PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Pulido

Publications and source records attributed to E Pulido.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Comparative pharmacokinetics of sulfamethazine in plasma and parotid saliva of sheep.

Salivary output in sheep is large enough to be considered a physiologic body fluid compartment. The hypothesis for this work was that pharmacokinetics of sulfamethazine in saliva was similar to that in plasma. A reliable technique was developed to measure parotid salivary output. Mean output of saliva was 3.18 +/- 1.04 L from a single parotid gland per day with a mean flow of 2.21 +/- 0.43 mL/min. Using concentrations of sulfamethazine in parotid saliva made it possible to calculate the total passage of sulfamethazine to parotid saliva, which was calculated to be 3.5% of the total dose. Pharmacokinetic variables obtained for sulfamethazine in plasma and in saliva were closely related (AUC 1408 micrograms.h/mL and AUC 1484 micrograms.h/mL; Vdarea 0.434 L/kg and Vdarea 0.374 L/kg; t 1/2 beta 4.30 h and 3.46 h, respectively) and no substantial differences were observed. The convenience of using salivary concentrations of sulfamethazine for drug monitoring is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

An epidemiologic study of stuttering.

A questionnaire designed to assess the prevalence of stuttering and its relation with: (a) central nervous system risk factors; (b) associated disorders (allergies, migraine-type headache, developmental dyslexia history, smoking, and drug abuse), and (c) depression symptoms, was given to a general population sample of 1879 Spanish-speaking university students (mean age = 24.0). A prevalence of 2% of self-reported stuttering was found. Results indicated that the prevalence of minor brain injury or dysfunction, developmental dyslexia history, word-finding difficulties, and depressive symptoms was higher among the self-reported stutterers than among the nonstutterers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Treatment of patients with chronic airways obstruction: a controlled study with bamyphylline.

A single-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 30 patients with chronic obstructive bronchopneumopathy to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of the theophylline derivative, bamyphylline. On entry, patients were allocated to receive twice daily oral doses of either 600 mg bamyphylline or placebo for a period of 60 days. Spirometric measurements, blood pressure and respiratory rate recordings and blood gas analyses were made at baseline and after 10, 30 and 60 days of treatment, as were assessments of clinical and objective signs, such as sibili, rales and vesicular murmurs. Plasma concentrations of bamyphylline 1 hour after the first dose of the day were monitored at the same intervals. The results showed that there was a highly significant progressive improvement in pulmonary function which was already apparent after 10 days and this was accompanied by a marked improvement in cardiac dynamics and clinical signs. Plasma concentrations of bamyphylline remained stable throughout the study period and there were no reports of side-effects or significant variations in blood chemistry.

Adult↗
PubMed1986

[Effect of propafenone on the pharmacokinetics of digoxin administered orally: a study in healthy volunteers].

It is well known that many cardiovascular drugs affect digoxin kinetics, but nothing is defined on propafenone-digoxin interaction. To clarify this problem, we studied digoxin kinetics in 8 healthy men, who received digoxin oral dose (0.50 mg) in the control state and again during maintenance therapy with propafenone (150 mg q.i.d.). Statistically significant changes were observed during propafenone in a number of digoxin kinetic indexes: a rise in peak serum digoxin concentration (4.30 vs 3.07 ng/ml - p less than 0.005), in area under the serum-digoxin concentration curve (4 h: 520.4 vs 368.9; 10 h: 789.6 vs 621.3 ng X min/ml - p less than 0.005; 24 h: 1187.6 vs 954.7 ng X min/ml - p less than 0.05) and urinary excretion of digoxin (277.7 vs 203.5 mcg - p less than 0.005). Renal digoxin clearance was not affected by propafenone. We conclude that propafenone interact kinetically with digoxin in healthy subjects, perhaps increasing digoxin bioavailability.

Administration, Oral↗