Biomedical subjects

E Rolls

Publications and source records attributed to E Rolls.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1998

Transform-invariant recognition by association in a recurrent network.

Objects can be recognized independently of the view they present, of their position on the retina, or their scale. It has been suggested that one basic mechanism that makes this possible is a memory effect, or a trace, that allows associations to be made between consecutive views of one object. In this work, we explore the possibility that this memory trace is provided by the sustained activity of neurons in layers of the visual pathway produced by an extensive recurrent connectivity. We describe a model that contains this high recurrent connectivity and synaptic efficacies built with contributions from associations between pairs of views that is simple enough to be treated analytically. The main result is that there is a change of behavior as the strength of the association between views of the same object, relative to the association within each view of an object, increases. When its value is small, sustained activity in the network is produced by the views themselves. As it increases above a threshold value, the network always reaches a particular state (which represents the object) independent of the particular view that was seen as a stimulus. In this regime, the network can still store an extensive number of objects, each defined by a finite (although it can be large) number of views.

Form Perception↗

PubMed1997

How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context.

A degraded image of an object or face, which appears meaningless when seen for the first time, is easily recognizable after viewing an undegraded version of the same image. The neural mechanisms by which this form of rapid perceptual learning facilitates perception are not well understood. Psychological theory suggests the involvement of systems for processing stimulus attributes, spatial attention and feature binding, as well as those involved in visual imagery. Here we investigate where and how this rapid perceptual learning is expressed in the human brain by using functional neuroimaging to measure brain activity during exposure to degraded images before and after exposure to the corresponding undegraded versions. Perceptual learning of faces or objects enhanced the activity of inferior temporal regions known to be involved in face and object recognition respectively. In addition, both face and object learning led to increased activity in medial and lateral parietal regions that have been implicated in attention and visual imagery. We observed a strong coupling between the temporal face area and the medial parietal cortex when, and only when, faces were perceived. This suggests that perceptual learning involves direct interactions between areas involved in face recognition and those involved in spatial attention, feature binding and memory recall.

Brain↗

PubMed1997

Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging.

In this paper we introduce the idea of explaining responses, in one cortical area, in terms of an interaction between the influence of another area and some experimental (sensory or task-related) parameter. We refer to these effects as psychophysiological interactions and relate them to interactions based solely on experimental factors (i.e., psychological interactions), in factorial designs, and interactions among neurophysiological measurements (i.e., physiological interactions). We have framed psychophysiological interactions in terms of functional integration by noting that the degree to which the activity in one area can be predicted, on the basis of activity in another, corresponds to the contribution of the second to the first, where this contribution can be related to effective connectivity. A psychophysiological interaction means that the contribution of one area to another changes significantly with the experimental or psychological context. Alternatively these interactions can be thought of as a contribution-dependent change in regional responses to an experimental or psychological factor. In other words the contribution can be thought of as modulating the responses elicited by a particular stimulus or psychological process. The potential importance of this approach lies in (i) conferring a degree of functional specificity on this aspect of effective connectivity and (ii) providing a model of modulation, where the contribution from a distal area can be considered to modulate responses to the psychological or stimulus-specific factor defining the interaction. Although distinct in neurobiological terms, these are equivalent perspectives on the same underlying interaction. We illustrate these points using a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of attention to visual motion and a position emission tomography study of visual priming. We focus on interactions among extrastriate, inferotemporal, and posterior parietal regions during visual processing, under different attentional and perceptual conditions.

Attention↗

PubMed1969

Neuron function inferred from behavioral and electrophysiological extimates of refractory period.

The refrcactory period of neurons mediating an electrically elicited behavior (self-stimulation) was estimated by varying the intrapair pulse separation in a stimulating train made up of pulse pairs and measuring the intensity of the elicited behavior. Two neuronal systems with different refractory periods were indicated. Single-unit recording in acute preparations stimulated through self-stimulation electrodes revealed primarily two classes of units. Each class gave refractory period estimates characteristic of one of the behaviorally indicated systems. The experiments illustrate a technique for establishing functional relations between single units in the brain and gross behavior.

Action Potentials↗