesion between the plasma membrane and the cell wall. To test the proposition of Cook et al. (W. R. Cook, F. Joseleau-Petit, T. J. MacAlister, and L. I. Rothfield, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:7144-7148, 1987) that these zones, called periseptal annuli, play a role in determining the division site, we analyzed the positions of these zones by phase-contrast and electron microscopy. In situ treatment of cells grown in agar showed that the youngest cell pole was the most susceptible to plasmolysis, whereas the constriction site was resistant. Lateral bays occurred only at some distance from a polar bay or a resistant constriction site. Orienting cells with their most prominently plasmolyzed polar bay in one direction showed that the lateral bays were always displaced away from the polar bay at about half the distance to the other cell pole. If no poles were plasmolyzed, lateral bays occurred either in the centers of nonconstricting cells or at the 1/4 or 3/4 position of cell length in constricting cells. The asymmetric positions of lateral plasmolysis bays, caused by their abrupt displacement in the presence of polar bays or constriction sites, does not confirm the periseptal annulus model (Cook et al.), which predicts a gradual and symmetric change in the position of lateral bays with increasing cell length. Our analysis indicates that plasmolysis bays have no relation to the development and positioning of the future division site.

Cell Division↗
PubMed1992

Hormone-induced dissociation of the androgen receptor-heat-shock protein complex: use of a new monoclonal antibody to distinguish transformed from nontransformed receptors.

The hormone-induced transformation process of the androgen receptor in the androgen-responsive human prostatic carcinoma cell line LNCaP was studied. Immunoprecipitation of the nontransformed cytosolic receptor (8S on sucrose gradients) with a specific monoclonal antibody (F39.4.1) resulted in coprecipitation of three heat-shock proteins (hsp90, hsp70, and hsp56). Upon incubation of the cells with the synthetic androgen R1881, the sedimentation value of the receptor complex decreased to an intermediate form of 6S, and an almost complete loss of coprecipitating heat-shock proteins was observed. After a 2-h incubation, the receptor was recovered in considerable part from the nuclear fraction (extraction with high salt; 4.6S form). By use of the bifunctional cross-linker dimethyl pimelimidate, dissociation of the 8S complex, but not of the 6S complex, was blocked. A newly developed monoclonal antibody (F52.24.4), directed against the C-terminal part of the DNA-binding domain of the androgen receptor, specifically recognized both the 4.6S and the 6S forms of the receptor but did not react with the nontransformed 8S form. It is concluded that the unoccupied androgen receptor is associated with several heat-shock proteins and that transformation of the receptor to the tight nuclear-binding form is a multistep process that involves the dissociation of heat-shock proteins from the receptor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1992

Anti-androgens and the mutated androgen receptor of LNCaP cells: differential effects on binding affinity, heat-shock protein interaction, and transcription activation.

Previous studies from this laboratory have described that LNCaP prostate tumor cells contain an androgen receptor (AR) with a point mutation in the steroid-binding domain (codon 868, Thr to Ala). This defect leads to a change in specificity of the AR. Estrogens, progestagens, and some anti-androgens (e.g., cyproterone acetate, hydroxyflutamide, nilutamide) stimulate LNCaP cell growth rate through the AR. The present studies indicate that not all anti-androgens showed agonistic effects with the mutated receptor. The growth rate of LNCaP cells did not increase with the anti-androgen ICI 176334, nor could this compound increase transcription activation of the reporter gene construct via the mutant receptor in a cotransfection system [HeLa cell cotransfection system with an androgen-regulated reporter gene construct (pG29G-tk-CAT) and the mutant receptor as trans-vector]. Interaction of the AR of LNCaP cells with heat-shock proteins was studied by isolation of the receptor with a specific monoclonal antibody and characterization of associated proteins. Hsp90, hsp70, and hsp56 were found to coprecipitate with the AR. Incubation of the cells at 37 degrees C with androgen (R1881, 10 nM) or the anti-androgen hydroxyflutamide, prior to receptor isolation, resulted in dissociation of the AR-heat-shock protein complex. This dissociation is paralleled by the transformation to a tight nuclear-binding form of the AR. In contrast, ICI 176334 could not induce a release of heat-shock proteins and did not increase nuclear binding, but inhibited the transformation process induced by R1881.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed1992

Androgens and androgen-receptors in prostate tissue from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: effects of cyproterone acetate.

Testosterone, 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone and cyproterone acetate (CPA) were estimated in samples of prostate tissue, obtained from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients who were or were not pretreated with CPA. Furthermore, these steroids were estimated in various fractions of the BPH tissue, and the number of nuclear androgen-receptor sites was determined. CPA-treatment caused a 4-fold, significant suppression of 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone levels in total prostate tissue and its subfractions, without affecting testosterone levels or the androgen-receptor contents of the nuclear extracts. Nuclear concentrations of CPA were twice as high as those of 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone. It is concluded that effects of CPA may have been caused through a combination of the following mechanisms: (1) suppression of peripheral androgen levels; (2) competition with androgens for (nuclear) androgen-receptors; and (3) suppression of prostatic 5 alpha-reductase.

5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors↗
PubMed1992

The androgen receptor in LNCaP cells contains a mutation in the ligand binding domain which affects steroid binding characteristics and response to antiandrogens.

The human prostate tumor cell line LNCaP contains an abnormal androgen receptor system with broad steroid binding specificity. Progestagens, estradiol and several antiandrogens compete with androgens for binding to the androgen receptor in the cells to a higher extent than in other androgen sensitive systems. Optimal growth of LNCaP cells is observed after addition of the synthetic androgen R1881 (0.1 nM). In addition, estrogens, progestagens and several antiandrogens do not inhibit androgen responsive growth, but have striking growth stimulatory effects and increase EGF receptor level and acid phosphatase secretion. We have found that the androgen receptor in the LNCaP cells contains a single point mutation changing the sense of codon 868 (Thr to Ala) in the ligand binding domain. Expression vectors containing the normal or mutated androgen receptor sequence were transfected into COS or HeLa cells. Androgens, progestagens, estrogens and several antiandrogens bind the mutated androgen receptor protein and activate the expression of an androgen-regulated reporter gene (GRE-tk-CAT), indicating that the mutation directly affects both binding specificity and the induction of gene expression. Interestingly, the antiandrogen casodex showed antiandrogenic properties in growth studies of LNCaP cells and did not induce reporter gene activity in Hela cells transfected with the mutant receptor. The mutated androgen receptor of LNCaP cells is therefore a useful tool in the elucidation of different levels of action of steroids and antisteroids.

Binding Sites↗
PubMed1992

Involvement of FtsZ in coupling of nucleoid separation with septation.

The cell-cycle parameters of an Escherichia coli strain expressing essential division gene ftsZ at one-fifth of its normal level, because of antisense regulation by DicF RNA, have been analysed. Inhibition of FtsZ expression affects neither the generation time nor the replication initiation mass, the C period, or the constriction period, but it does dramatically retard the initiation of constriction relative to replication termination. Separation of the nucleoids is equally postponed, indicating that division is not coupled to termination of replication, but to partitioning. The severe inhibition of nucleoid separation by DicF RNA, and its suppression by overproduction of FtsZ, suggest a role for FtsZ in the control of separation, and consequently in the coupling of separation and division. We suggest that the normal pattern of nucleoid separation previously found in cells deficient in ftsZ function was a consequence of the loss of a negative effect exerted by FtsZ on separation. In agreement with this view, we find that nucleoid separation is temporarily inhibited after arrest of FtsZ synthesis, but is later resumed as FtsZ is further diluted into the elongating filaments.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1992

Factors influencing the likelihood of successful decisions to treat dentin caries from bitewing radiographs.

The purpose of this study was to describe the role played by the ability to estimate caries depth in successfully deciding to treat dentin caries when making use of bitewing radiographs as a diagnostic test. A 10% random sample (n = 444) of Dutch dental practitioners was sent a two-wave questionnaire concerning radiographic caries diagnosis and restorative treatment decision making. The second wave consisted of simulated bitewing radiographs of 105 tooth surfaces with and without dentin caries according to two measuring standards: (a) a micro-radiographic "gold" standard and (b) a norm of expert observers. The dentists were asked to diagnose caries at 4 depths of penetration using a 5-point certainty scoring system to measure diagnostic ability; and to make a treatment decision for each surface. The overall response was 61% (273). A regression analysis was carried out using the chance per dentist of correctly deciding to treat dentin caries as the dependent variable. The degree of agreement with the experts' diagnosis of radiographic caries depth was used to create variables measuring diagnostic ability. Five significant (P less than 0.05) variables explained 60% (R2 = 0.60) of the variation in decision making. The best diagnostic ability variable explained 47% of the variation while the treatment criterion reportedly used explained 3%. We conclude that the ability of practitioners to interpret radiographs plays a major role in treatment decision making and that their reported treatment decision making criteria should not be taken at face value.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

New minC mutations suggest different interactions of the same region of division inhibitor MinC with proteins specific for minD and dicB coinhibition pathways.

Proper positioning of division sites in Escherichia coli requires balanced expression of minC, minD, and minE gene products. Previous genetic analysis has shown that either MinD or an apparently unrelated protein, DicB, cooperates with MinC to inhibit division. We have isolated and sequenced minC mutations that suppress division inhibition caused by overproduction of either DicB or MinD proteins. Most missense mutations were located in the amino acid 160 to 200 region of MinC (231 amino acids). Some mutations exhibited preferential resistance to one or the other coinhibitor, suggesting that two distinct proteins, possibly MinD and DicB themselves, interact in slightly different manners with the same region of MinC to promote division inhibition.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1991

Androgen receptors in endocrine-therapy-resistant human prostate cancer.

Despite the initial androgen-dependent growth of most human prostate cancers, eventually all prostate cancers become androgen-independent at varying intervals after androgen ablation or anti-androgen therapy. In order to gain more insight into the role of the androgen receptor (AR) in this process, AR and prostate-specific antigen (PA) expression was evaluated immunohistochemically in prostatic tumour tissues from patients who developed urinary flow obstruction between 4 and 107 months after onset of treatment. AR expression was evaluated with a monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for the N-terminal domain of the human AR. To substantiate the progressive tumour growth, proliferative activity was assessed immunohistochemically by staining with MAb Ki-67. Ki-67-defined tumour-growth fractions varied from 0.8-64.7%. In 13 of the 17 examined tumours over 80% of the tumour cells were AR-positive, 3 tumours showed a considerable heterogeneity in AR expression and in 1 tumour almost all tumour cells seemed to be AR-negative. Two-thirds of the examined tumours contained variable proportions of PA-positive tumour areas. These observations contrast with the view that androgen ablation induces a preferential outgrowth of receptor-negative tumour cells.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

Epitope prediction and confirmation for the human androgen receptor: generation of monoclonal antibodies for multi-assay performance following the synthetic peptide strategy.

The human androgen receptor (hAR) is an important regulatory protein particularly in male sexual differentiation. The investigation of hAR functionality has been hampered by the lack of AR specific monoclonal antibodies recognizing the functional domains of the receptor. Therefore production of high affinity mono-specific polyclonal (PAbs) and monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed to the hAR was initiated following the synthetic peptide (SP) strategy. Five hAR specific peptides were selected on the basis of their predicted antigenic properties avoiding homology with other steroid hormone receptors. Peptide specific polyclonal antisera were obtained following selected immunization protocols. Mono-specific polyclonal antibody responses were elicited to all peptides in mice and rabbits. Crossreactivity of the peptide specific antisera with the native hAR in various biochemical assays was observed with two out of five peptides. Peptide SP61 (hAR residues 301-320) was used for the generation site-directed MAbs specific for the hAR. Specificity for the hAR was established by immunoprecipitation, immune-complex density gradient centrifugation and immunohistochemistry on human prostate tissue sections. The multi-assay performance of the selected high affinity antibodies proved the usefulness of the straight forward peptide approach and opens a wide field of possible biochemical and physiological investigations into questions related to androgen action.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Regulation of growth of LNCaP human prostate tumor cells by growth factors and steroid hormones.

The mitogenic activity of several growth factors on androgen responsive LNCaP human prostate tumor cells was studied. A two-fold stimulation of cell proliferation was observed after a culture period of 6 days in 1 ng EGF/ml, 10 ng TGF-alpha/ml or 20 ng basic FGF/ml. TGF-beta (0.02 ng/ml), which did not affect cell proliferation when added alone to the culture medium, inhibited the EGF- and TGF-alpha-induced growth. The synthetic androgen R1881 (0.1 nM) stimulated cell proliferation three-fold and increased the number of EGF receptors from 11500 to 28500 sites/cell. One of the mechanisms involved in androgen action on these cells is therefore an increased EGF receptor expression and increased sensitivity to EGF. TGF-beta did not directly affect androgen-responsive growth but inhibited the synergistic effect of EGF. A considerable expression of TGF alpha (precursors) could be demonstrated on the cells by immunohistochemical staining. However the staining intensity was not affected by androgens. These results make it less likely that androgen-responsive growth is mediated by regulation of secretion of an EGF- or TGF alpha-like activity, which in turn acts in an autocrine manner to stimulate growth. Estrogens, progestagens and antiandrogens do not inhibit androgen responsive growth of LNCaP cells but have striking growth stimulatory effects, increase EGF receptor level and increase acid phosphatase secretion. LNCaP cells contain a modified androgen receptor system with respect to both steroid specificity and antiandrogen sensitivity. It has recently been shown that the stimulatory effects are due to a mutated amino acid in the steroid binding domain of the androgen receptor.

Cell Division↗