PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E P Efstathopoulos

Publications and source records attributed to E P Efstathopoulos.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Quality assurance (QA) procedures for software: evaluation of an ADC quality system.

Image viewing and processing software in computed radiography manipulates image contrast in such a way that all relevant image features are rendered to an appropriate degree of visibility, and improves image quality using enhancement algorithms. The purpose of this study was to investigate procedures for the quality assessment of image processing software for computed radiography with the use of existing test objects and to assess the influence that processing introduces on physical image quality characteristics. Measurements of high-contrast resolution, low-contrast resolution, spatial resolution, greyscale (characteristic curve) and geometric distortion were performed 'subjectively' by three independent observers and 'objectively' by the use of criteria based on pixel intensity values. Results show quality assessment is possible without the need for human evaluators, using digital images. It was discovered that the processing software evaluated in this study was able to improve some aspects of image quality, without introducing geometric distortion.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2001

A protocol-based evaluation of medical image digitizers.

Medical film digitizers play an important transitory role as digital-to-analogue bridges in radiology. Their use requires performance evaluation to assure medical image quality. A complete quality control protocol is presented, based on a set of test objects adaptable to the specification of various digitizers. The protocol includes parameters such as uniformity, input-output response, noise, geometric distortion, spatial resolution, low contrast discrimination, film slippage and light leakage, as well as associated measurement methods. The applicability of the protocol is demonstrated with two types of medical film digitizers; a charge-coupled device (CCD) digitizer and a laser digitizer. The potential value of the protocol is also discussed.

Analog-Digital Conversion↗
PubMed1999

Calculating shielding requirements in diagnostic X-ray departments.

Structural radiation protection for diagnostic X-ray facilities is most commonly performed following the recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Report No. 49. A number of analytical methods have already been developed to improve the design of these facilities. Specifically, these methods reassess shielding calculations in X-ray areas with respect to the methodology of the calculation of the barrier thickness and the number of sources considered in the area. Thus, they generate an overall solution for the cases met at the medical radiation structural design. This paper presents an extension of an existing method for calculating shielding requirements, for multiple X-ray tubes in a room operated at various beam qualities. The methodology computes the required shielding thickness such that the exposure behind it stays below a desired value. The presented method eliminates the overestimation of added shielding thickness which may occur using the other methods already mentioned. A user-friendly windows-based program has also been developed to assist shielding computations.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1998

Patient radiation doses during cardiac catheterization procedures.

The objective of the present project was the determination of the dose received by patients during cardiac procedures, such as coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and stent implantation. Thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs), suitably calibrated, were used for the measurement of the dose received at four anatomical locations on the patient's skin. A dose-area product (DAP) meter was also used. The contribution of cinefluorography to the total DAP was higher than that of fluoroscopy. A DAP to effective dose conversion factor equal to 0.183 mSv Gy-1 cm-2 was estimated with the help of a Rando phantom. Thus, the effective dose received by the patients could be assessed. Mean values of effective dose equal to 5.6 mSv, 6.9 mSv, 9.3 mSv, 9.0 mSv and 13.0 mSv were estimated for coronary angiography, PTCA, coronary angiography and ad hoc PTCA, PTCA followed by stent implantation and coronary angiography and ad hoc PTCA followed by stent implantation, respectively.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1996

Clinical evaluation of manual and automatic exposure control techniques in film-based chest radiography.

Chest radiographs obtained with either automatic exposure control (AEC) technique, or manual exposure control (MEC) technique, were compared in a sample of 329 cardiological and cardiosurgery patients. Parameters evaluated, were various anatomical regions, according to their appearance in both posteroanterior (PA) and lateral radiographs. Lateral radiographs obtained with the AEC technique demonstrated better image quality than those obtained with the manual technique. There was no definite advantage of the AEC technique in PA radiographs. The AEC technique has the potential to improve the quality of lateral chest radiographs of cardiological and cardiosurgery patients. It is considered to be a useful tool in chest radiography.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Automatic film processors' quality control test in Greek military hospitals.

The two major military radiology installations (Athens, Greece) using a total of 15 automatic film processors were assessed using the 21-step-wedge method. The results of quality control in all these processors are presented. The parameters measured under actual working conditions were base and fog, contrast and speed. Base and fog as well as speed displayed large variations with average values generally higher than acceptable, whilst contrast displayed greater stability. Developer temperature was measured daily during the test and was found to be outside the film manufacturers' recommended limits in nine of the 15 processors. In only one processor did film passing time vary on an every day basis and this was due to maloperation. Developer pH test was not part of the daily monitoring service being performed every 5 days for each film processor and found to be in the range 9-12; 10 of the 15 processors presented pH values outside the limits specified by the film manufacturers.

Calibration↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A tool for designing digital test objects for module performance evaluation in medical digital imaging.

Currently, medical digital imaging systems are characterized by the introduction of additional modules such as digital display, image compression and image processing, as well as film printing and digitization. These additional modules require performance evaluation to ensure high image quality. A tool for designing computer-generated test objects applicable to performance evaluation of these modules is presented. The test objects can be directly used as digital images in the case of film printing, display, compression and image processing, or indirectly as images on film in the case of digitization. The performance evaluation approach is quality control protocol based. Digital test object design is user-driven according to specifications related to the requirements of the modules being tested. The available quality control parameters include input/output response curve, high contrast resolution, low contrast discrimination, noise, geometric distortion and field uniformity. The tool has been designed and implemented according to an object oriented approach in Visual C++ 5.0, and its user interface is based on the Microsoft Foundation Class Library version 4.2, which provides interface items such as windows, dialog boxes, lists, buttons, etc. The compatibility with DICOM 3.0 part 10 image formats specifications allows the integration of the tool in the existing software framework for medical digital imaging systems. The capability of the tool is demonstrated by direct use of the test objects in case of image processing, and indirect use of the test objects in case of film digitization.

Algorithms↗