PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E R Pickar

Publications and source records attributed to E R Pickar.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Experience and design recommendations for picture archiving and communication systems in the surgical setting.

An analysis of the efficacy of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in the surgical domain was undertaken at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Interviews with surgeons and staff were conducted and supplemented by direct radiologist observation in the operating room (OR) and surgical outpatient clinic to determine patterns of routine clinical PACS use, levels of satisfaction both within and outside of the OR, and perceptions of the relative efficacy of the system in comparison to film. These data as well as suggestions from the surgical staff members were used to make recommendations for specific modifications in PACS design and operation to improve the current system and to help prescribe design improvements for future PAC systems. A high level of satisfaction with the system was found and the use of PACS was favored over film by a majority of surgeons and their staff. Findings of this study suggest that the design of a hospital-wide PAC system must have the flexibility to accommodate the specific requirements of a wide variety of end-users in their unique hospital environments.

Equipment Design↗

Picture archiving and communication system training for physicians: lessons learned at the Baltimore VA Medical Center.

Physicians practicing at the "filmless" Baltimore VA Medical Center need to be proficient in the use of the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) to be able to view radiologic images and accompanying reports. PACS training is necessary to assure optimal patient care and to satisfy potential medicolegal requirements. Providing such training is the responsibility of both the Imaging Department and the hospital. Training in the use of the PACS at the Baltimore VA is conducted by an on-site application specialist. Data were collected from interviews with the trainer, training log sheets, and physician surveys. Although 100% of radiologists received formal training, only 22% of nonradiologists were formally trained; 32% of these physicians identified themsleves as having been trained by their peers and 41% stated they were self-trained. We identified two goals of a PACS training program. The first is to teach physicians how to retrieve images and reports from current as well as prior studies and display them on a computer workstation. Secondly, the training should include instruction on the use of the various workstation tools to enhance image interpretation. Imaging requirements and usage by different physician groups vary, and PACS training should be tailored accordingly. Difficulties in the scheduling of training sessions during working hours and the widespread use of a "generic" log-on identification have contributed to the low (22%) compliance of nonradiologists with the formal training program. Although we believe that one-on-one training is most effective and can be best tailored to the needs and computer expertise of an individual particular physician, computer based training (both on and off-line) may provide an acceptable, and in some cases, a preferred alternative.

Baltimore↗