PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Penno

Publications and source records attributed to E Penno.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Macrophage uptake of ultra-small iron oxide particles for magnetic resonance imaging in experimental acute cardiac transplant rejection.

PURPOSE: To discriminate between acutely rejecting and non-rejecting transplanted hearts using a blood pool contrast agent and T2* magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a clinical 1.5T scanner. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Allogeneic and syngeneic heterotopic heart transplantations were performed in rats. One allogeneic and one syngeneic group each received either the ultra-small iron oxide particle (USPIO), at two different doses, or no contrast agent at all. MRI was performed on postoperative day 6. Immediately after the MR scanning, contrast agent was injected and a further MRI was done 24 h later. Change in T2* was calculated. RESULTS: No significant difference in change in T2* could be seen between rejecting and non-rejecting grafts in either of the doses, or in the control groups. There was a difference between the allogeneic group that received the higher contrast agent dose and the allogeneic group that did not receive any contrast agent at all. CONCLUSION: In our rat model, measurements of T2* after myocardial macrophage uptake of AMI-227 in a clinical 1.5T scanner were not useful for the diagnosis of acute rejection.

Acute Disease↗

The effect of transmission bandwidth on the quality of ophthalmological still and video images.

We have examined the minimum realtime transmission speed for video-angiography with the Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO) with respect to spatial and contrast resolution. An SLO fluorescein video-angiography sequence was recorded using high-quality media and relayed to a remote site at transmission speeds ranging from T3 (4.5 Mbit/s) to 0.125 T (197 kbit/s). Images were compared with each other subjectively by an ophthalmologist and objectively with image processing software. When compared qualitatively there was little difference between the T3 and T1 images. The T1 images scored well on clarity and contrast, while 0.5 T was satisfactory but inferior to T1. Transmission speeds below 0.5 T were inadequate. The digital analysis showed a slight difference between T3 and T1. We calculated that there was up to a 92% loss of resolution at 0.25 T and up to a 98% loss at 0.125 T. Based on our quantitative and qualitative analysis, a T3 line provided the highest bandwidth and best resolution, as expected. However, 0.5 T gave satisfactory results for realtime consultations and appears to be the minimum speed required for ophthalmic purposes, producing few motion artefacts and good resolution.

Cataract Extraction↗