PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E S Bishay

Publications and source records attributed to E S Bishay.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation?

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare mitral valve repair and replacement as treatments for ischemic mitral regurgitation. METHODS: From 1985 through 1997, a total of 482 patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation underwent either valve repair (n = 397) or valve replacement (n = 85). Patients more likely (P < or =.01) to undergo repair had functional mitral regurgitation or coronary revascularization with an internal thoracic artery graft; those more likely to receive valve replacement were in higher New York Heart Association functional classes or underwent emergency operations. These factors were used for multivariable propensity matching. Risk factors for early and late death were identified by multivariable, multiphase hazard function analysis. RESULTS: Within the propensity-matched better-risk group, survivals after valve replacement were 81%, 56%, and 36% at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years, but survivals after repair were 94%, 82%, and 58% at these intervals (P =.08). In contrast, within the poor-risk group, survivals after repair and replacement were similar (P =.4). Risk factors (P < or =.01) included older age, higher functional class, greater wall motion abnormality, and renal dysfunction. Approximately 70% of patients were predicted to benefit from repair; the benefit lessened or was negated if an internal thoracic artery graft was not used, if a lateral wall motion abnormality was present, or if the mitral regurgitation jet pattern was complex. Freedom from repair failure at 5 years was 91%. CONCLUSION: Late survival is poor after surgery for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Most patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation benefit from mitral valve repair. In the most complex, high-risk settings, survivals after repair and replacement are similar.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

The impact of HLA sensitization and donor cause of death in heart transplantation.

Current expansion of the recipient population and increased utilization of left ventricular assist devices as a bridge-to-transplantation have resulted in HLA sensitization becoming an increasingly important clinical problem in cardiac transplantation. We evaluated the impact of HLA sensitization and donor cause of death on survival in 500 cardiac transplant recipients. Donor cause of death was grouped into two categories, trauma and nontrauma. Panel reactive antibodies at the time of transplant were assayed and used as a marker for sensitization if more than 10%. Sensitized recipients had a poorer 1-year survival than those not sensitized (76 vs. 89%, respectively, P=0.2). Donor cause of death had an overall significant impact on survival with 1-year survival for recipients of trauma organs of 92 and 82% for recipients of nontrauma hearts (P=0.02). Trauma hearts transplanted into sensitized recipients yielded a survival of 93% at 1 year whereas if nontrauma donor hearts were transplanted into these recipients, survival was only 52% at 1 year, P<0.001. These intriguing results suggest that graft survival in HLA-sensitized recipients could be significantly improved through the use of hearts from trauma death donors.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Surgical management of massive atrial size mismatch in heart transplantation.

We describe a surgical technique that we successfully used in a case involving severe size mismatch between the recipient's atrial remnants and the donor heart atria. Complete recipient left atrial excision, extensive pulmonary vein mobilization, and plication of the right atrial remnant achieved this goal.

Anastomosis, Surgical↗
PubMed2000

Mitral valve surgery in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine (1) survival, (2) functional status and freedom from readmission for heart failure and (3) change in postoperative left ventricular (LV) dimensions and function following mitral valve repair or replacement in patients with severe LV dysfunction and mitral regurgitation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 1998, 44 patients with mitral regurgitation and a LV ejection fraction <35% (mean+/-SD, 28+/-6%) underwent isolated mitral repair (n=35) or replacement (n=9). The etiology of regurgitation was valvular in 18 (40%) patients, ischemic in 13 (30%) patients and dilated idiopathic cardiomyopathy in 13 (30%) patients. Every patient had been hospitalized one to six times for symptoms of heart failure (mean+/-SD, 2.3+/-1.5). All patients were receiving maximal drug therapy with 15 (34%) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and 12 (27%) in class IV. Seven (16%) patients were initially referred for consideration of transplantation. The mean+/-SD duration of follow-up was 40+/-21 months. RESULTS: One (2.3%) patient died 9 days postoperatively of acute bronchopneumonia. The mean+/-SD duration of ICU and hospital stay was 41+/-34 h and 9+/-3 days, respectively. The 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates were 89, 86 and 67%, respectively. Heart failure and sudden death accounted for 62% of the late deaths. The NYHA class improved for survivors from 2.8+/-0.8 preoperatively to 1. 2+/-0.5 at follow-up (P<0.0001). Freedom from readmission for heart failure was 88, 82 and 72% at 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. No patient has been listed for transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Mitral valve surgery offers symptomatic improvement and survival benefit in patients with severe LV dysfunction and mitral regurgitation. More liberal use of this surgery for cardiomyopathy patients is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The clinical significance of flow cytometry crossmatching in heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM) is more sensitive than the cytotoxic crossmatch in identifying preformed antibodies to donor alloantigens, but its clinical importance is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine the association of a FCXM with survival and incidence of vascular rejection in cardiac transplant recipients with a negative cytotoxic crossmatch. METHODS: Between 1993 and 1998, 357 heart transplant recipients with a negative T cell cytotoxic crossmatch were studied by three-color FCXM to quantitate anti-donor IgG reactions against B and T lymphocytes. Reactions positive against both were consistent with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I reactivity, and those against B cells only were considered to be against HLA Class II antigens. Endpoints were episodes of vascular rejection, death from acute and chronic rejection and overall survival. RESULTS: Fifty patients were FCXM for Class I-positive, 144 for Class II-positive, and 163 were negative. At 1 month, freedom from vascular rejection was 64% in Class I patients, but 90% and 96% in Class II or negative crossmatch patients (P<0.0001). Survival of the negative crossmatch group was higher than either Class I or II groups (94%, 74% and 76%, respectively, at 3 years; P<0.0001). Death from acute rejection was 3% and 2% at 3 years in negative or Class II-positive patients, but 19% in Class I patients (P<0.0001). Death from chronic rejection occurred only in Class II patients (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a negative T-cell cytotoxic crossmatch, a positive flow cytometry crossmatch correlates with important clinical events after heart transplantation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

The use and misuse of immunologic monitoring after transplantation: approaches that have proved useful.

Current practice in the monitoring of cardiac transplants revolves around the use of the endomyocardial biopsy. While this is effective for the identification of an ongoing immune response in the graft, for years investigators have explored less invasive approaches in the hope of achieving the same goal by examining the patient's immune response. For a number of years, lymphocytes, their subsets, and their level of activation in the periphery were investigated. To a large degree, it was a lack of specificity in these approaches that led to their falling out of favor. Examination of donor-specific reactivity by means of lymphocyte proliferation assays has also been used; however, these approaches have been impeded by the time and effort required to accomplish them. During the last few years, flow cytometric cross-matching during the posttransplant period has been used at our institution. While this cross-matching focuses on the humoral immune responses, we have found it to be of value in identifying patients at risk of rejection and in allowing the assessment of treatment modalities used to treat ongoing rejection. While the perfect approach remains to be found, the potential advantages of immunologic monitoring would seem to justify continued study.

Antibody Formation↗