PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

E Vidor

Publications and source records attributed to E Vidor.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Aventis Pasteur vaccines containing inactivated hepatitis A virus: a compilation of immunogenicity data.

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines were developed in the 1980s and were introduced during the early 1990s. The Aventis Pasteur (AvP) inactivated hepatitis A virus antigen is used in several different vaccine formulations licensed for adults and children. Presented here are the immunogenicity results compiled from 37 clinical trials performed in 20 different countries between 1991 and 2001 in which these vaccines were administered to adults (16 years of age and over), children (aged 12 months-17 years), and infants (younger than 12 months). The accumulated clinical experience with these hepatitis A virus-containing vaccines demonstrates the excellent immunogenicity of this antigen in a wide range of situations. As with other licensed inactivated hepatitis A vaccines, immunological priming is achieved in virtually all vaccinees after a single-dose primary immunization, and it may be reinforced by a booster vaccination administered 6-36 months after the primary vaccination.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Assessment of Helicobacter pylori gene expression within mouse and human gastric mucosae by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR.

Despite increasing knowledge on the biology of Helicobacter pylori, little is known about the expression pattern of its genome during infection. While mouse models of infection have been widely used for the screening of protective antigens, the reliability of the mouse model for gene expression analysis has not been assessed. In an attempt to address this question, we have developed a quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) that allowed the detection of minute amounts of mRNA within the gastric mucosa. The expression of four genes, 16S rRNA, ureA (encoding urease A subunit), katA (catalase), and alpA (an adhesin), was monitored during the course of a 6-month infection of mice and in biopsy samples from of 15 infected humans. We found that the selected genes were all expressed within both mouse and human infected mucosae. Moreover, the relative abundance of transcripts was the same (16S rRNA > ureA > katA > alpA), in the two models. Finally, results obtained with the mouse model suggest a negative effect of bacterial burden on the number of transcripts of each gene expressed per CFU (P < 0.05 for 16S rRNA, alpA, and katA). Overall, this study demonstrates that real-time RT-PCR is a powerful tool for the detection and quantification of H. pylori gene expression within the gastric mucosa and strongly indicates that mice experimentally infected with H. pylori provide a valuable model for the analysis of bacterial gene expression during infection.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine: reconstitution of lyophilised PRP-T vaccine with a pertussis-containing paediatric combination vaccine, or a change in the primary series immunisation schedule, may modify the serum anti-PRP antibody responses.

Immunogenicity data obtained after primary series immunisations against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), using a vaccine prepared by conjugating the capsular polysaccharide of Hib to tetanus toxoid (ActHIB), were compiled from 146 study groups comprising 85 clinical trials or vaccination programs conducted between 1987 and 1999. ActHIB was administered as a monovalent lyophilised vaccine, injected either in association with another paediatric vaccine (at separate administration sites) or in combination (where the different vaccines are mixed together in the same syringe before injection). Review of these data reveals two trends. First, PRP-T vaccine, given either alone or in combination with DTwcP, resulted in a stronger anti-PRP serum antibody response than when PRP-T was combined with DTacP vaccine. Second, an accelerated (i.e. one-month interval) immunisation schedule tended to induce a poorer anti-PRP antibody response than did the more widely spaced, standard inoculation schedules. Although an in-depth analysis of these over 11000 study subjects on an individual basis with multivariate analysis or multifactorial statistical methods might eventually provide working hypotheses to fully understand these phenomenon, the various licensed, PRP-T-containing paediatric combination vaccines have proved to be clinically effective.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗
PubMed2000

Absence of a significant interaction between a Haemophilus influenzae conjugate vaccine combined with a diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine in the same syringe and inactivated polio vaccine.

BACKGROUND: We compared the antibody response to Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide (PRP) after three doses of a diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) combined with a PRP-tetanus conjugate (PRP-T) in infants randomized to receive oral polio vaccine (OPV) or inactivated polio vaccine (IPV). The polio vaccine was given separately at the same visit. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-six infants from pediatric practices in suburban Chicago and New Orleans were randomized into two groups. Group A received OPV at 2 and 4 months of age; Group B received IPV at 2 and 4 months of age. Both groups received DTaP/PRP-T at 2, 4 and 6 months of age and hepatitis B vaccine at 2 and 4 months of age. A serum sample was obtained before immunization (age 2 months) and 1 month after 3 doses of DTaP/PRP-T (age 7 months). Sera were assayed for antibody responses to all relevant vaccine antigens. RESULTS: No significant vaccine antigen interference was found when polio immunization was provided by IPV or OPV for anti-PRP, diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis antibodies. OPV recipients had a significantly higher mean antibody response to serotype 1 (P = 0.03) and 2 (P = 0.0001) poliovirus. CONCLUSION: Whether polio immunization was accomplished with IPV or OPV did not significantly influence the antibody responses in sera obtained at 7 months of age for anti-PRP, anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus toxoid antibodies and antibodies to pertussis antigens, when DTaP/PRP-T was given in the primary series.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗
PubMed2000

Immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent combined vaccine compared with separate administration of reference licensed vaccines in infants.

OBJECTIVE: The immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent vaccine (diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio vaccine-hepatitis B-polyribosyl ribitol phosphate conjugated to tetanus protein; Hexavac; Aventis Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France) are compared with those of reference vaccines [diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio vaccine reconstituting lyophilized purified Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus protein vaccine (Pentavac; Aventis Pasteur MSD) and hepatitis B vaccine (H-B-Vax II; Aventis Pasteur MSD)] injected separately at the same visit in a prospective multicenter, comparative, open label trial. METHODS: Infants were randomized to receive Hexavac (n = 423) or Pentavac and H-B-Vax II (n = 425) as a primary immunization series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Seroprotection and seroconversion rates against all antigens at 1 month after the primary series were compared between the two vaccine groups with 95% confidence intervals (CI0.95) and were considered clinically equivalent (not inferior) when the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval on the difference (reference, hexavalent) was below predefined differences. RESULTS: Hexavac met and surpassed the pre-defined criteria for clinical equivalence to Pentavac and H-B-Vax II given concomitantly. It elicited similar seroprotection and seroconversion rates against all antigens. Seroprotection and seroconversion rates obtained 1 month after the third dose of Hexavac were >90% for all antigens. The postimmunization antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) for hepatitis B and purified Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide were about 2-fold higher in infants who received the reference vaccines than in infants who had received Hexavac. GMTs for poliovirus antibodies tended to be enhanced in infants vaccinated with Hexavac. GMTs for all other antigens were very similar among both groups. Hexavac was generally well-tolerated. At least one local reaction was reported in 20.3% of Hexavac injections compared with 15.8% at the Pentavac injections site and 3.8% at the H-B-Vax II injections site. These reactions were generally mild and transient. At least one systemic adverse event was reported in 45.7% of Hexavac injections compared with 42.2% of Pentavac and H-B-Vax II injections (mild fever, irritability and drowsiness were most frequently reported). The frequency of adverse events was not significantly different between groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse event occurred during the study. CONCLUSION: This liquid hexavalent vaccine was generally well-tolerated and provided immune responses adequate to be protective against six infectious diseases with a single injection, given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗
PubMed2000

Mathematical models for assessment of long-term persistence of antibodies after vaccination with two inactivated hepatitis A vaccines.

Very few studies with inactivated hepatitis A vaccines were designed for long-term follow-up of antibody persistence. Based on the serological data from these vaccine trials, mathematical models were developed to predict the decrease of anti-hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) antibodies after vaccination. This study was designed to compare Avaxim (0-6 months) to Havrix 720 (0-1-6 months). In this paper, both groups of vaccinees are described considering the age, gender, and weight of the subjects at enrollment. For mathematical modelling, two different approaches were used: one starting the calculations from the geometric mean titres (GMTs) at each point in time, the other basing the calculations on individual anti-HAV titres. Both vaccines are very immunogenic, although Avaxim shows a higher GMT at each point in time. When these data are used in mathematical models to predict the persistence of anti-HAV antibodies, both vaccines (Avaxim and Havrix 720) show similar long-term antibody kinetics. Antibody levels > or = 20 mIU/ml are estimated to last on average for at least 10 years after completion of the full vaccination course. Ten years after the full course, approximately 53% of subjects are estimated to have antibody levels > or = 20 mIU/ml. At 15 years, these levels will be maintained by about 34% of vaccinees. Avaxim and Havrix 720 show a similar long-term profile of persistence of anti-HAV. A mathematical model based on GMTs appeared to give equivalent results to a model based on individual serological data. The GMT method is easier to apply than the individual based method. However, the advantage of the latter method is the possibility of calculating confidence limits for the predicted values and making estimates of the percentage of subjects having a certain level of antibody titres at a certain time.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Safety and immunogenicity of a new formulation of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine.

The safety and immunogenicity of a new formulation of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, Avaxim, was evaluated in 189 children, aged 18 months to 15 years in a monocentric, open trial. Two vaccinations were given six months apart. Enrollment was balanced within three age groups: 18 months to 3 years, 4-8 years and 9-15 years. Antibody titers were measured blindly by an independent laboratory using a modified radioimmunoassay. Two weeks after the first dose, seroconversion was achieved by 94.6, 94.3 and 96.4% of initially HAV-seronegative subjects (antibody titre <20 mIU/ml) in each age group (youngest to oldest, respectively), with corresponding geometric mean titre concentrations (GMC) of 72.2, 54.3 and 47.1 mIU/ml. Just before the booster dose, the seroconversion rate was 100% in all groups, and the corresponding GMC values were 163, 169 and 111 mIU/ml. All groups included, a 22.6-fold rise in GMC from prebooster levels was observed four weeks after the booster dose. An explanatory analysis suggested a tendency for higher antibody levels in younger children at all vaccination time points. Local reactions were noted in 18.2% of the vaccinees after the first dose and in 8.5% after the booster dose. The rates of systemic reactions were 23.8% after the first dose and 11.4% after the booster dose. Overall, this trial demonstrated the good safety and immunogenicity profile of this vaccine in children aged 18 months to 15 years of age.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of two immunization schedules with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (AvaximTM).

BACKGROUND: Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines are licensed with a vaccination schedule based on two injections of vaccine given at least 6 months apart. METHODS: Two vaccination schedules for the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, AvaximTM (Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Lyon, France), were compared in a monocentric, randomized, open trial. Two doses of the vaccine were given at intervals of either 6 months (0-6 month group) or 12 months (0-12 month group) to 96 adult volunteers. Anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody titers were determined in a blind fashion using the modified RIA (mRIA) HAVABtrade mark assay. After excluding subjects with positive preimmunization anti-HAV titers and those with protocol deviations, both groups were still comparable by sex ratio and mean age. RESULTS: Four weeks (28 6 4 days) after the first dose, the seroconversion (SC) rate of initially HAV-seronegative subjects (antibody titer < 20 mIU/mL) was 100% in the 0-6 month group and 96. 9% in the 0-12 month group, with corresponding geometric mean titer (GMT) values (95% CI) of 369 mIU/mL (274-497 mIU/mL) and 445 mIU/mL (292-679 mIU/mL), respectively. After 6 months, SC was obtained in all subjects, and the corresponding GMT values were 349 mIU/mL and 359 mIU/mL in the 0-6 month group and the 0-12 month group, respectively. Four weeks after the booster dose given at 6 months, a 14.5-fold rise in GMT was observed. In the 0-12 month group, anti-HAV GMT values decreased by only 20% from 6 months to 12 months with a pre-booster GMT value of 286 mIU/mL at the 12-month evaluation. Four weeks after the booster given at 12 months, a 22. 5-fold rise in GMT was observed. Statistical analysis showed that the two vaccination schedules were comparable in their ability to boost antibody titers. Unsolicited reactions to vaccination were not different to those reported during earlier trials. Less than 12% of the vaccinees reported reactions after the first dose (11/93), or after the booster dose (11/92). CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated antibody persistence is excellent for at least 12 months after one dose of this vaccine, and that a booster may be given at any time between 6 and 12 months after primary immunization.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Early appearance of neutralizing antibodies after vaccination with an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine.

Sera from 30 subjects vaccinated with the Pasteur Merieux Serums & Vaccins (PM) inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, and from 30 subjects vaccinated with the Smithkline Beecham (SB) inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, were tested in two laboratories in order to provide comparative data on neutralizing activities of vaccine-induced antibodies. Sera were also evaluated by a modified radioimmunoassay (mRIA) and results were compared to neutralization assays results. Neutralizing antibody titres provided by the two laboratories correlated well (coefficient or correlation 0.42, P < 0.001). Neutralizing antibodies were detected after vaccination with both vaccines, and the kinetics of neutralizing antibody were the same with both vaccines. The titres gradually increased between the second week after the first dose and the post-booster dose (week 28). A strong booster effect of the booster vaccine dose on neutralizing titres was observed. Significantly higher neutralizing antibody titres with the PM vaccine were observed as early immune response on week 2 titres on both series of results. Vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody titres and vaccine-induced antibody mRIA titres correlated well (coefficient of correlation 0.82 and 0.72, respectively, P < 0.0001 in both cases). These results demonstrate early appearance of neutralizing antibody at high titre with the PM vaccine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Does immunoglobulin interfere with the immunogenicity to Pasteur Mérieux inactivated hepatitis A vaccine?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the immunogenicity of Pasteur Mérieux (P.M. s.v.) inactivated hepatitis A vaccine when given alone with its immunogenicity when given in combination with immunoglobulin. METHODS: We enrolled 80 healthy volunteers who were seronegative for anti-HAV. Forty subjects (group A) were given two doses of vaccine at 0 and 6 months plus 4 ml of immunoglobulin given simultaneously with the first vaccine injection; and 40 subjects (group B) were given vaccine alone. The population characteristics (age, sex, height and weight) of the two groups were comparable. RESULTS: Anti-HAV antibody was detectable at week 1 in 100% of group A and in 5.7% of group B, and in 100% of both groups at 4 and 8 weeks. Seroconversion rates (> or = 20 mIU/ml) were 97.4% in group A and 100% in group B at week 24 and were 100% in both groups 4 weeks after a booster injection at 6 months. The antibody response level was lower after concomitant administration of vaccine with immunoglobulin. The antibody geometric mean titer was higher at week 1 in subjects who had been given vaccine and immunoglobulin, but nearly 50% lower at week 4 and thereafter, indicating inhibition of the vaccine-induced immune response by immunoglobulin. At week 28, i.e. 4 weeks after the booster injection, geometric mean titers had increased about 13-15 times in both groups, reaching highly protective antibody levels (3351 mIU/ml in group A and 5843 mIU/ml in group B). No serious adverse effects were observed during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that P.M. s.v. hepatitis A vaccine is highly immunogenic and safe, even when given simultaneously with immunoglobulin. Despite the interference of the immunoglobulin with the active immune response, individuals who were immunized passively plus actively also developed high titers of anti-HAV antibody. It is therefore reasonable to expect that this inhibition will not affect the overall protection conferred by the vaccine.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Clinical immunogenicity and tolerance studies of liquid vaccines delivered by jet-injector and a new single-use cartridge (Imule): comparison with standard syringe injection. Imule Investigators Group.

A new needleless jet-injector, Mini-Imojet, was developed that administers liquid vaccines from a single-use, pre-filled cartridge named Imule, which avoids the risk of cross-contamination. We conducted clinical trials in several settings in France and West Africa to compare the immunogenicity and tolerance of five vaccines (influenza vaccine, Vi capsular polysaccharide typhoid vaccine, tetanus toxoid vaccine, diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis vaccine, and inactivated hepatitis A vaccine) administered with the Imule system vs standard syringe technique. In each vaccine study, all subjects of either group were tested for serum antibody titres to calculate the geometrical mean titres and seroconversion rates after complete vaccination. Immediate local-reactions were noted after each injection, and local and general reactions were evaluated during a predetermined period of follow-up. When delivered by the Imule technique, all the administered vaccines were of equivalent or superior immunogenicity, compared to the syringe technique. The tolerance to vaccines injected by the Imule system was acceptable in all studies. The most frequently observed reactions were mild (e.g. minor bleeding, superficial papules, erythema and induration) and could be considered to be inherent to the injection technique. The technical and safety advantages of the Mini-Imojet/Imule system, compared to sterilizable, standard disposable or autodestruct syringes and to classical multi-dose vial jet-injectors, reinforces the interest of this new injection technique for collective immunizations.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Vaccine antigen interactions after a combination diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis/purified capsular polysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid vaccine in two-, four- and six-month-old infants.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and immunogenicity of a diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP; Trepedia)/Haemophilus influenzae b polysaccharide (PRP-T; ActHib) combined vaccine (TriHibir; Pasteur Mérieux Connaught) was compared with DTaP and PRP-T given at the same visit but at separate sites in a prospective multicenter, open label trial. METHODS: Infants were randomized to four groups (three consistency lots of DTaP/PRP-T vs. one of the consistency lots given as separate vaccines); injections were administered at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Pre-Dose 1 and post-Dose 3 sera were assayed for antibody titers against all antigens. Reactions to the vaccinations were assessed by parent questionnaire for 30 days after each injection visit. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-five infants were enrolled; 296 evaluable infants were included in the DTaP/PRP-T group compared with 70 infants in the DTaP and PRP-T vaccine group. Infants who received the combined vaccine had higher post-Dose 3 geometric mean antibody titers to diphtheria antitoxin (P < 0.01) and pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin (P < 0.05) and lower geometric mean antibody titers to tetanus antitoxin (P < 0.05) and Haemophilus influenzae b (Hib) polysaccharide (PRP) (P < 0.05). The geometric mean anti-PRP antibody titer in the DTaP/PRP-T group was 4.3 micrograms/ml compared with 7.0 micrograms/ml in the separate vaccine group (P < 0.05), and the percentage of infants with antibody titers > or = 0.15 and 1 microgram/ml were, respectively, 95 and 86%, whereas they were 100% for both titers in the separate vaccines group. DTaP/ PRP-T vaccine given concomitantly or 1 month apart from hepatitis B vaccine and oral poliomyelitis vaccine caused no significant differences in immunogenicity or safety. The safety assessments for the DTaP/PRP-T vaccine showed no consistent differences in systemic or local injection site reactions compared with DTaP and PRP-T administered separately. CONCLUSION: Although the antibody responses to tetanus and Hib polysaccharide in the evaluated DTaP/PRP-T combined vaccine were significantly lower than those seen after separate DTaP and PRP-T administration, the combined vaccine elicited an immune response against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae b likely to confer protection.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1996

Analysis of the antibody response in humans with a new inactivated hepatitis A vaccine.

Sera from subjects vaccinated with the Pasteur Merieux (PM) inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (AVAXIM) have been analysed in order: (1) to assess comparability of the results provided by a modified radio-immunoassay (mRIA) in the different laboratories involved in testings of sera during clinical trials and by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) used during development of other inactivated hepatitis A vaccines; (2) to describe the IgM responses elicited by this vaccine compared with one control vaccine [HAVRIX, 720 ELISA antigens units; Smithkline Beecham (SB), Rixensart, Belgium]; (3) to provide comparative data between the PM vaccine and the SB vaccine on neutralizing activities of vaccine-induced antibodies. Vaccine-induced antibody titres evaluated by a mRIA in different laboratories correlated well and validated the comparability of the results obtained in various vaccine trials conducted by PM. Geometric mean titres (GMTs) expressed as milli-international units (mlU/ml) were higher with ELISA especially after the first dose, but seroconversion rates were similar and a good correlation was found between the two assays. IgM vaccine-induced antibodies were detectable in nearly all vaccinated subjects from week 2 after vaccination, with a peak titre between weeks 2 and 4 after the first dose. Comparison of GMTs by the Student Fisher t-test was statistically significant (P < 0.05) only at week 2 with higher titres in PM vaccinees. Neutralizing antibodies were detected after vaccination with the PM inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. The titres gradually increased between the second week after the first dose and the booster dose (week 24). A strong booster effect of the second dose on neutralizing titres was observed. Seroneutralizing titres induced at week 2 in subjects vaccinated with the PM inactivated hepatitis A vaccine were statistically significantly higher (P < 0.05) from those induced by the SB vaccine.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Immunogenicity and safety of a new inactivated hepatitis A vaccine: a clinical trial with comparison of administration route.

A bicentre, controlled, randomized, open trial was carried out in order to compare the immunogenicity and the reactogenicity of PASTEUR MERIEUX Sérums et Vaccins inactivated Hepatitis A Vaccine on adults, when used with different routes of administration [intramuscular (i.m.), subcutaneous (s.c.) and needless injection using a Jet injector device]. Vaccines were given at two doses 6 months apart to 147 seronegative subjects. Anti-Hepatitis A virus (HAV) titres were performed at each visit by modified radioimmunoassay assay. After the first dose, 138 subjects except one seroconverted (s.c.). After booster dose, all subjects exhibited high levels of HAV antibodies. The higher titres were observed with Jet injector (GMT: 305 mIU ml-1 after the first dose and 3727 mIU ml-1 after the booster dose), followed by the i.m. route (210 mIU ml-1, 3152 mIU ml-1) and the s.c. route (165 mIU ml-1, 2082 mIU ml-1). No statistically significant differences were observed in the three paired comparisons (i.m. vs jet injector; jet vs s.c., im vs s. c.). This inactivated hepatitis A vaccine appeared to be highly immunogenic after one single dose and one booster 6 months later.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Immunogenicity and safety of a new inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in a comparative study.

A multicentre, controlled, randomised, open, comparative trial including 839 healthy adult volunteers was carried out in order to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two vaccines against hepatitis A virus (HAV) during primary immunization and after booster injection. The first vaccine was produced by Pasteur Mérieux (PM), and the second vaccine by Smith-Kline Beecham (SKB). The vaccination schedule consisted of 2 doses (months 0, 6) for PM and 3 doses (months 0, 1, and 6) for SKB. Two weeks after the first dose, the seroconversion rates among initially HAV seronegative subjects (n = 608) were 93.4% and 76.1% for the PM and SKB vaccines, respectively, the corresponding geometric mean titres (GMTs) were 59.0 mIU/ml versus 30.8 mlU/ml (modified RIA HAVAB assay, Abbott Laboratories). Two months after the beginning of immunization (one dose versus two doses) the GMTs were 138.4 and 161.6 mlU/ml, respectively. At month 7, the seroconversion rates were 100% for both vaccines, and the GMTs were 4,189 and 3,163 mlU/ml, respectively. After the first dose of vaccine, 24.6% and 19.6% of the PM and SKB vaccines reported local reactions. The rates for systemic reactions were 27.2% and 25.0%, respectively. Lower rates for local and systemic reactions were seen after booster injections and statistical differences were not observed between the two vaccines. The study also demonstrated that vaccination was as well tolerated in subjects with anti-HAV antibodies as in HAV seronegative subjects. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant vaccine effect on seroconversion rates only at week 2 (P < 10(-4). The same conclusions were drawn from the analysis of GMT by multivariate regression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Good immunogenicity of GBM strain inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in healthy male adults.

A formalin-inactivated aluminium hydroxide adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine was evaluated in a dose-response study on 195 healthy male adults (age range: 18-31 years) in two French hospitals (Lyon, Rouen). Four doses (20, 40, 80, 160 RIA antigen units) were administered intramuscularly (i.m.) in two injections over a 6-month period. At the time of the first vaccine injection, 32 subjects (16.4%) were found positive (> 20 mIU ml-1) for HAV antibody (total Ig RIA HAVAB assay, Abbott Laboratories) and were excluded from the analysis of immunogenicity criteria. Fourteen days after the first vaccine injection, 78.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62-90) of seronegative subjects who received the 160 RIA antigen unit dose seroconverted with a geometric mean titre (GMT) of 43 mIU ml-1 (95% CI: 33-56). Seroconversion was 100% (95% CI: 91-100) at 1 month with a GMT of 95 mIU ml-1 (95% CI: 79-112). Statistical analysis revealed a significant dose-related effect (p < 0.0001) on GMT by multivariate regression analysis of the results after the first injection. Biological safety was evaluated and alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were similar prior to and 14 days after the first injection in the four groups. Reactions after injection were similar in the four dosage groups: 6.2% of subjects reported immediate reactions after first vaccination (feeling sick, spontaneous pain, headache), 8.9% reported local reactions at the site of injection (spontaneous pain, haematoma, local adenopathy) and 13.5% reported general reactions ('flu-like' syndrome, gastrointestinal tract disorders, fatigue, headache).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗