Craniofacial prostheses retained with osseointegrated implants.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dental Implantation, Endosseous↗
Biomedical subjects
E Roumanas
Publications and source records attributed to E Roumanas.
Restoration of irradiated patients using osseointegrated implants: current perspectives.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The success rates of osseointegrated implants used to restore patients who were irradiated for head and neck tumors are influenced by radiation-induced changes in the hard and soft tissues. PURPOSE: This article examined, by review of the literature, current perspectives on the restoration of irradiated patients using osseointegrated implants. RESULTS: In published reports that investigated both intraoral and extraoral applications, irradiation decreased implant success rates and the amount of reduction was dependent on the location within the craniofacial skeleton. The limited number of implants and patients in these studies precludes definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of placing implants into irradiated tissues. The implants placed into the irradiated anterior mandible have demonstrated an acceptable implant success rate of 94% to 100% with a minimal risk of osteoradionecrosis. The efficacy of implants in the posterior mandible has not been examined. Implant success rates ranged from 69% to 95% in the irradiated maxilla for intraoral applications. Extraoral applications demonstrated excellent implant success rates in the temporal bone (91% to 100%). The rates in the anterior nasal floor have varied from 50% to 100%. The implant success rates in the frontal bone decreased as the length of the studies increased (96% to 33%). The long-term efficacy of implants in the irradiated frontal bone is poor.
Animals↗
Osseointegrated implants and orbital defects: U.C.L.A. experience.
PURPOSE: A clinical study of 23 craniofacial implants placed in 8 irradiated and nonirradiated orbital detects was conducted over a 7-year period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implant-retained orbital prostheses were fabricated, implant success rate was determined, and the soft tissue responses were recorded at 6-month intervals. As a result of patient death, no data were gathered on three implants. A five-point scale was used to record the health of the peri-implant soft tissues and the patients were followed from 9 to 72 months. The unit of measure was a visit/site that was assigned for each instance an implant site was evaluated. Evaluations were conducted at 6-month intervals, and for the study period, there were 80 visit/sites. RESULTS: The study revealed that 42.5% (34/80) of the visit/sites demonstrated an absence of inflammation; 23.7% (19/80) of visit/sites demonstrated slight redness; 13.8% (11/80) demonstrated peri-implant red and moist tissues; 6.2% (5/80) demonstrated granulation tissue associated with the implants; and 13.8% (11/80) infection of the peri-implant soft tissues was noted. Implant success rate was 35% (7/20); implant success rate in the nonradiated patients was 37.5% (3/8) and the success rate for radiated patients was 33.3% (4/12). Implants placed in the orbital region demonstrated a high failure rate. Most implant failures occurred late as opposed to early in the study period. CONCLUSION: Orbital implants should be placed in patients who understand that long-term success rates may be low and require meticulous hygiene maintenance.
Adult↗
Nasal defects and osseointegrated implants: UCLA experience.
A clinical study of 23 craniofacial implants placed in 11 nasal defects was conducted over a 7-year period. Implant-retained nasal prostheses were fabricated, implant success rate was determined, and the soft tissue responses were recorded at 6-month intervals. No data were gathered on two implants because of patient death. The implant success rate was 71.4% (15/21) but varied significantly by anatomic site. The implant success rate in the glabella was 0% (0/4), whereas the success rate in the anterior nasal floor was 88.1% (15/17). All implant failures occurred within the first year of loading. A five-point scale was used to record the health of the peri-implant soft tissues, and the patients were followed up from 6 to 74 months. The unit of measure was a visit/site, and a unit was assigned for each instance an implant site was evaluated. Evaluations were conducted at 6-month intervals for a total of 76 visit/sites for the study period. The results revealed that 85.5% (65/76) of the visit/sites demonstrated an absence of inflammation; 10.5% (8/76) of the visit/sites demonstrated slight redness; 1.3% (1/76) demonstrated peri-implant red and moist tissues; 2.6% (2/76) demonstrated granulation tissue associated with the implants; and 0% (0/76) demonstrated infection of the peri-implant soft tissues. Severe soft tissue reactions around implants placed in the anterior nasal floor are rare.
Aged↗
Auricular prostheses and osseointegrated implants: UCLA experience.
A clinical study of 40 craniofacial implants placed in 13 auricular defects was conducted over a 6-year period. Implant-retained prostheses were fabricated, the implant success rate was determined, and the soft tissue responses were recorded at regular intervals. All of the implants became osseointegrated and none demonstrated failure during the study period. A five-point scale was used to record the health of the peri-implant soft tissues and the patients were followed up for up to 69 months. The results were as follows: 55.1% of the visit/sites demonstrated an absence of inflammation; 32.3% of the visit/sites demonstrated slight redness; 4.7% demonstrated red and moist peri-implant tissues; 5.5% demonstrated granulation tissue associated with the implants; and in 2.4% of the implants, infection of the peri-implant soft tissues was noted. Good patient hygiene compliance combined with thin and immobile peri-implant soft tissues resulted in minimal soft tissue complications.
Adolescent↗
Surgical stents for composite mandible reconstruction.
Surgical stents have improved and simplified our ability to predictably restore maxillomandibular relationships after composite oromandibular resections. Bimaxillary relationships are optimized, the aesthetic result is enhanced, and successful dental rehabilitation follows.
Aged↗
Restoration of oral function after maxillectomy with osseous integrated implant retained maxillary obturators.
This study assesses the success rate of osseous integrated implantation in assisting the prosthetic obturation of maxillectomy defects. Twenty-three patients received a total of 85 osseous integrated implants used for retaining maxillary obturators between 1985 and 1993. Defects include 13 radical maxillectomies, 5 premaxillary resections, 4 subtotal maxillectomies, and 1 soft-palate resection. Thirteen patients (50 implants) received a radiation dose ranging from 5,040 to 7,940 cGy. Implants can be placed at the time of ablation or subsequently. Efforts were made to spare uninvolved segments of the maxilla, especially premaxillary segments and tuberosities, at the time of ablation. Following a 6-month period of integration, implants were uncovered and utilized in prosthetic rehabilitation. Specific implant sites reveal variable success rates, with the anterior maxilla being 86% successful compared with the posterior maxilla being 57% successful. Radiation reduces the success rate from 80% to 55%, although it does not eliminate a patient from being a candidate for implantation. Prosthetic rehabilitation of large maxillary defects can be greatly facilitated with the use of osseous integrated implants in the remaining midfacial skeleton.
Alveolar Bone Loss↗
Advances in osseointegrated implants for dental and facial rehabilitation following major head and neck surgery.
Osseointegrated implants can be used to facilitate retention stability and support for facial and intraoral prostheses used to restore head and neck defects. Preliminary studies indicate that in nonirradiated maxillectomy patients the success rates are about 75%. In the reconstructed mandible the results appear to be more favorable--over 90% for implants placed in free nonvascularized bone grafts and over 90% for free revascularized bone grafts. Similar high success rates have been observed for most sites used to support facial prostheses. Success rates for auricular sites exceed 95% and for floor of nose sites success rates exceed 90%. Success rates have been lower (77%) for implants placed in the frontal bone for retention of orbital prostheses. Success rates for irradiated bone sites have been lower and range from 60.4% in the maxilla to 68.6% in facial bone sites. Of greater concern is that most implants placed in irradiated sites are beginning to show signs of impending failure.
Combined Modality Therapy↗