PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E S Berner

Publications and source records attributed to E S Berner.

31 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1976

The attainment of specified objectives by medical students in different learning environments.

Medical students were provided with behavioural objectives for the problem solving phase of their curriculum. They were assigned for 11 weeks to various hospital settings that differed in the presence or absence of structured classes, the expertise of the teaching staff, the amount of instruction time and the types of learning experiences. At the end of that time, the students took the same examination to measure attainment of the objectives. The only variable that was associated with significantly different examination scores was presence or absence of structured classes.

Curriculum↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Relationships among performance scores of four diagnostic decision support systems.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships among different performance scores for each of four diagnostic decision support systems (DDSSs). DESIGN: Intercorrelations among seven performance scores on a set of 105 cases for each of four DDSSs (DXplain, Iliad, Meditel, QMR) were computed. METHODS: The performance scores for each case reflected: 1) presence or absence of the case diagnosis in the DDSS knowledge base; 2) presence or absence of the correct diagnosis anywhere on the DDSS diagnosis list; 3) presence or absence of the correct diagnosis in the top ten diagnoses; 4) relevance of the DDSS diagnosis list; 5) comprehensiveness of the DDSS diagnosis list; 6) whether the DDSS suggested additional diagnoses to the experts' list; and 7) the length of the DDSS diagnosis list. RESULTS: For all DDSSs, the two Correct Diagnosis scores (top ten and total list) were significantly related: 1) to the presence of the correct diagnosis in the knowledge base; 2) to the Comprehensiveness score; and 3) to each other. There were significant differences among the four DDSSs on the magnitude and/or direction of the relationships between: 1) the two Correct Diagnosis scores; 2) the Relevance and Length scores; and 3) the Relevance and Additional Diagnoses scores. CONCLUSION: The production of a correct diagnosis for a given case is not related to the number of diagnoses suggested by the DDSS and, across different DDSSs, is not consistently related to other measures of performance. These data indicate that multiple measures are needed to fully describe the performance of a DDSS.

Algorithms↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of a decision support system on physicians' diagnostic performance.

PURPOSE: This study examines how the information provided by a diagnostic decision support system for clinical cases of varying diagnostic difficulty affects physicians' diagnostic performance. METHODS: A national sample of 67 internists, 35 family physicians, and 6 other physicians used the Quick Medical Reference (QMR) diagnostic decision support system to assist them in the diagnosis of written clinical cases. Three sets of eight cases, stratified by diagnostic difficulty and the potential of QMR to produce high-quality information, were used. The effects of using QMR on three measures of physicians' diagnostic performance were analyzed using analyses of variance. RESULTS: Physicians' diagnostic performance was significantly higher (p < 0.01) on the easier cases and the cases for which QMR could provide higher-quality information. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' diagnostic performance can be strongly influenced by the quality of information the system produces and the type of cases on which the system is used.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Influence of case and physician characteristics on perceptions of decision support systems.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines how characteristics of clinical cases and physician users relate to the users' perceptions of the usefulness of the Quick Medical Reference (QMR) and their confidence in their diagnoses when supported by the decision support system. METHODS: A national sample (N = 108) of 67 internists, 35 family physicians, and 6 other U.S. physicians used QMR to assist in the diagnosis of written clinical cases. Three sets of eight cases stratified by diagnostic difficulty and the potential of QMR to produce high-quality information were used. A 2 x 2 repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to test whether these factors were associated with perceived usefulness of QMR and physicians' diagnostic confidence after using QMR. Correlations were computed among physician characteristics, ratings of QMR usefulness, and physicians' confidence in their own diagnoses, and between usefulness or confidence and actual diagnostic performance. RESULTS: The analyses showed that QMR was perceived to be significantly more useful (P < 0.05) on difficult cases, on cases where QMR could provide high-quality information, by non-board-certified physicians, and when diagnostic confidence was lower. Diagnostic confidence was higher when comfort with using certain QMR functions was higher. The ratings of usefulness or diagnostic confidence were not consistently correlated with diagnostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that users' diagnostic confidence and perceptions of QMR usefulness may be associated more with their need for decision support than with their actual diagnostic performance when using the system. Evaluators may fail to find a diagnostic decision support system useful if only easy cases are tested, if correct diagnoses are not in the system's knowledge base, or when only highly trained physicians use the system.

Attitude to Computers↗