PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Pita Calandre

Publications and source records attributed to E Pita Calandre.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

A randomised open-label study of tiagabine given two or three times daily in refractory epilepsy.

Efficacy and tolerability of tiagabine was evaluated in patients with non-controlled partial seizures in a multicentre, open-label, parallel group study. Tiagabine was administered either two (b.i.d.) or three times daily (t.i.d.) as adjunctive therapy and titrated stepwise to a target of 40 mg/day during a 12-week, fixed-schedule titration period; this was followed by a 12-week flexible continuation period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients completing the fixed-schedule titration period. A total of 243 patients were randomised and received treatment, 123 to b.i.d. and 120 to t.i.d. dosing. Fewer patients in the b.i.d. (76 and 62%) than in the t.i.d. (87 and 72%) group completed the fixed-schedule titration period (OR: 0.562; 95% CI: 0.309-1.008; P=0.0532). The median percentage decrease in all types of seizure (excluding status epilepticus) during the fixed schedule titration period was 33.4% for the b.i.d. and 23.8% for the t.i.d. groups (P=0.9634; Van Elteren's test). The proportion of responders was similar for the b.i.d. and t.i.d. groups. There were no significant differences between dosage regimens in the change in median seizure rates from baseline. Adverse events were more frequent during the titration than the continuation period. Most events were mild and related to the central nervous system. Although their incidence was similar between treatment groups, severity was more frequent in the b.i.d. group. Our results suggest that during titration tiagabine is better tolerated with t.i.d. dosing, but during long-term maintenance, a t.i.d. schedule is as effective and well tolerated as b.i.d.

Anticonvulsants↗

[Monitoring of three delayed-release preparations of theophylline in the plasma of children: pharmacokinetic parameters and therapeutic significance].

The pharmacokinetic and clinical efficacy of three theophylline slow-release formulations was studied in 29 children suffering chronic bronchial asthma. Theophylline loading dose was of 6 mg/kg; maintenance dose was adjusted according to therapeutic effect and drug plasma concentrations and ranged to 11.1 to 31.3 mg/kg/daily (means = 22.32 +/- 6.6 mg/kg/daily). Peak theophylline plasma levels were 13.38 +/- 4.83 micrograms/ml and through plasma levels were 8.73 +/- 3.78 micrograms/ml. No difference was found among theophylline formulations for clinical response nor kinetic parameters. Drug plasma half-life varied from 2.9 to 18.2 hr (means = 8.85 +/- 3.64 hr). Theophylline total body clearance and apparent volume of distribution exhibited a marked decrease during chronic drug administration in relation to the values observed after intake of the loading dose. Twenty three of the children reached a good degree of control of bronchospasm and did not require any associated medication.

Adolescent↗

Gentamicin therapy monitoring in seriously compromised patients.

Gentamicin therapy was monitored in 30 patients with severe infection and other concomitant disease states. The application of the nomogram of Hull and Sarubbi [6] produced good plasma levels and disappearance of the infective agent without evidence of drug toxicity in 70% of patients. The remaining 30% did not respond satisfactorily to the treatment and showed low drug serum concentrations; and them had heavy fluid losses; when we modified their treatment, outside of the nomogram guidelines, we observed a better response. Since gentamicin distributes essentially in extracellular water, subjects who have alterations of body fluids regulation should be carefully controlled.

Adult↗

[Adverse reactions and interactions of antiepileptic drugs in epileptic women].

OBJECTIVE: To review the present knowledge related with gender differences in drug effects, with special emphasis concerning antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). DEVELOPMENT: Women and men differ in their response to drugs and these differences can be sometimes clinically relevant. Adverse drug reactions are noticeably more frequent in women, probably due to a combination of cultural and biological factors. Gender differences related to antiepileptic treatment have been observed concerning alterations in bone mineral density and lipid profile due to several AEDs, lamotrigine induced rash and visual field loss caused by vigabatrin. It is also important to study potential drug interactions between AEDs and contraceptives, as well as hormonal replacement therapy (HRT). At this respect, the influence of AEDs on the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of contraceptives are well known, but no data are available concerning the effect of contraceptives on AEDs pharmacology. Likewise, data relative to the eventual interactions arising between HRT and anticonvulsant are lacking. CONCLUSION: The knowledge about gender differences in the adverse drug reactions and interactions of AEDs is still limited; more information is necessary to optimize anticonvulsant treatment in epileptic women.

Adolescent↗