PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Rennie

Publications and source records attributed to E Rennie.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Access to donor insemination: Canadian ideals--UK law and practice.

Reproductive technology has made a huge impact on society, exposing many long-standing, unresolved anomalies in our values and traditions. Access to medically assisted reproduction is particularly controversial, raising medical, legal and ethical issues. The 1980s saw increasing demands across several jurisdictions for clear legal rules, the hope being expressed in Canada that "the law may reflect the community's level of tolerance; but...also stretch or fashion it in the interests of a worthy goal." The Canadian Law Reform Commission recommended that, with regard to donor insemination, "protection for the traditional family should not be incorporated in legislation" and that "access should be limited only in terms of the cost and scarcity of resources", selection not being based on "family status, sexual orientation and so on". This paper attempts a comparative examination of UK legislation on reproductive technology in this light, with particular focus on the rationing of access to donor insemination.

Canada↗

Working hours. Hardy annuals.

Employing nurses on annual-hours contracts which include on-call and stand-down duties has led to more efficient deployment of staff in relation to workload. The system has cut the use of agency nurses and bank staff and reduced staffing costs. The majority of staff who took part in the pilot scheme have chosen to remain on annual-hours contracts.

Cost Savings↗

The climacteric, osteoporosis and hormone replacement; views of women aged 45-49.

We report climacteric symptoms among women aged 45-49, and their attitudes towards HRT and osteoporosis prevention. Semi-structured questionnaires were administered to 481 women attending for bone density screening after random invitation. We recorded social class, menopausal status, history of HRT exposure and climacteric symptoms, awareness of HRT and osteoporosis, and potential willingness to consider HRT before and after bone densitometry. In total, 294 (61%) were from non-manual social classes; 338 (70%) were premenopausal, 68 (14%) postmenopausal and 75 (16%) uncertain; 101 (21%) were current/previous HRT users. Three or more climacteric symptoms were experienced by 189 (56%) of premenopausal women, compared to 64 (94%) of postmenopausal women. Most women had heard of HRT (96%) and osteoporosis (84%), usually from women's magazines or friends. HRT was usually prescribed for climacteric symptoms and, in one case, for osteoporosis prevention. Side effects were reported with most HRT preparations and affected 38% of all users. Of the 380 (79%) women who had never taken HRT, half had concerns about such treatment, and few wanted it at the menopause. However, 364 (96%) said they would consider HRT if their bone scan suggested increased osteoporosis risk. In conclusion, women around the menopause experience considerable climacteric morbidity, but are often anxious about HRT use. Better health education might improve HRT uptake, while long-term compliance might be enhanced by disclosure of fracture risk.

Bone Density↗